NSF Implementation of the Research Performance Progress Report November 2012 Research.gov Session 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Science Foundation Updates to the Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) November 19, 2012.
Advertisements

Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) Grantees may access a list of progress reports that are due using the Status page in eRA Commons, and selecting.
Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) Office of Sponsored Projects Dartmouth College 2013.
Federal Demonstration Partnership Meeting August 2010 Washington, DC.
Proposal Submission Modernization at NSF December
1 How Does E-Grants Streamlining Affect Me as a Grantee? Abbey Tyrna, OMB Watch National Grants Management Association Conference April 28, 2004.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
NSF Update NCURA 53 rd Annual Meeting Washington, DC November 9, 2011 
Complying with the NIH Public Access Policy Lisa Oberg, M. Libr. Associate Director for Public and Research Services.
New Awardees Session Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Conference May 29-31, 2013 Washington, DC.
Cost Sharing Update Facilities, Equipment & Other Resources – New format will assist proposers in complying with NSF cost sharing policy and is a required.
National Science Foundation Update NACUBO. Contact Information Jeremy Leffler Outreach Specialist, Policy Office, Office of Budget, Finance and Award.
Federal Update OSP Roundtable – January 16, 2013.
SPS Open Forum: The new OMB circular and grant/contract close-out.
FastLane Project Reports System 101 For Faculty and Staff Submitting Annual, Final or Interim Reports on National Science Foundation Projects May 1999.
NSF Fastlane Updates NCURA Region VI & VII Conference Chandler, Arizona April 17 – April 20, 2005.
OSP Roundtable January 21, NIH Updates New Salary Limitation: New Salary Limitation: ce-files/NOT-OD html.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Changes & Clarifications.
Andrew Nobleman & Halima Turner  Reporting Frequency: The Grants Officer, after coordination with the DOC operating unit, shall prescribe the frequency.
Content /slide credits to Samantha Hunter, Policy Office, National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation Policies and Procedures Update EPSCoR PD/PA Meeting May 22, 2012.
BFA Updates Tom Cooley NSF CFO & BFA Director NSF Advisory Committee for Budget and Operations November 8-9, 2006.
National Science Foundation FastLane: An eGovernment Success Story BS
RESEARCH PERFORMANCE PROGRESS REPORT (RPPR) NIH's & NSF's Implementation of the RPPR Presented By: Nadira Clarke: David Gillich:
NIH Implementation and Guidance Syracuse University Office of Sponsored Programs Stuart Taub.
Completion and Attrition in AGEP and non-AGEP Institutions Technical Workshop CGS Annual Meeting December 10, 2011 Robert Sowell Jeff Allum Nathan Bell.
An Introduction to Grants.gov Sponsored Programs Office February 22,
Moving Toward Quantitative Evidence-based Science Policy: Science of Science Policy Developmental Efforts In Theory, Evaluation Methods, and Data Infrastructure.
1 Federal Grants Streamlining Michael Nelson Director, Grants Management Division.
NSF Bev Sherman Division of Information Systems National Science Foundation.
Grants 3.0 Faculty Review January 21, Agenda Introductions Meeting Objective Background and Project Objective Key Changes Examples: -Amendment.
1 Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 Highlights and Timeframes for Implementation of the Act Terry Hurst DAS, Office of Grants,
1 Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 Highlights and Timeframes for Implementation of the Act Terry Hurst DAS, Office of Grants,
Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) Implementation by NIH) February 14, 2013 Annie Publow, Director, OSP, Government/NonProfit.
WORKER EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM Business Officials Breakout Session Grantee Meeting, March 7, 2006 NIH Transition to the SF424 (R&R) Application.
NSF – HSI Workshop 1 Electronic Systems: FastLane & Grants.gov NSF Workshop for Sponsored Project Administrators at Hispanic Serving Institutions April.
NSF Implementation of the Research Performance Progress Report March
Webinar on Reporting and Evaluation for Museums for America Grantees January 6-8, 2009.
1 QEM/BIO Workshop October 21, 2005 Award Administration.
Georgia State University’s Grants System: PeopleSoft Grants and Beyond Tonia Davis-Greenway University Research Services and Administration Office of Research.
Workshop for all NSF-funded PIs regarding new NSF policies and requirements. America COMPETES Act contains a number of new requirements for all those funded.
Getting Started With Your ATE Evaluation ATE PI Conference October 24, 2012 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation.
Financial Rep Meeting February 17, SPONSORED RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION ROBERTA MCMANUS JULIE WAMMACK 2.
FEDERAL UPDATE Jeff Warner Senior Contract and Grant Officer Alisia Ford Contract and Grant Officer Spring QRAM - Tuesday, March 12, 2013.
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
PRESENTED BY: OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS JANUARY 10, 2013 Research Performance Progress Reports (RPPR) update.
NSF Policy & Electronics Hosted by:. Ask Early, Ask Often Jean Feldman Jean FeldmanBFA/DIAS (703)
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.
NSF policies and requirements for Implementation of the America COMPETES Act. America COMPETES Act contains a number of new requirements for all those.
C-DERL is an application designed to be a Federal- wide, online repository for data standards, definitions, and context. It was authorized jointly by the.
Thank you to our Major Underwriter.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
1 Research Terms and Conditions Status Update Briefing to the Council on Governmental Relations.
Federal Geographic Data Committee Update Ivan DeLoatch NGAC Meeting August 26, 2009.
NSF Core Documents and Online Resources for Proposal Preparation and Post-Award Activities Jeffrey G. Ryan School of Geosciences Former NSF Program Director.
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
NSF Update NCURA PRA Conference New Orleans, LA March, 2013.
07/16/2007 C&G Officer User Guide for eCAFSlide 1 C&G Officer User Guide for eCAF.
Introduction to NSF’s new PAPPG Tammy Custer Kim Holloway Office of Sponsored Programs.
Office of Sponsored Projects Federal Updates/Reminders ROUNDTABLE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 CAMPUS.
NSF Update October 2009 Jo Ann Smith, Ph.D. Research Development Office of Research & Commercialization.
AISL PI Conference February 29, 2016 Division of Grants and Agreements.
NSF Proposal & Award Policy Update
OSP Federal Update April 11, 2018.
Carol Wigglesworth and Emily Linde National Institutes of Health
Acting Branch Chief for the Telecommunications Branch
QRAM Federal update November 2012.
Presentation transcript:

NSF Implementation of the Research Performance Progress Report November 2012 Research.gov Session 1

Ask Early, Ask Often  Jean I. Feldman – Head, Policy Office, Division of Institution & Award Support – Chair, RBM/RPPR Working Group – Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management – –  Erika Rissi – Lead, Research.gov Business Office – Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management – – 2  Mary Santonastasso – Business Sponsor of Research.gov. – Division Director, Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management – –

Today’s Agenda  Research.gov Introduction and Background  Research Performance Progress Report Overview  NSF Implementation of the RPPR – Components  Key Differences  Implementation Dates  NSF Implementation and Pilot  Discover More 3

RESEARCH.GOV INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 4

Research.gov is led by the National Science Foundation NSF is: – The funding source for approximately 20 percent of all federally supported basic research conducted by America's colleges and universities – Tasked with keeping the United States at the leading edge of discovery in areas from astronomy to geology to zoology 5

Supports the needs of institutions and researchers Increases transparency of federal research spending and outcomes Provides easy access to federal research information Leverages government- wide standards Research.gov provides easy access to research-related information and services

Researchers can do business with NSF through a suite of services Government-wide grantees Find grant opportunities and submit proposals Apply for grants NSF Grantees Find grant opportunities and submit proposals Research Grantees Support the research community with a modern technology platform Submit financial and project reports Research.gov is the modernization of FastLane, providing the next generation of grants management capabilities for the research community 7

Research.gov offers grants management services… Access Services – InCommon – Single Sign-on with FastLane Reporting Services – Project Outcomes Report – Annual, Final, and Interim Reports (Coming Soon) Financial Services – The Federal Financial Report – Financial Services – Award Cash Management $ervice (Coming Soon) Application Services – Grants Application Status – Application Submission Web Services 8

…and public facing services Research Spending & Results Policy Library SEE Innovation Research Headlines & Events 9

RESEARCH PERFORMANCE PROGRESS REPORT 10

RPPR Background  The Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) is the result of a government-wide effort to create greater consistency in the administration of federal research awards by streamlining and standardizing reporting formats – The RPPR is the product of Research Business Models (RBM) Subcommittee of the Committee on Science (CoS), a committee of the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) – Upon implementation, the RPPR will be used by federal agencies that support research and research-related activities. – NSF has led research agencies in the development of an RPPR data dictionary based upon the OMB RPPR approved policy 11

RPPR Website 12

NSF Implementation  NSF will offer a new project reporting service on Research.gov which implements the RPPR format, replacing NSF’s annual, final, and interim project reporting capabilities in the FastLane System – One of the key drivers in development of the project reporting service is to improve the user experience – Another key driver is to incorporate more structured collection of the project reports data for enhanced NSF use – NSF has led research agencies in the development of an RPPR data dictionary based upon the OMB RPPR approved policy 13

Report Components  Mandatory Category: – Accomplishments: What was done? What was learned?  Optional Categories: – Products: What has the project produced? – Participants & Other Collaborating Organizations: Who has been involved? – Impact: What is the impact of the project? How has it contributed? – Changes/Problems – Special Reporting Requirements (where applicable) – Appendix 1: Demographic Information for Significant Contributors

Key Differences of the New Project Report System  Project reporting dashboard  Structured collection of data  Rich text editor  PDF upload to support images, charts, and other complex graphics  Improved citation search through Thomson Web of Science  Special reporting requirements are controlled by solicitation  PI no longer provides demographic information on significant participants 15

Key Implementation Dates  Phase I Pilot – Begins October 22  Six organizations  FastLane freeze 10/1-10/21  Phase 2 Pilot - Begins in December 3  Additional 20 organizations  FastLane freeze 11/12-12/2  Final Target Launch Date: January 2013  All NSF awards and organizations  NSF-wide FastLane freeze 16

Detailed Timeline and Activities 17 October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013 Pilot Phase 1Pilot Phase 2Full FastLane FREEZEFull Operations 6 Pilot Institutions Expand to 20 additional Pilot institutions Institute NSF-wide freeze on new project reporting in FastLane All institutions migrated to Research.gov Communication with affected PIs and Institutions FastLane freeze for 6 pilot institutions POs approve all pending FastLane project reports for 6 pilot institutions Overdue dates will be extended to 3/15 for all reports due between 9/15-12/3 Communication with affected PIs and Institutions FastLane freeze for 20 additional pilot institutions POs approve pending FastLane project reports for 20 pilot institutions For reports due 12/4- 1/21, due date extended to 1/21 and overdue date extended to 4/30 if current overdue date is before or equal to 4/30, otherwise overdue date will be extended to 30 days after current due date Communication with all NSF PIs and Institutions POs approve all pending FastLane project reports FastLane freeze for all institutions that are not involved in the pilot Turn off FastLane and migrate all users to Research.gov Resume regular project report review and approval activities

NSF Implementation and Pilot During the pilot phase (from Research.gov): – PIs in the pilot will use Research.gov to view reporting requirements and create/submit all project reports – PIs not in the pilot will be directed to FastLane – All SPOs will be able to search for and view reports through FastLane During the pilot phase (from FastLane): – PIs in pilot will be directed to Research.gov to view reporting requirements and create/submit all project reports – PIs not in the pilot will be able to submit project reports through FastLane PRS – SPOs will be able to search for and view reports through FastLane 18

NSF Implementation and Pilot: What Does This mean for You?  What does this mean for PIs in the pilot? – PIs in Phase I should stop submitting project reports in FastLane by October 1 and then use Research.gov to prepare and submit starting October 22 – PIs in Phase 2 should stop submitting project reports in FastLane by November 12, and then use Research.gov to prepare and submit starting December 3 – Many report due/overdue dates will be adjusted – Note: PIs and SPOs in Phase I have already received communications regarding the actions needed 19

Full Rollout Plan  Full rollout to all NSF awardee organizations is targeted for January 2013  The same rollout mechanism will be used – Suspend FastLane submissions for a period of time – Begin Research.gov submissions – Adjust due/overdue dates 20

Project Reports Access: PI View  Login with FastLane User ID and password  Access Project Report Dashboard or navigation 21

Annual, Final, and Interim Project Reports: PI View 22

Project Report Entry: PI View 23

Project Report: PI View Search Products/Journals  Products: – Publications – Technologies or techniques – Inventions, patent applications, and/or licenses – Websites – Other Products  Add a publication citation from Thomson Web of Science 24

Project Report: PI View Upload PDF File  PDF files can be uploaded for: – Accomplishments – Products – Special Requirements 25

Project Report: SPO View Search Project Reports  SPOs can search for a list of reports by: – Organization Name – Award Number – Award Title – Award Status – PI/co-PI Last Name – Managing Division – Report Type – Search Type 26

DISCOVER RESEARCH.GOV TODAY! 27

How Can I Get More Information?  Research.gov Webinar Series – For directions, November 16: How Can Research.gov Help Me? January 16: Project Reports on Research.gov: What’s In It for Me? January 24: ACMS: A New Approach to Award Payments  Research.gov Website: Project Report Info PageProject Report Info Page  Research.gov Help Desk – or  Stop by the Research.gov Exhibit at the NCURA Conference! 28

Provide feedback on Research.gov  Your feedback will help Research.gov prioritize and enhance services – Take our ForeSee pop-up survey – Complete online feedback form – Questions or comments? us at Complete the online feedback form Take the pop-up survey 29

Questions 30

Appendix: Pilot Phase I Organizations – Appalachian State University – College of Charleston – Cornell University – Hampton University – Indiana University – Refactored Materials 31

Appendix: Pilot Phase 2 Organizations – Arizona State University – Illinois Institute of Technology – Ohio State University – University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc – Syracuse University – University of California- Irvine – University of California-Los Angeles – Georgia Southern University – Georgia Southern University Research Foundation – Northern Illinois University – University of Illinois at Chicago – University of Maine Machias – University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign 32