The Cycle of Performance Getting Back on the Path to Excellence Warning Flags/Precursors Palo Verde: A Case Study Frederic Lake Corrective Action Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating SHE Management Systems in Organizations: A case for Business Sustainability Presentation by A. Chimutanda SHAW 7-9 October 2009.
Advertisements

Human Performance: Observation Principles of Excellence
STREAM ANALYSIS Diagnosing Organizational Change Peg Lucky & Tom Kriesel HPRCT 2010.
Excellence in Causal Analysis Establishing the infrastructure to support high quality causal analysis Frederic Lake/Larry Leavitt Palo Verde Nuclear Power.
ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Pat Picariello, Director, Developmental Operations 1 Strategic Planning & New Activity Development.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Strategic Planning & New Activity Development September 2013.
1 DOE Safety Committee Handbook. 2 Effective Safety Committee! Make it work for you!
NERC Reliability Readiness The Next Steps Mitch Needham NERC Readiness Evaluator September 24, 2007.
School Leadership that Works:
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
1 CM HOW-TO DETAILED DISCUSSION. 2 OBJECTIVE n Upon completion of this training you will demonstrate an understanding of how to perform a CM evaluation.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Leadership in Organizations 11-1 Chapter 11 Leadership in Teams and Decision Groups.
INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
Rapid Performance Analysis Results and Solutions 1 “List the Desired State or Goal Statement”
Change Management: How To Achieve A Culture Of Safety
1 Component Design Basis Inspection (CDBI) Graydon Strong 6/17/14.
Calvert Cliffs A Case for Change Thomas Trepanier Constellation Energy Nuclear Group Plant General Manager, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant.
SHE Training Series, Atul Limited1 AN INTRODUCTION TO Zero Injury Program.
Why a safety culture matters (Attributes and Issues) Michael Corradini Nuclear Engr. & Engr. Physics University of Wisconsin, Madison WI.
PowerPoint slides by R. Dennis Middlemist Colorado State University Chapter 2 Managing Change.
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Understand What Drives Employee Engagement
Chapter 17: Team Building & Training Dr. Patricia McDiarmid.
Industry Nuclear Safety Culture* Process Thomas C. Houghton Director, Safety Focused Regulation Nuclear Energy Institute March 12, 2009 *Nuclear Safety.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
1 Vendor/Contractor Design Performance Xcel Energy – Nuclear Department Adam C. Annis June 26, 2012.
Implementing Total Quality Management
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1 Workshop on the Strategic Planning Model. 2 Strategic Planning Model A B C D E Environmental Scan A ssessment Background Information Situational Analysis.
Regulatory Information Conference (RIC)
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
Integrating Safety Management Systems – Opportunities for Improvement
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Safety Culture (& ISM) Peter S. Winokur Thanks to Matt Moury, Doug Minnema, and Dan Burnfield Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board November 28, 2007.
Organizational Change
NRC Leadership Expectations and Practices for Sustaining a High Performing Organization NRC Commissioner William C. Ostendorff FR/SSO/FS Workshop U.S.
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
ISMS Best Practices Workshop Initial Steps to Integrate HPI into ISMS Continuous Improvement CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. September 12-13, 2006.
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
When Partnering Fails… Gayle Waldron President, The Management Edge.
1 Human Performance in Reactor Safety George E. Apostolakis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Presented at the Quality Colloquium,
1 D D O C U M E N T A T I O N & I N F O R M A T I O N S E R V I C E S 1 Achieving and Maintaining High Reliability through Human Performance.
Presented by Dorian Conger Conger-Elsea, Inc Riveredge Parkway, Suite 740 Atlanta, GA phone fax
Margin Management. PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a.
MGMT 371 Groups and Teams  Group & Team defined, compared  Formal group functions, benefits  Group development  Member roles, norms  Teams and trust.
HR Practices For I/T Success. THIS REPORT PRESENTS I/S HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICE RESEARCH FINDINGS WITH THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVE Understand HR practices.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
ISM Annual Review and Declaration Lessons Learned CH2M HILL Hanford Group John McDonald.
Ch. 9: Groups and Teams  Group & Team defined, compared  Formal group functions  Group development  Member roles, norms  Teams and trust  Self-managed,
Dealing with Leadership Burnout Lesley Telford Collegiate Leadership Coach Sunday, February 12 th,
2006 CMBG Conference Workshop 2: Facilitator: Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
People Priorities Framework
New Supervisors’ Guide To Effective Supervision
Leadership in Groups and Teams Chapter 7. “When building a team, I always search first for people who love to win. If I can’t find any of those, I look.
DOE ISMS Champions – BNL Integrating Safety Culture into ISMS CH2M HILL Hanford Group.
Presented by Dorian Conger General Manager Conger-Elsea, Inc Riveredge Parkway, Suite 740 Atlanta, GA
1. 2 How to Read and “Right” a Causal Factors Analysis Report ISM Workshop – Feedback and Improvement Session B-2 Richard S. Hartley, Ph.D., P.E. November.
International Safety Rating System
Trainer Contact Information Wes Horton, CET, STS – – –
Regulatory Information Conference (RIC)
Utility Corporate Performance
Intentional Leadership
Foundations of an Effective Safety Culture
HPI Leadership and Challenges
Critical Factors in Managing Technology
Results of Design Reviews
2014 Quad States Instructors Summer Conference
Presentation transcript:

The Cycle of Performance Getting Back on the Path to Excellence Warning Flags/Precursors Palo Verde: A Case Study Frederic Lake Corrective Action Program Manager Palo Verde: A Case Study Frederic Lake Corrective Action Program Manager

Potential Stages of Power Plants ABCDE

Coming off a Long Period of Strong Performance Attributes –Mature Culture –Stable Operations –Performance indicators Green –Positive recognition by industry (INPO, Peers) Attributes –Mature Culture –Stable Operations –Performance indicators Green –Positive recognition by industry (INPO, Peers)

Coming off a Long Period of Strong Performance Behaviors –Overconfidence –Believing your own press –Arrogance –Withdrawal –Managers not reinforcing behaviors to set high standards –Managers distracted (external changes, regulatory, major projects) Behaviors –Overconfidence –Believing your own press –Arrogance –Withdrawal –Managers not reinforcing behaviors to set high standards –Managers distracted (external changes, regulatory, major projects)

Unaware Culture Some members may challenge current behaviors but face denial from other members CAP owners may be dealing with poor behaviors Strength of the Culture: –Length of time –Stability of membership –Emotional intensity of past experiences Some members may challenge current behaviors but face denial from other members CAP owners may be dealing with poor behaviors Strength of the Culture: –Length of time –Stability of membership –Emotional intensity of past experiences

Palo Verde…..Early 2000s Plant running well PV recognized as excellent by INPO The place where people come to benchmark Insular Staff Plant running well PV recognized as excellent by INPO The place where people come to benchmark Insular Staff

Mounting Problems… – 2006: –NRC Substantive Cross-Cutting Issues (SCCI) in Human Performance and PI&R –Decreasing Equipment Reliability –Increased Forced Loss Rate –Decreasing Regulatory Confidence 2007 –INPO Evaluation: significant weaknesses in several areas –NRC ROP Column – 2006: –NRC Substantive Cross-Cutting Issues (SCCI) in Human Performance and PI&R –Decreasing Equipment Reliability –Increased Forced Loss Rate –Decreasing Regulatory Confidence 2007 –INPO Evaluation: significant weaknesses in several areas –NRC ROP Column 4

What Problems? Attributes –Increasing emergent issues/equipment failures/Forced Outages –Poor CAP Behaviors/Accountability –Efforts to Turn Performance Overly focused on process/procedure changes

Efforts to Turn Performance Not Successful Using old solutions Cause Analysis fails to correct underlying problems Using old solutions Cause Analysis fails to correct underlying problems The problems that exist today cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them. …Albert Einstein

What Problems? Behaviors –Event significance not recognized –Signs of performance decline rationalized –Teamwork declines; groups become isolated –Training is minimized –Reluctance to challenge each other Behaviors –Event significance not recognized –Signs of performance decline rationalized –Teamwork declines; groups become isolated –Training is minimized –Reluctance to challenge each other

Who me? Attributes –Problems persist –Increasing backlogs –Sub-optimizing –Rapid decline in performance indicators - station is measuring against themselves –Ineffective Evaluations

Who me? Behaviors –Finger pointing; low accountability –Poor CAP support: loopholes Poor closures & resolution CAP vs. real work –Declining CARB performance Poor support High use of alternates Driving down level of participation Behaviors –Finger pointing; low accountability –Poor CAP support: loopholes Poor closures & resolution CAP vs. real work –Declining CARB performance Poor support High use of alternates Driving down level of participation

Interim Measures Metrics showing magnitude of backlogs Outside cause analysis expertise Team established to determine scope and magnitude of issues Comparison of station performance to the industry (Epiphany) Metrics showing magnitude of backlogs Outside cause analysis expertise Team established to determine scope and magnitude of issues Comparison of station performance to the industry (Epiphany)

Communication Message: –Unless we change something bad will happen –Objective is sustained performance; not just getting out of trouble Weekly alignment meetings Executive level CAP message Safety message Relentless repetition………. Message: –Unless we change something bad will happen –Objective is sustained performance; not just getting out of trouble Weekly alignment meetings Executive level CAP message Safety message Relentless repetition……….

