ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 7 STATION AREA PLANNING. Module 7 Station Area Planning Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed.
Advertisements

Sustainable Orange County Built Environment Subcommittee August 19, 2013.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Steering Committee #3 August 20, 2012.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns MnAPA Annual Conference September 28, 2011 St. Cloud, Minnesota Mark Filipi, AICP PTP.
Utilizing Connected Travel Demand and Land Use Models in the Sacramento Region Gordon R. Garry Sacramento Area Council of Governments April 30, 2010.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Economic Impact Study Overview Study Objective –Establish the baseline economic impact of Lake Granbury-related activity.
Incorporating Greenhouse Gas Considerations in RTP Modeling Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers CTC Work Group Meeting on RTP Guidelines June 28, 2007.
Scenario Planning with Envision Tomorrow
February 29,  Convergence  Reduced Cost  Increased Revenue  Productive vs. New Revenues  A “Plan”  Land Use / Finance / Services.
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
THE COSTS OF SUBURBAN SPRAWL AND URBAN DECAY. What is Suburban Sprawl? Sprawl is unsustainable development that wastes tax dollars, destroys farmland.
Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division Oregon Transportation Plan 2005 Modeling Alternative Policy Choices Becky Knudson,
Lec 16, LU Part 2: Scenarios & Assessment of transportation impacts on the urban activity system Scenarios Envision Utah’s scenarios Assessment of transportation.
Advanced Modeling System for Forecasting Regional Development, Travel Behavior, and the Spatial Pattern of Emissions Brian J. Morton Elizabeth Shay Eun.
GreenSTEP Statewide Transportation Greenhouse Gas Model Cutting Carbs Conference December 3, 2008 Brian Gregor ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis Unit.
Envision Tomorrow + Fiscal Impact Tool (ET+FIT) July 16 th, 2013.
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Analysis Modules Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and the.
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014.
Part II: Case Studies 1.Arlington, VA: Transit-oriented Development Boosts Economy County-wide. 2.Portland, OR: Streetcar Increases Investment and Redevelopment.
New Partners for Smart Growth 11th Annual Conference San Diego February 2, 2012 New Parking Standards for Affordable Housing.
Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
East Central Florida Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Affordable Housing Group Bill O’Dell Shimberg Center for Housing Studies 7 April 2014.
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Land Market Monitoring: Beyond Land Supply Gerrit-Jan Knaap Professor and Director National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education University of.
Presentation Template Creating Sustainable Places Planning Tools for Creating Sustainable Places.
Greater Washington 2050 Planning Tools Task Force May 29 th 2009 Harriet Tregoning and Alan Imhoff Regional Targets & Indicators.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
Projecting Energy and GHGs for General Plans and Regional Transportation Plans Robert A. Johnston Mike McCoy Information Center for the Environment University.
Getting to Know Cube.
Healthy Places: The Community of Tomorrow. USA Population 2000 –275 million people –Median age: 35.8 yrs 2030 –351 million people –Median age: 39 yrs.
Scenario S: Preferred Alternative. Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
VALUES WORKSHOP Anne Arundel County | April 26, 2010.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
EPA’s Development, Community and Environment Division: T ools for Evaluating Smart Growth and Climate Change February 28, 2002 Ilana Preuss.
Russell Provost Urban and Regional Planning Principal Investigator: Ruth Steiner.
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
San Joaquin Valley Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS) Update July 25,
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Regional Transportation & Land Use IREM / BOMA Real Estate Forecast Breakfast 2009 Rich Macias, Director Regional & Comprehensive Planning Southern California.
Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.
Jennifer Dill Marc Schlossberg Linda Cherrington Suzie Edrington Jonathan Brooks Donald Hayward Oana McKinney Neal Downing Martin Catala.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Smart Growth and Air Quality: Design Concepts to Protect Human Health David B. Goldstein, Ph.D. Natural Resources Defense Council San Francisco, CA
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
Form & Function of Metropolitan America WALKABLE URBAN DRIVABLE SUB-URBAN WALKUPS: (Walkable Urban Places) DRVABLE EDGE CITIES WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Transit Oriented Development: Prospects for action on climate change February 16, 2011 Presented to NYMTC David King Columbia University.
Regional Roads Committee
Transit-Oriented Affordable Housing
The Economics of Regional Growth
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
Housing Policy Meeting
Presentation transcript:

ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS

What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment (ROI) model  Scenario Builder  Extension for ArcGIS  Performance Models

Why Use Scenario Planning?  Weigh choices against consequences  Test policy options quickly  Prepare for uncertainty  Develop strategies to optimize outcomes

Scenario Building Process Create Building & Development Types Scenario Development Evaluation Baseline Analysis

Regional “Balance” Analysis  Jobs-Housing balance impacts transportation  GIS tool to identify imbalanced areas  Candidates for detailed scenarios

Redevelopment Readiness Analysis  A tool to assess which parcels within a study area may be candidates for redevelopment in the short term.  Two methods:  Low Hanging Fruit: isolate the bottom quartile of total value per acre (land + improvement)  Timing: estimate the parcels that are ready today, or within 5-10 years based on the age of the structure and the value of the land and a depreciation schedule.

