George D. Kuh Fall Faculty Conference Arkansas State University August 18, 2010 What Matters to Student Success: Lessons for ASU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HART RESEARCH P e t e r D A S O T E C I Raising The Bar
Advertisements

Association of American Colleges and Universities.
NSSE:RetrospectiveandProspective George Kuh AAC&U General Education and Assessment Conference March 2, 2007.
George D. Kuh 16 th ISL Symposium Durham, England September 2, 2008 High Impact Activities What They Are, What They Are, Why They Work, Who Benefits.
Office of Academic Student Instructional Support -OASIS- -Cheri Tillman, Pat Burns.
The Role of Academic Leadership in Student Success August 21, 2012 Deans and Department Chairs` Dialogue Southern Utah University Charles Schroeder, Consultant.
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Student Engagement at Lutheran Colleges Story Lines from Employers and NSSE in an Era of Accountability George D. Kuh LECNA Destin, FL February 6, 2010.
Connecting Completion and Quality for Student Success Illinois Performance Funding Steering Committee Chicago, IL November 13, 2013 Carol Geary Schneider.
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
1 Student Engagement Retreat: The Sophomore Student November 18, 2011.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Students who are… …engaged in the classroom – pass; …engaged in their academic program - return; …engaged in deep learning – graduate. What constitutes.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
Critical Thinking In Every Classroom Teaching Academy: New Faculty Orientation August 11, 2007.
Student Success Programs Where Retention Theory and Practice Converge Mary Stuart Hunter Houghton Mifflin College Survival National Conference July 12,
Dr. Bettina Shuford, Associate Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs Dr. Amy Gauthier, Senior Associate Director, Housing and Residential Education High Impact.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
What Matters to Student Success: The Promise of High- Impact Practices George D. Kuh RIT Faculty Institute Rochester, NY May 26, 2010.
H. Kent Weldon Annual Conference for Higher Education Debra Humphreys Association of American Colleges & Universities Learning.
Student Success as a University-wide Commitment Faculty Presentation August 25, 2011.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
What Matters to Student Success George D. Kuh Humboldt State Arcata, CA May 18, 2011.
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Assessment of Student Learning Faculty In-service June 5, 2006.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
George D. Kuh U of Maine System March 20, 2007 Strengthening Institutional Responsibility for Student Success: Lessons from NSSE.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
What Matters to Student Success George D. Kuh 4 th Annual Student Success Symposium Conway, AR March 31, 2011.
Debra Humphreys Association of American Colleges & Universities Employment and Market Data and Trends Rethinking Success:
An Overview.  Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U)  Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP)  aacu.org/leap.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
Liberal Education and America’s Promise: Changing the Conversation about Student Success and Institutional Accountability SHEEO—Denver, CO August 2009.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
SHEEO Annual Meeting July 14, 2010 Debra Humphreys Association of American Colleges & Universities Raising the Bar: Employers'
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
Why Are HIP Practices so Important to Students?... Where and how are we accomplishing these at CWU? HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES: Create an environment that helps.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
Closing the Experience Gap March 30, 2017
Student Engagement Data in the UK: Policy and Practice
NSSE Results for Faculty
Promoting Student Success in the First Year of College
High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
The Heart of Student Success
Jeanne Butler, Director Office of Assessment
Presentation transcript:

George D. Kuh Fall Faculty Conference Arkansas State University August 18, 2010 What Matters to Student Success: Lessons for ASU

We all want the same thing—an undergraduate experience that results in high levels of learning and personal development for all students.

Know Your Students “Part of being a good teacher (not all) is knowing that you always have something new to learn about … these particular students at this particular time and their particular set of aspirations, confusions, misconceptions, and ignorance” (Bain, 2004, p.174)

What If…  We imagined what our work would be like using what we know about how students learn…?  And we created optimum learning conditions for all students…?  Then, how would we re-design our programs and practices?  What kinds of teaching and assessment approaches would we use?

Overview Overview  What the world needs now  Why engagement and high- impact practices matter  Implications for ASU

“It’s the Learning, Stupid”

Association of American Colleges and Universities

Narrow Learning is Not Enough: The Essential Learning Outcomes  Knowledge of Human Cultures and the Physical & Natural World  Intellectual and Practical Skills  Personal and Social Responsibility  “Deep” Integrative Learning

Deep, Integrative Learning Deep, Integrative Learning  Attend to the underlying meaning of information as well as content  Integrate and synthesize different ideas, sources of information  Discern patterns in evidence or phenomena  Apply knowledge in different situations  View issues from multiple perspectives

HART RESEARCH P e t e r DASSOTESCIA Raising The Bar Employers’ Views On College Learning In The Wake Of The Economic Downturn Key findings from survey among 302 employers Conducted October 27 – November 17, 2009 for

Raising The Bar – October/November 2009 – Hart Research for 12 Employer expectations of employees have increased % who agree with each statement Our company is asking employees to take on more responsibilities and to use a broader set of skills than in the past Employees are expected to work harder to coordinate with other departments than in the past The challenges employees face within our company are more complex today than they were in the past To succeed in our company, employees need higher levels of learning and knowledge today than they did in the past

Raising The Bar – October/November 2009 – Hart Research for 13 % saying two- and four-year colleges should place MORE emphasis on helping students develop these skills, qualities, capabilities, knowledge Employers’ Top Priorities for Student Learning In College Effective oral/written communication Critical thinking/ analytical reasoning Knowledge/skills applied to real world settings Analyze/solve complex problems Connect choices and actions to ethical decisions Teamwork skills/ ability to collaborate Ability to innovate and be creative Developments in science/technology

Student Engagement What Really Matters in College: Student Engagement Because individual effort and involvement are the critical determinants of college impact, institutions should focus on the ways they can shape their academic, interpersonal, and extracurricular offerings to encourage student engagement. Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005, p. 602

Foundations of Student Engagement Time on task (Tyler, 1930s) Quality of effort (Pace, s) Student involvement (Astin, 1984) Social, academic integration (Tinto,1987, 1993) Good practices in undergraduate education (Chickering & Gamson, 1987) College impact (Pascarella, 1985) Student engagement (Kuh, 1991, 2005)

Student Engagement Trifecta  What students do -- time and energy devoted to educationally purposeful activities  What institutions do -- using effective educational practices to induce students to do the right things  Educationally effective institutions channel student energy toward the right activities

Good Practices in Undergraduate Education (Chickering & Gamson, 1987; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005) Student-faculty contact Student-faculty contact Active learning Active learning Prompt feedback Prompt feedback Time on task Time on task High expectations High expectations Respect for diverse learning styles Respect for diverse learning styles Cooperation among students Cooperation among students

National Survey of Student Engagement Community College Survey of Student Engagement National Survey of Student Engagement (pronounced “nessie”) Community College Survey of Student Engagement (pronounced “cessie”) College student surveys that assess the extent to which students engage in educational practices associated with high levels of learning and development

NSSE & CCSSE Questionnaires Student Behaviors Institutional Actions & Requirements Reactions to College Student Background Information Student Learning & Development

Effective Educational Practices Level of Academic Challenge Active & Collaborative Learning Enriching Educational Experiences SupportiveCampusEnvironment Student- Faculty Interaction

Key findings Key findings

Grades, persistence, student satisfaction, gains across a range of desired outcomes, and engagement go hand in hand

It’s more complicated than this…  Many of the effects of college are “conditional”  Some are compensatory  Some have unusually positive effects

Who’s more engaged? Who’s (on average) more engaged?  Women  Full-time students  Students who live on campus  Students with diversity experiences  Students who start and stay at same school

Who’s more engaged?  Women  Full-time students  Students who live on campus  Students with diversity experiences  Students who start and stay at same school  Students who have done “high- impact” practices

 Integrating ideas or information from various sources  Included diverse perspectives in class discussions/writing  Put together ideas from different courses  Discussed ideas with faculty members outside of class  Discussed ideas with others outside of class  Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Essential Learning Outcome: NSSE Deep/Integrative Learning  Synthesizing & organizing ideas, info., or experiences  Making judgments about the value of information  Applying theories to practical problems or in new situations  Examined the strengths and weaknesses of your own views  Tried to better understand someone else's views  Learned something that changed how you understand an issue

Effects of Participating in High-Impact Activities on Deep/Integrative Learning and Gains

Effects of Participating in High-Impact Activities on Student Engagement

High Impact Activities Increase Odds Students Will: Invest time and effort Invest time and effort Interact with faculty and peers about substantive matters Interact with faculty and peers about substantive matters Experience diversity Experience diversity Get more frequent feedback Get more frequent feedback Reflect & integrate learning Reflect & integrate learning Discover relevance of learning through real-world applications Discover relevance of learning through real-world applications

National Survey of Student Engagement Participation in High-Impact Activities 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Somewhat ImportantImportantVery Important Average Importance Faculty Placed on the Experience Percentage of Seniors Who Did the Experience Learning community Research with a faculty member Service learning

Ponder This Ponder This “If all you ever do is all you’ve ever done, then all you’ll ever get is all you ever got” Texan quoted in T. Friedman, Hot, Flat and Crowded p. 6) Texan quoted in T. Friedman, Hot, Flat and Crowded (2008, p. 6)

Four Step Agenda 1.Make the classroom the locus of community building 2.Use engaging pedagogies campuswide

Engaging Pedagogies and Practices Classroom organization Classroom organization Early and continuing assignments requiring reflection and integration coupled with feedback Early and continuing assignments requiring reflection and integration coupled with feedback Use of peer preceptors/mentors Use of peer preceptors/mentors One minute papers (variations) One minute papers (variations) Case studies Case studies Debates Debates Simulations Simulations Small group problem sets Small group problem sets Others… Others…

3. Put money where it will make a difference to student success “…in professional baseball it still matters less how much you have than how well you spend it”

3. Put money where it will make a difference to student success a. It’s not how much you spend but where a. It’s not how much you spend but where (DEEP study, Delta Cost Project)

Occasional Paper #3 Connecting the Dots Between Learning and Resources Jane V. Wellman With all the talk about the need for more accountability, surprisingly little is known about what kind of resources an institution needs in order to produce a given level of student attainment.

Wellman’s Conclusions  Intentionality matters as much or more than money alone  Spending on instruction and student services pays off in learning, retention and graduation  Excess units cost institutions money, cost students in time and money, and do not get students to the finish line

3. Put money where it will make a difference to student success a. It’s not how much you spend but where a. It’s not how much you spend but where (DEEP study, Delta Cost Project) b. Sunset redundant and ineffective programs c. Invest in “high-impact” activities that contribute to student success c. Invest in “high-impact” and other activities that contribute to student success d. Make work a high-impact activity e. If something works, consider requiring it.

Worth Pondering How do we reach our least engaged students?

4. Cultivate a campus culture that fosters student success  unshakeable focus on student learning (“teach the students we have, not the students we wish we had”)  “get the right people on the bus”  high performance expectations for all  human-scale settings  “positive restlessness”

Positive restlessness  “We know who we are and what we aspire to.”  Confident, responsive, but never quite satisfied…  Self-correcting orientation  Continually question, “are we performing as well as we can?”

What If… create optimum learning conditions for all students…  All ASU faculty and staff effectively used what is known about how students learn to create optimum learning conditions for all students…  Then, how would our instructional approaches, programs and practices change?  What would be the impact on student learning and success?

Last Word  We must embrace the lineage of our students.  Campus cultures do not change easily or willingly.  To foster more student success we must use promising policies and practices more consistently throughout the institution.  Do we have the will to do so?

Questions &Discussion