A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 1. A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17 th SOT meeting Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz M. Kubo (ISAS/JAXA), K. Shimada (University of Tokyo), K. Ichimoto, S.
Advertisements

SDO/HMI multi-height velocity measurements Kaori Nagashima (MPS) Collaborators: L. Gizon, A. Birch, B. Löptien, S. Danilovic, R. Cameron (MPS), S. Couvidat.
Numerical Simulations of Supergranulation and Solar Oscillations Åke Nordlund Niels Bohr Institute, Univ. of Copenhagen with Bob Stein (MSU) David Benson,
August 22, 2006IAU Symposium 239 Observing Convection in Stellar Atmospheres John Landstreet London, Canada.
1 Plasma flows during solar flares A. Berlicki Observatoire de Paris, Section de Meudon, LESIA (Astronomical Institute of the Wrocław University, Poland)
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
Andreas Lagg MPI for Solar System Research Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
Andreas Lagg, MPS & IMaX and Sunrise team 2nd Sunrise Science Meeting, May , Freiburg TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before.
Nanoflares and MHD turbulence in Coronal Loop: a Hybrid Shell Model Giuseppina Nigro, F.Malara, V.Carbone, P.Veltri Dipartimento di Fisica Università della.
3-D Simulations of Magnetized Super Bubbles J. M. Stil N. D. Wityk R. Ouyed A. R. Taylor Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Calgary,
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Solar Radiation Physical Modeling (SRPM) J. Fontenla June 30, 2005a.
METO 621 Lesson 13. Separation of the radiation field into orders of scattering If the source function is known then we may integrate the radiative transfer.
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 23 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Why does the temperature of the Sun’s atmosphere increase with height? Evidence strongly suggests that magnetic waves carry energy into the chromosphere.
Vector Spectropolarimetry of Dark-cored Penumbral Filaments with Hinode Bellot Rubio ApJL, 2007, in press.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Flow and Magnetic Fields of Solar Active Regions in Photosphere and Chromosphere Na Deng Post-Doctoral Researcher California State University Northridge.
Nonlinear effects on torsional Alfven waves S. Vasheghani Farahani, V.M. Nakariakov, T. Van Doorsselaere, E. Verwichte.
Ch. 5 - Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
Spring School of Spectroscopic Data Analyses 8-12 April 2013 Astronomical Institute of the University of Wroclaw Wroclaw, Poland.
What stellar properties can be learnt from planetary transits Adriana Válio Roque da Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie.
What coronal parameters determine solar wind speed? M. Kojima, M. Tokumaru, K. Fujiki, H. Itoh and T. Murakami Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
Statistical properties of current helicity and twist distribution in the solar cycle by high resolution data from SOT/SP on board Hinode K. Otsuji 1),
UNNOFIT inversion V. Bommier, J. Rayrole, M. Martínez González, G. Molodij Paris-Meudon Observatory (France) THEMIS Atelier "Inversion et transfert multidimensionnel",
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the solar photosphere we can observe.
M. Collados Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias CASSDA School Apr Tenerife M. Collados Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias CASSDA School.
Stellar Atmospheres II
Energy Transport and Structure of the Solar Convection Zone James Armstrong University of Hawai’i Manoa 5/25/2004 Ph.D. Oral Examination.
Magnetic Correspondence between Moving Magnetic Features and Penumbral Magnetic Fields M. Kubo and T. Shimizu ISAS/JAXA - The 6th Solar-B Science Meeting.
Spicule observed in He Å Solar seminar in 2009 April 20 Short : Tetsu Anan HAZEL Bueno et al Nuño et al , 2, 3,
A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 1. A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 2 Why Hinode?  spectra are easier to interpret than, e.g. CRISP (continuous WL coverage)
1 Atmospheric Radiation – Lecture 9 PHY Lecture 10 Infrared radiation in a cloudy atmosphere: approximations.
Multi-level observations of magneto- acoustic cut-off frequency Ding Yuan Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Decay of a simulated bipolar field in the solar surface layers Alexander Vögler Robert H. Cameron Christoph U. Keller Manfred Schüssler Max-Planck-Institute.
Differences between central and peripheral umbral dots Michal Sobotka 1 Jan Jurcak 2,1 SXT seminar, 2008/10/10, NAOJ Astronomical Institute, Academy of.
COST 723 Training School - Cargese October 2005 KEY 1 Radiative Transfer Bruno Carli.
Using Realistic MHD Simulations for Modeling and Interpretation of Quiet Sun Observations with HMI/SDO I. Kitiashvili 1,2, S. Couvidat 2 1 NASA Ames Research.
Digital Image Processing Lecture 16: Segmentation: Detection of Discontinuities Prof. Charlene Tsai.
Inversions based on ME atmospheres Stokes inversions beyond ME atmospheres Luis R. Bellot Rubio Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC) Granada, Spain.
1. Twist propagation in Hα surges Patricia Jibben and Richard C. Canfield 2004, ApJ, 610, Observation of the Molecular Zeeman Effect in the G Band.
A multiline LTE inversion using PCA Marian Martínez González.
Coronal loops: new insights from EIS observations G. Del Zanna 1,2, S. Bradshaw 3, 1 MSSL, University College London, UK 2 DAMTP, University of Cambridge,
Photospheric MHD simulation of solar pores Robert Cameron Alexander Vögler Vasily Zakharov Manfred Schüssler Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung.
Acoustic wave propagation in the solar subphotosphere S. Shelyag, R. Erdélyi, M.J. Thompson Solar Physics and upper Atmosphere Research Group, Department.
High resolution images obtained with Solar Optical Telescope on Hinode
Lecture 8 Optical depth.
NLTE polarized lines and 3D structure of magnetic fields Magnetic fields cross canopy regions, not easily investigated by extrapolations, between photosphere.
Digital Image Processing Lecture 16: Segmentation: Detection of Discontinuities May 2, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai.
Spectral Line Transfer Hubeny & Mihalas Chap. 8 Mihalas Chap. 10 Definitions Equation of Transfer No Scattering Solution Milne-Eddington Model Scattering.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Initial trade-off: Height-resolved.
SHINE 2008 Vector Magnetic Fields from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager Steven Tomczyk (HAO/NCAR) Juan Borrero (HAO/NCAR and MPS)
Measurements of photospheric magnetic field within and around sunspots Rolf Schlichenmaier, Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik ENS, 29.Mai 2006 Image:
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Measurement of magnetic field by Hanle effect in Na I D 2 T. Anan (Kyoto univ.) 1, review of Holzreuter et al , Hanle effect of Na D2.
Simulations and radiative diagnostics of turbulence and wave phenomena in the magnetised solar photosphere S. Shelyag Astrophysics Research Centre Queen’s.
Chromospheric Evershed flow
Structure and Flow Field of Sunspot
A new technique of detection and inversion
Digital Image Processing Lecture 16: Segmentation: Detection of Discontinuities Prof. Charlene Tsai.
Diagnosing kappa distribution in the solar corona with the polarized microwave gyroresonance radiation Alexey A. Kuznetsov1, Gregory D. Fleishman2 1Institute.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Wave heating of the partially-ionised solar atmosphere
Chapter 13 – Behavior of Spectral Lines
Coronal Loop Oscillations observed by TRACE
Model of solar faculae А.А. Solov’ev,
Na Deng Post-Doctoral Researcher
Contents Introduction to the inversion code
Presentation transcript:

