Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC 2006- Athens VERIFICATION OF POWER PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVE POWER CONTROL WIND TURBINES IN COMPLEX.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP3 - Energy yield estimation of wind farm clusters DANIEL CABEZÓN CFD Wind Engineer CENER (National Renewable Energy Center of Spain) Support by.
Advertisements

Wind Flow Over Forested Hills: Mean Flow and Turbulence Characteristics CEsA - Centre for Wind Energy and Atmospheric Flows, Portugal J. Lopes da Costa,
Wind Resource Assessment
Wind farm project “Pakline – Ljubusa – Kupres” Sarajevo, 15 March 2011.
Inflow angle and Energy Production Jørgen Højstrup Wind Solutions / Højstrup Wind Energy Power Curve Working Group, Louisville 6 October 2014.
Predicting the yield of small wind turbines in the roof-top urban environment S J Watson, D G Infield and M R Harding Centre for Renewable Energy Systems.
Wake model benchmarking using LiDAR wake measurements of multi MW turbines Stefan Kern, Clarissa Belloni, Christian Aalburg GE Global Research, Munich.
TOWARDS BANKABLE LIDARS - HOW STABLE ARE LIDARS OVER TIME?
Wind Atlas for Egypt: measurements, micro- and mesoscale modelling Niels G. Mortensen, Jake Badger & J. Carsten Hansen Wind Energy Department Risø National.
CEREA – Group « Meteorological Measurements » 15 September METEOROLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER E. Dupont – D. Demengel.
Parameterised turbine performance Power Curve Working Group – Glasgow, 16 December 2014 Stuart Baylis, Matthew Colls, Przemek Marek, Alex Head.
PCWG meeting Louisville CO USA October 2014 Maintenance team MT12-1 Revision of IEC : Wind Turbines – Part 12-1: Power performance measurements.
LiDAR analysis at a site with simple terrain Alex Clerc, Lee Cameron Tuesday 2 nd September
The generics of wind turbine nacelle anemometry
windtest grevenbroich gmbh Wang,Qi Power performance measurement techniques 功率特性测量技术.
Uncertainty in Wind Energy
2-D data discussion Raymond Byrne DKiT, Ireland Maeva Sabre CSTB, France.
8/25/20152 ” وهو الذى أرسل الرياح بشراً بين يدى رحمته ، وأنزلنا من السماء ماءً طهوراً ” الفرقان - 48 And He it is Who sends the winds as heralds of glad.
The Remote Sensing of Winds Student: Paul Behrens Placement and monitoring of wind turbines Supervisor: Stuart Bradley.
Wind Power Analysis Using Non-Standard Statistical Models
© Vattenfall AB Vattenfall Perspective on Wind in Forest Jens Madsen Principal R&D Engineer, Ph.D Vattenfall Research & Development AB.
UK growth in small wind Richard Caldow Field operations manager.
Dynamic thermal rating of power transmission lines related to renewable resources Jiri Hosek Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Prague, Czech Rep.
EWEC 2007 Centre for Renewable Energy Sources Wind Turbine Testing Laboratory WT Load Measurements: A Comparison between Load- Based and Analytical Calibration.
Last update: © Lahmeyer International GmbH Portfolio Effect of Diversified Renewable Energy Sources Gaining benefits from the Portfolio Effect.
UNCERTAINTY The Classical Approach ALAN DERRICK SENIOR TECHNICAL MANAGER September
Improving WAsP predictions in (too) complex terrain
Accounting for tree growth in resource assessment: A case study using the VENTOS code on Kyle wind farm Presenter: Oisin BRADY (VENTEC) Contributors: Anabel.
Wolf-Gerrit Früh Christina Skittides With support from SgurrEnergy Preliminary assessment of wind climate fluctuations and use of Dynamical Systems Theory.
