Arizona Institutions of Higher Education (AZIHE) Network Statewide Online AOD Survey Melissa McGee, Ph.D., MPH University of Arizona AZIHE Network, Chairperson.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

11 Liang Y. Liu, Ph.D. Community Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Section Texas Department of State Health Services

Advertisements

Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.

Healthy People 2020: Preparing for a New Decade Dr. Jeanette Guyton-Krishnan NCHS Data Users Conference August 18, 2010.

National Perspective of Healthy People 2020 Penelope Slade-Sawyer, P.T., M.S.W. HHS Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 18 th Annual Healthy.

Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.

A Comparison of Methods for Estimating Child Maltreatment Rates: Evaluation Approaches for a Child Maltreatment Prevention Initiative.

ROADMAP FOR THE FUTURE Developing the Maine Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan

Logistics Customer Satisfaction Survey Results FY 2007 Logistics FY 2007 Customer Satisfaction.

OUTCOMES part II. OUTCOMES  Two general categories: Institution Centered Outcomes Those outcomes that have more direct benefit to the College than to.

A formalized, multi-sector, county-wide coalition encompassing all of Ingham County to achieve its vision of reducing use and misuse of alcohol, and other.

Strengthening College Alcohol Abuse Prevention Efforts in Arizona Through a Statewide Tri- University Consortium.

 Bridge Builders Creating Collaborations Between Student Affairs and Fundraising Emilie Cravens Dr. April Heiselt Mississippi State University 2012 SACSA.

Knowledge of Emergency Contraception in California Recent Trends and Persistent Disparities May 24, 2005 San Francisco, California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,

Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative Update Meeting September 23, 2004 Bridgeport Holiday Inn.

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 1 Assessment driven planning: The development of a strategic plan to address risky drinking.

Implementing an Online Statewide Survey to Address Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among University Students in Arizona Presenters: Peggy Glider, Ph.D. Jon.

HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.

Community Based Projects to Prevent Underage Drinking Community Based Projects to Prevent Underage Drinking Kathryn Stewart MADD National Board Safety.

Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.

Evaluating NSF Programs

How can we reduce college student drinking? How can we reduce college student drinking? Lessons learned from the Harvard School of Public Health College.

NASPA Conference March 28, 2004 Presented by: Carole W. Middlebrooks University of Georgia.

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.

Florida CSI. History: A two year grant funded by the U.S. Department of Education; Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools Applied 2009 Approved 7/1/2010.

Source: Massachusetts BRFSS Prepared by: Health Survey Program Using the BRFSS to Track Healthy People 2010 Objectives Highlights from the 2004 Massachusetts.

BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.

The Proof is in The Process: Data-Driven Program Implementation Rose Lee Felecia Johnson Tonya Johnson.

[INSERT Your name, title] [INSERT PRESENTATION TITLE]

Koreen Johannessen, MSW Peggy Glider, Ph.D Andrew J. Maghielse, BFA

Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.

Evaluation of the INFluence Program Presented by: Tristan Kirby Intern, Office of Women’s Health Indiana State Department of Health.

Jenny Haubenreiser, MA, FACHA President, ACHA A Comprehensive Approach to College Health in the U.S.

Student Drug Use Survey 2014 Regional Findings 1.

The Spring Branch Coalition of The Coalition of Behavioral Health Services Drug Free Communities Grant Project Director: Dr. Sandy Olson, Ph.D Evaluation.

THE COLLEGE ALCOHOL SURVEY: THE COLLEGE ALCOHOL SURVEY: The national longitudinal survey on alcohol, tobacco, other drug and violence issues at institutions.

March 2015 Inter-American Network for the Prevention of Violence and Crime.

The Indiana Youth Survey Insert Your Name, Title and Organization.

Strategic Planning for the Arts Summary of Online Surveys Buena Vista Conference Center December 16, 2009.

The Illinois Youth Survey Insert Your Name, Title and Organization.

Learn More Indiana’s Partner Updates Susan Tharp Elizabeth Crouch.

Nebraska Collegiate Consortium To Reduce High-Risk Drinking Environmental Scanning NCC Skill Building Workshop April 11, 2006.

1. Exercise Leadership 2. Build Collaborations 3. Choose Evidence-based Programs 4. Use a Strategic Planning Process 5. Evaluate Program 6. Work Toward.

National Alcohol Beverage Control Associations Administrators’ Conference October 26-28, 2008 Gig Robinson Public Information Officer (PIO) and Education.

Step 2. Selecting Strategies that Fit Effective Identify evidence-based strategies that have been shown through research and scientific studies to be.