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 1

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 2

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 3  Fe I and profiles degraded to SP pixel size  Maps of inferred B and v LOS very similar to real ones!

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 4  Inversion codes capable of dealing with gradients  Are based on numerical solution of RTE  Provide reliable thermal information  Use less free parameters than ME codes (7 vs 8)  Infer stratifications of physical parameters with depth  Produce better fits to asymmetric Stokes profiles  Height dependence of atmospheric parameters is needed for  easier solution of the 180 o azimuth disambiguity  3D structure of sunspots and pores  Magnetic flux cancellation events  Polarity inversion lines  Dynamical state of coronal loop footpoints  wave propagation analysis  …

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 5 Spatial resolution:  0.4" VIP + TESOS + KAOS Inversion: SIR with 10 free parameters +

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 6 SIR Ruiz Cobo & del Toro Iniesta (1992) 1C & 2C atmospheres, arbitrary stratifications, any photospheric line SIR/FT Bellot Rubio et al. (1996)Thin flux tube model, arbitrary stratifications, any photospheric line SIR/NLTE Socas-Navarro et al. (1998)NLTE line transfer, arbitrary stratifications LILIA Socas-Navarro (2001)1C atmospheres, arbitrary stratifications SPINOR Frutiger & Solanki (2001)1C & 2C (nC) atmospheres, arbitrary stratifications, any photospheric line, molecular lines, flux tube model, uncombed model MISMA IC Sánchez Almeida (1997)MISMA model, arbitrary stratifications, any photospheric line SIR/GAUS Bellot Rubio (2003)Uncombed penumbral model, arbitrary stratifications