Extrapolation of Extreme Response for Wind Turbines based on Field Measurements Authors: Henrik Stensgaard Toft, Aalborg University, Denmark John Dalsgaard.
Problems related to the use of the existing noise measurement standards when predicting noise from wind turbines and wind farms. Erik Sloth Vestas Niels.
ECE 7800: Renewable Energy Systems
EWEC2007 Milano, 8 May 2007 Extrapolation of extreme loads acc. to IEC Ed.3 in comparison with the physics of real turbine response Dirk Steudel,
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines EWEC2007 Milan, Italy 7-10 May 2007 B. Skaare 1, T. D. Hanson 1, F.G. Nielsen 1, R. Yttervik.
Revision of IEC PT Power performance measurements on electricity producing wind turbines TC88 meeting March 2010 Troels Friis Pedersen.
WINDTEST Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EWEC 2007 Session DT2 Slide No. 1 Comparison of the ZephIR Wind-LiDAR to Classical Cup Measurements On- and Offshore.
Influence of wind characteristics on turbine performance Ioannis Antoniou (1), Rozenn Wagner (1), Søren M. Pedersen (1), Uwe Paulsen (1), Helge A. Madsen.
Wind power Part 2: Resource Assesment San Jose State University FX Rongère February 2009.
A METHODOLOGY FOR ESTIMATING WIND FARM PRODUCTION THROUGH CFD CODES. DESCRIPTION AND VALIDATION Daniel Cabezón, Ignacio Martí CENER, National Renewable.
Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines
Wind Turbine Design Methods
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
Environmental Business Council December 17, 2009
EWEC06 ( , Athens) Numerical Site Calibration on a Complex Terrain and its Application for Wind Turbine Performance Measurements Toshiyuki SANADA.
Renewable Energy Project Analysis Course - Module 1
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Systems: Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms J. Y. Grandidier, Valorem, 180 Rue du Marechal Leclerc, F B ´ Begles,
Experience of Modelling Forested Complex Terrain Peter Stuart, Ian Hunter & Nicola Atkinson 30 th October 2009.
High Meteorology: Wind throughout the boundary-layer
An Overview of the Technology and Economics of Offshore Wind Farms
Performance of wind energy conversion systems. For the efficient planning and successful implementation of any wind power project, an understanding on.
Engineering, Policy, Finance
Upflow correction method EWEA Power Curve Working Group London, 2015 December.
Applied Measurement Technologies State-of-the-art case studies Mike Courtney, Kurt Hansen, Rozenn Wagner, Guillaume Léa DTU Wind Energy Carsten Thomsen,
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
An evaluation of power performance for a small wind turbine in turbulent wind regimes Nicholas J. Ward Ph.D. Student, Energy Engineering Advisor: Dr. Susan.
IEC FDIS 2016 Consensus Analysis Project
Performance verification
Upflow correction method
Cost effective power performance testing with nacelle mounted Lidars
Structural Reliability Aspects in Design of Wind Turbines
Turbulence and Heterogeneous Wind
Power curve loss adjustments at AWS Truepower: a 2016 update
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
P = 0.5  v A Wind Energy Potential 3 P power, Watts
Chengcheng Chen, Tingting Jiang, Genyong Wu
5-beam Avent demonstrator
Engineering, Policy, Finance
Lidar Measurement Accuracy under Complex Wind Flow in Use for Wind Farm Projects Matthieu Boquet, Mehdi Machta, Jean-Marc Thevenoud
Where are the winds?.
Micrositing for Wind Turbines
Presentation transcript:

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens VERIFICATION OF POWER PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVE POWER CONTROL WIND TURBINES IN COMPLEX TERRAIN N. Stefanatos, F. Mouzakis, E. Binopoulos, F. Kokkalidis, P. Papadopoulos Centre for Renewable Energy Sources (CRES) Wind Energy Department Laboratory for Wind Turbine Testing (LWTT)

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Share the experience – respect confidentiality Verification of power performance in complex terrain The Laboratory for Wind Turbine Testing (LWTT) of CRES is a Testing Laboratory accredited by DAP GmbH according to ISO/IEC for wind turbine power performance measurements (and others). Numerous verifications of power curve in complex terrain sites have been successfully completed by CRES-LWTT Valuable experience gathered, but is commercially confidential Lets talk Confidential:  No site names  No wind turbine types  Non-dimensional results

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Method-Standards applied IEC :1998 MEASNET Power Performance Procedure Ver. 3/2000 IEC :2005  requirements regarding instrumentation properties and positioning fulfilled Additional features  Shear profiles measured at reference mast and at wind turbine position Verification of power performance in complex terrain

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens CASE P1 -Pitch controlled -Fairly complex (terrain inclination typical 10%) -Only site calibration and shear results available CASE P2 Pitch controlled Semi-flat terrain (terrain inclination typical 4%) Power curve measurement campaign complete Overview of Cases studied (no photos, sorry..) Verification of power performance in complex terrain

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Overview of Cases studied (no photos, sorry..) Verification of power performance in complex terrain - CASE P3 Pitch controlled Very complex terrain (terrain inclination typical 20% and higher) Power curve measurement campaign complete CASE S6 Stall controlled Extreme complex terrain (terrain inclination typical 40%) Velocity ratios direction and velocity sensitive Power curve measurement campaign complete 5 STALL CONTROL CASES Summary results from 5 older stall controlled cases also included

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Verification of power performance in complex terrain Know your site (1) : Velocity ratios CASE P1 Fairly complex terrain case (10% inclination) Limited dependence of velocity ratios to mean wind speed CASE S6 Extreme complex terrain case (40% inclination) Strong dependence of velocity ratios to mean wind speed

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Know your site (2) : Turbulence Verification of power performance in complex terrain Mean Turbulence levels in complex terrain sites may vary significantly (eg. from 7% to 20%)

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Verification of power performance in complex terrain Know your site (3) : Shear Shear ratio from 0.80 to 0.92 Inverse shear at w/t position for one case

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Verification of power performance in complex terrain Case P2 – Semi flat Terrain inclination: 4% Velocity ratio :1.01 ΔΑΕP=-0.45% Case P3 – Very complex Terrain inclination: 20% Velocity ratio: 1.17 ΔΑΕP=1.78 % Results (1) : The good, the perfect and…

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Verification of power performance in complex terrain Case S6 – Stall, extreme complex Deviations  Velocity dependent site calibration factors  Working sector extended to NON-MEASNET complete direction bins to gain high wind speed bins  Warranted power curve not measured (optimised for site specific air density and wind speed annual distribution) Terrain inclination: up to 40% Velocity ratio:1.03 ΔΑΕP= % Results (2) : … and the stall controlled

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Verification of site calibration – Case S6 -Extreme Conventional site calibration Velocity-dependent s.c Verification of power performance in complex terrain Direction sensitive power curve Verification failed No direction effect on power curve Verification successful

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Verification of power performance in complex terrain Effect of mast base altitude height difference on velocity ratio Small AEP deviation regardless of the Velocity ratio (for 5 stall cases also) Results 3 – Sensitivity analysis (or “stall control can be OK too…)

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Verification of power performance in complex terrain Turbulence intensity : Limited effect Mast distance : No effect (within the IEC limits) Results 4 – Sensitivity analysis (or “stall control can be OK too…)

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens Lets get dimensional again Assume  10 MW wind farm  8 m/s Annual mean wind speed  kWh price : EUROs  10% less AEP  Income lost per year: 200 kEUROs (many times the cost of a power curve verification campaign…) Verification of power performance in complex terrain Terrain inclination: up to 40% Velocity ratio:1.03 ΔΑΕP= %

Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens  Wide variety of flow conditions in complex terrain – not always bad  Current methods adequate to give reliable results even in difficult cases  Extreme cases do exist and require additional attention  Verification and cross-check procedures very important “A power curve verification campaign may prove to be a very good investment” Verification of power performance in complex terrain Conclusions