ESW 7 – NENA ICE Testing NG9-1-1 Interoperability Testing −Background -Need -Response: NENA-sponsored NG9-1-1 Interop Testing −NENA Industry Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The U.S. Department of Transportation and the Next Generation Jenny Hansen, Contractor – NG9-1-1 Project Coordinator USDOT/NHTSA.
Advertisements

1 Today’s System – Timeline. 22 Today’s versus NG9-1-1 Today’s 9-1-1Next Generation Virtually all calls are voice callers via telephones.
LNG for NG 9-1-1/ NG Realization of IETF Standards for the operational use in a Legacy Network Gateway for Next Generation Emergency Communication.
Brian Rosen Chair, Long Term Definition WG.  i1 = document older strategies for VoIP into  i2 = standard way to support VoIP on current E9-1-1.
What’s Next for i3? Dan Mongrain, Senior Solutions Consultant Bell Canada Terry Reese NENA NG9-1-1 Architecture Evolution Subcommittee Chair Senior Consultant,
Confidential1 1 FCC Text to Gulf Coast NENA October 15, 16.
What Makes It Work? A Panel Discussion on Next Generation 9-1-1
SAFE Blueprint and the Security Ecosystem. 2 Chapter Topics  SAFE Blueprint Overview  Achieving the Balance  Defining Customer Expectations  Design.
NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Committee Status Overview Pete Eggimann, DSC Co-Chair Jim Shepard, DSC Co-Chair NENA: The.
SBC in NGN Architectures Jonathan Cumming. Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited All Rights Reserved.2 SBC in NGN Architectures NGN Standardisation.
NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida ESIND working group Jim Lockard, Joel McCamley Co-Chairs.
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
Handouts Software Testing and Quality Assurance Theory and Practice Chapter 11 System Test Design
NENA 2008 Breakout Session Template
Standards for Shared ICT Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013 Gale Lightfoot Senior Staff Program Manager, Office of the CTO, SPB Cisco ATIS Cybersecurity Standards.
Network security policy: best practices
AMHS (ATS Message Handling System)
ESW – May 2010 UK Architecture for VoIP 999/112s John Medland – BT 999/112 Policy Manager.
Use of OCAN in Crisis Intervention Webinar October, 2014.
Stephen Alexander Secretary General and COO IMPA.
DOCUMENT #:GSC15-PLEN-48 FOR:Presentation SOURCE: ATIS AGENDA ITEM: PLEN 6.10 CONTACT(S): James McEachern
December 5, 2003FG3 Report FOCUS GROUP 3 Interoperability Report to NRIC VI Council December 5, 2003 Cliff Naughton (Boeing)
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
NENA History 30 years as a non-profit association for 9-1-1
Global Advisory Panel (GAP) on Corporate Governance and Risk Management of Blood Services in Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Introduction to the Global.
M2M Consolidation August 17-18, 2011 Washington D.C. 1 ARIB/TTC’s Feedback on Consolidation Issues M2MCons02_06.
- 1 - Roadmap to Re-aligning the Customer Master with Oracle's TCA Northern California OAUG March 7, 2005.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Framework for Black Link Management and Control draft-kunze-black-link-management-framework-00 Ruediger KunzeDeutsche Telekom March th IETF Prague1.
NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Emergency Incident Data Document (EIDD) Transfer Protocols Jerry Schlesinger, PMP – City.
NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida Industry Collaboration Event (ICE) Roger Hixson, NENA Technical Issues Director Delaine Arnold,
© Copyright 2007 Arbinet-thexchange, Inc. All Rights Reserved. VoIP Peering Pilot Using the Internet2 Backbone.
Building Information Exchange with First Responders (BIEFR) David Holmberg, NIST June 11, 2009 Slides credit to Alan Vinh.
 Working Group 2: Optimal Approach to NG9-1-1 Architecture Implementation by PSAPs Status Report September 29, 2015.
A Routing Extension for HELD draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04 James Winterbottom Hannes Tschofenig Laura Liess.
Next Generation Standards, Transitions and Challenges Brian Rosen Senior Director, Neustar Chair, Long Term Definition WG, NENA.
All-IP Access Network Issues 1 TSG-A/3GPP2 All IP Access Network Issues -- TSG-A View -- February
Sharing Incident Information Using the Emergency Incident Data Document MICHAEL SMITH - DSS CORP. RICK BLACKWELL, ENP - GREENVILLE COUNTY, SC.
NG9-1-1 Core Architecture: i3 v3 TERRY REESE BRIAN ROSEN.
Together, we’re changing the world of NG9-1-1 Deployments and Standards Nate Wilcox CTO.
Network design Topic 1 Business goals. Agenda Network life cycle Network design process Business goals Scope Constraints.
ATIS Overview December 9, ATIS in Brief Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS): With a focus on interoperability and innovation,
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
ND 911 Association Preparing for NG /24/2010.
September 28, 2006 Page 1 3GPP2 MMD Status for IMS Workshop Jack Nasielski
9-1-1 ASSOCIATION - STEPS COMMITTEE 1/3/2013 NG9-1-1 TECHNOLOGY & PROCESS.
Colombo, Sri Lanka, 7-10 April 2009 Need of Interoperability “within” an NGN – An approach Rajeshwar Dayal, Director Dept. of Telecommunications, India.
1 Presented by Jim Nixon, Breakout Session Moderator December 15, 2005 Report from Breakout Session #2 Individuals/Organizations to Government.
3GPP2 IP Multimedia Domain 3GPP CN Plenary June 5, 2002 Betsy Kidwell Chair, 3GPP2 TSG-N Ph: Fax: Ph: Fax:
ESW 7 – NENA Standards Roger Hixson - NENA We are mid-way through documentation development for NG9-1-1, with a number of documents published and more.
Internet Real-Time Lab, Columbia University NG9-1-1 Prototype Demo Jong Yul Kim, Wonsang Song, and Henning Schulzrinne.
Industry Perspective of Section 508 John Godfrey (202) Information Technology Industry Council NIST Accessibility May.
NENA ICE Testing. Next Generation 911 Testing Illinois Institute of Technology NG-911 Test Network NENA ICE 5 ICE 8 ICE 6 VPNs used to remotely access.
Association of Enterprise Architects International Committee on Enterprise Architecture Standards Jan 23, Collaborative Expedition Workshop #57aeajournal.org.
Building Systems for Today’s Dynamic Networked Environments A Methodology for Building Sustainable Enterprises in Dynamic Environments through knowledge.
The member organizations of the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council are grateful to the Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology.
© 2015 Airbus DS Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. Lights, Camera, NG9-1-1 Diana Gijselaers/ Solutions Engineer – NG9-1-1 GIS and Core Services.
U.S. DOT Next Generation Project: A National Framework and Deployment Plan.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
U.S. DOT Next Generation Project: A National Framework and Deployment Plan Summit for Large Cities Chicago, IL – May 21, 2009.
Anytime, Anywhere Access Benefits Functionality Work Order Administration Dispatch Work Order Work Order Details New Work Order Additional Functionality.
© NENA is the Voice of © NENA was founded in 1981 on the principle of “One Nation, One Number,” in order to help assure ubiquitous.
Lecture 15 Attribute Driven Design Again Topics ATAM – team expertise and experience needed Chapter 24 Next Time: June 22, 2016 CSCE 742 Software Architecture.
Technical Standards: Paving the Way to NG9-1-1
Lecture 12 Attribute Driven Design Again
Understanding the System of Systems
Alison Sengupta County of Lexington
Changing TPAs: What to Consider
REC Data Specification and UK Link File Formats
Presentation transcript:

ESW 7 – NENA ICE Testing NG9-1-1 Interoperability Testing −Background -Need -Response: NENA-sponsored NG9-1-1 Interop Testing −NENA Industry Collaboration Events(ICE) -What is ICE? -Program Benefits -Program Highlights -ICE Governance/Organization −Overview of ICE-1 −Overview of ICE-2 −Architecture & Interfaces −Future ICE Topics For Further Information

NG9-1-1 Interop Testing - Background The transition to NG9-1-1 is a complicated thing −Many stakeholders; government, industry, standards development organizations (SDOs) −Will of necessity be multi-vendor −Legal, funding, standards progress of little import if equipment, software and systems do not interoperate as planned −Limited testing on case-by-case, customer-by-customer, vendor-by-vendor has taken place, however… −Common interoperability test program, with level playing field for all to test, learn, and further develop accordingly, is needed NENA recognized need to provide such an environment −Industry Collaboration Events (ICE) grew out of NENA NG Partner Program −NENA established ICE to: -…create an environment where all vendors can test with other vendors efficiently, cost effectively, and on a level playing field

What is ICE? Industry Collaboration Events A series of events held under the auspices of NENA, organized by a representatives from all stakeholder groups, that will allow vendors of Next Generation products to develop and test the interoperability of their systems with those from other vendors.

