 Intro, readings, etc.  Theoretical introduction / intro to alternative theories of IR  How international relations differ from domestic politics 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is a State? Differentiating Terms State
Advertisements

Introducing Foreign Policy Analysis
RealPolitik or Power Politics
Major Ideologies of IR Goldstein, Joshua A & Pevehouse, John C. International Relations. 9 th Ed Update. Pearson.
Neo-Realism: a structural theory of IR
Fundamental Question What is the fundamental difference between international politics and those that occur within states? It is the lack of institutions.
The Realist Paradigm- Hans Morgenthau
Realism.
What are the properties of a billiard (or pool or snooker) ball? How do they behave?
What are the issues important for domestic order? 4.
Chapter 5 Power, Conflict, and Policy
Chapter 2: Theories of World Politics
Plan for Today: 1. Wrap-up of points from Sagan & Waltz debate. 2. Evaluation of decisionmaking approaches. 3. Introduction to constructivism.
What is a State? Differentiating Terms Differentiating Terms –State  Max Weber defines it as the organization that maintains a monopoly of violence over.
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
Plan for Today: Domestic Politics & Decisionmaking Approaches 1. Completing democratic peace debate. 2. Evaluating domestic politics as theory. 3. Introduction.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
International Relations
Outline News items Iran nuclear agreement How to prepare for quizzes Main takeaways for today Revisit power from end of last class Structure for comparing.
An enduring logic of conflict in world politics?
International anarchy could be best defined as: Chaos Multilateralism No world government Government by the United Nations No world government.
Social Constructivism
International Relations
Plan for Today: Constructivism 1. Midterm exam format. 2. Continuing introduction to constructivism: what kinds of arguments about norms/ identities? 3.
Social Constructivism
Judicial Decision-making. Legal Model Traditional model of applying “the law” to facts of case Assumes that the law is discoverable Often sufficient for.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 3: Classical Realism.
Plan for Today: Concluding Feminism & Introduction to Human Rights 1. Critiques of feminist theory. 2. Evaluating feminism as IR theory. 3. Identifying.
Chapter 3 Contending Perspectives: How to Think about International Relations Theoretically.
 10 questions  1 minute per question  Quiz ends at 10:10am  If you have any concerns that your I>clicker is not working, get out a piece of paper.
Theories of International Relations - Neo-Realism The Neo-Realist paradigm and comparison with the Classical Realism The Neo-realist conceptualisation.
POSC 2200 – The State, Decision Making and Foreign Policy Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science.
Review for final exam. Structure of essay Your thoughts?
International Security and Peace
Conceptualizing the European Union Conceptualizing the institutional structure of the European Union. The problem: Traditional conceptualizations of the.
SeungJu Kim I Realism  State is the pre-eminent actor in the international system.  Self-help: state must build up its military power to ensure.
Political Concepts An Introduction To Political Theory and Statehood.
©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Thinking Theoretically: Putting.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
Ancient Greece B.C.E..
P LAN FOR T ODAY : 1. Remaining theories’ approaches to globalization: Marxism and feminism. 2. Will international politics fundamentally change in future?
Lecture 1 The Origins of the International State System.
Alternative theories of Small State Studies Máté Szalai Máté Szalai
Liberalism & “Radical” Theories John Lee Department of Political Science Florida State University.
Liberal Approaches to International Relations POL 3080 Approaches to IR.
Security in International Relations Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015.
‘Anarchy is What States Make of It’
Unit 3 Seminar.  You will be getting a break during Unit 4- there are no grade assignments due  The exam that you took for Unit 3 was not graded-I am.
US-China Relations: Should Australia be Worried? Professor Martin Griffiths Dean, School of International Studies Tuesday 26 th May 2015.
21 st Century World Politics Continuity or Change?
James Fitzgerald School of Law and Government Dublin City University
Greek Politics and War. Democracy  Greek demos (people) and kratein rule.  It began around 500 B.C.  In a direct democracy, people vote firsthand on.
Introduction to Political Science (IRE 101) Week 3 Political Theories
Please fill them out. Thanks!
Lecture #2 Alternative Theoretical Perspectives: Constructivism, Marxism, Feminist Theory.
** Emergence of Realism
Lecture 8.1 LIBERALISM A. Alternative to realism
IR in the news Steel/aluminum tariffs and responses to them
What is a State? Differentiating Terms State
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
Lecture 3: Realist Theory of IR
Athenian comedy.
Theories of International Relations
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORY OF IR
International Security and Peace
Introduction How to read for this class Plagiarism Office hours today
IR School of Thought: Constructivism
Authority and Government
Lecture 3: Realist Theory of IR
Presentation transcript:

 Intro, readings, etc.  Theoretical introduction / intro to alternative theories of IR  How international relations differ from domestic politics  Three levels of causes / three levels of analysis  Causes of the Peloponnesian War  Power – ◦ 2 meanings ◦ Paradox of unrealized power

 Anarchy  Self-help system  Law not enforceable  Weaker sense of community and shared norms

International Relations Feminist theory Realism Institutionalism

International Relations Feminist theory Realism Institutionalism

 Deep (or ultimate) causes ◦ "logs" ◦ System structure, anarchy, power of actors  Intermediate causes ◦ "kindling" ◦ specific policies, structure of decision-making  Proximate: ◦ "matches" ◦ mistakes, actions of individuals, etc.

 Systemic level: system and structure ◦ anarchy, balance of power, polarity  State level: qualities of states ◦ democracy/dictatorship, capitalist/communist  Individual level: ◦ traits/decisions of specific people

 Realism  Institutionalism  Feminist theories  Constructivism – important but not covered in this class  6 tenets of each – theory matrix on Blackboard ◦ Focus ◦ Actors ◦ Goals ◦ Means ◦ Organizing Principle ◦ Dynamics

 Deep causes – structure and dist’n of power ◦ “growth of Athenian power and the fear which this caused in Sparta”  Intermediate causes ◦ Historical animosity of Athens and Sparta ◦ Political structure that gave women little voice (Lysistrata)  Proximate causes ◦ Getting involved in Epidamnus and Potidaea ◦ Misperceptions/misjudgments of other side

 Control of resources: ◦ Tangible and intangible resources provide potential to wield influence  Influence over outcomes: ◦ Ability of one nation to make another nation do things they would not otherwise do.

 Relational ◦ "Power over whom?" ◦ Whether state has power depends on comparison to another state  Situational ◦ "Power to do what?“ ◦ Whether state has power depends on what “powerful” state wants “weak” state to do

 The paradox: sometimes powerful states are not powerful ◦ States with lots of resources (1 st sense) can … ◦ fail to wield influence over others (2 nd sense)  Usually, there is no paradox (21 of 30 wars won by country with larger military

 Three levels of causation: deep, intermediate, proximate  Three levels of analysis: structure, state, individual  Applying levels to Peloponnesian War case  Two meanings of power: resources/influence  Two aspects of power: relational/situational  Paradox of unrealized power: strong don’t always influence the weak