Abu Raihan, MD, MPH Director of Program, Asia IAPB 9th GA, Hyderabad, 17-20 September 2012 Symposium 6: Challenges in Monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Implementing NICE guidance
Program Management Primary Eye Care Boateng Wiafe, MD, Regional Director for Africa Course 8, 9GA IAPB Hyderabad, 17 Sept, 2012.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
IAPB Human Resource Programme Committee: A global approach to HRD Course 3. Training an Eye Care Team IAPB 9 th General Assembly Hyderabad Suzanne S Gilbert,
Management Information System Challenges in Community Oriented Programmes B.R. Shamanna Hyderabad, AP, India 9 th General Assembly, IAPB, Course 5, 17.
Shared Decision Making – a strategic framework for commissioners 2 May 2012.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
The Community Engagement Studio: Strengthening Research Capacity through Community Engagement Consuelo H. Wilkins, MD, MSCI Executive Director, Meharry.
Etc Objective:There is effective monitoring, evaluating, reviewing and supporting classroom practice resulting in improvement. Action stepsTimelines and.
Creating Better Health and Care Services An overview of a Better Health and Care Review process.
Leadership Matters!. Overview Provincial District School.
® © 2005, CARE USA. All rights reserved. A System for Measuring Impact Organizational Performance and Learning November 2, 2010.
Challenge Questions How well do we meet the need of our stakeholders?
What is H(M)IS?. Purpose of HIS “is to produce relevant information that health system stakeholders can use for making transparent and evidence-based.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Lessons Learned for Strong Project Delivery & Reporting Sheelagh O’Reilly, Kristin Olsen IODPARC Independent Assessors for the Scottish Government IDF.
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Bond.org.uk The Bond Effectiveness Programme: developing a sector wide framework for assessing and demonstrating effectiveness July 2011.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Strategies to Operationalise Primary Eye Care Boateng Wiafe, MD, Regional Director for Africa Course 11, 9GA IAPB Hyderabad, 18 Sept, 2012.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
DON MARIANOS, DDS, MPH ORAL HEALTH 2014 INITIATIVE WEBINAR MAY 11, 2012 Prevention & Dental Public Health (DPH) Infrastructure: A State Oral Health Program.
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
Sue Huckson Program Manager National Institute of Clinical Studies Improving care for Mental Health patients in Emergency Departments.
Advancing Quality in Primary Care – What is Quality Improvement? 10 March 2011 Powys THB/IRH Paul Myres- Chair Primary Care Quality Forum.
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.
Strengthening Health Information Systems: Creating an Information Culture Manila, June 14, 2011 Theo Lippeveld, MD, MPH,
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
Public Health Advocacy in Low Income Settings: Views and Experiences on Effective Strategies and Evaluation of Health Advocates in Malawi IFGH Conference:
Regional Strategy on Human Resources for Health (WHO Western Pacific Region) Presentation by Dr Ezekiel Nukuro Regional Adviser, Human Resources.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
Budgeting for children’s rights – Not without them! – Experiences of youth groups in budget advocacy Addis Ababa, December 7th-8th, 2010 Anastasie A. Koudoh,
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Internal Fundamentals of Performance Measurement Dr. Mohammed Alahmed Dr. Mohammed Alahmed 1.
Impact Measurement why what how Atlanta. Today Imperatives Questions Why Now? Significant Challenges Breakthroughs in the field CARE’s Long-Term.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Using results frameworks to shift the focus of evaluation to a strategic level Emerging research on the principles underpinning results frameworks Kate.
© Plan COMPETENCIES Transferring competencies to the field level Bell’Aube Houinato Geneva, February 2007.
Lithuanian Education Quality Management: System of School Internal and External Audits Ričardas Ališauskas Head of Education Development Division of the.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
SOCIAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Collecting clients data for enhancing client satisfaction and retention.
Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre Strengthening the evidence base for improvement science: lessons learned Dr Nicola Gray, Senior Lecturer,
Equality Standard Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Equality Standard Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Equality Delivery System (EDS2) 2015/18 Ricky Somal:
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
"Learning and achievements of SWA Global platform and its relevance to achieving Hygiene and Sanitation Development in India" India WASH Summit 17 th February.
Development Account: 6th Tranche Strengthening the capacity of National Statistical Offices (NSOs) in the Caribbean Small Island Developing States to fulfill.
Critical Program Movement: Integration of STD Prevention with Other Programs Kevin Fenton, MD, PhD, FFPH Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis,
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Title of the Change Project
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Monitoring and evaluation of disability-inclusive development
Gathering a credible evidence base
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING.
April 2011.
World Bank project example
Why do we request a PIR? The information provided in the PIR helps inspectors to understand how the service meets the five key questions and the plans.
Presentation transcript:

Abu Raihan, MD, MPH Director of Program, Asia IAPB 9th GA, Hyderabad, September 2012 Symposium 6: Challenges in Monitoring Clinical Program Outcomes Developing an Institution-Wide M &E paradigm: The ORBIS experience

2 | ORBIS International Outline Definition and purpose of M&E ORBIS Paradigm: Importance of clinical outcomes Principles of choosing and using key outcomes Multi-tier challenges & barriers to data collection Conclusions

3 | ORBIS International Monitoring Systematic and routine collection of information from the on-going programs for three main purposes: To have internal and external accountability of the resources used and the results obtained To learn from experience to improve practice and take informed decisions To empower partners to deliver quality care

4 | ORBIS International Evaluation Assessing systematically and objectively the value of program. Evaluations help to draw conclusions about five main aspects of the interventions: Relevance Effectiveness Efficiency Impact Sustainability

5 | ORBIS International Key Elements in Designing the M&E Framework Define relevant indicators and their measures; Identify and set benchmarks/standards; Determine data collection strategy; Analyze data and prepare reports for dissemination and decision making.

6 | ORBIS International Purpose of Institution-wide Approach of M&E It is one of the important component of program planning, development and implementation Standardization of data collection and information flow Provides checks and balances over program planning and implementation Strong M&E leads to transparency and good governance for an organization

7 | ORBIS International ORBIS Paradigm: Importance of Measuring Clinical Outcomes To measure excellence in training and practice for quality patient care To provide evidence for advocacy to persuade policy makers, partners to promote good quality eye health Demonstrate impact of good vision on individuals, families and on communities Sustainability ensured when good outcomes attract patients

8 | ORBIS International Principles for Choosing Key Outcomes Outcomes must be appropriate and practical to collect by partners Outcomes reflect quality Outcome data supports Continuous Quality Improvement process

9 | ORBIS International Complexity of Clinical Outcomes There is no one standard for all diseases For certain complex procedures, outcomes are the result of expert consultations –Pediatric cataract, glaucoma –ROP –Retina Current standards are based on international best practices - PPP Current standards are based on international best practices - PPP This is a good place to start, however, these outcomes may need to be adapted as we put them into practice. This is a good place to start, however, these outcomes may need to be adapted as we put them into practice.

10 | ORBIS International Internal Challenges Data collection: who what when how frequent Cost to implement strategy: information system and other resources Which software to manage data on the outcomes? Willingness and ability of staff / partners to collect Analysis, use, and dissemination of results- requires additional skills

11 | ORBIS International External Challenges Cultural issues, not valuing the purpose Suspicion and fear System and resources lacking Privacy / legal issues in some countries to patient data with foreign NGOs Partners feel alienated from M&E process. –Often they have no inputs in the process- “one-size-fits-all” requirements –One-way, upward accountability, very little feedback loop.

12 | ORBIS International Sub-Saharan Africa No systems to collect/collate data No culture to record Suspicion/fear of recording India Limited systems to collate Suspicion/Fear of sharing+/- USA Good patient note Published and publicly available outcome data Lack of information Barriers to data availability Barriers to Outcome Data

13 | ORBIS International Practical Approach to Clinical Outcomes Invest resources for Staff, training, and retention System for data collection and management Develop capacity to analyze data and give partners feedback on the results: close the loop! Build or strengthen capacity of partners toward clinical excellence in practice Bringing Ophthalmologists on board is the key !

14 | ORBIS International Areas for Debate Should current standards be universal across all countries? What are context specific appropriate standards? Ho do we change the culture?

15 | ORBIS International Conclusions Challenges exist, though most can be addressed through appropriate investment in resources Attitudes and perceptions are crucial but are often difficult to change The shift to include measurement of clinical outcomes is critical to good quality eye care programs for elimination of blindness.

16 | ORBIS International Thank you