Best of ASCO in Gyn Oncology Adnan R Munkarah. Biologics in Recurrent Ovarian Ca Cediranib- highly selective and potent oral TK inhibitor of VEGFR1, VEGFR2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
O VARIAN C ANCER C LINICAL T RIALS P LANNING M EETING Unanswered Questions in Upfront Therapy IP Therapy Issue Keiichi Fujiwara, MD, PhD Saitama Medical.
Advertisements

Novel AKT Inhibitor Afuresertib in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Demonstrates Favorable Safety Profile and Significant Clinical Activity.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Can We Define Tumors That Will Respond to PARP Inhibitors? A Phase II Correlative Study of Olaparib in Advanced Serous Ovarian Cancer and Triple-Negative.
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
PARP Inhibition: A New Approach To Cancer Therapy? Dr. Geert Kolvenbag
Unanswered Questions in Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: Controversial Areas Deborah K. Armstrong, M.D. May 29, 2009.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
GCIG Meeting 29th May 2009 The Implications of Primary Chemotherapy for Clinical Trials Iain McNeish Professor of Gynaecological Oncology Barts and the.
Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology.
Phase 1b Study of Iniparib (BSI-201) Combined with Irinotecan for Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 Cell Cycle Effects of Iniparib plus Gemcitabine.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Investigating the Role of Anti- Angiogenic Agents in Ovarian Cancer Carol Aghajanian, M.D. Chief, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
ESP1/SARC025 Global Collaboration: A Phase I Study of a Combination of the PARP inhibitor, Niraparib and Temozolomide in Patients with Previously Treated,
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
O’Shaughnessy J et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 1007.
Phase III Trial of Induction Gemcitabine (G) or Paclitaxel (T) Plus Carboplatin (C) Followed by Elective T Consolidation in Ovarian Cancer (OC), Stages.
WHAT WILL THE KEY ISSUES IN END- POINT ASSESSMENT BE, IN FUTURE OVARIAN CANCER TRIALS INVOLVING NOVEL TARGETED AGENTS? first line treatment maintenance/consolidation.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
E2100 A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab as First- Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates TAS102 and BSC vs. Placebo and BSC Reviewer: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October 2011.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
OCEANS: A Randomized, Double- Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab (BEV) in Patients with Platinum-
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Audeh MW et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Clinical Science Symposium)
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
CALYPSO Trial: Carboplatin & Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) versus Carboplatin & Paclitaxel in Relapsed, Platinum- Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Pujade-Lauraine.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
INTERGROUP STUDY 0148 BMS CA Effect of TAXOL® (paclitaxel) and Doxorubicin Dose on Disease Free and Overall Survival of Patients with Node Positive.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel- Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab- Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
PHASE II RANDOMIZED STUDY OF TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE VERSUS TRASTUZUMAB PLUS DOCETAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH HUMAN EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2 – POSITIVE.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Pazopanib in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A new galloping horse. Dr. Raafat Ragaie, MD,FRCR.
Relapsed/Refractory Ovarian Cancer: Decision Points in Diagnosis and New Treatment Strategies Friday, March 24, 2006 Palm Springs Convention Center Primrose.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Claudia Marchetti Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
BIBF 1120 (Nintedanib) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer:
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Ovarian Cancer: A new look at an old veteran
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
Randomized phase III trial on Trabectedin (ET 743) vs clinician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancers.
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Presentation transcript:

Best of ASCO in Gyn Oncology Adnan R Munkarah

Biologics in Recurrent Ovarian Ca Cediranib- highly selective and potent oral TK inhibitor of VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3 and c- Kit(Matulanis #5501, Hirte#5521) Cediranib- highly selective and potent oral TK inhibitor of VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3 and c- Kit(Matulanis #5501, Hirte#5521) Sunitinib- multitargeted RTK inhibitor (Biagi #5522) Sunitinib- multitargeted RTK inhibitor (Biagi #5522) Pertuzumab- monoclonal ab prevents HER2 dimerization + CBDCA (Kaye #5520, Lalla #5550) Pertuzumab- monoclonal ab prevents HER2 dimerization + CBDCA (Kaye #5520, Lalla #5550) Sorafenib- oral TKI targeting raf & VEGFR, PDGFR, Flt3, c-kit ( Matei D, GOG #5537) Sorafenib- oral TKI targeting raf & VEGFR, PDGFR, Flt3, c-kit ( Matei D, GOG #5537)

