Fall Technical Conference Regional Haze SIP Development Snowbird, Utah September 17 - 19, 2002.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Strategy for the development of an African Science and Technology Policy framework By Dr. Abdul-Hakim Rajab Elwaer Director of HRST AUC AFRICAN UNION.

Advertisements

GEO-5 in Ottawa 1 29 November 2004 Draft GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan and Status Report on Reference Document Ivan B. DeLoatch, Toshio Koike, Robert.

NACAA-ECOS-EPA SIP Reform Workgroup Nancy Kruger Deputy Director NACAA

Session 321 An Implementation Strategy: Identifies who is responsible for which actions Identifies what funding mechanisms and other resources are available.

Rider 8 Technical Workgroup Development. Introduction - Rider 8 Program for Ozone 74 th State Legislative Session authorized and budgeted to assist areas.

FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS’ AQRV WORKGROUP (FLAG): CONSTRUCTING A CONSISTENT PROCESS.

1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Revised PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines Biotech/ChemPharm Customer Partnership.

Kathy WilkinsLes Janis Montana University SystemGeorgia State University NACTEI Conference May 12, 2011 The proposed cut of 13 percent from Perkins Title.

Performance Auditing at PPS: Guidelines and Success Factors Richard C. Tracy District Performance Auditor April 16, 2007.

October, 2011 Shinji Kakuno Agency for Natural Resources and Energy METI, Japan Report on APEC Low-Carbon Model Town Project.

IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.

WRAP Status Report EPA/RPO Meeting Durham, NC February 6, 2002.

United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED) Revised documents and procedures for assessing Member States’ implementation efforts.

WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Villa Florence Hotel San Francisco, CA April 9-11, 2003.

Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.

Fire Emissions Joint Forum –Section 308 Strategies for Fire Coordinating efforts of states changing or developing smoke management strategies for regional.

3rd WG meeting, Brussels Proposed Plan for Governance of the Washington Group Prepared by: Jennifer Madans, Barbara Altman, Beth Rasch (USA); Renée Langlois.

WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.

1 Update on the STIP-II Project & Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Meeting Portland, OR April 3, 2003.

WESTAR Strategic Plan 2005 Update WESTAR Staff May 6, 2005 Juneau, Alaska.

Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,

Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.

Response to WRAP Air Managers Committee Memo “Request for Cost Estimates” April 6, 2009 WESTAR Council.

Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission February 2010 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Process Considerations Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.

2014 Spring Business Meeting Boise, Idaho. Jeff Gabler.

§309 Technical Support Document “Table of Contents” First Draft Tom Moore WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002.

Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents Hillview Elementary School September 9, 2013.

Update on the STIP-II Project: Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Air Manager’s Committee Santa Fe, NM March.

Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.

Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q 1 Regional Haze Update WESTAR September 17-19, 2007 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.

1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.

WESTAR Staff Reports 2015 Fall Business Meeting Scottsdale, Arizona.

2012 Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT. Jeff Gabler.

1 Spring Business Meeting Regional Haze SIP Development Survey San Francisco, California April 9, 2003.

2005 Progress on Emissions Inventories Attribution of Haze Workgroup Meeting January 24, 2006.

Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.

Summary of STIP Project Workplan Development of A Model SIP/TIP for Section Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September.

Air Managers and State Caucus support  State Caucus – IWG feedback on Questions  Tribal Caucus Liaison WRAP Workgroups-Ad Hoc  Attribution of Haze 

Update on the WRAP STIP-2 Project Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Board Meeting, Tempe AZ November 13, 2002.

BAIRWMP Update September 9, 2011 Prop 84 Prop 84 Plan Update Plan Update Implementation Grant Implementation Grant North Bay Process North Bay Process.

Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.

Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.

WESTAR Staff Reports Technical Coordinator Regional Haze Planning Training.

WESTAR Staff Reports  Technical Coordinator Report  Regional Haze Planning Report  Training Program Report.

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation

New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics

Guideline for Implementing Training Programme

TN: TEACH AACTE Grant TN TEACH: The TN EPP Assistive and Collaborative Help Network.

Implementing the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program

Visibility Coordinator Regional Haze

Negotiating Your Local Targets and Understanding Perkins Core Indicator Annual and Trend Reports November 9, 2017.

WRAP Charter Revisions, Board of Directors and Funding

Arizona Regional Haze State Implementation Plan

Tier I and II Technical Assistance WebEx

Summary of Themes from Meetings with Air Directors and Staff

Gulf of Honduras Task Group 1 Process

Training Program Report

2012 Spring Business Meeting Seattle, Washington

2013 Fall Business Meeting Denver, Colorado

Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.

MONTANA REGIONAL HAZE VISIBILITY PROTECTION PLAN

Stakeholder Workshop 1: Situation Analysis

The Registry’s Protocol Development Process

WRAP Regional Haze Planning Schedule of Communication

WESTAR Planning Committee Report

Gulf of Honduras Task Group 1 Process

TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group

WESTAR Planning Committee Report

WESTAR Staff Reports Technical Coordinator Report

Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis

Presentation transcript:

Fall Technical Conference Regional Haze SIP Development Snowbird, Utah September , 2002

PLANNING COMMITTEE Survey to Evaluate Resources Necessary to Develop a Regional Haze Control Plan Bob Habeck Montana DEQ

PURPOSE OF SURVEY “To Determine State Resources Needed to Prepare, Review, Approve, and Implement Regional Haze Visibility Control Plans 1.” 1 Source: November 7, 2001 letter to EPA Assistant Administrator Jeff Holmstead. WESTAR committed to preparing a report addressing this topic.

SURVEY RATIONALE Results will be used by states in deciding between 308 and 309 strategies. Results will be use when working with EPA on SIP preparation, funding, and implementation issues. Results will be useful to WRAP committees to assist in prioritizing products that states are depending upon for SIP development.

SURVEY DESIGN Survey was developed by ad hoc work group. Survey sent to states on 7/2 - returned 8/12. Identified SIP Development into phases: Phase I. – Project Planning Phase II. – SIP Development Phase III. – State/Local Adoption Phase IV. – SIP Approval Phase V. – Implementation

SURVEY RESPONSE To date, received responses from 14 states. Preliminary data has been compiled and was distributed to Air Directors on for initial review. NOTE: Preliminary data has not been through QA/QC procedures and will change.

GENERAL TRENDS High variability among states and strategies. High dependence upon WRAP products. State resource demands are greatest during SIP Development - Phase II and lowest during SIP Approval - Phase IV. 308 strategy indicated more resource demands than 309 strategy for SIP Development. 308 and 309 Project Planning - Phase I have comparable resource demands.

NEXT STEPS Planning Committee ad hoc workgroup to conduct follow-up QA/QC with states to provide response consistency. Planning Committee to review & discuss draft survey results for adequacy, consistency, and final report format. Produce draft survey report by January * DISCUSSION OF REPORT CONTENT *

POSSIBLE REPORT CONTENT Possible explanation of variability in responses within and between states and strategies. Possible introduction of ‘complexity classes’ to adequately compare states. Possible plots of work week by timelines to illustrate when resources are needed: (1) by state, (2) by EPA Region, and/or by WESTAR states and strategy. SEE EXAMPLE NEXT SLIDE

POSSIBLE REPORT CONTENT (continued)

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS: What Content Needs to be in the Final Survey Report for Your use? How Best to Present Raw Data in the Final Survey Report for Your use? Other Questions / Comments for a Usable Final Survey Report? * END OF SLIDES *