Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
Advertisements

Lecture 4 The Formation and Evolution of CMEs. Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) Appear as loop like features that breakup helmet streamers in the corona.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
The Solar Wind and Heliosphere Bob Forsyth - 21 st / 22 nd October 2013 TOPICS The Sun – interior and atmosphere Origin of the solar wind Formation of.
DEFINITION, CALCULATION, AND PROPERTIES OF THE Dst INDEX R.L. McPherron Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California Los Angeles.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
The Solar Wind and Heliosphere Bob Forsyth - 15 th October 2007 TOPICS The Sun – interior and atmosphere Origin of the solar wind Formation of the heliosphere.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Global Distribution of Slow Solar Wind N. U. Crooker, S. W. Antiochos, X. Zhao, Yi-M. Wang, and M. Neugebauer.
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
Heliospheric MHD Models (for the LWS Community) LWS Workshop, Boulder, CO, March 23-26, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 and Vic Pizzo 2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES &
Center for Space Environment Modeling T. H. Zurbuchen, on behalf of W. Manchester, J. Kota, I. Roussev, T. H. Zurbuchen, N.
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
Relationship Between Magnetic Clouds and Earth-Directed CMEs: Space Weather Research in Stanford Solar Group Xuepu Zhao The Second International Space.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Solar Activity and VLF Prepared by Sheila Bijoor and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global AWESOME.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
The Solar Wind.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Heliosphere: The Solar Wind March 01, 2012.
Global Simulation of Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth's Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Tatsuki Ogino Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory.
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
1 SPD Meeting, July 8, 2013 Coronal Mass Ejection Plasma Heating by Alfvén Wave Dissipation Rebekah M. Evans 1,2, Merav Opher 3, and Bart van der Holst.
Stream interface slope near 1 AU and the configuration of the heliospheric current sheet at 2.5 solar radii K.D.C. Simunac STEREO SWG October 2009.
Energy conversion at Saturn’s magnetosphere: from dayside reconnection to kronian substorms Dr. Caitríona Jackman Uppsala, May 22 nd 2008.
Identifying the Role of Solar-Wind Number Density in Ring Current Evolution Paul O’Brien and Robert McPherron UCLA/IGPP.
ASEN5335- Aerospace Environments -- The Solar Wind 1 THE INTERPLANETARY MEDIUM AND IMF Consequently, the "spiral" pattern formed by particles spewing.
Publications in Comparative Magnetospheres Siscoe, G. L.: Towards a comparative theory of magnetospheres, in Solar System Plasma Physics, Vol. II, edited.
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
GEOEFFECTIVE INTERPLANETARY STRUCTURES: 1997 – 2001 A. N. Zhukov 1,2, V. Bothmer 3, A. V. Dmitriev 2, I. S. Veselovsky 2 1 Royal Observatory of Belgium.
CME Propagation CSI 769 / ASTR 769 Lect. 11, April 10 Spring 2008.
Yu.G. Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy of SB RAS Transparency of a magnetic cloud boundary for cosmic rays I.S. Petukhov, S.I. Petukhov.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © The Heliosphere: Solar Wind Oct. 08, 2009.
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Measurements of the Orientation of the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Neil Murphy Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Manuela Temmer Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Austria Tutorial: Coronal holes and space weather consequences.
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
Xuepu Zhao Oct. 19, 2011 The Base of the Heliosphere: The Outer (Inner) Boundary Conditions of Coronal (Heliospheric) models.
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Heliosphere - Lectures 5-7
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
The Bow Shock and Magnetosheath
Introduction to Space Weather
Physics 320: Interplanetary Space and the Heliosphere (Lecture 24)
Presentation transcript:

Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow into which they are launched. In particular, the simulations are used to estimate how interplanetary dynamical processes affect the propagation of the injected CME material and how the ambient interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) is distorted in the interaction. The solar wind is composed of alternating patterns of slow flow (with high density and low temperature) and fast flow (with low density and high temperature). The slow flow is thought to be the interplanetary extension of the coronal streamer belt, while the fast flow is known to emerge from coronal holes. The spiral interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) reverses polarity across a very thin layer (the heliospheric current sheet) which is embedded in the slow, dense streamer belt flow circling the Sun. CMEs have been identified as a prime causal link between solar activity and large, non-recurrent geomagnetic storms [Gosling et al., 1991]. Interplanetary events with a southward IMF component Bz < -10 nT and with a duration larger than 3 hours have a one-to-one causal relationship with intense (Dst < -100 nT) geomagnetic storms [Gonzales and Tsurutani, 1987]. Great magnetic storms are caused by a combination of Bz from injected magnetic cloud structures with Bz generated by interplanetary dynamic interactions [Tsurutani et al., 1999]. The solar wind is composed of alternating patterns of slow flow (with high density and low temperature) and fast flow (with low density and high temperature). The slow flow is thought to be the interplanetary extension of the coronal streamer belt, while the fast flow is known to emerge from coronal holes. The spiral interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) reverses polarity across a very thin layer (the heliospheric current sheet) which is embedded in the slow, dense streamer belt flow circling the Sun. CMEs have been identified as a prime causal link between solar activity and large, non-recurrent geomagnetic storms [Gosling et al., 1991]. Interplanetary events with a southward IMF component Bz < -10 nT and with a duration larger than 3 hours have a one-to-one causal relationship with intense (Dst < -100 nT) geomagnetic storms [Gonzales and Tsurutani, 1987]. Great magnetic storms are caused by a combination of Bz from injected magnetic cloud structures with Bz generated by interplanetary dynamic interactions [Tsurutani et al., 1999]. Meridional cross sections of interplanetary disturbances 2 days after CME launch. Distributions of velocity (gray scale), injected mass (color scale), bulk density (contours), and IMF (projected unit vectors) are shown in slices across pulse center. The dynamic distortion of the CME depends strongly upon where it is launched with respect to the streamer belt. Schematic view of the outflow conditions at the inner boundary. The distribution of the mass density is shown with enhanced color intensity. The solid line in the middle of the streamer belt indicates location of the heliospheric current sheet. Numerical Simulation of Interplanetary Disturbances V J Pizzo and Dusan Odstrcil NOAA Space Environment Center and CIRES Abstract Background Simulated CME Interplanetary Structure The evolution and appearance of CMEs can be strongly affected by their interaction with background solar wind structures. This interaction also distorts the IMF and enhances its southward component, Bz. Substantial Bz excursions can be generated by:  shock compression of the spiral IMF  draping around a CME by mass flow convection  distortion of the IMF by rarefaction waves trailing the CME The amplitude of Bz generated by interplanetary dynamics depends mainly upon the details of the configuration of the corotating streamer belt and the initial position and speed of the CME with respect to the streamer belt flow. The evolution and appearance of CMEs can be strongly affected by their interaction with background solar wind structures. This interaction also distorts the IMF and enhances its southward component, Bz. Substantial Bz excursions can be generated by:  shock compression of the spiral IMF  draping around a CME by mass flow convection  distortion of the IMF by rarefaction waves trailing the CME The amplitude of Bz generated by interplanetary dynamics depends mainly upon the details of the configuration of the corotating streamer belt and the initial position and speed of the CME with respect to the streamer belt flow. Numerical Model Conclusions A three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model is used in a Sun- centered spherical coordinate system between 0.14 and 1.04 AU [Odstrcil and Pizzo 1999]. An explicit finite-difference TVDLF (Total-Variation-Diminishing Lax- Friedrichs) algorithm is applied with dimensional splitting on a non-staggered numerical grid. A tilted-dipole outflow configuration is specified at the inner boundary near the Sun, and a structured, corotating solar wind flow with a spiral IMF is established by dynamic relaxation. The CME is modeled as a simple plasma blob injected at high speed into the ambient spiral IMF. No magnetic ejecta are currently included in the calculation, although such embedded structures will be included in subsequent calculations. Four different cases of a CME launch are considered, as illustrated in the figure at top center. A three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model is used in a Sun- centered spherical coordinate system between 0.14 and 1.04 AU [Odstrcil and Pizzo 1999]. An explicit finite-difference TVDLF (Total-Variation-Diminishing Lax- Friedrichs) algorithm is applied with dimensional splitting on a non-staggered numerical grid. A tilted-dipole outflow configuration is specified at the inner boundary near the Sun, and a structured, corotating solar wind flow with a spiral IMF is established by dynamic relaxation. The CME is modeled as a simple plasma blob injected at high speed into the ambient spiral IMF. No magnetic ejecta are currently included in the calculation, although such embedded structures will be included in subsequent calculations. Four different cases of a CME launch are considered, as illustrated in the figure at top center. Simulated Spacecraft Profiles Temporal profiles of interplanetary disturbances generated by CMEs launched near the slow streamer belt flow. Schematic views of the initial outflow conditions for four different cases are included at the top-right of each panel, and the location of the observing points (at 1 AU) is projected into that region. Observing points at 1 AU are at the pulse centerline (top row), at 15 deg north (middle row), and 15 deg south (bottom row). Radial velocity, number density, total magnetic field, and north-south magnetic field are shown from top to bottom. The solid and dashed lines in the number density plots show the total and injected number density, respectively. Shaded areas indicate intervals where the injected densities define the main body of the CME plasma. IMF Distortions Input Flow Configurations North-south IMF as function of time and heliographic latitude at 1 AU. Profiles are obtained from the temporal evolution of variables stored at 5 deg intervals along a meridional cut through the pulse center. The heliographic locations of these 17 observing points are projected onto a schematic view of outflow conditions at 0.14 AU (left column). Light filling indicates a region where the solar wind velocity is less than 500 km/s; this approximately indicates the location of the slow streamer belt flow. Dark filling indicates a region where the injected mass density is larger than 5 cm^3, which approximately indicates the extent of the CME. The pulse centerline is indicated by the thick profile at the center of each panel.