ICE Program Benefits For Vendors: −Provide a convenient, cost-effective, & safe forum for vendors to test and develop with other vendors For Customers: −Reduce implementation risks & achieve NG9-1-1 benefits – Gain Confidence For the NG9-1-1 transition: −Promote a consistent, nationwide, open, standards-based implementation

ICE Program Highlights Completely voluntary Guided by a steering committee with representatives from all stakeholder groups ICE1 focused on the core of the NG9-1-1 network (i.e. i3) −Upcoming ICE2 dedicated to testing transition elements Based on the standards work being done in NENA, ATIS/ESIF, IETF, TIA and other SDOs ICE1 took place the w/o November 2, 2009 at Texas A&M −ICE2 is scheduled for w/o May 24, AT&T, Irving, TX ICE is intended to be a multi-step series of events: −Future ICE event themes tentatively set (see NENA website) −Envisioned as ongoing NG9-1-1 interoperability test program −Next ICE (ICE-8) dedicated to recording & logging technologies

ICE Governance & Organization To guide and oversee the ICE process, NENA established the ICE Steering Committee (SC) −Steering Committee made up of stakeholders from a broad cross section of the industry. −Policy setting body for ICE events: content, frequency, goals, participant invitation, etc. To further manage event SC in turn created two operational committees: −The Event Planning Committee -Charged with managing all aspects of planning and conducting the event. -Composed solely of representatives of companies that have agreed to participate in the initial event −The Data Gathering and Reporting Committee -Charged with capturing important outcomes from the event and reporting the data out to government buyers, consultants, standards development -Committee is open to anyone that wishes to participate This organizational setup was reviewed after ICE-1 for effectiveness and retained, for now

Overview of ICE-1 Date/Location: −November 2- 5, 2009 −Texas A&M University ITEC Lab, College Station, TX Scope: −Both bilateral and multi-vendor test scenarios were run: -Each with a defined architecture and list of vendor participants -Testing call flow and interface standards −Focused on NG9-1-1 components; transition & legacy interfaces postponed to ICE-2 Data gathered/reporting focused in two areas: −Gathered data regarding the status of underlying standards −Gathered data regarding the interfaces that were tested External reporting limited: −Information about the state of standards was made available to all affected standards development organizations −In addition, a summary of the event was made generally available

ICE-1 – Elements Tested Intelligent End Point (NG-capable SIP client) Access Network (Legacy or VoIP) NG9-1-1 Network (e.g. ESRP) NG9-1-1 Databases −Location Information Server (LIS) −LoST Server (Emergency Call Routing Function, ECRF) NG9-1-1 PSAP Border Control Function (BCF) Logging Services – ICE-1 will focus on Voice recording. Master Clock source- Interface Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) Mapping Services/GIS

Overview of ICE-2 Date/Location: −May 24 – 27, 2010 −AT&T Center for Learning, Irving, TX Scope: −Bilateral and multi-vendor test scenarios will be run: -Each with a defined architecture and list of vendor participants -Testing call flow and interface standards −Focused on transition & legacy interfaces and equipment -Two separate scenarios, dedicated to different transition architectures/standards –Scenario 1: NENA i3 transition elements –Scenario 2: ATIS RFAI transition elements Data to gathering/reporting approach similar to ICE-1 External reporting will continue to be limited, as in ICE-1

ICE-2 – Elements Tested Same elements as in ICE-1, with a few additions, specific to transition: −Legacy Network Gateways (including subcomponents) -PIF, LIF, NIF −Legacy PSAP Gateways −IP Selective Router (Scenario 2) −Legacy Selective Router Gateways (Scenario 2)

ICE-1 – Architecture & Interfaces

ICE-2 – Architecture & Interfaces Scenario 1

ICE-2 – Scope of Call Handling Tests

Overview of Future ICE Topics ICE 3 - Location Related Issues ICE 4 - Call Routing Based on LoST Hierarchy ICE 5 - Emergency Services for the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Community ICE 6 - Individual NG9-1-1 Element Testing ICE 7 - Supplemental Data ICE 8 - Recording and Logging Devices These events may overlap or be held in non-numerical sequence

Questions or Follow-Up: −Contact Ray Paddock -Secretary to ICE Steering Committee -(303) ICE-1 Public Information Packet can be found here: − 1%20Industry%20Collaboration%20Event%20overview%20document. pdfhttp:// 1%20Industry%20Collaboration%20Event%20overview%20document. pdf ICE-2 Public Information Packet in preparation For Further Information