The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practices
Advertisements

Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Analytical Method Development and Validation
Instrumental Analysis
Errors in Chemical Analyses: Assessing the Quality of Results
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall
PHARM 462 PART / /31 Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) VALIDATION of ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS.
World Health Organization
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Pharmaceutical Development Analytical.
Limitations of Analytical Methods l The function of the analyst is to obtain a result as near to the true value as possible by the correct application.
Statistical Concepts (continued) Concepts to cover or review today: –Population parameter –Sample statistics –Mean –Standard deviation –Coefficient of.
Data Handling l Classification of Errors v Systematic v Random.
Quality Assurance.
Validation of Analytical Methods
Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice
Analytical Chemistry Definition: the science of extraction, identification, and quantitation of an unknown sample. Example Applications: Human Genome Project.
Validation of analytical methods
ASEAN GUIDELINES FOR VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
QUALITY CONTROL OF PHYSICO-Chemical METHODS Introduction :Validation توثيق المصدوقية.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Validation of Analytical Methods Used For Bioequivalence.
Chemometrics Method comparison
Quality Assessment 2 Quality Control.
Instrumental Analysis
Validation of Analytical Method
Laboratory Validation of Analytical Methods
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall Lecture 4.
Analytical considerations
Unit 1 Accuracy & Precision.  Data (Singular: datum or “a data point”): The information collected in an experiment. Can be numbers (quantitative) or.
Introduction to Analytical Chemistry Dr M. Abd-Elhakeem Faculty of Biotechnology General Chemistry Lecture 7.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
Biostatistics: Measures of Central Tendency and Variance in Medical Laboratory Settings Module 5 1.
Chapter 5 Errors In Chemical Analyses Mean, arithmetic mean, and average (x) are synonyms for the quantity obtained by dividing the sum of replicate measurements.
Measurement Uncertainty Information in
Lecture 4 Basic Statistics Dr. A.K.M. Shafiqul Islam School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis
Quality Control Lecture 5
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
5. Quality Assurance and Calibration Quality assurance is We do to get the right answer for our purpose. Have Sufficient accuracy and precision to support.
CALIBRATION METHODS. For many analytical techniques, we need to evaluate the response of the unknown sample against the responses of a set of standards.
Chapter 4 Statistics Tools to accept or reject conclusion from experimental measurements Deal with random error only.
1 Exercise 7: Accuracy and precision. 2 Origin of the error : Accuracy and precision Systematic (not random) –bias –impossible to be corrected  accuracy.
RESEARCH & DATA ANALYSIS
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Limit of detection, limit of quantification and limit of blank Elvar Theodorsson.
Lect Eli Solomon M.Sc 1 VALIDATION PRINCIPLES Principles of qualification and validation which are applicable to the manufacture of medicinal.
Quality Control: Analysis Of Data Pawan Angra MS Division of Laboratory Systems Public Health Practice Program Office Centers for Disease Control and.
BME 353 – BIOMEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENT PRINCIPLES.
Industrial Technology Institute Test Method Validation & Verification H.P.P.S.Somasiri Principal Research Scientist / SDD-QAD /QM Industrial Technology.
Chapter 1: Introduction Analytical Chemistry Analytical Chemistry Qualitative analysis Qualitative analysis Quantitative analysis Quantitative analysis.
Quality Control Internal QC External QC. -Monitors a test's method precision and analytical bias. -Preparation of quality control samples and their interpretation.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Lecture 10 ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION IN HPLC AND GC. Lecture 10 – Chromatography, Dr. Rasha Hanafi 1© Dr. Rasha Hanafi, GUC.
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
means to “TO CHECK OR PROVE THE VALIDITY OF” According to FDA – “ The goal of validation is to establish a documented evidence which provides a high degree.
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
World Health Organization
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
Analytical Method Validation
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and Calibration Methods
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION
World Health Organization
Introduction To Medical Technology
Quality Control Lecture 3
▪Internal quality control:
Introduction to Analytical Chemistry
Quality Assessment The goal of laboratory analysis is to provide the accurate, reliable and timeliness result Quality assurance The overall program that.
Presentation transcript:

The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content uniformity 70 to 130 % of the test concentration Dissolution testing +/-20 % over the specified range Impurity1 to 120% of the specification

4. Accuracy and Precision Accuracy: The degree to which an experimental result approaches the true or accepted answer Accuracy – nearness to the truth.

Ways to Describe Accuracy: Error: The difference between the result obtained by a method and the true or accepted value. Absolute Error d = (X – µ) where: X = the experimental result µ = the true result All Methods, except counting, contain errors – don’t know “true” value

Example  Atomic absorption analysis of As +3 and pb +2 in a sample yield the following results As +3 = 600 µg.ml -1 d = 5 µg. ml -1 pb +2 = 9 µg.ml -1 d = 0.3 µg.ml -1 From absolute error As +3 results is less accurate than pb +2 results but is not true as we see from relative error. E rel As +3 = 5/600 x100 =0.83% E rel pb +2 = 0.3/9 x100 = 3.3 % As +3 results is more accurate, although it has larger absolute error.

