The Comprehensive Walk Through Protocol The Comprehensive Walkthrough Protocol.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
0 Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits This sample lesson and accompanying documentation are.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Observing Learning Helen Bacon and Jan Ridgway Inclusion Support Services.
Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.
Lesson Design Study Suggestions from our text: Leading Lesson Study.
Observing Children: A Tool for Assessment
Presented by Gayle Box, Associate Kentucky Adult Education.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Observations A Mirror of the Classroom. Objectives  Gain specific strategies for communicating with teachers to promote successful teaching and learning.
Improving the quality of talk to support pupil learning.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Collaborative Data Teams
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1 Our Approach to Lesson Study María E. Torres Summer, 2004.
Content Area Reading Strategies Before, During, and After Reading.
Book Study Guidelines Achieving Improvements in Teaching and Learning.
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
GIST “ Helping Students explore tough text, to read and summarize a given text” By: Lindsey Benson.
Improving the quality of talk and questioning to support pupil learning.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
Task Based Learning In your classroom.
1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Marketing UpdateBoard of Directors Meeting – July 2008 Classroom Walkthrough version 3.0 An Introduction to.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
NEASCNEASC Standards Committees Kick-off Today’s Topic: Overview of the NEASC Game Plan and instructions for today’s work.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Lesson Study Presented by: Darliny G. Katz, Instructional Reading Specialist Florida.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE) Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Session 4 Technical Assistance.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 8: Standard 2- Instructional Planning Please sit in groups with teachers NOT from your school.
Intro to Visualizing and Verbalizing Summer 2012.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
The Coaching Cycle: Before, during, after
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
How to Write Lesson Plan Using the Cooperative Group Instructional Model.
How to Write Lesson Plan Using the Project-Based Instructional Model.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
QUADRANT PARTNERS VIDEO SUCCESSFUL COACHING Know contemporary views & standards Model & demonstrate effective instructional behaviors Provide.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Santa Cruz County Office of Education Teaching Algebraic Thinking Professional Development Focus on Lesson Study October 11, 2010.
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
1 Participating in Learning Community to: Present and Give Feedback on QUALITY EVIDENCE required to complete Professional Certification Washington State.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Formative Assessment February Fraction Action.
Simulation 1 – Elementary School Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits.
Exploring Foundational Principle : “Provide assessment and evaluation in mathematics that supports student learning”
FULL DAY SCHEDULE TimeActivity Notes 8:00 – 8:20Opening Session Commons Area 8:20 – 8:30BREAK & Move to Classrooms 8:30 – 9:35Team Introductions & Tuning.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
The Year of Core Instruction
Critical Reading Charting the Text.
Session 6, Writing Performance Task Preparation Guide, Part 2
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region Chris LeMieux
Exploring Foundational Principle :
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

The Comprehensive Walk Through Protocol The Comprehensive Walkthrough Protocol

1.To learn the purposes of the Comprehensive Walkthrough 2.To learn the various types of components 3.To learn how to collect evidence 4.To learn to debrief the evidence 5.To learn to collate the evidence into findings for the Summary Report Goals of this Session

What is a Comprehensive Walk Through A comprehensive visit of a school’s classrooms and other areas by a team of participants, either school-based, external, or both What is a Comprehensive Walkthrough?

Purpose of the Walk Through To determine the school’s strengths and areas for concern in implementing curriculum, instruction and assessment, climate and safety To assess implementation of the SIP Action Sequences and determine whether midcourse corrections are indicated To use the data gathered to focus actions for the school to attain AYP Purposes of the Comprehensive Walkthrough

Team members can use the General Components of the protocol in any classroom to look at: A.Classroom and Learning Environment B.Classroom Instruction and Assessment C.Students’ Learning and Behavior Walkthrough Components: General

The Walk through Formats: Supplementary Team members can use these components individually or together with the Focused Components: A. School Climate and Safety B. Literacy C. Math D. Science E. Special Education F. ESOL/Bilingual Walkthrough Components: Focused

Choose components and team members based on the needs of the school. Conduct any parts of the walkthrough simultaneously or at different times. Components: How and When

Before Conducting a Focused Walkthrough Identify the focus of the walkthrough Review the school’s SIP Action Sequences Review school’s Roster/Schedule Divide the SAT into pairs and assign each pair designated room(s) Review Code of Conduct

During a Focused Walkthrough Upon entering the room, the team members situate themselves in different areas of the room. Make every attempt not to interrupt classroom activity.

Conducting the Walk Through Spend minutes in each classroom. Look at and listen to what is occurring. If indicator is present and implemented, as written, put “Y” (Yes). If indicator is present, but not implemented as written, put “N” (No). Record all evidence while in the classroom. Conducting the Walkthrough

Conducting the Walk Through: Collecting Evidence Record the following types of evidence: Quotes Anecdotes Comments Evidence is crucial data that supports your decisions about indicators. Conducting the Walkthrough: Collecting Evidence

Evidence: Quotes Quotes reflect what you hear teachers, students or other staff say, either by themselves or in exchanges with each other. Examples: “Today, we are going to practice writing an opening sentence for a paragraph.” “Miss Smith, how can I find the ‘percent’ key on this calculator?” “Steven, refer to your notes from yesterday.” Evidence: Quotes

Anecdotes reflect a short summary or retelling of an event that may include quotes or paraphrasing of exchanges. Example: “ Teacher has students at board. They each have a problem to solve using the ‘T-chart’ strategy. Teacher asks each to explain ‘why’ for each step to the rest of the class” Evidence: Anecdotes

Evidence: Comments Comments reflect descriptive details about what the team member sees or hears. Examples: “The teacher is using strategies today that were taught in last month’s Professional Development.” “The objectives for this lesson are aligned with the Planning and Scheduling Timeline.” Evidence: Comments

Debriefing the Evidence At the end of the walkthrough visits, partners meet to discuss findings. All team members discuss findings collectively. The facilitator leads a discussion about the evidence, looking for trends (strengths and areas for improvement), rather than isolated incidents. Debriefing the Evidence

Debriefing Examples After visiting seven classrooms, a participant might summarize, for example: “In five of the seven classrooms, there was evidence that the math curriculum was not being followed.” or “The teacher did not appear to have content knowledge.” Findings from this evidence may prompt the school to seek more professional development for math teachers. Debriefing Examples

The Summary Report The Summary Report is compiled by the facilitator of the walkthrough. The report includes findings based on the accumulated evidence, listed under headings, as “Strengths” and “Areas for Improvement”. Future supports for the school will be determined from the findings in this report. The Summary Report

Your Turn to Practice Attached is a sample lesson for your review. Read through the sample dialogue and record evidence in the form of quotes, anecdotes or comments as though you were conducting a walkthrough in that room. Turn to a partner and debrief your visit. Your Turn to Practice

Questions Concerns “What if ?”