OPSM 501: Operations Management Week 6: The Goal Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 12: Service processes and flow variability Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin.
Advertisements

S. D. Deshmukh OM V. Capacity Planning in Services u Matching Supply and Demand u The Service Process u Performance Measures u Causes of Waiting u Economics.
Slide 1Time and Throughput Management & Improvement© Van Mieghem Bottleneck Management and Improvement  Time and Throughput: –Critical Path vs. Bottleneck.
7 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Constraint Management (Short-term Capacity Planning) 7.
Theory of Constraints Scheduling APICS PDM January 14, 2009.
Theory of Constraints Part II: TOC Concepts
S. Chopra/Operations/Managing Services1 Operations Management: Capacity Management in Services Module u Why do queues build up? u Process attributes and.
Healthcare Operations Management © 2008 Health Administration Press. All rights reserved. 1.
1 Presentation by: Tim Sullivan CIRAS (Center for Industrial Research and Service) Iowa State University Extension.
OPSM 405 Service Management Class 19: Managing waiting time: Queuing Theory Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Y Narahari, Computer Science and Automation, Indian Institute of Science SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE MEASURES Y. NARAHARI Computer Science and Automation.
23–1. 23–2 Chapter Twenty-Three Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
OM&PM/Class 2b1 1Operations Strategy –Class 1a: Introduction to OM –Class 1b: Strategic Operational Audits 2 Process Analysis –Class 2a + 2b: Process Flow.
Based on the book: Managing Business Process Flows.
OM&PM/Class 7a1 Operations Management & Performance Modeling 1Operations Strategy 2Process Analysis 3Lean Operations 4Supply Chain Management 5Capacity.
Chapter 18 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints
1 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Nov-2010Theory of Constraints 1- Basics Practice; Follow the 5 Steps Process Purchased Part $5 / unit RM1 $20 per unit RM2 $20 per.
7 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Constraint Management 7 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
Process Analysis and Applications Module
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS Session 6 SCHEDULING E
S. Chopra/Operations/Quality1 Wrap Up Levers for Improving Process Performance.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints.
Capacity Management in Services Module
Chapter 16: Learning Objectives
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 7: Process analysis Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Operations Scheduling. Scheduling in a Process-Focused Environment.
1 Slides used in class may be different from slides in student pack Chapter 18 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints  Goldratt’s Rules.
S. Chopra/Operations/Quality1 Wrap Up Levers for Improving Process Performance.
OPSM 301: Operations Management
Ricardo Ernst Top Management Program in Logistics & Supply Chain Management (TMPLSM) Production and Operations Management 6: Theory of Constraints.
Based on the book: Managing Business Process Flows.
Scheduling.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16 Scheduling.
Introduction to Theory of Constraints
Management of Waiting Lines McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
Announcement-exam rules
OPSM 501: Operations Management Week 4: Process analysis Kristen’s Cookie Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16 Scheduling.
OPSM 405 Service Management Class 18: Managing capacity Koç University Zeynep Aksin
 Copyright, Ansari, Bell, Klammer and Lawrence, Management Accounting: A Strategic Focus, Irwin-McGraw-Hill, THE THEORY OF CONSTRAINTS AND THROUGHPUT.
OPSM 405 Service Operations Management
TOC 1 Theory Of Constraints. TOC 2 Theory of Constraints How does TOC differ from the conventional shop control theory? Throughput definition * Emphasis.
OPSM 301 Operations Management Class 5: Business process flows: Analysis Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Theory of constraints Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Analysis and Design of Asynchronous Transfer Lines as a series of G/G/m queues.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1.
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 19: Flow variability Koç University Zeynep Aksin
The Theory of Constraints
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 17 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints.
1 Session 18 Implementation of TOC at Tosoh, SMD Laura Blum Production and Inventory Control Manager.
Performance Measurement Financial
The Effects of Process Variability 35E00100 Service Operations and Strategy #3 Fall 2015.
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 13-14: Queue management Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin
Management of Waiting Lines Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Lin/Operations/Managing Services1 Capacity Management in Services Module u Queuing processes and performance measures u Why do queues build up? u Performance.
Key Learnings: Little’s Law
Class 28: Review for Final Exam
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved
Strategic Capacity Management
Managing Flow Variability: Safety Capacity
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
Synchronous Manufacturing
Constraint Management
Chap 11 Learning Objectives
Theory of Constraints Part II: TOC Concepts
Theory of Constraint.
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
Presentation transcript:

OPSM 501: Operations Management Week 6: The Goal Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin

How do you keep track of the goal?  Accounting measures –Profits (absolute) –ROI (relative) –Cash flow (survival)  What are leading indicators of financial performance? –Throughput –Inventory –Operating expense

Making Money - How do we measure it? The GOAL : To Make Money  Bottom line measurements Net Profit Return on Investment Cash Flow (Absolute)(Relative)(Survival) What is the bridge? ACTIONS

Use Global Operational Measures Throughput (T) The rate at which the system generates money through sales Inventory (I) All the money the system invests in purchasing things the system intends to sell Operating expense (OE) All the money the system spends in turning inventory into throughput

The Direct Impact Operational Measurements and the Bottom Line Net Profit Return on Investment Cash Flow ThroughputInventoryOperating Expense

The Indirect Impact Inventory and Holding Costs Net Profit Return on Investment Cash Flow ThroughputInventoryOperating Expense Holding costs

The Competitive Edge Impact Net Profit Return on Investment Cash Flow ThroughputInventoryOperating Expense Competitive edge

Role of Reduced Inventory  Product –Quality –Engineering  Price –Higher margins –Lower investment per unit  Responsiveness –Due-date performance –Shorter quoted lead time

Increasing Process Capacity in The Goal  “is to increase the capacity of only the bottlenecks” –“ensure the bottlenecks’ time is not wasted” increase availability of bottleneck resources eliminate non-value added work from bottlenecks –reduce/eliminate setups and changeovers synchronize flows to & from bottleneck –reduce starvation & blockage –“ the load of the bottlenecks (give it to non- bottlenecks)” move work from bottlenecks to non-bottlenecks need resource flexibility – unit capacity and/or #of units. invest

Drum-Buffer-Rope  The drum is the constraint-sets the speed  The buffer is a time buffer used to protect the drum from disruptions in the preceding production steps  The rope is a schedule that dictates the timing of the release of raw materials, or jobs, into the system

Theory of Constraints 1.Identify the System’s Constraints 2.Decide how to exploit the system’s constraints 3.Subordinate everything else to the above decision 4.Elevate the system’s constraints 5.If in the Previous steps a constraint has been broken, go back to step 1)

Lessons from the Goal  Identify the goal: making money  Making money requires clear operational measures  Management systems (accounting, incentives, measurement) often get in the way of good plant management  There are typically only a few bottleneck resources: every other resource should be subordinated to them  Balance flow, not capacity  Once you identify the bottleneck, you can elevate its capacity: continuous improvement  How do you protect the bottleneck? –Effective scheduling (drum-buffer-rope) –Effective lot sizing (transfer versus order lotsize) Work smarter, not harder

Process management  Strategic positioning-establish product capabilities  Determine appropriate process capabilities: time, quality, cost, flexibility  Process design, appropriate selection of resources  Process documentation: flowchart  Analyze at macro level –Where is the bottleneck? –Is capacity enough? –How is time performance? –Where do quality problems occur?  Analyze at micro level –Scheduling: focus on the bottleneck –Set-up times, lotsize –Reduce variability

Framework for Process Flow Management Competitive? No Flow Chart Process Identify Bottlenecks Maximal Flow Rate Identify Critical Path Minimal Flow Time Demand Pattern Macro Average Performance Process Re-Design Competitive? No Micro Variability Performance Demand & Supply Mgt Continuous Improvement mean variability Yes

15 Example: What would you produce? Product A Product B  Sales price90TL100TL  Materials45TL40TL  Time per unit55 min.50 min.  Demand unlimited unlimited  Total time available40 hours per week  Weekly operating expense 5000TL

16 Process information Product A Product B R4 13 min/unit R4 8 min/unit R3 10 min/unit R1 15 min/unit R3 2 min/unit R2 15 min/unit R1 10 min/unit R2 15 min/unit 5 TL 10 TL 20 TL 20 TL 10 TL Component X Component Y Component Z

17 Analysis of production alternatives Product A Product B Resource unit Load Th. Capacity unit Load Th. Capacity (min) (2400min/week) R R R R units of B 80x60TL=$4800 per week200TL weekly loss 160 units of A 45TLx160=$7200 per week 2200TL weekly profit What if weekly demand is 60 units per week for both A and B?

