Market Based Solutions for Demand Response Providers Today and the Future Alice Jackson Occidental Energy Ventures Corp.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T&D Losses Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
INSULATING PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD FROM RUC CAPACITY SHORT CHARGE Mark W. Smith J. Kay Trostle August 2008 DSWG.
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Aggregating Small Loads to provide Ancillary Services
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
ANCILLARY SERVICES THE NEXT STEP IN MARKET GRANULARISATION.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Institute for Sustainable Energy
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
NSRS deployment April John Adams ROS – May 12, 2005.
Special WMS Meeting PRR 525 December 3, 2004 Austin Energy Proposal Leonard Stanfield.
Real Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Cost Events.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
August 17, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting Updated Analysis of Non-Spin Deployments and RUC John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
1 Compliance Update May Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance Performance further declined in March  March performance comparison.
RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Demand Side Working Group Chairman Slides June 27, 2008 Mary Anne Brelinsky Vice President 1.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
© Property of ERCOT /17/20041 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Adams November 17, 2004.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
Graph Trend Definitions Telemetered SCE: Sum of all QSE’s Telemetered SCE (uses “Left” scale). Regulation Deployed: Sum of all Regulation Ancillary Service.
– 1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal ICCP Business Case By Jeyant Tamby, ERCOT.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April In Brief Two Working Group reports Two Working Group reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports BENA presentation.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
Planning for Texas’ Energy Future Select Committee on Electric Generation Capacity and Environmental Effects Bob Kahn President & CEO February 6, 2008.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
09/20/20061 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Dumas September 20, 2006.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Ancillary Service Qualification Self-Certification approach ROS Discussion March 16,
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
December 8, 2006 PUCT DR Workshop Status of LaaR Participation in RPRS.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
A Midsummer Night’s DREAM
Txho/10627 HLP089.PPT DSWG LaaR Update May 13, 2005.
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Benefits of ICAP Reliability Economics
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
Sandip Sharma ERCOT Manager, Operations Planning
Presentation transcript:

Market Based Solutions for Demand Response Providers Today and the Future Alice Jackson Occidental Energy Ventures Corp.

Demand Response Today Active Opportunities –Responsive Reserve Service - Available –Non Spin – Available but flawed –RPRS – Not Available –Controllable Load – Pilot program Passive Opportunities –Balancing Energy Price Responsiveness –Peak Shaving

Demand Participation over Time (as of 09/2006 DSWG Mtg)

Today’s Market Active Participation Sample –RRS from LaaR (max 1150 MW/hr) 2/3 Bilateral Market 1/3 ERCOT Daily Auction Passive Participation Sample –Peak Shaving ERCOT acknowledges that it occurs and can roughly estimate activities

Peak Shaving Sample

Excess LaaR Possibilities Replacement Reserve Service (RPRS) from LaaR –Work with ERCOT to resolve the systems issues with permitting LaaR to perform in RPRS Controllable Load Resources –Complete the pilot program and have Controllable Load Resources as a fixed part of the Zonal market Non-Spin through Linked Bids –Currently LaaR Resources can not link RRS bids with NRS bids; the ERCOT systems effectively kick out the RRS bid

Controllable Load Resources What is a Controllable Load resource? Zonal Protocol Section states: “…load resources capable of controllable reducing or increasing consumption under dispatch control (similar to AGC) and that immediately respond proportionally to frequency changes (similar to generator governor action)”

Real-time Frequency Signal Telemetry RRS / RGS Dispatch Signal Controllable Load Control System CLR dispatch set point Process Flow: ERCOT sends dispatch signal to QSE QSE passes signal to Controllable Load Resource (CLR) CLR control system monitors real- time frequency CLR control system accepts ERCOT signal and calculates required response (ERCOT dispatch +/- frequency response) CLR responds QSE views response via telemetry and passes signal to ERCOT QSE Controllable Load ERCOT

CLR Example: Pipeline Pumps w/Variable Speed Drives Could provide Regulation Up and Regulation Down Service –Large downstream tank with 2 days swing of volume and motor provides 1 MW up and 1 MW down swing capability -OR- Could provide Responsive Reserve –Set point is at full motor output unless called to provide the service

Outstanding Nodal Issues Load Resources not allowed in RUC (Reliability Unit Commitment) –Market Power / Cost Issues Load Resources are not paid LBMP upon activation –This causes a faulty price signal

Market Based Load Response Important to maintain the integrity and quality of demand response by implementing market based solutions. By definition market based solutions by demand response providers lower costs to consumers Lowering the cost to consumers is not necessarily true of subsidized programs.

Conclusion Demand response is off to a good start in ERCOT. In practice, further participation is being limited by assumptions about the capability of Load Resources versus the facts about Load Resource capabilities. As a demand response community we must work together to keep moving forward to advance the solutions currently in place and develop new market based solutions to meet the needs of the future.