Several methods of determining accuracy are available: Drug Substance (authentic sample) 1.Application to an analyte of known purity (e.g. reference material); 2.Comparison with those of a second well- characterized procedure, the accuracy of which is stated and/or defined. (Reference methods) Drug Product (formulation) 1.Application to synthetic mixtures of the drug product components to which known quantities of the drug substance to be analyzed have been added; 2.In cases where it is impossible to obtain samples of all drug product components, it may be acceptable either to add known quantities of the analyte to the drug product or to compare the results obtained from a second, well characterized procedure, the accuracy of which is stated and/or defined Impurities (Quantitation) Accuracy must assessed on samples spiked with known amount of impurities

Accuracy should be assessed  Using a minimum of 9 determinations over a minimum of 3 concentration levels covering the specified range (e.g. 3 concentrations /3 replicates each of the total analytical procedure).  Accuracy should be reported as percent recovery

Precision  Precision: The degree to which an experimental result varies from one determination to the next. Precision - reproducibility

Ways to Describe Precision: 1. Absolute Standard Division If the results are normally distributed, 68.3 % of the results can be expected to fall within the range of ± 1 σ of the mean as a result of random error.

2. Relative Standard deviation: 3. Confidence limits We might use this to estimate the probability that the population mean (µ) lies within a certain region centered at

Example A pharmacist determined the % of vitamin C in Rino C Tablets, obtaining the following results, = 15.3 σ = 0.1 n= 4 Calculate the confidence limit of the mean at probability90% and 99% (t =2.353 at 90 % probability and, at probability 99%) Solution µ = 15.3 ± x 0.1/√4 µ = 15.3 ± 0.12 µ = 15.3 ± x 0.1/√4 µ = 15.3 ± 0.29

Repeatability should be assessed using: a)A minimum of 9 determinations covering the specified range for the procedure (e.g. 3 concentrations/3 replicates each) or b)A minimum of 6 determinations at 100% of the test concentration. Recommended Data: The standard deviation, relative standard deviation (coefficient of variation) and confidence interval should be reported for each type of precision investigated.

Chromatogram of the same concentration of Norfloxacin; (a) 5 mg% and the same concentration of Salicylic acid, (d) 2 mg% id at 274 nm.

Method Validation- LOD and LOQ Sensitivity Limit of detection (LOD) – “the lowest content that can be measured with reasonable statistical certainty.” إحصائية معقولة من اليقين Limit of quantitative measurement (LOQ) – “the lowest concentration of an analyte that can be determined with acceptable precision (repeatability) and accuracy under the stated conditions of the test.” How low can you go?

Detection Limit  smallest concentration which can be reported with a specified degree of certainty by a definite, complete analytical procedure.

Methods of determination ( (depending on whether the procedure is a non- instrumental or instrumental.)  Based on: 1.Visual Evaluation 2.Signal-to-Noise 3.The Standard Deviation of the Response and the Slope a)the Standard Deviation of the Blank b)the Calibration Curve

 Based on Visual Evaluation Is determined by the analysis of samples with known concentrations of analyte and by establishing the minimum level at which the analyte can be reliably detected.  Signal-to-Noise Typically 3 times the signal-to-noise (based on standard deviation of the noise) تداخل موجات

 The Standard Deviation of the Response and the Slope The detection limit (DL) may be expressed as: DL = 3.3 σ/S σ = the standard deviation of the response S = the slope of the calibration curve The slope S may be estimated from the calibration curve of the analyte. The estimate of σ may be carried out in a variety of ways, for example: – Based on the Standard Deviation of the Blank – Based on the Calibration Curve

Quantitation limit  The minimum level at which the analyte can be quantified with acceptable accuracy and precision.

 Based on Signal-to-Noise Approach Typically 10 times the signal-to-noise (based on standard deviation of the noise)  Based on the Standard Deviation of the Response and the Slope The quantization limit (QL) may be expressed as: QL = 10σ/ S Where s= the standard deviation of the response S = the slope of the calibration curve The slope S may be estimated from the calibration curve of the analyte.  The slope S may be estimated from the calibration curve of the analyte. The estimate of σ may be carried out in a variety of ways, for example: – Based on the Standard Deviation of the Blank – Based on the Calibration Curve

Robustness  Robustness of an analytical procedure is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small but deliberate variations in method parameters. It should show the reliability during its usage.  Examples of typical variations are: 1. stability of analytical solutions, 2. extraction time. Examples In the case of liquid chromatography, 1.variations of pH in a mobile phase 2.variations in mobile phase composition, 3.different columns (different lots and/or suppliers), 4.temperature, 5.flow rate. In the case of gas-chromatography, examples of typical variations are different columns, temperature, flow rate.

Ruggedness  Ruggedness of an analytical method is the degree of reproducibility of the results obtained by the analysis of the same sample under a variety of normal test conditions. For example different  laboratory,  analysts,  instruments, and  reagents.

System suitability testing The tests are based on the concept that the equipment, electronics, analytical operations and samples to be analyzed constitutes an integral system that can be evaluated as such. ويشكل نظام متكامل يمكن تقييمه على هذا النحو