Building-Level Financial Analysis  Envision Tomorrow Prototype Builder  Estimate ROI (Return on Investment) based on local costs and rents/sales prices  Gap Financing Tools

Test Financial Performance of Zoning Alternatives BaselineOptimalChange Height4 Stories6 Stories+2 Parking Spaces % Land Used43,000 Square Ft 0% Density31 DU / Acre63 DU / Acre+103% Floor Area Ratio % Project Value$17.3 Million$23.5 Million+35% Unit Cost$519,272$369,590-29% Baseline 4 story Mixed Use with existing parking Optimal 6 story Mixed Use with lower parking requirements

Create Prototype Buildings Why start with buildings?  Easily modeled & lots of existing data  Density and Design  Rents and Sales Prices  Costs and Affordability  Energy and Water Use  Fiscal Impacts  Physical Form  Height  Unit sizes  Parking configurations  Financial Reality  Rents / sales prices  Construction costs  Land costs Feasible?

Development Type Mix A Variety of Buildings, Streets and Amenities Create a “Place” Town Center Medium-Density Residential Single-Family Residential

Real-time Scenario Building and Evaluation Select Paint See Changes in Real Time

Envision Tomorrow Scenario Indicators  Land consumption & impact  Vacant and redevelopment lands  Measure development impact to sensitive lands (user defined sensitive areas)  Infill and Redevelopment  Percentage of growth on vacant lands or accommodated through infill  Housing  Unit type mix, FAR, density, tenure  Cost and affordability (rents / sales prices)  Match to estimated future housing demand  Employment  Industry mix, FAR and density  Employment wage  Jobs-Housing Balance

Envision Tomorrow Scenario Indicators  Square footage of new buildings by type  Land use mix (entropy score)  Value of new buildings  Sales and property tax revenues  Value of required subsidy  Household and Population  Population and density  Average household size  Average household income Based on new housing costs

Envision Tomorrow Scenario Indicators  Parking spaces, area and costs  Lot coverage and impervious surface  Private landscaping and open space  Estimated new street characteristics  New street length  Network and intersection density

Building-Level Sustainability Indicators  Building energy use  Carbon emissions from energy use  Landscaping water consumption  Internal building water consumption  Solid waste generated

Fiscal Impact Modeling  A Modified Version of the Federal “FIT” Fiscal Impact Model  Estimate and compare county and municipal revenues and costs from scenarios  Uses building values and infrastructure costs from Envision Tomorrow to capture explicit differences in revenues and costs from different land use types  Indicators:  Revenue Cost Ratio  New Revenues (Property, Income and Sales Taxes)  New Costs (Infrastructure, O&M and Services)

Revenues vs. Expenditures Net Annual Revenue

Proximity Measures (Walkable Access)  Calculate the proportion of development in a scenario that is within walking distance to any amenity, such as a school or park  Example:  50% of residents are within a 10 minute walk to a park

Affordability Housing + Transportation + Energy Costs  Assess trade-offs  Trade higher housing costs for lower transportation costs?

Shared Parking Opportunity  Increases in walking combined with mixing uses presents an opportunity for shared parking

Transportation Indicators  Household Vehicle Miles Traveled  Trips by Mode  Auto  Transit  Walk  Bike  Cost of Transportation (Auto and Transit)  Health Benefits of Increased Walking  Changes is Transportation Air Pollutants

Household Travel App  Predicts travel behavior based on land use variables  Household VMT  Auto trips  Walk trips  Transit trips  Bike trips

70 Output Fields Calculated for Each “Neighborhood” Boundary VariableGIS Field Name Household Variables Household Size TOT_AVG_HH_SIZE Household Income TOT_AVG_HH_INC Number of Employed Workers in the Household TOT_AVG_HH_WORKERS Accessibility Variables Activity Density within ¼, ½, and 1 miles ACTDENQTRMI ACTDENHALFMI ACTDEN1MI Job-Population Balance within ¼, ½, and 1 miles JOBPOPBALQTRMI JOBPOPBALHALFMI JOBPOPBAL1MI Land Use Entropy (Mix) within ¼, ½, and 1 miles ENTROPYQTRMI ENTROPYHALFMI ENTROPY1MI Percent of Regional Employees/Jobs Accessible within a 10, 20 and 30 Minute Auto Trip PCTREGEMP10MINA PCTREGEMP20MINA PCTREGEMP30MINA Percent of Regional Employees/Jobs Accessible within a 30 Minute Transit Trip PCTREGEMP30MINT Intersection Density within ¼, ½, and 1 miles INTDENQTRMI INTDENHALFMI INTDEN1MI Percent of 4-way Intersections within ¼, ½, and 1 miles PCT4WAYINTQTRMI PCT4WAYINTHALFMI PCT4WAYINT1MI Transit Stop Density within ¼, ½, and 1 miles TRANSSTOPDENQTRMI TRANSSTOPDENHALFMI TRANSSTOPDEN1MI Rail Stops within a ½ mile RAILTRANSSTOPHALFMI

Activity Density (Jobs + Pop) / Developed Area

Employment Access Within 10 minute auto trip

Job Population Balance 1-ABS(EMP-0.2*POP)/(EMP+0.2*POP)

Intersection Density Within a quarter mile

Percent 4-Way Intersections Within a quarter mile

Transit Stop Density Within a quarter mile

Rail Stop Density Within a quarter mile

Land Use Mix Within a quarter mile

HH VMT

Vehicle Trips

Walk Trips

Bike Trips

Transit Trips

Web-based ET+ In Development  As easy as Google Maps  No costly licenses or fast computers required for users  Many uses:  Real-time zoning administration  Direct local feedback on forecasts or plans  Live workshops with technical audience  Scenario development on mobile devices