Week 4 – Getting Ready for Online Survey or School ‘snapshot’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Six Core Principles of a Professional Learning Community
When Students Can’t Read…
A Guide to Implementation
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Effective Management of Teaching and Learning
Working group A The contribution of Global Education to Education for Sustainable Development.
IB- PYP Presentation September 11, 2014.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Having clarity about our students’ strengths allows us to make thoughtful decisions about what we need to teach in a given year and keeps focused on specific.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
0 Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits This sample lesson and accompanying documentation are.
Towards STEM fluency A cross-curricular Key Stage 3 project.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Overview  Continuing the Journey to 85:5/16  Celebrating Accomplishments  Invitational Education  Culture & Diversity  Teacher & Principal Evaluation.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Ricki Sabia, JD edCount, LLC Senior Associate and NCSC Technical Assistance and Parent Training Specialist Universal Design for Learning: Working to Create.
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Hertfordshire PE conference Headteacher workshop – ‘Primary PE and School Sport Premium: Evidence & Impact’
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Principles of Assessment
School Innovation in Science Formerly Science in Schools An overview of the SIS Model & supporting research Russell Tytler Faculty of Education, Deakin.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
1 CCR Conference Summer 2014 Building Capacity of Content Teachers through A Comprehensive Literacy Initiative.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) Professional Development Clusters 2010–2012.
Launching a great year! NWP SEED Grant NWP Core Principles Teachers at every level—from kindergarten through college—are the agents of reform. Writing.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
A Quick Guide to the Characteristics of Highly Performing Schools Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education (2014) produced for Teach First.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Music and Dance Back to School In-Service: Towards Performance Readiness District Learning Day Colonial Middle School 8:00 – 3:00 August 5, 2015.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Developing Common Course Syllabi November 20, 2010 Heather Sass, Education Consultant Preview.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Identifying Assessments
Principles of High-Quality Professional Development Dean Richards January 15, 2009.
A Deep Dive into the Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Nevada STEM Program Recognition Rubric K-12 Program Definitions Exploratory The Exploratory STEM program describes a school program that has intermittent.
TEMPUS IV MASTS Master curriculum design workshop in Nis Subject Teacher Education Master Programme at University of Belgrade.
Curricular Design and Academic Expectations
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Delete this text and type team members’ names
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
UNITED Protocol Matt Schneider Delete this text and Type Team Name
UNITED Protocol Geo2nd Floor Delete this text and Type Team Name
Presentation transcript:

Week 4 – Getting Ready for Online Survey or School ‘snapshot’

Domain Community Parents Leadership School Vision Team Building Professional Development Professional Development Time Management Cycle Organization Pedagogy Evaluation Technology Click on one of the topics to go directly to the topic. Or use navigation guide below to navigate:

Community Sees School as the place where learning occurs Is aware of the shared responsibility for learning Occasionally visible in schools offering help and expertise, participating in extracurricular activities Visible participates in school based learning activities and in community based learning activities Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

Parents  Have an “arms-length” involvement in pedagogy  Regularly informed about pedagogical direction  Asks to contribute to some decision making around on pedagogical decisions  Actively engaged in pedagogical decisions.  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

Leadership  Principal makes decisions and occasionally consults  Decisions are reached by vote and /or consensus  Leadership is occasionally shared in various areas  Teachers and community take ownership of change.  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

School Vision  Goals are established without vision-making  Vision-making has some impact on setting goals  Shared visions used in establishing many goals  A shared vision drives all activities in the school.  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

Team Building  Teachers work individually most of the time  Teachers work in teams but not within the classroom  Teachers work effectively in small interdisciplinary or cycle teams.  Everyone is part of a team, sharing and planning tasks, involved in the realization of shared goals and vision.  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

Professional Devleopment  Expertise and decision making around PD comes from outside the school  Some use of in-house expertise and some internal decision making in PD  Teachers personal professional growth contributes to strengthening the shared internal expertise; which is supported by external expertise.  Teachers’ personally directed professional expertise and strategic use of external expertise aligns with the needs and vision of the school.  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

Time Management  No time for teamwork is built into workloads  Funding grants are used to create team time  Most team time is built into workloads  Teams contribute to shared strategic decision making around their own time and workloads.  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

Cycle Organization  Teachers teach students by single grade levels  Teaching in teams with various groupings.  One teacher stays with a group for two years  Cycle team manages all students in that cycle.  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

Pedagogy Learning is organized around disciplinary content, is teacher focused and program driven. Some learning is may be integrated across disciplines and may “touch on” the cross curricular competencies or is linked to a focus drawn from the broad areas of learning. Learning is often organized around student inquiry; the teacher relates the learning to the broad area of learning throughout the process; the teacher aims explicitly at the development of cross curricular and subject specific competencies. It is the shared responsibility of a team of teachers. Learning is driven by student inquiry, which arises from the focuses of development of the Broad Areas of Learning; teacher teams share the responsibility of promoting the aims of the QEP through explicit development of cross-curricular and subject area competencies.  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

Evaluation  End-of-grade tests defined by disciplinary content and objectives  Use of some complex tasks in some discipline; use of some descriptive tools and tools allowing for observation, however criteria are not drawn from the program.  Use of a range of tools and methods (portfolios, complex tasks) in all disciplines; pertinent evaluation criteria are drawn from the program. Use of observation and descriptive tools; use of portfolios and complex situations integrating multiples competencies. All criteria are pertinent and are drawn from the program, stated in observable terms; students are active in the process.  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP

Technology  Taught as a set of skills to be mastered.  Occasionally built into learning activities  Regularly integrated into learning situations  Used as a continuous resource within class  Does NOT incorporate principles of the QEP  Demonstrates Understanding of SOME of the principles of QEP  Understands and incorporates MANY principles of the QEP  Toward FULL integration of the principles of QEP