Folate Receptor  FR  Overexpressed in majority of EOC, absent in nomrla tissues Overexpressed in majority of EOC, absent in nomrla tissues MORAb-003 humanized monoclonal ab to FRA MORAb-003 humanized monoclonal ab to FRA Armstrong D #5500 Armstrong D # patients with platinum sensitive EOC in first relapse 52 patients with platinum sensitive EOC in first relapse Asymptomatic patients treated with single agent ab (SA) Asymptomatic patients treated with single agent ab (SA) Symptomatic patients or those with progression on SA receive ab with platinum & Taxane Symptomatic patients or those with progression on SA receive ab with platinum & Taxane MOAb-003 significantly increased overall response and duration of response MOAb-003 significantly increased overall response and duration of response

Folate Receptor  FR  Bell-McGuinn #5517 Bell-McGuinn #5517 Phase I trrial in platinum resistant EOC patients Phase I trrial in platinum resistant EOC patients Well tolerated Well tolerated + response + response

Belinostat Histone deacetylase inhibitor Histone deacetylase inhibitor Preclinical studies Preclinical studies Synergy with carboplatinum and taxol Synergy with carboplatinum and taxol Effect in platinum resistant and sensitive EOC Effect in platinum resistant and sensitive EOC Well tolerated in combination with taxol/carbo and clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients (Finkler #5519) Well tolerated in combination with taxol/carbo and clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients (Finkler #5519) Promising activity in LMP ovarian tumors (Mackay # 5518) Promising activity in LMP ovarian tumors (Mackay # 5518)

Seiji Isonishi, 1 Makoto Yasuda, 1 Fumiaki Takahashi, 2 Noriyuki Katsumata, 3 Eizo Kimura, 1 Daisuke Aoki, 4 Toshiko Jobo, 5 Fumitoshi Terauchi, 6 Hiroshi Tsuda, 4 Toru Sugiyama 7 1.The jikei University School of Medicine, 2. Kitasato University,3. National Cancer Center Hospital, 3. Kousei General Hospital, 4. Keio University School of Medicine, 5. Social Insurance Sagamino Hospital, 6. Tokyo Medical University, 7. Iwate Medical University School of Medicine j j

Conventional administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin (c-TC) every 21 days is a standard therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Conventional administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin (c-TC) every 21 days is a standard therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Several phase II clinical trials of dose-dense weekly administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin (dd-TC) in ovarian cancer have demonstrated promising efficacy and favorable tolerability Several phase II clinical trials of dose-dense weekly administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin (dd-TC) in ovarian cancer have demonstrated promising efficacy and favorable tolerability (Gynecol Oncol 2005; 96: 296, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2008; 61: 243). (Gynecol Oncol 2005; 96: 296, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2008; 61: 243). Recent randomized phase III trials for breast cancer demonstrated weekly paclitaxel improved survival (NEJM 2008;358: , JCO 2008; 26: ). Recent randomized phase III trials for breast cancer demonstrated weekly paclitaxel improved survival (NEJM 2008;358: , JCO 2008; 26: ). Conventional administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin (c-TC) every 21 days is a standard therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Conventional administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin (c-TC) every 21 days is a standard therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Several phase II clinical trials of dose-dense weekly administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin (dd-TC) in ovarian cancer have demonstrated promising efficacy and favorable tolerability Several phase II clinical trials of dose-dense weekly administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin (dd-TC) in ovarian cancer have demonstrated promising efficacy and favorable tolerability (Gynecol Oncol 2005; 96: 296, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2008; 61: 243). (Gynecol Oncol 2005; 96: 296, Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2008; 61: 243). Recent randomized phase III trials for breast cancer demonstrated weekly paclitaxel improved survival (NEJM 2008;358: , JCO 2008; 26: ). Recent randomized phase III trials for breast cancer demonstrated weekly paclitaxel improved survival (NEJM 2008;358: , JCO 2008; 26: ).