Stop the Bleeding Direct and targeted actions to break the culture patterns and stop the declining performance: –Problem definition & triage –Causal analysis to determine underlying drivers and actions –Training using outside expertise in the essential functions of CAP, including causal analysis and CARB –Refining metrics and reinforcing accountability for CAP Direct and targeted actions to break the culture patterns and stop the declining performance: –Problem definition & triage –Causal analysis to determine underlying drivers and actions –Training using outside expertise in the essential functions of CAP, including causal analysis and CARB –Refining metrics and reinforcing accountability for CAP

Safety Nets Increased oversight Closure Review Boards for actions important to the recovery 100% CAP Closure Reviews Increased management control of CAP administrative functions Increased oversight Closure Review Boards for actions important to the recovery 100% CAP Closure Reviews Increased management control of CAP administrative functions

Behaviors Directive Management from Executive Leadership and CAP Program Owner Focus on Specific CAP Behaviors: –Identification of Issues –Causal Analysis Quality –Quality Completion of Corrective Actions Training to close skills and knowledge gaps and to improve performance Directive Management from Executive Leadership and CAP Program Owner Focus on Specific CAP Behaviors: –Identification of Issues –Causal Analysis Quality –Quality Completion of Corrective Actions Training to close skills and knowledge gaps and to improve performance

Evaluate Gaps Team devoted to analyses of performance Results grouped into Fundamental Overall Problem Areas : –Causal analysis performed for each area –Outside expertise –Actions formed the basis for the Site Integrated Improvement Plan (SIIP), and the NRC Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) Team devoted to analyses of performance Results grouped into Fundamental Overall Problem Areas : –Causal analysis performed for each area –Outside expertise –Actions formed the basis for the Site Integrated Improvement Plan (SIIP), and the NRC Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL)

1.Organizational Effectiveness 2.Operational Focus 3.Emergency Preparedness 4.Engineering Programs 5.Design Control / Configuration Management 6.Engineering Technical Rigor 7.Equipment Reliability 8.Industrial Safety 9.Problem Identification & Resolution 10.Procedures / Work Instructions 11.Managing Plant Work Loads 12.Training & Qualification 13.EDG K-1 Relay (White Finding) 14.RAS Event (Yellow Finding) 1.Organizational Effectiveness 2.Operational Focus 3.Emergency Preparedness 4.Engineering Programs 5.Design Control / Configuration Management 6.Engineering Technical Rigor 7.Equipment Reliability 8.Industrial Safety 9.Problem Identification & Resolution 10.Procedures / Work Instructions 11.Managing Plant Work Loads 12.Training & Qualification 13.EDG K-1 Relay (White Finding) 14.RAS Event (Yellow Finding) Cause Analysis

Palo Verde Leadership Model We SAFELY and efficiently generate electricity for the long term

Turning the Tide Attributes –High volume of identification, causal analysis, and reliance on compensatory measures –Station begins to recognize that problem identification and resolution is a behavior; not simply a process –Metrics drive performance –Consistent message to the organization on staying the course

Turning the Tide Behaviors –Leaders start to align around: Need to improve Improvement goals Operational focus –Leaders working down a level and exhibit a directive leadership style –WeBe – some workers take a wait and see attitude (well be here when youre gone) Behaviors –Leaders start to align around: Need to improve Improvement goals Operational focus –Leaders working down a level and exhibit a directive leadership style –WeBe – some workers take a wait and see attitude (well be here when youre gone)

Closing the Gaps Attributes –Overall plant performance improving –Fewer major equipment issues –Performance indicators continue to show improvement –High CAP backlog of conditions and actions, many of which may be no longer necessary

Closing the Gaps Behaviors –Using experience, self-assessment, and benchmarking to improve major processes –Leaders focus on improving accountability which allows for compensatory measures to be replaced by long-term processes –Improved coordination between departments –Some pockets of resistance; however, the gap between high performers and low performers is widening and becoming more evident Behaviors –Using experience, self-assessment, and benchmarking to improve major processes –Leaders focus on improving accountability which allows for compensatory measures to be replaced by long-term processes –Improved coordination between departments –Some pockets of resistance; however, the gap between high performers and low performers is widening and becoming more evident

The Plateau……….. Symptoms: –If you think this is bad…you should have seen it before Actions: –Focus on 3-5 year plans not just the immediate improvement plans –Communication and awareness –Overtly looking for signs of the plateau & continuous challenging Symptoms: –If you think this is bad…you should have seen it before Actions: –Focus on 3-5 year plans not just the immediate improvement plans –Communication and awareness –Overtly looking for signs of the plateau & continuous challenging

Demonstrating Performance Improvement Attributes –Plant operating reliably –Problems identified early and low level trending, analysis, and other performance improvement tools are used –Improved metrics that compare to industry –Involvement with the industry

Demonstrating Performance Improvement Behaviors –Highly accountable organization –Supervisors consistently reinforce expectations –Equipment failures are considered organizational failures –We find and fix our problems Behaviors –Highly accountable organization –Supervisors consistently reinforce expectations –Equipment failures are considered organizational failures –We find and fix our problems

ABCDE Potential Stages of Power Plants

Common Warning Flags & Factors Overconfidence Isolationism Production Priorities –Safety is assumed and not explicitly emphasized –Significance of issues underplayed Operations and Engineering: –Poor application of fundamentals –Erosion of design margins Poor Change Management Defensive Leaders Poor Self-Critical Behaviors Overconfidence Isolationism Production Priorities –Safety is assumed and not explicitly emphasized –Significance of issues underplayed Operations and Engineering: –Poor application of fundamentals –Erosion of design margins Poor Change Management Defensive Leaders Poor Self-Critical Behaviors

Life is 10% what happens to you and 90% how you CHOOSE to react to it! Life is 10% what happens to you and 90% how you CHOOSE to react to it!