Privacy, Confidentiality and Data Sharing Committee May 24, 2005.

March 31, 2011 Long-Term Individual & Community Consequences (not an accountability measure) Consumption (Long-term outcomes) Strategies (State required)

Introduction Results Hayley Schultz and Kathleen Nybroten, Ph.D.  Psychology and Sociology  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Hayley Schultz and Kathleen.

Partnership Meeting October 20, 2011 Amanda Deming, M.S Prevention Needs Assessment (PNA) Survey: Data, Trends, and Implications.

Maine Learning Community: Day 2 Selecting Strategies and Implementation March 26, 2007 Maine Office of Substance Abuse (OSA) Northeast Center for Application.

Cultural Competence Considerations [and other alliterations] in International Research IRB 2 Continuing Education March 10, 2015.

 The development of the perinatal assessment tool was a vital precursor leading to the addition of data collection of the perinatal population. Data collected.

J. Aaron Johnson, PhD 1 and J. Paul Seale, MD 2 1 Institute of Public and Preventive Health and Department of Psychology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta,

Barnstable County Regional Substance Abuse Council Updated October 2015 Barnstable County Department of Human Services |

Step 2. Selecting Strategies that Fit Effective Identify evidence-based strategies that have been shown through research and scientific studies to be.

1 New Coordinator Orientation April 9, :00 p.m. (EST)

Training of Process Facilitators 1- Training of Process Facilitators 5-1.

Crystal Reinhart, PhD & Beth Welbes, MSPH Center for Prevention Research and Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Social Norms Theory.

Office of Overseas Programming & Training Support (OPATS) Environment Community Engagement— Environmental Education and the Design for Behavior Change.

Drug Free Sarasota 2014 Annual Report.  Prescription Drug Misuse/Abuse.

Madison MS SPF-SIG Community Survey Findings January 27, 2009.

Promoting Evidence-Based Policymaking by Sharing State Administrative Data Dr. Marty Romitti January 25, 2017.

Partnerships for success (PFS)

Cal Poly Pomona WHERE’S THE PROBLEM

Using Data on Prescription Drug Misuse to Inform Prevention Efforts on Campus: A Panel Discussion Anne McDaniel, PhD, Senior Associate Director, Center.

Using Early Care and Education Administrative Data

FAA Center of Excellence for Technical Training and Human Performance

The Vermont Young Adult Survey: Methods and Some Initial Findings

Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston

Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston

Presentation transcript:

Arizona Institutions of Higher Education (AZIHE) Network Statewide Online AOD Survey Melissa McGee, Ph.D., MPH University of Arizona AZIHE Network, Chairperson

Background Arizona consortium founded in the early 1990s U.S. DOE Safe & Drug Free Schools Coalition Grant AZ affiliate of the AZ/NV/UT region of The Network AZIHE Network’s ongoing challenge

AZIHE Network Strategic Plan State Outcome Activity 4.A. – “Coordinate college AOD surveillance and assessment efforts across the state.” Mission: “…to provide Network member institutions with broad overall AOD-related goals based on the environmental management model and endorsed and promoted by the U.S. DOE and the Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention.”

Launching a Statewide IHE AOD Survey Funding sources PCCHA Dr. Joel Grinolds Grant, regional funds from The Network Goal: To implement a tri-university AOD survey that identifies AOD norms, trends, attitudes, knowledge and efficacy of AOD programming for the majority of Arizona university students. Objective: To collect 1,500 surveys from each university, for a total of 4,500 statewide

Methods Survey development Application for approval from Human Subjects Office Purchase software, domain and host site

Methods (cont.) Request random sample of 6,000 student names and addresses from campus Office of Registration Solicit survey participants Clean data and perform frequency analyses

Arizona College/University AOD Survey Demographics Actual AOD Use Perceived AOD Use Consequences of AOD Use Protective Behaviors Attitudes related to AOD use and relevant issues

Survey Results (N = 4,426) AZ students report lower rates of AOD use than college students nationwide. About a third of students report experiencing negative consequences; most use some type of protective behavior when drinking. Most troubling trends are concentrated among our youngest students – freshmen and students under the age of 21.

Data Supporting Environmental Management Initiatives Support for campus AOD rules and regulations Support for laws and ordinances regarding drinking and driving Support for laws and ordinances maintaining quiet, safe neighborhoods Support for restricting alcohol availability at campus celebration events

Advantages & Disadvantages of Online Surveying Pros Convenient for survey respondent Convenient for survey administrator Convenient for survey evaluator Cons Non-use of university issued account Survey respondent bias