Ovarian Epithelial, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube cancer FIGO Stage II-IV Ovarian Epithelial, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube cancer FIGO Stage II-IV Conventional TC (c-TC) Paclitaxel 180mg/m 2, day 1 Paclitaxel 180mg/m 2, day 1 Carboplatin AUC 6.0, day 1 Carboplatin AUC 6.0, day 1 every 21 days for 6-9 cycles every 21 days for 6-9 cycles Conventional TC (c-TC) Paclitaxel 180mg/m 2, day 1 Paclitaxel 180mg/m 2, day 1 Carboplatin AUC 6.0, day 1 Carboplatin AUC 6.0, day 1 every 21 days for 6-9 cycles every 21 days for 6-9 cycles Dose-dense weekly TC (dd-TC) Paclitaxel 80mg/m 2, days 1,8,15 Paclitaxel 80mg/m 2, days 1,8,15 Carboplatin AUC 6.0, day 1 Carboplatin AUC 6.0, day 1 every 21 days for 6-9 cycles every 21 days for 6-9 cycles Dose-dense weekly TC (dd-TC) Paclitaxel 80mg/m 2, days 1,8,15 Paclitaxel 80mg/m 2, days 1,8,15 Carboplatin AUC 6.0, day 1 Carboplatin AUC 6.0, day 1 every 21 days for 6-9 cycles every 21 days for 6-9 cycles Randomization Stratification; Residual disease: 1cm FIGO Stage : II vs. III vs. IV Histology : clear cell/mucinous vs.serous/others New Ovarian Elaborate trial: NOVEL trial

I.Histologically or cytologically* confirmed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer II.No prior chemotherapy III.Age: 20 and more IV.Performance status: ECOG 0-3 V.1) Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm 3 2) Platelet count at least 100,000/mm 3 3) Bilirubin less than 1.5mg/dL 4) SGOT less than 100 IU/l 5) Serum creatinine less than 1.5mg/dL VI. Written informed consent I.Histologically or cytologically* confirmed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer II.No prior chemotherapy III.Age: 20 and more IV.Performance status: ECOG 0-3 V.1) Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm 3 2) Platelet count at least 100,000/mm 3 3) Bilirubin less than 1.5mg/dL 4) SGOT less than 100 IU/l 5) Serum creatinine less than 1.5mg/dL VI. Written informed consent *CA125/CEA >25, and GI cancer should be ruled out

Primary endpoint: Primary endpoint: Progression-free Survival Secondary endpoints: Secondary endpoints: Overall survival (OS) Response rate Adverse events Quality of life (FACT) Primary endpoint: Primary endpoint: Progression-free Survival Secondary endpoints: Secondary endpoints: Overall survival (OS) Response rate Adverse events Quality of life (FACT)

Hypothesis:5 months improvement in median PFS (from 16 to 21 months) Hypothesis:5 months improvement in median PFS (from 16 to 21 months) Statistical test:2 sided log-rank with α=0.05, β=0.2 Statistical test:2 sided log-rank with α=0.05, β=0.2 Sample size:380 patients initially on Apr Sample size:380 patients initially on Apr patients with one interim analysis after amendment on Jan Progression defined as: Progression defined as: appearance of any measurable or evaluable lesion OR CA125 level > 2 times UNL or nadir for 2 consecutive measurements at least 1 week apart Hypothesis:5 months improvement in median PFS (from 16 to 21 months) Hypothesis:5 months improvement in median PFS (from 16 to 21 months) Statistical test:2 sided log-rank with α=0.05, β=0.2 Statistical test:2 sided log-rank with α=0.05, β=0.2 Sample size:380 patients initially on Apr Sample size:380 patients initially on Apr patients with one interim analysis after amendment on Jan Progression defined as: Progression defined as: appearance of any measurable or evaluable lesion OR CA125 level > 2 times UNL or nadir for 2 consecutive measurements at least 1 week apart

