National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Advertisements

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
The Towson University Learning Environment Results of the 2002 National Survey of Student Engagement Linda Suskie, Director Office of Assessment.
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
National Survey of Student Engagement—Technology and Diversity Indicators for Student Success Indiana State University College of Education.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
Student Engagement at the Research University (SERU) at UW: Student Life Student Life Assessment Meeting 02 October 2014 Debbie McGhee.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago Elizabeth Owolabi, Ph.D. Director.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
1 NSSE Columbus State University Program Overview  What do you know about college student engagement?  Why is student engagement important?
IUPUI Council on Retention and Graduation – October 13, 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement Understanding IUPUI Students: National Survey of Student.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
Climate for Minorities at UK A Summary of Various Survey Findings (1997 – 2001)
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
What does “Supportive Campus Environment” mean at a commuter institution? Analysis of a NSSE benchmark Marcia Belcheir Boise State University.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
2013 NSSE Results.
The NJIT Student Experience
Presentation transcript:

National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting

What is the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)? National survey designed to measure institutional quality Used by more than 1100 institutions over time— 557 participated in 2006 Answered by 331,600 students in % responded at BSU—22% of FY students and 35% of seniors BSU is part of the Urban Consortium of schools

This presentation will cover: Benchmark comparisons Out of class activities Perspective-taking and views on diversity Demographic information

Benchmark comparisons

Questions: Do students at BSU experience the same level of academic challenge as students at other institutions? Do students at BSU report the same level of student- faculty interaction as students at other institutions? What percentage of first-year (FY) students report they never had a serious conversation with students of a different race or ethnicity? What percentage of first-year students report that they spend no time on co-curricular activities? Do students perceive that BSU provides the same supportive campus environment as students at other institutions?

Benchmark comparisons Level of academic challenge  Score similar to other institutions, though slightly low for seniors Active and collaborative learning  Score similar to other institutions Student-faculty interaction  Similar to other urban institutions but low compared to national figures for both first-year students and seniors

Enriching educational experiences benchmark

Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity BSU FYNatl FYBSU SrNatl Sr Never24%17%16%13% Some- times 37%34%43%35% Often26% 27% Very often 13%23%14%25%

Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity- URBAN COMPARISONS BSU FYUrban FY BSU SrUrban Sr Never24%17%16%12% Some- times 37%33%43%34% Often26%27% 29% Very often 13%24%14%26%

Had serious conversations with students who are very different in terms of their beliefs (religious, political, personal) BSU FYNatl FYBSU SrNatl Sr Never14%12%10% Some- times 33%34%36%35% Often30%29%33%30% Very often 23%26%20%26%

Had serious conversations with students who are very different in terms of their beliefs (religious, political, personal) – URBAN COMPARISONS BSU FYUrban FY BSU SrUrban Sr Never14% 10%11% Some- times 33% 36%35% Often30%28%33%29% Very often 23%25%20%25%

Plan to do community service or volunteer work BSU FYNatl FYBSU SrNatl Sr Haven’t decided 18%16%10% Do not plan to do 11%8%19%18% Plan to do 35%39%15%14% Done 35%37%56%59%

Plan to do community service or volunteer work – Urban Comparisons BSU FYUrban FY BSU SrUrban Sr Haven’t decided 18%20%10%13% Do not plan to do 11%12%19%22% Plan to do 35%38%15%17% Done 35%30%56%47%

Time spent participating in co- curricular activities Weekly time spent: BSU FYNatl FYBSU SrNatl Sr 0 hrs.68%42%64%47% 1-5 hrs.20%30%23%29% Over 5 hrs. 12%28%13%24%

Time spent participating in co-curricular activities – Urban Comparisons Weekly time spent: BSU FYUrban FY BSU SrUrban Sr 0 hrs.68%64% 65% 1-5 hrs.20%22%23%22% Over 5 hrs. 12%14%13%

Extent contact among students from different backgrounds is emphasized BSU FYNatl FYBSU SrNatl Sr Very little25%15%27%20% Some39%34%39%36% Quite a bit 25%32%27% Very much 11%20%7%16%

Extent contact among students from different backgrounds is emphasized – Urban Comparisons BSU FYUrban FY BSU SrUrban Sr Very little25%18%27%21% Some39%35%39%35% Quite a bit 25%29%27%28% Very much 11%17%7%17%

Supportive campus environment benchmark

Quality of relationships (Average rating on 1-7 scale) Quality with: BSU FYNatl FYBSU SrNatl Sr Other students Faculty Admin- istration

Quality of relationships (Average rating on 1-7 scale) – Urban Comparisons Quality with: BSU FYUrban FY BSU SrUrban Sr Other students Faculty Admin- istration

Extent that BSU provides the support you need to succeed academically BSU FYNatl FYBSU SrNatl Sr Very little9%3%9%5% Some33%23%38%26% Quite a bit 39%45%40%44% Very much 19%29%13%24%

Extent that BSU provides the support you need to succeed academically – Urban Comparisons BSU FYUrban FY BSU SrUrban Sr Very little9%4%9%7% Some33%29%38%31% Quite a bit 39%44%40%42% Very much 19%23%13%20%

Extent that BSU helps you cope with your non-academic responsibilities BSU FYNatl FYBSU SrNatl Sr Very little47%28%51%40% Some34%39%33%37% Quite a bit 15%23%13%16% Very much 5%9%3%7%

Extent that BSU helps you cope with your non-academic responsibilities – Urban Comparisons BSU FYUrban FY BSU SrUrban Sr Very little47%38%51%46% Some34%36%33% Quite a bit 15%19%13%14% Very much 5%8%3%6%

Extent that BSU provides the support you need to thrive socially BSU FYNatl FYBSU SrNatl Sr Very little30%19%37%27% Some42%38%45%40% Quite a bit 21%31%15%24% Very much 6%12%3%9%

Extent that BSU provides the support you need to thrive socially – Urban Comparisons BSU FYUrban FY BSU SrUrban Sr Very little30%27%37%34% Some42%38%45%41% Quite a bit 21%25%15%19% Very much 6%10%3%6%

Recent study looked at Supportive Campus Environment benchmark ratings Do students’ feelings of a sense of community or connectedness also influence their feelings about a supportive campus environment? Does greater discrepancy between students’ “ideal college” perceptions and their experiences at BSU relate to perceptions of a supportive campus environment? What role does stress play? Do students with more stress perceive BSU as less supportive?

Findings from study: Feeling like you belong—that you’re a member of a community was the most important predictor Discrepancies between “ideal” and “actual” experiences also related to Supportive Campus Environment Emotional and time stress, but not physical illness, also played a role

Out of class activities

What percentage report that they: often exercise? spend more than 20 hours per week working at a job off-campus? Spend more than 20 hours per week caring for dependents? Spend some time each week on community service? Spend less than 5 hours per week on campus outside of class?

How much does your institution emphasize attending campus events and activities? Very little –16% of FY and Seniors Some – 33% of FY and 38% of Seniors Quite a bit or very much – 50% of FY and 45% of Seniors Findings similar to other urban institutions but low compared to first year (FY) students nationally

Participation in activities at BSU Cultural eventsExerciseWorship, meditation,etc. FYSrFYSrFYSr Never34%33%21%14%47%39% Some- times 45%48%34%28%19%24% Often15%13%23%25%11%15% Very often 5%7%23%33%23%22%

Percent who spent more than 20 hours per week preparing for class

Percentage of students spending any time working on-campus

Percent who spent more than 20 hours working off-campus

Percent who spent more than 20 hours per week relaxing and socializing

Percent who spent more than 20 hours per week caring for dependents

Percent who spent more than 5 hours commuting per week

Percent who spent some time each week on community service

Percent who spent less than 5 hours on campus outside class

Perspective-taking and Diversity

Questions: What percentage…. often tried to better understand someone else’s views by imagining how an issues looks from her/her perspective? thought that understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds was very important? thought that they had made significant gains in understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds?

Perspective-taking Examined the strengths and weaknesses of your own views on a topic or issue  Never: 6-9%, Often or very often: 51-53% Tried to better understand someone else’s views by imagining how an issue looks from his/her perspective  Never: 4%, Often or very often: 57-67% Learned something that changed the way you understand an issue or concept  Never: 3%, Often or very often: 59-62%

How important is understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds? How much progress have you made? ImportanceGains 1 st YrSenior1 st YrSenior Not/ Very little5%4%25%24% Slight/ Some15%16%36%43% Moderate/ Quite a bit 33%31%25%23% Very much48%49%15%10%

Demographic and other student information

Questions: What percentage of first-year students are first- generation college students? What percentage thought that family commitments would delay their graduation? What percentage thought that financial problems would delay their graduation? What percentage of first-year (FY) students thought that they would graduate in four years?

Age of Freshmen

Race/ethnicity and Gender 56% of both freshmen and seniors are female (similar to urban and national figures) 76% of freshmen are white non-Hispanic (compared to 65% at urban and 69% nationally) 78% of seniors are white non-Hispanic (compared to 68% at urban institutions and 70% nationally) 10% of students preferred not to respond to the race/ethnicity question

Percent who began college at current institution

Living arrangements Living:BSU FY Natl FY BSU Sr Natl Sr On-campus17%59%3%12% Residence – walk to campus 9%7%15%24% Residence – drive to campus 73%33%82%62%

Living arrangements – Urban Comparisons Living:BSU FY Urban FY BSU Sr Urban Sr On-campus17%28%3%4% Residence – walk to campus 9%7%15%10% Residence – drive to campus 73%65%82%86%

Parent’s educational attainment (% with no college experience)

Percent enrolled full-time

Percent who said it was likely that family commitments would delay graduation

Percent who said it was likely that financial problems would delay graduation

How long will it take to complete your bachelor’s degree?