Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
Advertisements

Main project Calls How to Apply Seminar 29th February 2012 – Copenhagen Christopher Parker.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Progress Reporting Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 25th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
CISB444 - Strategic Information Systems Planning
Information and Publicity Requirements Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 24th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE WG PROJECT IDEAS AND INITIATIVES WG3 CREATIVITY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP MEETING BUCHAREST
Axis 3: Diversification of the rural economy and Quality of Life in rural areas Axis 4: The Leader approach DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development
Indicators : Telling the story of European Territorial Cooperation Bologna, 20 June 2013.
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
Application Form – Part C Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Northern Periphery & Arctic Programme How To Apply seminar 20th March 2014 North Atlantic House, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Strategic Commissioning
Result orientation: Telling the story of European Territorial Cooperation Skellefteå, 19 September 2013.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Toolbox CRC programme managers – Dag Kavlie, RCN Analysis of indicators used for CRC Monitoring and Evaluation Ljubljana, 15 September 2009.
The Programme Area What “new” elements in the NPA? A.Stronger focus on change and tangible results B.Higher budget and grant rates C.Simplification measures.
NPP concepts and communications Kirsti Mijnhijmer 21 August 2008 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Objectives, Priorities and Concepts. OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Operational Programme outlines the framework, strategy and management of the programme for.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 21 st April 2010 – Portrush, Northern Ireland Teresa Lennon and Michael O’Brien European Union European.
Quality Objectives Kirsti Mijnhijmer 20th March Copenhagen, Denmark.
Partnership Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Strategic project Call and themes for the Seventh Call How to Apply Seminar 16 th February 2011 – Copenhagen Christopher Parker.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
1 Energy Efficient Buildings PPP: Results and outlook from an industry perspective On behalf Stefano Carosio D’Appolonia SpA/E2BA Coordinator EeB PPP AIAG.
Project Call Information Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat 30th September 2015, Kuopio, Finland.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 20 th January 2011, Friars Carse Hotel, Dumfries, Scotland Rachel Burn.
APPROVED by the Commission 16 th December The structure The Programme Area The Programme Strategy The Priorities Financing and Implementation.
Improving Outcome Measurement Scottish Annual Statistics Users Conference 29/10/09 Dr Mark McAteer Director of Governance & Performance Management.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Project Call Information Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015 Copenhagen, Denmark.
NPA Application Section A Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Danube Transnational Programme – opportunities for cooperation Bucharest
2014 – 2015, a busy year 30 th September launch of 1 st Call 16 th December Programme approved by Commission Launch of 2 nd Call 5th January 1st Call.
PROGRAMME STATUS Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 30th September - Kuopio, Finland.
Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme 2014 – 2020 Ole Damsgaard.
NPP concepts Kirsti Mijnhijmer 2nd September 2008 – Umeå, Sweden European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Results Focus & Partnership Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 1st October 2014, Strathpeffer, Scotland.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
General overview Ole Damsgaard Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme How to apply seminar 20 th March 2014.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.
The Cool North  The Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme aims to expand regions’ horizons, building on concrete outcomes and enabling the.
4th Call Information Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat 1st June 2016, Cork, Ireland.
Open Days 2015 “Interreg Europe: how can Investment for Growth and Jobs programmes benefit? October 15 th, 2015 / Brussels Managing Authority testimony:
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 17 th June 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European Regional.
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat April 20th, 2016 – Faroe Islands.
Cronfeydd yr UE: Buddsoddi yng Nghymru EU Funds: Investing in Wales European Funding and Collaboration for Health and Wellbeing in Wales 8 & 9 February.
20th September – 28th February
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING
Danube Transnational Programme DTP First Call for Proposal and beyond
Introduction - Final activity reporting
The EU context for future funding in Scotland John Bachtler The Future of EU Funding in Scotland European Parliament Seminar Grand Central Hotel, Glasgow,
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
Application Form – Part C
Danube Transnational Programme Marius V. Niculae Project Officer
5th Call Information Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat
6th Call Information Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
General overview Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
5th Call Information Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat
General overview Ole Damsgaard, Joint Secretariat
Project intervention logic
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark

Some terminology  Result: what is intended to be changed in the programme area  Outputs: direct products of the programme, intended to contribute to results. They are mainly developed at project level (products/services).  Results orientation: for the period, the focus is shifting from only measuring outputs (products/services) to measuring the results that they contribute to (change in the programme area).