637 Patients enrolled and randomly assigned 320 Assigned to c-TC dd-TC 317 Assigned to dd-TC 319 Eligible Patients 312 Eligible Patients 1 Ineligible 5 Ineligible 6 cycles of treatment Additional 3 cycles should be given if clinical responses were observed. Interval or secondary debulking surgery were allowed. 319 Primary intention to treat efficacy analysis 314 Safety analysis 312 Primary intention to treat efficacy analysis 312 Safety analysis

Characteristic Conventional TC (n = 319) Dose-dense TC (n = 312) Median age (range) 57 (25-84) 57 (25-87) FIGO stage, % IIIIIIV ECOG PS, % 0 or Disease, % Ovarian Fallopian tube Primary peritoneal

Characteristic Conventional TC (n = 319) Dose-dense TC (n = 312) Surgery, % Primary debulking Primary debulking Interval debulking Interval debulking Secondary/Second Look Secondary/Second Look Residual disease, % < 1cm > 1cm Histologic type, % Clear or Mucinous Serous or others

Measurable % of patients c-TC (n = 135) dd-TC (n = 147) Objective response CRPRNCPDNE P=0.72 Evaluated by WHO criteria Clinical Response

Adverse Event c-TC (n = 314) dd-TC (n = 312) P value no. (%) Neutropenia 276 (80) 286 (92) 0.15 Thrombocytopenia 120 (38) 136 (44) 0.19 Anemia 137 (44) 214 (69) < Febrile neutropenia 29 (9) 1.00 Neuropathy-motor 43 (14) 37 (12) 0.55 Neuropathy-sensory 86 (27) 71 (23) 0.20 Evaluated by NCI-CTC ver.2.0

c-TC (n = 319) dd-TC (n = 312) > 6 cycles (all patients) 9 cycles (responding patients) 231 (72%) (60%) 37 Completed protocol therapy Discontinued protocol therapy progression/death progression/deathtoxicityhematologicneuropathyallergy patient refusal for toxicity others patient refusal other reasons Unknown 200 (63%) 117 (37%) (47%) 165 (53%)

TreatmentnEvent Median PFS P value HR95%CIc-TC mos. dd-TC mos

TreatmentnEvent 2-yr survival P value HR95%CIc-TC % dd-TC %

n PS PS Age > Age < Primary peritoneal 63 Fallopian tube 32 Ovarian536 Serous/Others527 Clear cell/Mucinous 104 FIGO stage IV 98 FIGO stage III 417 FIGO stage II 116 Residual disease > 1cm 342 Residual disease < 1cm 289 Overall631 dd-TC betterc-TC better

PFS was improved with dose-dense weekly TC compared to conventional TC in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. PFS was improved with dose-dense weekly TC compared to conventional TC in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Analysis of overall survival is ongoing. Analysis of overall survival is ongoing. Hematologic toxicity was increased in dose-dense TC. Hematologic toxicity was increased in dose-dense TC. Neurotoxicity was similar in both groups. Neurotoxicity was similar in both groups. PFS was improved with dose-dense weekly TC compared to conventional TC in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. PFS was improved with dose-dense weekly TC compared to conventional TC in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Analysis of overall survival is ongoing. Analysis of overall survival is ongoing. Hematologic toxicity was increased in dose-dense TC. Hematologic toxicity was increased in dose-dense TC. Neurotoxicity was similar in both groups. Neurotoxicity was similar in both groups.

AZD2281 (KU ), a PARP (poly ADP-ribose polymerase) inhibitor with single agent anticancer activity in patients with BRCA deficient ovarian cancer: Results from a phase I study Peter C Fong 1, David S Boss 2, Craig P Carden 1, Marja Mergui-Roelvink 2, Jacques De Greve 3, Charles M Gourley 4, James Carmichael 5, Johann S de Bono 1, Jan H Schellens 2, Stan B Kaye 1 1 The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, UK, 2 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands, 3 UZ Brussel Oncologisch Centrum, Belgium, 4 Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, UK, 5 KuDOS Pharmaceuticals/AstraZeneca, UK

