The Carbon Principles Strictly Private and Confidential.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon Dioxide Emissions Costs and Electricity Resource Planning New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Case No UT March 28, 2007 Presented.
Advertisements

Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International Arbitration International.
March 2009 Emissions Trading in South Africa National Climate Change Summit Emily Tyler.
1 AEP Perspectives on Development and Commercialization of CCS Technology for Natural Gas Power Generation Matt Usher, P.E. Director – New Technology Development.
J U N E J U N E T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
CALPINE March 2, 2004 HARVARD ELECTRICITY POLICY GROUP Natural Gas and Electricity Ron Walter Executive Vice President.
James A. Slutz Assistant Secretary Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy APEC Energy Trade and Investment Roundtable September 30 – October.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Carbon Dioxide Mitigation: The Technology Challenge Richard A. Bradley and Cedric Philibert.
Derek Eaton Division of Technology, Industry & Economics Economics & Trade Branch Geneva, Switzerland “Designing the Green Economy” Centre for International.
Bipartisan Policy Center Energy Project DECEMBER 14, 2011.
Clear Thinking on Nuclear: New Plant Construction Nuclear energy is dependable, affordable, and environmentally sound. Nuclear energy is needed to meet.
Financing new electricity supply in the UK market with carbon abatement constraints Keith Palmer 08 March 2006 AFG.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE 1 Dr. Robert K. Dixon Head, Energy Technology Policy Division International Energy Agency.
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
The Potential for Increased Cooperation on Offshore Wind among the Northeast States Warren Leon, Executive Director.
Michael Eckhart Managing Director Global Head of Environmental Finance Corporate & Investment Banking Citigroup Capital Markets, Inc.
Energy Policy Conundrum Dependence on foreign supplies of oil and natural gas as an “economic” and a “national security” issue Oil shock in 2005 was primarily-demand.
Corporate Overview September Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (the "Company") makes forward-looking statements in this.
The Lodge at Ballantyne Charlotte, North Carolina February 7, 2007 Panel Discussion: The Role of Coal Generation in a World of Greenhouse Gas Regulation.
Enhancing Sustainable Economic Development with Low-Impact Renewable Energy Clean Air Renewable Energy Coalition Andrew Pape-Salmon, Pembina Institute.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Cecilia Tam International Energy Agency Martin Taylor Nuclear Energy Agency The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Energy Future Paris,
Green Banking and MRV 17 November 2010 Takashi Hongo Special Advisor and Head of Environment Finance Engineering Department Japan Bank for International.
International Energy Markets Calvin Kent Ph.D. AAS Marshall University.
RENEWABLE ENERY & BIOMASS COGENERATION TRAINING – KENYA BY LEWIS B. MHANGO.
1 1 CURRENT ENERGY POLICY CHALLENGES. THE 2030 ENERGY AND CLIMATE FRAMEWORK DG Energy, European Commission.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Prague, 7 October.
Potential EESE Board GHG Emission Targets for the NH Climate Action Plan NH EESE Board Goal Team Sub-Committee Friday, October 16, 2009.
Washington’s Electric Cooperatives Our Energy, Our Future: A Dialogue with America Mobilizing co-op consumers to ask their elected representatives tough.
GA Regional UN Conference on Sustainable Development By: Emma Bunting and D’Andra Brown.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
Increasing the Role of Renewable Energy Sources Bill Abolt Chicago District Manager Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. May 10, 2007.
Low carbon scenarios for the UK Energy White Paper Peter G Taylor Presented at “Energy, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change scenarios” June.
The policy and plan on CDM Forum MDP Maroc Marrakech, April Italian Ministry for the Environment and Territory Department for Global Environment,
Renewable Energy: Legal Challenges and Solutions for the Green Economy American Bar Association Renewable Energy: Legal Challenges and Solutions for the.
Combined Heat and Power Workshop Report and Next Steps Power Committee Briefing 7/15/03.
Weathering the Change Action Plan 2 ACT Climate Change Council 8 November 2011.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
A Brave New World Cathy Woollums, SVP, Environmental and Chief Environmental Counsel NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting – June 2, 2014.
The Economics of Climate Change Policy By: Dr. Margo Thorning, Ph.D. Senior Vice President and Chief Economist American Council for Capital Formation Washington,
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
El Gallo Hydroelectricity Project PDD Analysis
Energy Transformation for Green Growth Pathways for Sustainable Energy Security to Power India’s Economic Growth 29 August 2015, Kolkata.
NS4054 Fall Term 2015 North America Energy Trilemma.
Carbon Abatement Technologies – A new Strategy Brian Morris Head Cleaner Fossil Fuel Technologies Unit.
1 Strategic Plan | May Decisions on rates, budgets, investments, programs and services for six years ( ) The Strategic Plan.
Country Partnership Strategy FY12-16 Consultations with Civil Society The World Bank Group June 2, 2011.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
 Cap and Trade Application: Global Warming 6. 2.
1 DRAFT DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Resource Study Discussion Only NPC Demand Task Force – Residential and Commercial Findings & Recommendations January.
Dutch presidency agenda on ensuring industrial competitiveness Erik Janssen, Ministry of Economic Affairs The Netherlands.
Shifting capital to the low-carbon transition Feb Andrea Marandino Sustainable Finance & Corporate Risk Specialist – WWF-UK
Assessing Geopolitical Economics in Securities A panel on the impact of economic and geopolitical forces.
Market Update ASLF 2016 Antonio Blázquez D. Securities Country Manager.
Traversing New Waters: Eight Years Post-Crisis A Panel on the Impact of the Regulatory Tsunami on Securities.
I NSURANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF PRINCIPLES FOR SUSTAINABLE INSURANCE (PSI) OF THE UN ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM FINANCIAL INITIATIVE, AND CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS.
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
Socio-Economic Benefits of Renewable Energy
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
Toronto Waterfront Scan and Environmental Improvement Strategy Project - Economic Opportunity in a Sustainable Waterfront Presentation to the Federation.
UK Climate Policy.
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
BP China Management 120.
India Energy Congress 2013 Sustainable Sources of Energy February 2013.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLY
Renewable Action Plan Update
Presentation transcript:

The Carbon Principles Strictly Private and Confidential

Why? - Help Banks to Finance Power Responsibly The Carbon Principles were developed to allow for the financing of new electric power generation through a responsible and robust process, maximizing reliance on efficiency and renewables and addressing lender and investor concerns around carbon risk while working with sponsors to meet the future power needs of their customers Government policy and proposed legislation in the United States is creating significant uncertainty around potential carbon costs –This uncertainty is increasingly affecting the ability of power developers and utilities to advance coal-based power projects beyond the regulatory approval stage –As a result, project sponsors are losing the coal option, potentially increasing the industry’s dependence on natural gas which is subject to volatile price swings and growing dependence on imported LNG In this environment of tension between carbon uncertainty and the need for a balanced supply portfolio, several leading financial institutions have developed an approach to assessing carbon risk that is both responsible and responsive to the concerns of investors, regulators and other stakeholders –As lenders, our goal is to help our clients provide reliable, low cost power to their customers –As financial institutions we have a duty to indicate potential risks to investors, including carbon risks –We have developed the Carbon Principles as a set of common beliefs among leading banks, environmental groups and power companies that stresses the need for a balanced portfolio of investment options –The adopting banks are committed to applying the Enhanced Diligence Process to applicable transactions to include a review of carbon risks as part of our overall diligence The Principles and Enhanced Diligence creates a robust process to provide greater comfort that project sponsors and their lenders are addressing a wide range of issues around proposed coal plants, including carbon risks

Current Environment is a Legislative Patchwork Numerous states have adopted Renewable Portfolio Standards or Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets, independent of National and Regional initiatives Regional Initiatives Climate Stewardship Act of 2003 (McCain-Lieberman) 2000 levels by 2010 Climate and Economy Insurance Act of 2005 (Bingaman) 2.4% yearly reduction in intensity during ; 2.8% yearly reduction in intensity during Strong Economy and Climate Protection Act of 2006 (Feinstein) discussion draft (3/06) 2006 levels through 2010; 5% yearly reduction during ; 1% yearly reduction during ; 7.25% below current levels in 2020 Clean Air Planning Act of 2006 (Carper) S levels in ; 2001 levels in 2015 CO 2 from electric generation sector. (5/2006) Safe Climate Act of 2006 (Waxman) H.R levels in 2010; 1990 levels in 2020; 80% below 1990 levels in (7/2006) Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act (Jeffords) S levels in 2020; 27% below 1990 by 2030; 53% below 1990 by 2040; 80% below 1990 levels in (7/2006) America’s Climate Security Act (Lieberman, Warner) S % below 2005 levels in 2020; 30% below 2005 by 2030; 50% below 2005 by 2040; 70% below 2005 levels in (10/2007) Proposed National Legislation There is growing expectation of a national climate change policy in the next five years that will limit or tax the release of carbon dioxide by power generators. However, in the interim some regions and state have already advanced their own initiatives to limit CO2 in what could become a patchwork of localized programs.

