Wed/Thurs January 7/8. Bellringer  Turn in your HW.  Read Coretta Scott King’s speech. Recall yesterday’s journal topic.  Next, pairs reread the speech,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finishing the outline.   How power is gained  Words vs. violence – which is more convincing?  Public speaking and persuasion  Manipulation and politics.
Advertisements

Persuasive Techniques
1.16 Using Rhetorical Appeals (Page 65)
The Tools You Need to Break It Down.  I can analyze a text using elements of the rhetorical web.
Persuasion Rhetoric: The art of persuasion.
Warm Up Go to kahoot.it and get ready for a Caesar plot review quiz.
Section 1 – Analyzing Arguments
1.16 Using Rhetorical Appeals (Page 65)
Speech in the VA Convention
Speech Analysis. As you listen and read along:  Circle unfamiliar words  Underline words or phrases that stand out to you. They may be well- said, creative,
BOOM Word Wall. RHETORICAL ANALYSIS ESSAY An essay where you analyze the author’s argument, looking at the author’s rhetorical appeals and style.
National Council of Teachers of English Dr. Beverly Ann Chin November 21, 2014 Washington, DC.
--- Hephizibah Roskelly and David A. Jolliffee, Everyday Use
Rhetoric : the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
12/8/14 Do Now: - Using the list of rhetorical devices, complete the rhetorical strategies pre- assessment. Homework: - None Content Objective (What):
Wednesday, Thursday 1/21 – 1/22 Bellringer Handout – Class set. Please write in your composition notebooks.
Introduction to Rhetoric
Response Essay Type: Rhetorical Analysis. Rhetoric “the art of speaking or writing effectively” www. merriam-webster.com.
AGE OF REASON – 1760s-1790s. Age of Reason Ojectives/Goals RI 11.1: Cites strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Rhetorical Techniques.  Rhetoric is the art of speaking or writing formally and effectively as a way to persuade or influence people.  Rhetoric improves.
Is Everything an Argument?
Aristotle said rhetoric is useful because “things that are true and things that are just have a natural tendency to prevail over their opposite.” But.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Rhetoric = The Art of Persuasion The history of rhetoric and the concepts of ethos, pathos and logos began in Greece.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
The Declaration of Independence
PERSUASIVE ENGLISH III JANUARY 6 BELLRINGER Write an argument for or against the death penalty. Remember, use pathos, ethos, logos. You have 10 minutes.
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS ESSAY Writing Workshop. Highlight your essay.  Include a “key” to show which colors you will use to indicate the following:  Thesis.
The technique or study of communication and persuasion The art of creating a text using the most appropriate language to help you achieve your desired.
Defining Rhetoric And Understanding the Rhetorical Triangle.
Aristotle’s PeRsuasive Audience appeals. ARISTOTLE In Rhetoric, Aristotle describes three main types of rhetoric: ethos, logos, and pathos. Rhetoric (n)
Argument: Bridge Words. What are Bridge Words? Bridge Words are terms that link what we are reading to the unit objective. For this unit we are reading.
Act III continued (Day 2) The Funeral Speeches. Warm Up & Reminders! Put your phone up & turn your homework (extra credit for 3 rd period) into the tray,
1/13/15 Do Now: -Pass forward your HW (syntax worksheet) -“Turn and Talk” What is the purpose of MLK writing “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”? Homework:
Aristotle’s Triangle: A pictorial analysis of the speaking or writing situation. Speaker Audience Purpose or subject.
Welcome to... A Game of X’s and O’s
LEADING THROUGH WORDS. QUICK WRITE On your paper respond to any of the following questions. You need to continue to write for the whole time provided.
Warm-up Academic Language North: East: West: Discourse Roles North: East: West: TASK: Turn in warmups.
3 Types of Persuasion: Ethos, Logos, Pathos RHETORICAL STRATEGIES: Rhetoric (n) - the art of speaking or writing effectively or persuasively What does.
Day 16 Objectives SWBATD analysis by identifying an author’s implicit and stated assumptions about a subject, based upon evidence in the selection. Language:
The Thesis Statement. What is a thesis statement? A thesis statement is the most important sentence in your paper. A thesis statement tells your readers.
Chapter 4: Writing a Rhetorical Analysis ENG 113: Composition I.
Rhetorical Strategies Lesson #7. Writing Tip #4 – Commas (continued)  Restrictive clauses vs. non-restrictive clauses  Restrictive clauses provide information.
An introduction to RHETORIC adapted from THE LANGUAGE OF COMPOSITION by SHEA, SCANLON and AUFSES.
THE RHETORICAL TRIANGLE: An Approach to Argument.
A Change of Heart About Animals
Unit 2 preparing to write an argument
Introduction to Argumentative Writing
Rhetoric The art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional techniques.
Rhetorical Analysis in Serial.
How writers use language to influence the reader
Text analysis Letter from Birmingham Jail
Introduction to Rhetoric
an introduction to RHETORIC
Speech at the Virginia Convention
RHETORICAL READING Paying attention to the author's purposes for writing and the methods used in the writing.
Persuasive Techniques in Writing
Rhetoric Rhetoric: Using language to persuade..
Introduction to Argumentative Writing
What is Rhetoric? Lesson 1.
Persuasive Techniques in Writing
Rhetorical Appeals ETHOS, PATHOS & LOGOS.
AGE OF REASON – 1760s-1790s.
American Literature.
Rhetorical Devices Round 1.
Argumentation and Persuasion
Rhetoric : the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Journal #5: Intro to Rhetoric
Persuasive devices fall into these 3 categories.
Presentation transcript:

Wed/Thurs January 7/8

Bellringer  Turn in your HW.  Read Coretta Scott King’s speech. Recall yesterday’s journal topic.  Next, pairs reread the speech, filling in terms around the SMART Chart. This activity involves both identifying examples of the rhetorical techniques and associating them with particular appeals (ethos, pathos, or logos).  For example, King says, “Morality is never upheld by legalized murder.” This is an example of using a word with a strong negative connotation (murder) for emotional effect, so you would write “connotation” on one of the spokes near pathos.

 Objectives:  Identify and evaluate the effectiveness of speakers’ use of ethos, pathos, logos, and the rhetorical elements that contribute to them.  Analyze how perspective and purpose influence rhetorical choices and compare the effectiveness of rhetorical strategies in Brutus’s and Marc Antony’s speeches in Act 3, Scene 2 of Julius Caesar  Essential Questions:  How do writers and speakers persuade their audiences to adjust or change their positions?  How does the author’s perspective influence his/her rhetorical choices?  Standards:  RI6: Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text in which the rhetoric is particularly effective, analyzing how style and content contribute to the power, persuasiveness, or beauty of the text.  SL3: Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, assessing the stance, premises, links among ideas, word choice, points of emphasis, and tone used.  L3: Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functions in different contexts, to make effective choices for meaning or style, and to comprehend more fully when reading or listening.

 We will analyze Brutus and Marc Antony’s speeches.  We will start with Brutus.  You will have a group task and an independent task. When you finish with Brutus’s speech, you will do the same with Marc Antony’s speech.

 Synecdoche (Si-neck-da-key): A form of metaphor.  A part of something is used to signify the whole. Also, the reverse can be true where the whole can represent the part.  Canada played in the U.S. hockey finals. In reality, the Canadian team played the U.S. team, not the entire country.)  Another from involves the container representing the thing being contained.  The pot is boiling. (In reality, the pot isn’t boiling, just the water in the pot.)  Also, it can involve the material form which an object is made standing for the object.  The quarterback tossed the pigskin. (The football is made of pigskin)  Claim/Counterclaim  Irony/Sarcasm (Tone)  Repetition  Parallel structure  Rhetorical questions

With a partner  Listen  Then, reread with small group and note the ethos, pathos, logos.  1. Highlight the elements with different colors to distinguish between them. (for example, yellow for ethos, green for pathos, etc.)  2. Circle the repeated words (repetition that helps create tone)  3. Underline the claim/counterclaim  4. Draw squiggles under examples of irony  5. Write question marks on the rhetorical questions Independently  After completing the task with the group, you are now working independently:  Write a paragraph:  Evaluate the effectiveness of the rhetorical elements Brutus uses to justify his claim. YOU MUST use specific examples. If you were in the crowd, would his speech persuade you to support his position?

 After Brutus speaks, Marc Antony and others bring in Caesar’s body. Brutus tells the crowd that he and other conspirators have given Marc Antony permission to deliver Caesar’s eulogy.

With a partner  Listen  Then, reread with small group and note the ethos, pathos, logos.  Highlight the elements with different colors to distinguish between them. (for example, yellow for ethos, green for pathos, etc.)  Circle the repeated words (repetition that helps create tone)  Underline the claim/counterclaim  Draw squiggles under synecdoche  Write question marks on the rhetorical questions Independently  After completing the task with the group, you are now working independently:  Write a paragraph in which you evaluate the effectiveness of the various rhetorical elements Marc Antony uses to discredit Brutus. YOU MUST include specific examples. If you were in a crowd, would his speech persuade you to support his position?