PARP Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1- member of PARP enzymes Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1- member of PARP enzymes Abundant nuclear protein Abundant nuclear protein Binds to DNA breaks Binds to DNA breaks Activated PARP cleaves NAD+ into nictoinamide and ADP-ribose and polymerizes the latter onto nuclear receptor proteins including histones, transcription factors and PARP itself Activated PARP cleaves NAD+ into nictoinamide and ADP-ribose and polymerizes the latter onto nuclear receptor proteins including histones, transcription factors and PARP itself Contributes to repair of single strand breaks in DNA Contributes to repair of single strand breaks in DNA

Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP)

PARP inhibitors & BRCA

BRCA2 -/- BRCA2 +/+ BRCA2 +/- Increased sensitivity of BRCA1 -/- and BRCA2 -/- cells to PARP inhibition BRCA1 -/- BRCA1 +/+ BRCA1 +/- No difference in sensitivity between heterozygous and wild-type BRCA cells Farmer et al. Nature 2005; 434: Targeted inhibition  selective and less toxic therapy

From targeted therapy to the AZD2281 Phase I study Oral, small molecule PARP inhibitor Oral, small molecule PARP inhibitor IC 50 for PARP1 enzyme in the low nM range IC 50 for PARP1 enzyme in the low nM range Phase I trial began at RMH then NKI; later expanded to other centres Phase I trial began at RMH then NKI; later expanded to other centres Escalation phase: All tumour types Escalation phase: All tumour types Primary objectives of safety and tolerability Primary objectives of safety and tolerability Expansion phase: BRCA mutation carriers (HR deficient) especially ovarian cancer Expansion phase: BRCA mutation carriers (HR deficient) especially ovarian cancer Further assessment of efficacy Further assessment of efficacy

Overall recruitment Escalation Phase (n=46) 1,2 Escalation Phase (n=46) 1,2 Various tumour types; BRCA carrier status not mandatory Various tumour types; BRCA carrier status not mandatory 10 dose level cohorts: 10 dose level cohorts: 10mg daily given for 2 out of 3 weeks 10mg daily given for 2 out of 3 weeks 600mg bid continuous dosing 600mg bid continuous dosing 11 BRCA carrier ovarian cancer 11 BRCA carrier ovarian cancer Expansion phase (n=52) at 200mg bid continuous 2 Expansion phase (n=52) at 200mg bid continuous 2 Confirmed BRCA mutation carriers Confirmed BRCA mutation carriers 39 ovarian cancer 39 ovarian cancer 1 Fong et al. Proceedings of ASCO Yap et al. Proceedings of ASCO 2007

Toxicities (first 60 patients, all tumour types) Most toxicities were Grade 1-2 (≥95%) Most toxicities were Grade 1-2 (≥95%) Most common toxicities were: Most common toxicities were: nausea 28%, vomiting 18%, dysgeusia 13%, anorexia 12% nausea 28%, vomiting 18%, dysgeusia 13%, anorexia 12% fatigue 28% fatigue 28% Grade 3-4 toxicities were rare: Grade 3-4 toxicities were rare: myelosuppression (≤5%) myelosuppression (≤5%) nausea and vomiting (2-3%) nausea and vomiting (2-3%) CNS: dizziness or mood changes (2-3%) CNS: dizziness or mood changes (2-3%) Pattern of toxicity similar in BRCA mutation carriers Pattern of toxicity similar in BRCA mutation carriers

Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) Dose (mg)/ Schedule Tumour type DLTOutcome 400 bid continuous Ovarian Ca G3 low mood and G3 fatigue Resolved within 24 hours of drug discontinuation Recurred with re-challenge 600 bid continuous Mesothelioma G4 thrombocytopenia Resolved 2 weeks after drug discontinuation 600 bid continuous Breast Ca G3 somnolence Resolved within 24 hours of drug discontinuation G1 on lower dose Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) = 400mg bid

Demographics BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer subpopulation Patients Dose (mg bid) ≤ Total = No. evaluable for efficacy = Includes primary peritoneal cancer (2 pts), fallopian tube carcinoma (1 pt) and 1 ovarian cancer pt with compelling family history for BRCA mutation Excluded pts: 1 pt died from disease-related non-neutropenic sepsis after 1 cycle 1 pt had DLT on day 1 and again on day 8 with re-challenge of drug 2 pts had PD within 2-3 weeks after commencement