Carbon Policy Uncertainty Raises Cost Concerns Note: The ppm CO 2 eq stabilization target is similar to the one used in the Stern Review. Stabilization lines for atmospheric CO 2 equivalent concentrations of 450 and 550 pp represent reductions the U.S. would need to achieve in tandem with immediate and significant commitments from all industrialized countries and the eventual cooperation of all major developing country emitters to prevent atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations from exceeding 450ppm or 550 ppm based on the multi-stage scenario used in this study. The Union of Concerned Scientists have prepared a similar analysis, but it targets the lower 450 ppm target. See Figure 3a in Uncertainty around the nature and form of a national program creates concerns about the future level of reductions required and the resulting costs to meet those reductions. Banks can no longer assume a business as usual approach to long term financings in the power industry

A Groundbreaking Collaborative Effort Environmental Advisors Industry Advisors Current Adopters The Carbon Principles are the culmination of a year-long collaborative effort by several leading financial institutions in the power space, in conjunction with their industry clients and leading environmental groups to create a responsible and responsive approach to examining carbon risk

What Are The Carbon Principles? This balanced portfolio includes: Energy Efficiency –The best way to limit CO2 emissions is to not produce them Renewable and low-carbon energy technologies –Renewable energy and low carbon help meet electricity needs while also leveraging American technology and creating jobs Conventional and advanced generation –Conventional or advanced generating facilities will be needed to meet demand, including power from natural gas, coal and nuclear technologies When a client has selected a coal-fired power plant as the best supply options for its customers, the Carbon Principles banks will apply the Enhanced Diligence Process to assess the potential carbon related risks of that investment as part of our overall diligence procedures The Carbon Principles are a common set of beliefs that a balanced portfolio approach is needed in the power industry to meet future needs

When do the Principles Apply? All new construction or expansions of coal-fired power plants with a net increase greater than 200MW Built by investor-owned entities, public or private Located in the United States. It does not apply to non-coal plants, municipal or co-op owned plants at the current time, or plants less than 200MW This would cover approximately 70% of planned new MWs of coal generation in the United States What plants will be covered by the Carbon Principles? In which situations will the adopting financial institutions apply the Enhanced Diligence? Construction of new coal power plant in Illinois, When leading a Project Financing with known use of proceeds When leading a Corporate Financing where the borrower has represented that they have a coal plant under construction or will begin construction within the next six months When will the adopting financial institutions start implementing this process? Within six months of adopting the Carbon Principles

What is the Enhanced Diligence Process? The Enhanced Diligence Process is meant to supplement the due diligence a financial institution would normally engage in during a financing. It is meant to probe deeper into the risks surrounding future carbon policy and evaluate the extent to which these risks have been considered and/or mitigated during the planning stage. The Enhanced Due Diligence Process does NOT: –pre-suppose an outcome, –judge a company’s supply choice, –mandate specific carbon price hurdles, policy assumptions, or technology choices Each financial institution will make its own diligence judgments on any financing in which the Enhanced Diligence Process is employed The Enhanced Due Diligence Process does: Provide lenders with a process by which to evaluate a proposed financing against a range of potential carbon emissions policy assumptions and expected costs Assess the economic viability of proposed financings under a range of carbon price scenarios Encourage consideration of assumptions that err on the side of caution until more clarity around anticipated carbon policies becomes available Examine the strategies of the project sponsor to mitigate these carbon related risks Promote a discussion around a company’s overall supply strategy, including energy efficiency and renewable efforts where applicable

All Documents are Available at: carbonprinciples.org

The Future of the Carbon Principles Recruiting other financial institutions to adopt the Principles Educating our power industry clients on the intent and implications of the Principles Working with municipal clients to lay the groundwork for expanding the Principles to the municipal finance market Ensuring that implementation deadlines are met and sharing best-practices among adoptees Maintaining an ongoing dialogue among the adoptees and the industry and environmental advisors The Next Steps for the Carbon Principles include: