WORKSHOP 10 October 2011 David F. Murphy Stuart Reid The Partnering Initiative www.ThePartneringInitiative.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do we need a GN of NGOs? Yes! (as far as participation in the GN does not reduce/affect involvement in the GP/DRR) The GN should build on existing networks.
Advertisements

CSO/NGO Consultations Report to IATI Signatories, Partner Countries and Steering Committee Paris, 4 July 2011.
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.
Leicestershires Vision for short break transformation Leicestershire is committed to the transformation and expansion of short break services for disabled.
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Developing an Evaluation Strategy – experience in DFID Nick York Director – Country, Corporate and Global Evaluations, World Bank IEG Former Chief Professional.
Independent External Evaluation of UNESCO Presentation to Joint Meeting of the PX and FA Commissions.
Best practice partnership models
NORTHERN TERRITORY TREASURY Performance Development Framework (PDF) Review 2003 Original Treasury PDF Implemented 2009 November reviewed.
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
AfDB / IFAD Joint Evaluation of Agriculture & Rural Development in Africa: A Review of Partnerships Benchmark Review and Evaluation Template (odcp consult,
ORGANISED LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA (SALGA) PRESENTATION TO CNM Scope of the relationships between local governments of IBSA July 2009.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Lessons Learned for Strong Project Delivery & Reporting Sheelagh O’Reilly, Kristin Olsen IODPARC Independent Assessors for the Scottish Government IDF.
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
" ICT SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSALISATION OF SECONDARY EDUCATION“ Ashish Garg Asia Regional Coordinator Global eSchools and Communities Initiative 27 th May 2009,
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
‘Approaches to programme planning and budgeting’ Experience of Regional Centre for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in South-Eastern Europe.
1 Jon Whitfield Agency CEO Head of Government Internal Audit.
Developing International Projects and Collaborations Suzanne Alexander Director, International Office University of Leicester BUTEX winter.
STRENGTHENING the AFRICA ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION NETWORK An AMCEN initiative A framework to support development planning processes and increase access.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
Outcomes of the 16 th Regional Disaster Managers Meeting held from 9 th – 11 th August 2010 Presentation to the Pacific Humanitarian Team Monday 6 th December.
Inter faith strategy Towards a framework for inter faith dialogue and social action Equality and Diversity Forum 12 th March 2007.
Strategic partnerships Elaine Paterson Fund Development Committee Chair and Monjeya ElGhadamsy Committee Member.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
STRATEGIC DIRECTION UPDATE JANUARY THE VISION AND MISSION THE VISION: ENRICHING LIVES AND CREATING SUCCESSFUL FUTURES. THE MISSION: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE.
FLLLEX – Final Evaluation
“Helping business to build an inclusive workplace” A Proposal for Membership of UK Council for Access and Equality.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
IAEVG Quebec June Career Development Benchmarks-Tertiary Programmatic rather than practitioner competencies Compare o UK Matrix standard o AGCAS.
Planned Commission Communication on the role of the Private Sector in Development A contribution to the reflexion on How to Innovate International Cooperation.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
The COPING project has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/ ) under Grant Agreement no Level.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
NSDS DESIGN PROCESS: ROAD MAPS & OTHER PRELIMINARIES Prof. Ben Kiregyera NSDS Workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 9 August 2005.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Partnership Definition and Principles The imprecise nature of the word "partnership" has created confusion in CARE and other organizations. “Partnering.
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
LIFELONG GUIDANCE SYSTEMS: COMMON EUROPEAN REFERENCE TOOLS ELGPN PEER LEARNING ACTIVITY WP2 Prague April 2008 Dr John McCarthy, Director International.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
Creating Innovation through International collaboration Melanie Relton & Helen Kidd, British Council 7 April 2013, Qatar.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
©, Manuel Benito, Paris, Mars 2006 Focusing in the process of building a Virtual Campus as a tool for ODL The experience of the University of the Basque.
Housing with Care and Support. Workforce challenges and solutions.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
CDP-GIZ research project – Paris Workshop Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH André Lammerding, Head of Programme International Water Stewardship.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
W. Schiessl, AGRI E.II.4 Programme management and institutions involved in monitoring and evaluation.
Project Cycle Management
SAI Engagement with External Stakeholders
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
Presentation transcript:

WORKSHOP 10 October 2011 David F. Murphy Stuart Reid The Partnering Initiative

Purpose of the workshop Present and discuss provisional findings and draft deliverables Facilitate a discussion around how various parts of UNESCO could work together to implement and integrate partnering practices Gather additional information to help shape the final version of the project deliverables

Structure of today’s workshop Introduction Presentation of key elements from draft deliverables Open Q & A on the work to date Short break Group Discussion: questions which are critical and where we are seeking more input from you Feedback and discussion from groups Outline of next steps in data collection and analysis Close

Inception Report “Approaches to building and managing partnerships: contributing to a UNESCO partnership strategy”

Draft Policy Framework For Strategic Partnerships (187 EX/17 Part IV) Provides General co-operation principles (para III) Specific criteria for engagement (IV, 8) Checks & assessments (IV, 9) Possible forms of co-operation (V, 11 & 12) An “umbrella statement” of rules for engagement with external partners

Independent External Evaluation Such a (partnership) strategy should aim to support: Civil society and other partners contributing to defining UNESCO’s goals rather than being regarded solely as vehicles for programme delivery; Making UNESCO more accessible and less bureaucratic, especially important for NGOs Renewing networks (e.g. between institutes, programmes, universities and centres of excellence) that can improve UNESCO’s links with scientists, researchers and communities of practice A linked strategy for the “private sector” that recognises and accommodates the diversity of companies, foundations, innovative financing vehicles and public-private partnerships

Independent External Evaluation “Partnerships evolve over time and require appropriate structures and processes. Flexible procedures, creating opportunities for ongoing dialogue and partnership ‘styles of working’ would also facilitate partnership formation and strengthening.”

Not reinventing the wheel……… a lot has been done already – umbrella statement; PS review; agreement templates; etc. don’t want more procedures, you do want practical approaches BUT there have been missed opportunities strategic re-orientation is critical for UNESCO need to confront the challenge of building a ‘partnership culture’

Partnering not partnership Focus on the process rather than the structure:  How you present who you are  How you recognise partnering opportunities  How you work with your partners  How you learn from experience

Our deliverables Good practice guidelines for dealing with external partners Guidance on the identification and development of effective partnerships and partners Tools for building and managing partnerships in each main partner category Key lessons learned from previous and ongoing partnerships Benchmarking of partnership approaches against comparable UN agencies.

Progress to date Review of key UNESCO documentation 19 interviews, 27 staff Online survey launched for all field offices 7 ongoing case studies of selected partnerships Comparative review of partnership practice in 4 major UN agencies

D 1: Good practice guidelines Purpose is to focus attention on UNESCO’s ability to partner effectively Each Guideline has specific recommended Actions that follow from it Cross-cut the material being developed in survey, case studies etc

Guideline 1: Achieve clarity of terminology UNESCO uses a clear working definition of partnership, which is accepted and employed across the organisation UNESCO uses a typology of partnerships, classifying the main types of partnership in which UNESCO engages

Partnership and collaboration  All partnerships are forms of collaboration but not all collaborations are partnerships (and this is absolutely appropriate).

Actions 1.Create a single, concise and clear statement of partnership for UNESCO to use in all documentation and online media 1.Building on the distinctions identified in the Draft Policy Framework (V, 11), create a typology of different kinds of partnership based on the purpose and function of the partnership 1.Provide internal guidance documents and orientation programmes to familiarise staff with new partnership terminology

Guideline 2: Recognise Value UNESCO recognises and clearly communicates the value for partners of working with UNESCO UNESCO recognises and clearly communicates the value of working in partnership with each main category of partner

Actions 1.Write a clear statement of how partnership fits into the achievement of UNESCO’s overall mandate 2.Write a statement of the value that UNESCO brings to any partnership 3.Write a rationale for the way that UNESCO selects and works with partners i.e. its ‘reasons to partner’ for each main category – and the value that partner might bring 4.Encourage staff to make explicit recognition of the value brought to any programme by both external and internal stakeholders

Guideline 3: Decentralise decision-making The balance of responsibility between HQ and the field is re-designed to encourage innovation in partnership The role of Field Offices, Category 1 Institutes and National Commissions in UNESCO partnerships is re- thought to support this process of decentralisation The Approval and Engagement Process for partnership is simplified and streamlined without compromising reputational safeguards

Actions: 1.Explore the potential for decentralising some degree of the partnership engagement and approval process to regional or country offices 1.Consult with National Commissions to consider how they might better support UNESCO (centrally) in identifying strategically advantageous partnerships 1.Consider including a ‘pre-partnership’ stage to acknowledge potential for collaboration before proposals are formally processed

Guideline 4: Build a partnership culture UNESCO is committed to building a culture within the organisation which will generate and support internal cooperation and external partnership UNESCO and its partners integrate learning into their partnerships so that partner organisations both learn from each other, and generate learning that can be shared in their respective organisations

Actions 1.Incorporate monitoring and review of the partnership itself rather than of just the programme outcomes. 1.Integrate the development of partnering skills into staff development and appraisal programmes 1.Encourage peer-peer learning opportunities in partnering practices between different parts of UNESCO

Reflections and Feedback

Group Discusssion 1.How can we re-structure UNESCO’s partnership decision-making & approvals without increasing reputational risk? –How might the different parts of UNESCO be mobilised to support this process? Approaches, roles, responsibilities, etc. 2.What are some of the best opportunities for UNESCO to develop more ambitious partnerships? –Which issues & partners offer the best prospects?

The relationship spectrum TRANSACTIONAL COLLABORATION PARTNERSHIP RELATIONSHIP TRANSACTIONAL RELATIONSHIP  One party defines the programme, which is limited by their own knowledge / experience  Co-generation based on joint knowledge → More appropriate / implementable solutions  One party purchases a service from – or donates to the work of – another  Partners bring together complementary resources → Potential for more innovative solutions

Partnership relationship Transactional relationship Could be solved by one actor with enough resources Intrinsically multi- stakeholder issue The relationship spectrum

Next Steps Integrate feedback from this workshop and from consultation with IOS Complete partnership case studies Collect data from online field survey Complete comparisons with UN agencies Analyse and organise data Produce first draft of final outputs 21 October