Recall the house game: an unbalanced line  if average task times are different, will have an unbalanced line will have idleness  in unbalanced case, slowest task determines output rate bottleneck is busy idleness in other stages

The role of variability 6units/hr 4 or 8/hr 2 or 10 0 or 12 As variability increases, throughput (rate) decreases Capacity/hr:

The role of task times: a balanced line  if task times are similar will have a balanced line in the absence of variability (deterministic) complete synchronization is possible in a balanced line idleness is minimized, though in the presence of variability full synchronization cannot be achieved

Compounding effect of variability and unbalanced task times 6/hr4/hr 4 or 8/hr 2 or 6/hr 2 or 100 or 8 4/hr 3.5/hr 2.5/hr

Resource interaction effects 6/hr 4 or 8/hr 2 or 10 0 or 12 6/hr 4 or 8/hr 2 or 100 or 12 6/hr 4.5/hr 3/hr 1.5/hr In a serial process downstream resources depend on upstream resources: can have temporary starvation (idleness) As variability increases, the impact of resource interaction increases

Variability in multi-stage processes  We have seen how variability hurts performance in a multi-stage process –Worse with unbalanced task times and resource interference  Note that –We assumed a very simplistic form of processing time variability –We assumed there is no variability in arrivals  We now know variability hurts, but can’t say how much yet

Want to eliminate as much variability as possible from your processes: how?  specialization in tasks can reduce task time variability  standardization of offer can reduce job type variability  automation of certain tasks  IT support: templates, prompts, etc.  Incentives  Scheduled arrivals to reduce demand variability  Initiatives to smoothen arrivals

Want to reduce resource interference in your processes: how?  smaller lotsizes (smaller batches)  better balanced line  by speeding-up bottleneck (adding staff, changing procedure, different incentives, change technology)  through cross-training  eliminate steps  buffers  integrate work (pooling)

Flow Times with Arrival Every 4 Secs (Service time=5 seconds) Customer Number Arrival Time Departure Time Time in Process What is the queue size? Can we apply Little’s Law? What is the capacity utilization?

Customer Number Arrival Time Departure Time Time in Process Flow Times with Arrival Every 6 Secs (Service time=5 seconds) What is the queue size? What is the capacity utilization?

Customer Number Arrival Time Processing Time Time in Process Effect of Variability What is the queue size? What is the capacity utilization?

Customer Number Arrival Time Processing Time Time in Process Effect of Synchronization What is the queue size? What is the capacity utilization?

Conclusion  If inter-arrival and processing times are constant, queues will build up if and only if the arrival rate is greater than the processing rate  If there is (unsynchronized) variability in inter-arrival and/or processing times, queues will build up even if the average arrival rate is less than the average processing rate  If variability in interarrival and processing times can be synchronized (correlated), queues and waiting times will be reduced

Why is there waiting?  the perpetual queue: insufficient capacity-add capacity  the predictable queue: peaks and rush-hours- synchronize/schedule if possible  the stochastic queue: whenever customers come faster than they are served-reduce variability

Components of the Queuing System Visually Customers come in Customers are served Customers leave

A measure of variability  Needs to be unitless  Only variance is not enough  Use the coefficient of variation  C or CV=  / 

Interpreting the variability measures C i = coefficient of variation of interarrival times i) constant or deterministic arrivals C i = 0 ii) completely random or independent arrivals C i =1 iii) scheduled or negatively correlated arrivals C i < 1 iv) bursty or positively correlated arrivals C i > 1

To address the “how much does variability hurt” question: Consider service processes  This could be a call center or a restaurant or a ticket counter  Customers or customer jobs arrive to the process; their arrival times are not known in advance  Customers are processed. Processing rates have some variability.  The combined variability results in queues and waiting.  We need to build some safety capacity in order to reduce waiting due to variability

Specifications of a Service Provider Service Provider Leaving Customers Waiting Customers Demand Pattern Resources Human resources Information system other... Arriving Customers Satisfaction Measures Reneges or abandonments Waiting Pattern Served Customers Service Time

Upcoming events  Next week we will have an in-class activity, don’t miss class!  Midterm exam will be Week 10-proposed date November 26 Monday