Demographics BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer subpopulation CharacteristicsNumber BRCA1 / BRCA2 / Family history 41 / 8 / 1 Median age (range) 52 (37-80) yrs ECOG PS Median duration from diagnosis to treatment (range) 4.7 (0.5–16) yrs Platinum status Sensitive (PD > 6 months after platinum) Resistant (PD ≤ 6 months after platinum) Refractory (PD on platinum or on completion of platinum) Median no. of prior systemic therapies (range) 3 (1-8)

23 mm

21mm 16mm

Total Platinum sensitive Platinum resistant Platinum refractory No. of evaluable patients Responders by RECIST 13 (28%) 5 (50%) 8 (32%) 0 (0%) Responders by GCIG CA (39%) 8 (80%) 8 (32%) 2 (18%) Responders by either RECIST or GCIG criteria 21 (46%) 8 (80%) 11 (44%) 2 (18%) SD (> 4 cycles) 6 (13%) 1 (10%) 4 (16%) 1 (9%) Median duration of response in weeks (range) 24 (10-77) 23 (16-77) 24 (10-65) 26 (20-32) Response to AZD2281 by platinum-free interval

Total Platinum sensitive Platinum resistant Platinum refractory No. of evaluable patients Responders by RECIST 13 (28%) 5 (50%) 8 (32%) 0 (0%) Responders by GCIG CA (39%) 8 (80%) 8 (32%) 2 (18%) Responders by either RECIST or GCIG criteria 21 (46%) 8 (80%) 11 (44%) 2 (18%) SD (> 4 cycles) 6 (13%) 1 (10%) 4 (16%) 1 (9%) Median duration of response in weeks (range) 24 (10-77) 23 (16-77) 24 (10-65) 26 (20-32) Response to AZD2281 by platinum-free interval

Total Platinum sensitive Platinum resistant Platinum refractory No. of evaluable patients Responders by RECIST 13 (28%) 5 (50%) 8 (32%) 0 (0%) Responders by GCIG CA (39%) 8 (80%) 8 (32%) 2 (18%) Responders by either RECIST or GCIG criteria 21 (46%) 8 (80%) 11 (44%) 2 (18%) SD (> 4 cycles) 6 (13%) 1 (10%) 4 (16%) 1 (9%) Median duration of response in weeks (range) 24 (10-77) 23 (16-77) 24 (10-65) 26 (20-32) Response to AZD2281 by platinum-free interval

Total Platinum sensitive Platinum resistant Platinum refractory No. of evaluable patients Responders by RECIST 13 (28%) 5 (50%) 8 (32%) 0 (0%) Responders by GCIG CA (39%) 8 (80%) 8 (32%) 2 (18%) Responders by either RECIST or GCIG criteria 21 (46%) 8 (80%) 11 (44%) 2 (18%) SD (> 4 cycles) 6 (13%) 1 (10%) 4 (16%) 1 (9%) Median duration of response in weeks (range) 24 (10-77) 23 (16-77) 24 (10-65) 26 (20-32) Response to AZD2281 by platinum-free interval

AZD2281 key messages Well tolerated oral therapy not associated with the typical toxicities of chemotherapy Well tolerated oral therapy not associated with the typical toxicities of chemotherapy Clear evidence of beneficial tumour response in BRCA mutated ovarian cancer patients Clear evidence of beneficial tumour response in BRCA mutated ovarian cancer patients 46% (21/46 pts) response rate (RECIST or GCIG CA125) 46% (21/46 pts) response rate (RECIST or GCIG CA125) 13% meaningful disease stabilisation 13% meaningful disease stabilisation Total clinical benefit rate of 59% Total clinical benefit rate of 59% A randomised phase II trial in BRCA ovarian cancer pts with platinum-free interval of 0-12 months A randomised phase II trial in BRCA ovarian cancer pts with platinum-free interval of 0-12 months AZD2281 vs pegylated liposomal doxorubicin AZD2281 vs pegylated liposomal doxorubicin