Using a Content Progression to Develop Comment Codes that Support Formative Feedback Emily Lai & Daisy Vickers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Foundations in Number: Teachers PreK – Grade 2 Offered by: Looney Math Consulting
Advertisements

Elko County School District CCSS Math Professional Development Module 3, Week 2 Digging into the CCSS, part 1.
© 2014 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units To do now: How many triangles can.
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
Julie Coiro, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island Creating Performance-Based Measures of Online.
HOW MIGHT WE SUPPORT TEACHERS AS THEY DEEPEN THEIR OWN UNDERSTANDING AND EXPLORE STUDENT THINKING RELATED TO THE K-6 GEOMETRY PROGRESSION? GINI STIMPSON.
Preparing for the Data Team Process 1.  Know the rationale for “Step A” with respect to the data team process.  Experience Step A as a tool to help.
Introduction 1.How do you use technology now? 2.What helps? 3.What hinders? Definition of Technology Computers Software Internet Digital cameras and camcorders.
Gary D. Borich Effective Teaching Methods 6th Edition
Supporting Teachers to Learn the Practice of Ambitious Mathematics Teaching Summer Learning Institute Teacher Education Workshop July 17, 2011.
Tools for Teachers Linking Assessment and Learning “Assessment should be an integral part of teaching. It is the mechanism whereby teachers can learn how.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Building an Assessment System for Learning Paul Nichols, Ph.D. Vice.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Kindergarten- Module.
Project Overview Teacher Planning Work Samples & Reflections Teaching Resources Assessment & Standards Classroom Teacher Guide Pre-service Teacher Guide.
Mathematics the Preschool Way
Developing a Knowledge and Understanding of English Language Teaching Resources Project Overview Teacher Planning Work Samples & Reflections Standards.
Assessing the Curriculum Gary L. Cates, Ph.D., N.C.S.P.
Norm Kennedy SEA – February 11,  Math Trailblazers ◦ Comprehensive, K-5 mathematics curriculum with problem solving at its core ◦ Background 
Geometry Grades 3-5. Goals:  Build an understanding of the mathematical concepts within Geometry, Measurement, and NBT Domains  Analyze and describe.
A Habits of Mind Framework Supports Knowledge for Teaching Geometry Daniel Heck Horizon Research, Inc. Chapel Hill, North Carolina Rachel Wing & Mark Driscoll.
Common Core State Standards Integrated Pathway: Math 1
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 11 Learning and Cognition in the Content Areas.
+ Adapted, with permission: Akay Tuncak, NYC DOE Amy Hoffman, NYC DOE Hal Melnick, Bank Street College Faculty Marvin Cohen, Bank Street College Faculty.
A Role for Formalized Tools in Formative Assessment Bob Dolan, Senior Research Scientist, Pearson CCSSO NCSA | National Harbor |
Planning Focus Workshop Facilitated by: Sandy Sanford.
Lunch and Learn: A Collaborative Time for North Carolina Teachers Your Presenter Information.
T1PM3 4 th and 5 th grade Math Institute Focus on Geometry, Measurement and Data & The Eight Mathematical Practice September 27, 2011.
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
1 Overview Comments on notebooks & mini- problem Teaching equitably Analyzing textbook lessons End-of-class check (Brief discussion) Introduction to multiplication.
Lunch and Learn: A Collaborative Time for North Carolina Teachers Your Presenter Information.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
Integrating Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Mathematics and Science.
The Four P’s of an Effective Writing Tool: Personalized Practice with Proven Progress April 30, 2014.
Assessment Online. Assessment Online on TKI offers a wide range of information on how leaders and teachers can use assessment to enhance teaching and.
Proficiency-Based Assessment: Implications for our Practice Nicole Rigelman Portland State University Teachers of Teachers Mathematics Conference September.
SD WriteToLearn Assessment Pilot TIE Conference April 20, 2010.
Explore the National Parks through Measurement MEGAN H. WICKSTROM ELIZABETH W. FULTON.
How to Improve Diagnostic Assessment Reporting Practices: What Information Do Teachers Need and How Can We Best Communicate It? Communicating Results of.
Teaching and Learning with Technology, 4e © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Designing and Planning Technology- Enhanced Instruction.
Penny Pixel Project Project Overview Teacher Planning Work Samples & Reflections Teaching Resources Assessment & Standards Classroom Teacher Guide Pre-service.
Lunch and Learn: A Collaborative Time for North Carolina Teachers Your Presenter Information.
Ultranet for students Functionality Overview Learner Profile Learner Profile (Release 2) Personalised information on every student Progress Attendance.
Creating a Standards-Based Classrooms An Overview of Adapting and Adopting Research Based Instruction to Enhance Student Learning.
What is Pear Deck? What are the benefits of using Pear Deck in the classroom? How is Pear Deck used in each subject area? Discuss a Pear Deck case study.
Innovations in Online Performance Tasks Emily Lai Amy Reilly.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
Insight Learning System Presented by: Emily Lai Amy Reilly On behalf of Jennifer Kobrin.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Spring 2012 Ohio’s Academic Content Standards - Extended for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Increasing grade-level standard accessibility.
INTRODUCTION TO THE WIDA FRAMEWORK Presenter Affiliation Date.
Introducing. Allows teachers to match little books to a child's or group’s level of math understanding, providing rich opportunities for teaching and.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Underperforming groups.
OHIO LEARNING STANDARDS K-12 MATHEMATICS GRADE 3 BY: AMY FURMAN.
Lunch and Learn: A Collaborative Time for North Carolina Teachers Your Presenter Information.
The Teachers’ Guides are the core of the programme: Learning progressions by outcomes Support for using Student Activity Books Planning support Links to.
1 Using DLESE: Finding Resources to Enhance Teaching Shelley Olds Holly Devaul 11 July 2004.
Computer Science Standards Review
Grade 2 Back to School Night
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Assessing Math Looking closer at PARCC Task Types.
Pinpoint Math.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Testing Updates February 19, 2013
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Creating Coaching Cycles that Move Coach Practice Forward
A Research Companion to Principles and Standards
Presentation transcript:

Using a Content Progression to Develop Comment Codes that Support Formative Feedback Emily Lai & Daisy Vickers

Presentation Overview Context and background How are the codes being developed? How might teachers use the codes? How might the codes support formative feedback? Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.2

Context/Background Researching Personalized Assessment, Teaching, and Learning (PATL) Integrated learning system Several components –Teaching resources –Learning resources –Assessment resources –Professional development resources Mechanism for integration is a shared learning progression in math Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.3

PATL Assessment Resources Online game (auto-scored) Online performance tasks (auto-scored) Classroom activities (teacher scored) Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.4

How are the codes being developed? Content progression: Geometric measurement of area Grades 2-4 Based on research from math education field –Progressions for the Common Core State Standards in Math (University of Arizona Institute for Mathematics and Education) –Doug Clements and Julie Sarama (SUNY, Buffalo) –Michael Battista (The Ohio State University) –Jere Confrey and colleagues (North Carolina State University, Friday Institute) Used the research to extract levels that represent successively more sophisticated understandings and ideas Mapped multiple strands (geometry, area, length) Identified performance indicators/behaviors, as well as common errors/misconceptions where possible Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.5

The Content Progression: Geometric Measurement of Area Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.6

How are the codes being developed? Classroom activities ‾ Teacher scoring, based on observation and student work Online performance tasks –Automated scoring, based on activity stream data Designed to collect relevant evidence defined by the progression A single activity can elicit a wide range of student responses Each potential response mapped to a “weblet” of the content progression ‾ Weblet is a node of connected/adjacent stages ‾ Weblets identify potential student errors and misconceptions at particular levels or stages Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.7

Example activity Look at the shape below. How much space or area does this shape cover? Write a number sentence that tells how you know. You can use: Square tiles (1 inch or 1 cm) Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.8 = 1 square inch

Possible student responses Student BehaviorProgression Stage Potential Error/ Misconception Student uses tiles to cover the interior of the square. Visualization of 2D shapes as collections of area composites Student uses 1 cm tiles instead of 1 inch tiles, or uses a combination of both types. Student may not completely cover the interior of the shape. Student counts the number of square units in the interior of the shape. Area is additiveStudent may miscount, lose count, or count some tiles twice. Student may count only the squares on the diagonal. Student writes a number sentence using addition or multiplication. Abstract intuitive formulas Student computes the perimeter instead of the area. Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.9

How might teachers use the codes? In observing/evaluating student work, teachers may select some number of comment codes For the online performance tasks, codes could be auto assigned Comment codes specific to particular stages or levels of the progression, but some overlap may occur (e.g., routine counting errors) Enter observations into Student Profile –Digital reporting tool –Interactive display based on teacher questions/decisions –Bayesian Inference Nets to aggregate evidence within and across assessment components Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.10

How might teachers use the codes? Student Profile will display information on student location on the progression (e.g., “weblet”) Student Profile will also identify comment codes – errors and misconceptions Could be used to identify specific follow-up activities/resources Student-facing version of the Profile Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.11

How well do the codes support formative feedback? Needed/planned future research: Validate content progression Verify alignment of assessment/learning activities to the progression Validate the assessment activities – are they eliciting the targeted student behaviors and responses? Explore consistency/accuracy of teacher scoring/assignment of comment codes Explore perceived utility of comment codes by teachers Explore perceived utility of comment codes by students Explore impact on student learning Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.12

Looking for Pilot Schools! For 2014/2015 school-year If you’re interested in being a PATL pilot school, please contact Amy Reilly Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.13

Thanks! Emily Lai Daisy Vickers Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.14