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 7 atmospheric parameters: T...gas temperature B...magn. field strength γ,φ...incl. / azimuth angle of B v LOS...line-of sight velocity v mic...micro-turbulent velocity A X...abundance (A H =12) G...grav. acc. at surface v mac...macro-turbulence v inst...instr. broadening v abs...abs. velocity Sun-Earth RTE has to be solved for each spectral line each line-of sight each iteration  efficient computation required! height independent height / tau dependent

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 8

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 9 The contribution function (CF) describes how different atmospheric layers contribute to the observed spectrum. Mathematical definition: CF ≡ integrand of formal sol. of RTE (here isotropic case, no B field): line core: highest formation wings: lowest formation Intuitively: profile shape indicates atmospheric opacity. Medium is more transparent (less heavily absorbed) in wings.  one can see „deeper“ into the atmosphere at the wings.

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 10 The general case: Height of formation: „This line is formed at x km above the reference, the other line is formed at y km …“  caution with this statement is highly recommended!  CFs are strongly dependent on model atmosphere  different physical quantities are measured at different atmospheric heights

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 11

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 12 „brute force method“: 1.synthesis of Stokes spectrum in given model atmosphere 2.perturbation of one atm. parameter 3.synthesis of „perturbed“ Stokes spectrum 4.calculation of ratio between both spectra 5.repeat (2)-(4) for all τ i, λ i, atm. parameter, atm. comp. The smart way:  knowledge of source function, evolution operator and propagation matrix  direct computation of RFs possible (all parameters known from solution of RTE, simple derivatives)

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 13 Linearization: small perturbation in physical parameters of the model atmosphere propagate „linearly“ to small changes in the observed Stokes spectrum. introduce these modifications into RTE: only take 1 st order terms, and introduce contribution function to perturbations of observed Stokes profiles response functions

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 14 RFs have the role of partial derivatives of the Stokes profiles with respect to the physical quantities of the model atmosphere: In words: If x k is modified by a unit perturbation in a restricted neighborhood around τ 0, then the values of R k around τ 0 give us the ensuing variation of the Stokes vector. Response function units are inverse of their corresponding quantities (e.g RFs to temperature have units K -1 )

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 15 Temp |B| VLOS model on the left is:  500 K hotter  500 G stronger  20° more inclined  50° larger azimuth  no VLOS gradient (right: linear gradient)

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 16 Milne Eddington RFs can be simply defined as the partial derivatives of the Stokes vector with respect to the model parameters x  R x (λ) is analytical and function of λ only  It depends on constant quantities S 0, S 1,  0,  λ D, a, B, , , v LOS,  (model parameters)  can be analytically evaluated for ME atmospheres (see Orozco-Suarez et al., 2007) Fe I at nm  =  = 45º

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 17 RFs to B and v LOS perturbations The sensitivity of spectral lines to the various parameters depend on wavelength and present several extrema Stokes V is more sensitive to weak fields but I, Q, and U when the field is strong v LOS is always well measured because I and Q, U, and V sensitivities compensate The shape of the RFs for B and for v LOS are different. This helps disentangle magnetic field from LOS velocity effects RFs to B RFs to v LOS I/IcI/Ic Q/IcQ/Ic U/IcU/Ic V/IcV/Ic I/IcI/Ic Q/IcQ/Ic U/IcU/Ic V/IcV/Ic

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 18

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 19

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 20

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 21

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 22  Plane-parallel, 1-component models to obtain averaged properties of the atmosphere  Multiple components (e.g. to take care of scattered light, or unresolved features on the Sun). Allows for arbitrary number of magnetic or field-free components (turns out to be important, e.g. in flare observations, where we have seen 4-5 components).  Flux-tubes in total pressure equilibrium with surroundings, at arbitrary inclination  in field-free (or weak-field surroundings)  embedded in strong fields (e.g. sunspot penumbra, or umbral dots)  includes the presence of multiple flux tubes along a ray when computing away from disk centre  efficient computation of lines across jumps in atmospheric quantities  Integration over solar or stellar disk, including solar/stellar rotation  molecular lines (S. Berdyugina)  non-LTE (MULTI 2.2, not tested yet, requires brave MULTI expert)