Intervention logic 1 Programme Area specific challenges and opportunities 2 Selected interventions 3 Tangible results or solutions => Measurable changes at Programme Area level

Intervention logic at programme level  Vision: what does the programme want to achieve  Thematic objectives: 4 themes form the basis for the 4 priorities  Specific objectives: how the programme plans to meet the vision  Results sought: what changes the programme wishes to see, e.g.  raised awareness, improved entrepreneurial climate, raised preparedness  Result indicators: how the changes will be measured  Actions supported: examples of interventions to help achieve the results sought, including examples of target groups and partners  Output indicators: quantifying the outputs that are developed  Performance framework: accountability for outputs, finances

What does it mean for projects?  Project result: what change does the project hope to achieve?  Qualitative contribution to programme result indicators (neutral/positive)  Project objectives: how will the project achieve its chosen result?  Project outputs: products/services, i.e. the solutions to meet the chosen objectives and result  Quantitative contribution to output indicators  Deliverable: by-product in developing the main outputs  Budget and spending target  Contribution to the programme financial targets

Quality Objectives - Purpose  Bridge the gap between the project outputs and programme results  Indicate the type of projects the programme aims to support; those delivering meaningful change.  Form a reference point for evaluating project applications – basis for selection critearia Change in programme area (results) Quality objectives Products & services (outputs)

Quality Objectives  Concrete  Innovative  Focused  Relevant  Responsible  Viable  Transnational  Strategic  Value-for-money

Quality Objectives  Concrete  Innovative  Focused  Relevant  Responsible  Viable  Transnational  Strategic  Value-for-money

Quality Objectives – Innovative, Relevant  Innovative: the project output is new or innovative to the partner organisations, the partner countries involved, or the Programme area.  Relevant: Project outputs take into account relevant conditions in each part of the project’s target area. This means that the project outcomes:  Demonstrate a high relevance for the development needs and opportunities in the target area.  Take into account the current situation for the sector/each part of the target area.  Demand-driven: The development of project outputs is based on demonstrable stakeholder demand and include stakeholder involvement (interface)

Quality Objectives – Viable, Transnational  Viable: project outputs are supported by appropriate business and dissemination models that allow the project output to become self-sustaining when the project support ends.  Marketing plans for the project output to reach identified relevant target groups. Note: branding should focus on project outcomes, not the project.  Realistic provision/delivery models. For example, ensuring that that the project output is delivered by organisations with the right competences, and well integrated, etc.  Transnational: the design of project outputs clearly draws on the results of transnational cooperation.  E.g. transferring models/knowledge/technology from one region to another, partners complementing each others’ competences and resources, combining different regional skill sets, gaining a critical mass, etc.

Result indicators – Programme level Specific Objective Result Indicator Priority axis 1 - Innovation 1.1Degree of collaborations between SMEs and R&D 1.2 Awareness and attitudes among health professionals towards the use of eHealth technologies. Priority axis 2 – Entrepreneurship 2.1Conditions for start-ups in remote, sparsely populated areas 2.2Awareness of business opportunities beyond local markets among SMEs Priority axis 3 – Renewables and energy efficiency 3 Awareness of energy efficiency opportunities and renewable solutions in housing sector and public infrastructures in remote and sparsely populated areas Priority axis 4 – Protecting, developing and promoting natural and cultural heritage 4Preparedness of responsible authorities in remote and sparsely populated areas for environmental management in relation to climate change and impacts of new investments in exploitation of natural resources

Output indicators – Project level TypeOutput Indicator Measurement unit Common indicators Number of enterprises receiving supportEnterprises Number of enterprises cooperating with research institutionsEnterprises Specific indicators Number of product and service opportunities to be developed, based on new or existing R&D Products and services Number of supported SMEs reporting productivity increase in %. (i.e. Increased sales, customer base and increased productivity) SMEs Number of innovative models/solutions addressing viability and low critical mass in public service provision Collaborations Number of innovative technology-driven solutions for public service provision in remote areas Services Example Priority Axis 1

Thank you for listening!  Kirsti Mijnhijmer Joint Secretariat Tel.: periphery.eu 