Shaping the Future of Management Education 2013 AACSB Business Accreditation Standards Dan LeClair EVP & Chief Operating Officer Twitter @AACSBdan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Faculty of Health & Social Work Using Credit for Good Curriculum Design Presentation Revisit original objectives Impact of Credit on the Curriculum Who.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Michael Solt, Dean College of Business Administration March 6, 2015
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
College of Business Goals Academic Year Goal 1: Increase Awareness of Academic Programs and Centers Goal 2: Maintain AACSB Accreditation Goal.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
The Accounting Faculty Dilemma CFBSD: Accounting Working Group November 18, 2013 Tim Daus, Sandy Hilton, Tom Scott.
RTPI Education Commission Reported in 2003 Increase the supply of an effective cadre of planners and technical support Recognise the growing global and.
Quality Enhancement and Communications The development and delivery of a research active curriculum will be promoted as a core and high quality activity.
College of Business Spring 2013 Advisory Council Meeting AACSB Standards Update.
AACSB International Accreditation: An Overview
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
1 Forging the Future of Management Education Midwest Business Deans October 12, 2007 Jerry E. Trapnell, EVP & CAO AACSB International.
AACSB Update SBAA Summer Meeting 2014 Robert Reid EVP & Chief Accreditation Officer.
November 29, 2006Management Form Principal’s Task Force: Student Life & Learning Morton J. Mendelson Deputy Provost (Student Life & Learning)
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
2015 Commendations and Citations Information Session.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
PJC Adult High-UWF PDS An Alternative – Professional Development School that depends on community involvement.
SBAA 2009 Annual Meeting Savannah, Georgia November 10, 2009 Contours of Quality: Shaping the Future of Management Education Jerry E. Trapnell EVP & Chief.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International): Process and Experiences Dr. James Simpson Dr. Yeqing Bao College of Business.
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
The UWF Strategic Planning Facilitators Robert Dugan, Jim Hurd, Kyle Marrero, Dottie Minear, Stacie Whinnery, and Josh Finley The University of West Florida.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Robert Hodgkinson, Executive Director, Technical Thought Leadership.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
Student Affairs and Services Creating an environment for learning and service.
Think Academics: Academic Visioning David Marker Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
Planning for Flexible Instruction Proposed integration of FID requirements into CP process Advisory Mtg.
Sustain currency and relevance through scholarship and related activities Scholarly Academics (SA) sustain currency and relevance through professional.
Quality Assurance in UK Higher Education: Reviews and Accreditations Wendy Yip Director, International Development.
1 " BLUEPRINT 20\20” The Future of Fire Service Training & Education in California Fire & Emergency Services Higher Education Conference June 1 – 4, 2007.
EXECUTIVE EDUCATION: EXED INTRODUCTION RABSPP Reaching Across Boundaries to Solve Public Problems To educate and train leaders around the world.
Office of Service Quality
EXECUTIVE EDUCATION: EXED INTRODUCTION RABSPP Reaching Across Boundaries to Solve Public Problems To establish and brand a premier Executive Education,
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
“International Accreditations as Driver of Responsible Management Education” 1st PRME Chapter Meeting Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) April 2016.
Strategic Planning at Appalachian Student Life. Mission Statement The mission of Appalachian State University is to prepare students to lead purposeful.
Doctoral Program Orientation
Principles of Good Governance
Övergripande org. illustration
Strategic direction Chapter 4.
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Planning for People, Processes, Priorities and Progress
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Curriculum and Accreditation
Achieving AACSB Accreditation: Pathway to High Quality Business Education and International Legitimacy by Prof. Dr. Zafar U. Ahmed BBA (New York), MBA.
NJCU College of Education
Teaching Excellence Development Fund
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Quality assurance and curriculum development
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
February 21-22, 2018.
Computer Science Section
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
AACSB Sneak Peek: How the 2020 AACSB Business Standards are Shaping Up
Presentation transcript:

Shaping the Future of Management Education 2013 AACSB Business Accreditation Standards Dan LeClair EVP & Chief Operating Officer Twitter @AACSBdan

The BRC Process 15 Standards 2.5 Years ► 8 April 2013 50,000+ contacts through written communication 5,000+ people involved 1,500+ hours of BRC members’ time in meetings 50+ conferences 30+ cities worldwide 15 Standards

The Standards… Reduces number of standards from 21 to 15 Each is more relevant and less redundant All are holistically and equally important

New Standards Snapshot

Recognizing high-quality and continuous improvement through Four Sections Strategic Management & Innovation Participants Learning and Teaching Academic & Professional Engagement

Eligibility Criteria Demonstrating commitment to Core Values and Guiding Principles A: Ethical Behavior Establishing a fundamental expectation B: Collegiate Environment Advanced level, engagement, and faculty involvement C: Commitment to Corporate and Social Responsibility Fostering responsibility in society Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria Setting and framing the foundation for review D: Accreditation Scope and AACSB Membership Flexibility and choice E: Oversight, Sustainability, and Continuous Improvement Foundations and context for accreditation review F: Policy on Continued Adherence to Standards and Integrity of Submissions to AACSB Consistency and Integrity Eligibility Criteria

Strategic Management & Innovation Standard 1: Mission, Impact, and Innovation Deepening our understanding of mission Standard 2: Intellectual Contributions Impact & Alignment with Mission Beyond counting: valuing the impact and quality of scholarship Standard 3: Financial Strategies and Allocation of Resources Financial strategies to sustain quality and innovation Strategic Management

Participants Standard 4: Student Admissions, Progression, & Career Development Supporting student academic and professional success Standard 5: Faculty Sufficiency & Deployment Ensuring an appropriate level of engaged faculty Standard 6: Faculty Management & Support Enabling the development of highly effective faculty Standard 7: Professional Staff Sufficiency & Deployment Recognizing the increasing importance of professional staff Participants: Students, Faculty, & Professional Staff

Learning and Teaching Standard 8: Curricula Management & Assurance of Learning Giving context to Assurance of Learning Standard 9: Curriculum Content Fostering innovation with flexible guidance and clarified expectations Standard 10: Student Faculty Interactions Articulating a central expectation across teaching/learning models Learning and Teaching

Learning and Teaching Standard 11: Degree Program Educational Level, Structure, & Equivalence Protecting the integrity of accredited degree programs Standard 12: Teaching Effectiveness Developing teaching skills in a changing environment Learning and Teaching

Academic & Professional Engagement Standard 13: Student Academic & Professional Engagement Fostering student involvement in both academic and experiential learning Standard 14: Executive Education Recognizing the growing importance and benefits of executive education Standard 15: Faculty Qualifications & Engagement Elevating scholarship and developing intersections between theory and practice Academic and Professional Engagement

Questions & Discussion

Sustained engagement activities Std 15 Sustained engagement activities Academic (Research/Scholarly) Applied/Practice Initial academic preparation and professional experience Significant professional experience Scholarly Practitioners (SP) Instructional Practitioners (IP) Doctoral degree Scholarly Academics (SA) Practice Academics (PA) SA + PA + SP + IP ≥ 90 percent SA + PA + SP ≥ 60 percent SA ≥ 40 percent