Dr. Bill Corcoran June 22, 2010 16th Annual HPRCT Conference June 21-25 · Baltimore Inner Harbor Hosted by Constellation Energy President, Nuclear Safety.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Orinthology Mill Creek Middle School Science Olympiad 2010.
Advertisements

TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Designing Effective Action for Change
Planning Reports and Proposals
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Kapitel 21 Astronomie Autor: Bennett et al. Galaxienentwicklung Kapitel 21 Galaxienentwicklung © Pearson Studium 2010 Folie: 1.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 3.1 Chapter 3.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Optimized Human Error Evaluation
2010 HPRCT Presentation – Optimized Human Error Evaluation June 23 rd, 2010 Presenter: Terry J. Herrmann, P.E. Associate, Structural Integrity Associates.
Labeling claims for patient- reported outcomes (A regulatory perspective) FDA/Industry Workshop Washington, DC September 16, 2005 Lisa A. Kammerman, Ph.D.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
State of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Patient Safety Reporting System Module 2 – New Event Entry.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Determine Eligibility Chapter 4. Determine Eligibility 4-2 Objectives Search for Customer on database Enter application signed date and eligibility determination.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
ZMQS ZMQS
Software in Legacy Systems
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Slide 1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) Data Subcommittee February 25, 2014.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Chapter 13 Overall Audit Plan and Audit Program
ABC Technology Project
Juan Gallegos November Objective Objective of this presentation 2.
© S Haughton more than 3?
TU/e Service business logic framework Egon Lüftenegger, Information Systems Group, TU/e.
VOORBLAD.
5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:
1 Cultural and Diversity Considerations. Learning Objectives After this session, participants will be able to: 1.Define cultural competency 2.State the.
Identifying Our Own Style Extended DISC ® Personal Analysis.
THE WORK AT ANTIOCH. I. WORKED ACCORDING TO ABILITY, Acts 13:1-3 A. "Ministered," v. 3; Eph. 4:11-13; 1 Pet. 4:11; 1 Cor. 12: 14-22; Matt. 25:15, 21,
State of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Patient Safety Reporting System Module 1 – Overview and Administrative Functions.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Lecture 8: Testing, Verification and Validation
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
“Be An Example” Introduction 1st Timothy 4:12 Matthew 5:16
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Figure Essential Cell Biology (© Garland Science 2010)
©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests of Transactions.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Statistically-Based Quality Improvement
Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health & Disease Sixth Edition
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
CpSc 3220 Designing a Database
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
A Foundation for Root Cause Analysis-( ) William R. Corcoran, Ph.D., P.E. Nuclear Safety Review Concepts Corporation © 2011 W. R. Corcoran, NSRC.
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Bill Corcoran June 22, th Annual HPRCT Conference June · Baltimore Inner Harbor Hosted by Constellation Energy President, Nuclear Safety Review Concepts Corporation, Windsor, CT Human Quality ( Lines of Inquiry When Human(s) Dont Perform Satisfactorily in Service and/or Arent Suitable for Their Intended Purpose ) © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

PECO NUCLEAR A Unit of PECO Energy

3 3

4 4

Needed to Probe Human Quality (HuQ) Some knowledge of Human Behavioral Technology (HBT) Some knowledge of Business Issue Investigation (aka RCA) Empathy, compassion, curiosity, skepticism Perspective: A good investigation makes the despicable explicable. 5 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

Human Quality (HuQ) Whats the Problem about HuQ? What is HuQ? Looking at the Problem as a Quality Problem Lines of Inquiry Conclusions 6 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

Whats the Problem about HuQ? All reported consequential events resulted from Inactions of humans Behaviors of humans and/or Conditions affected by humans Established by humans Desired by humans Tolerated by humans and/or Undetected by humans 7 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

What is HuQ? I A Quality Item Is demonstrated to meet its qualitative and quantitative (Q/Q) acceptance criteria Will perform satisfactorily in service Function-what its supposed to do Situation-conditions under which it is supposed to do it Time-when its supposed to do it and for the time its supposed to do it Is suitable for its intended purposes 8 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

What is HuQ? II Is it the same for humans? What are the Q/Q acceptance criteria? What is satisfactory performance in service? What are the intended purposes? 9 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

Looking at the Problem as a Quality Problem The Item Its source Its history How it was treated How it was used The environment that it was used in Accountability for quality 10 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

Lines of Inquiry (LOIs) I Facts HuQ is never a direct cause HuQ is never the root cause HuQ is never a root cause LOIs What is the nature, the magnitude, the location, and the timing (NMLT) of the HuQ Issue? What are the factors that resulted in the NMLT of the HuQ Issue? 11 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

Lines of Inquiry (LOIs) II What are the factors that resulted in the NMLT of those factors? For each factor Creation Non-discovery Failure to effectively address 12 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

Lines of Inquiry (LOIs) III For each factor Missed opportunities Barrier inadequacies Earlier, better, cheaper, safer, more risk- informed, more safety culture indicative, more compliant ways of identifying and/or addressing the HuQ Issue and/or its factors before the event 13 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

Lines of Inquiry IV For each HuQ Issue Significance Significance of HuQ Issue Significance of each factor Extent Extent of HuQ Issue Extent of each factor Factors resulting in the extent 14 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

Conclusions HuQ issues are like other Q issues Perform satisfactorily in service Suitable for intended purposes Meet Q/Q acceptance criteria HuQ issues have logical Lines of Inquiry 15 © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,

16 Questions? © 2010, William R. Corcoran, NSRC Corp., ,