Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OCCC AtD Meeting, September 16, 2009 Mr. Stuart Harvey 1.
Advertisements

1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2009 Findings.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
LFCC SENSE 09 Data Dave Urso John Milam March 23, 2010.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
Entering Community College Students: Consciously Creating Critical Connections 2012 FYE Conference San Antonio, TX.
Engaging and Retaining New Developmental Education Students CASP Conference Thursday, Oct. 14, :00 – 10:00AM.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement State Center Community College District CCSSE Workshop November 7, 2014.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
TAIR 2007 Using CCSSE Results for Improvement. CCSSE Overview.
Susan Burrow August 17, The Purpose of the QEP Improve student learning in developmental math through active learning and supplemental instruction.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement JIM Meeting Presentation January 20, 2009 Jerome Ward Director, Institutional Research Cochise College.
Strategic Conversation: A Commitment to Student Engagement.
Topic #1 – COMPLETERS (Graduation and Transfer) Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.
Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
ENGAGING STUDENTS, CHALLENGING THE ODDS 2006 SFCC Findings
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement Wyoming Community Colleges Statewide Workshop October 29, 2013.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 C OMMUNITY C OLLEGE S URVEY OF S TUDENT E NGAGEMENT & F ACULTY S URVEY OF S TUDENT E NGAGEMENT RESULTS FOR IVCC (CCSSE AND CCFSSE) Cathy Bangert &
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Most & Least Frequent Activities.
Measuring the impact on student engagement in the redesigned Blended Course using Quality Matters standards. Bill Knapp, Dean of Learning Technologies.
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
North Seattle College All College Meeting
Welcome Back! Spring 2014 Welcome back everyone – hope you had good holidays and are ready to tackle the spring semester. I have a very short presentation.
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Director, Institutional Research
Student Equity Planning August 28, rd Meeting
The Heart of Student Success
Faculty In-Service Week
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings

Overview  CCSSE: What is it?  MVC Cohort & Comparison Groups  Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice  Educational Support  Full-time vs Part-time Students  CCFSSE  Using CCSSE Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE: What is it?  The CCSSE survey instrument captures student engagement as a measure of institutional quality.  Student engagement, or the amount of time and energy that students invest in meaningful educational practices, is the foundation for CCSSE’s work.  Community College Leadership Program at UT- Austin  CCSSE validation research shows that CCSSE is measuring institutional practices and student behaviors that matter Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE: What is it? A Tool for Improvement - CCSSE helps us:  Assess quality in community college education  Identify and learn from good educational practice  Identify areas in which we can improve Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE: MVC Cohort Students  Representative sample of 10% of Spring 2008 credit students  38% - Native language is not English  39% - Fathers are not HS graduates  58% - Major source to pay for college is their own income/savings Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE: Comparison Groups  The 2008 CCSSE Cohort: 343,000 community college students from 585 institutions US and Canada  HSI/HACU Cohort: 16,800 students from 26 community colleges in seven states  Other DCCCD Cohort: 5,600 students from BHC, CVC, ECC, EFC, NLC, & RLC  MVC 2005 Cohort: 496 students Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE 2008 Benchmark Findings

CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice The five CCSSE benchmarks include 38 engagement items from the CCSSE survey:  Reflect many of the most important aspects of the student experience  Practices and behaviors are powerful contributors to effective teaching, learning, student success/retention Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice The five CCSSE benchmarks are:  Active and Collaborative Learning  Student Effort  Academic Challenge  Student-Faculty Interaction  Support for Learners Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Benchmark Score Calculation: 1. Survey items are rescaled so they are all on same scale of 0 to 1 2. Scores for all benchmark items are averaged 3. Standardized so that the national cohort respondents’ scores have a mean of MVC’s benchmark scores are relative to the national cohort Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice CCSSE Mountain View College 2008 Benchmark Scores 50 is the national average Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice MVC 2008 cohort scored higher than the MVC 2005 cohort in:  Active and Collaborative Learning  Academic Challenge  Student-Faculty Interaction MVC 2008 cohort scored higher than the DCCCD, HSI/HACU, and National cohorts in:  Support for Learners Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Active and Collaborative Learning Cohort Comparison Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Active and Collaborative Learning Benchmark CCSSE Items: 4a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 4b. Made a class presentation 4f. Worked with other students on projects during class 4g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Active and Collaborative Learning Benchmark CCSSE Items: (continued) 4h. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 4i. Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course 4r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

CCSSE 2008 Educational Support Findings

Educational Support Services Items that contribute this area include: 9. How much does this college emphasize each of the following? (b, c, d, e, f) 10. How many hours do you spend each week doing the following? (c) 12. How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge & skills in? (h, k, n, o) 13. How often, how satisfied, how important are you with the following services? (a – k) Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Use and Value of Educational Support Services OftenRarely/never Academic advising/planning15%36% Career counseling9% +48% - Job placement assistance2%45% - Peer or other tutoring6%47% Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)15%39% + Child care1%38% Financial aid advising17%39% + Computer lab32%27% + Student organizations5%47% + Transfer credit assistance9%39% Services to students with disabilities 3%34% VeryNot at all Academic advising/planning72% +6% Career counseling62% +16% Job placement assistance38%35% + Peer or other tutoring43% +26% - Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)51% -21% Child care29%52% - Financial aid advising61%24% Computer lab62%14% Student organizations31% +35% - Transfer credit assistance58% +25% Services to students with disabilities 44%40% How OFTEN do you use the following services? How IMPORTANT are the following services? MVC 2008 Results - + = difference of 5 or more percentage points compared to MVC 2005, 3 or more with HSI/HACU or National Cohorts Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Satisfaction with Educational Support Services VeryNot at all Academic advising/planning28% +9% Career counseling20% +15% Job placement assistance7%15% Peer or other tutoring17%11% Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)26% -8% Child care4%12% Financial aid advising23%14% Computer lab43%5% Student organizations11%12% Transfer credit assistance18% +14% Services to students with disabilities 9%10% + How SATISFIED are you with the following services? MVC 2008 Results - + = difference of 5 or more percentage points compared to MVC 2005, 3 or more with HSI/HACU or National Cohorts Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

2008 CCSSE Full-time vs. Part-time Student Findings

Full-time vs Part-time Students Findings In General:  Full-time students are more engaged in their college education experiences than part-time students  Therefore, full-time students’ outcomes are more successful than those of part-time students Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Full-time vs Part-time Students Findings MVC 2008 Findings:  Full-time student average scores on all five benchmarks were 7 – 14 points higher than the average scores of part-time students  Full-time students’ responses were considerably higher than part-time students for all classroom and academic experience items (4. a – u) Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Full-time vs Part-time Students Findings MVC 2008 Benchmark Findings: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Full-time vs Part-time Students Findings MVC 2008 Benchmark Findings: CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice All Students Part- time Full- time 0-29 Credits 30+ Credits Active and Collaborative Learning Student Effort Academic Challenge Student Faculty Interaction Support for Learners Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

2008 CCFSSE Findings

CCFSSE: (Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement)  50 MVC faculty responded (33 FT & 17 PT)  Surveys faculty about their perceptions regarding students’ educational experiences. Results are aligned with CCSSE to allow colleges to contrast student and faculty perceptions.  Surveys faculty about teaching practices, the ways they spend their professional time Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Source: 2008 CCSSE and CCFSSE Cohort data. CCFSSE: A Tale of Two Perspectives National Cohort - Student Engagement: Student and Faculty Views by Benchmark National findings are consistent with MVC CCSSE vs. CCFSSE findings. Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Student and Faculty Perceptions at Mountain View College Examples of College Experience Items (Response of “Often” or “Very Often”) Faculty Responses Student Responses Prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in 26%47% Come to class without completing readings or assignments 44%14% Discuss grades or assignments with you67%45% Receive prompt feedback from you about their performance 94%50% Discuss ideas from their readings or classes with others outside of class 21%51% Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Using CCSSE Results

Understand the Facts  21% of MVC part-time students versus 31% of MVC full-time students say they often or very often talk about career plans with an instructor or advisor.  34% of part-time students versus 27% of full-time students say they never have those conversations. Source: 2008 CCSSE Cohort data. Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Understand the Facts Part-time students are less likely to:  Work with other students on projects during class  Make class presentations  Participate in a community-based project as part of a course Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Using CCSSE To Assess, Inform, and Act 1.Identify key areas (e.g., the areas identified in your strategic plan). 2.Start with the benchmarks. 3.Look at individual survey items. 4.Identify the least engaged student groups. 5.Involve the college community. Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Using CCSSE To Assess, Inform, and Act 6.Design strategies and set targets. 7.Share the data and plans to address them. 8.Track progress by measuring outcomes. 9.Increase efforts that are working. Modify or discontinue those that are not. 10.Repeat. Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results

Conclusion Mountain View College in Spring 2008:  Overall, students are more engaged than they were in Spring 2005  Part-time students are considerably less engaged than full-time students  Overall, students and faculty have different perceptions about student engagement  The most important comparison: where we are now, compared with where we want to be. Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) – MVC Spring 2008 Results