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 23  SPINOR applied to: Fe I Fe I Ti I  1st component: tube ray (discontinuity at boundary)  2nd component: surrounding ray Borrero et al. 2006

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 24 Hinode SOT:

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 25 1 magnetic component, 5 nodes

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 26 flux tube model

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 27  confirms uncombed model  flux tube thickness km Borrero et al. 2006

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 28 multiple rays  pressure balance  broadening of flux tube multiple rays  pressure balance  broadening of flux tube

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 29 without OH SPINOR applied to: Fe I / magn. comp (6 nodes) 1 straylight comp. molecular OH lines with OH

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 30 SPINOR applied to: Fe I / magn. comp (4 nodes) 1 straylight comp. molecular OH lines investigation of thermal-magnetic relation

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 31 oscillations observed in Stokes-Q of FeI and calc. phase difference between Q-osc.  time delay 2-C inversion with straylight:  FT-component  magn. background RF-calc: difference in formation height (velocity): ~20 km relate time delay to speed of various wave modes Bloomfield et al. [2007]

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 32 oscillations observed in Stokes-Q of FeI and calc. phase difference between Q-osc.  time delay 2-C inversion with straylight:  FT-component  magn. background RF-calc: difference in formation height (velocity): ~20 km relate time delay to speed of various wave modes Bloomfield et al. [2007]

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 33 oscillations observed in Stokes-Q of FeI and calc. phase difference between Q-osc.  time delay RF-calc: difference in formation height (velocity): ~20 km 2-C inversion with straylight:  FT-component  magn. background relate time delay to speed of various wave modes Bloomfield et al. [2007]

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 34 oscillations observed in Stokes-Q of FeI and calc. phase difference between Q-osc.  time delay 2-C inversion with straylight:  FT-component  magn. background RF-calc: difference in formation height (velocity): ~20 km relate time delay to speed of various wave modes  best agreement for: fast-mode waves propagating 50° to the vertical Bloomfield et al. [2007]

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 35 Analysis of 51 umbral dots using SPINOR:  30 peripheral, 21 central UDs  nodes in log(τ): -3,-2,-1,0 (spline-interpolated)  of interest: atomspheric stratification  T(τ), B(τ), VLOS(τ)  INC, AZI, V MIC, V MAC const.  no straylight (extensive tests showed, that inversions did not improve significantly) Riethmüller et al., 2008

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 36 Riethmüller et al., 2008 center of UD:

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 37 atmospheric stratification retrieved in center (red) and the diffuse surrounding (blue) Riethmüller et al., 2008

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 38 Vertical cut through UD Riethmüller et al., 2008

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 39 Conclusions:  inversion results are remarkably similar to simulations of Schüssler & Vögler (2006)  UDs differ from their surrounding mainly in lower layers  T higher by ~ 550 K  B lower by ~ 500 G  upflow ~ 800 m/s  differences to V&S:  field strength of DB is found to be depth dependent  surrounding downflows are present, but not as strong and as narrow as in MHD (resolution?) Riethmüller et al., 2008

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 40 = 200 G; Grid: 576 x 576 x 100 (10 km horiz. cell size) Brightness Magnetic field. Vögler & Schüssler

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 41  =0.7  =0.5  =0.3 =1=1 R. Cameron et al.

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 42 G-Band (Fraunhofer): spectral range from 4295 to 4315 Å contains many temperature-sensitive molecular lines (CH) For comparison with observations, we define as G-band intensity the integral of the spectrum obtained from the simulation data: [Shelyag, 2004] 241 CH lines + 87 atomic lines

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 43 Download from GBSO download-section  spinor use invert and IR$softhttp://

A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 44  install and run SPINOR  atomic data file, wavelength boundary file  use xinv interface  SPINOR in synthesis (STOPRO)-mode  1 st inversion: Hinode dataset of HeLIx +  play with noise level / initial values / parameter range  change log(τ) scale  try to get the atmospheric stratification of an asymmetric profile  invert HeLIx + synthetic profiles Examples:  Abisko 2009  spinor  abisko_spinor.tgz unpack in spinor/inversions: cd spinor/inversions ; tar xfz abisko_spinor.tgz