PEACE III - Theme 1.1 Aid for Peace – Phases I & II 21 September 2011 Celeste McCallion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.
EuropeAid Pre-Assessment and Assessment for Parliamentary Development Promoting domestic accountability: engaging with parliaments EC support to governance.
Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION
Training for Participants Date, Location, Venue 1 Welcome! Welcome to PEM 2 Module!
Indicators to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the Strategy State of the art Karin Sollart Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
First Evaluation of Good Governance for Medicines Programme Brief Summary of Findings.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Pillar 4a Information management
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
Guidance Note 12 – Monitoring, Reporting and Evaluation Information for Lead Partners 21 September 2011 Sarah Reid Managing Authority.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Time schedule for ex ante evaluation and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Romania-Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Operational Programme
UNCTAD ICT and E-Business Branch 9/17/2015 / 1 Joint UNCTAD-ITU-UNESCAP Workshop Information Society Measurements in Asia-Pacific Bangkok, July 2006.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
1 Enhanced Commonwealth Performance Framework: A Programme Manager’s Perspective Government Programmes Community of Practice Forum – 23 March 2015 Suzanne.
Project Overview, Objectives, Components and Targeted Outcomes
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
University of Sunderland COMM80 Risk Assessment of Systems ChangeUnit 13 Overview of Riskit*: The Method and its Techniques * Further information available.
18 March th meeting of the Evaluation Expert Committie 1 Thematic Working Group „Ex post Evaluation Guidelines” State of play Jela Tvrdonova.
EVALUATION APPROACHES Heather Aquilina 24 March 2015.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM GMS CEP-BCI Phase II Results Monitoring Framework GMS Environment Operations Center.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
© Commonwealth of Australia 2003 The Quality Assessment Framework.
Methodological Lessons Joint Evaluation of Conflict Prevention and Peace-Building in DRC, Day 2, Presentation in Oslo ‘What Have We learnt From.
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
DANIDA’s Experience of Results Managing for Development Results Peter Ellehøj – Quality Assurance Department November 2011.
Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER Federal Office for Agriculture FOAG WP5 Impact assessment and evaluation of ERA-NET.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
M&E requirements for grant signing: M&E Plan Workshop on effective Global Fund Grant negotiation and implementation planning January 2008 Manila,
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
Leonie Robinson ODEMM Project Coordinator Options for delivering ecosystem-based marine management (ODEMM) MSFD mini-seminar Brussels, 22 Feb 2012.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Antonio Mocci Mestre, January 17, 2011 Lead partner: Governance of the project monitoring, evaluation and dissemination systems.
REPORT OF THE TASK FORCE ON IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF FELLOWSHIPS IN THE UN SYSTEM AND AGENCIES Dr Alexandre Goubarev, WHO/Impact Assessment Taskforce Chair.
Evaluating implementation of the IRF in Ayrshire & Arran, Highland, Lothian and Tayside IRF Clinical Event June 9, 2010 Presentation by Marian Craig.
Action 12:Internal Monitoring BMW Regional Assembly.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
RTI, MUMBAI / CH 81 FOLLOW UP PROCEDURES DAY 8 SESSION NO.3 (THEORY) BASED ON CHAPTER 8 PERFORMANCE AUDITING GUIDELINES.
Performance Auditing and Auditing of Performance Information Audit Committee 28 March 2008.
REVIEW OF JAR EXPERIENCES MAIN FINDINGS IHP+ Nairobi Meeting December
September 2005 DEA: First National Workshop 1 Development and Energy in Africa First National Workshop: Tanzania 12 September 2005 Introduction Gordon.
How did we get to this point Reviewed the BDA (2008) Curriculum Framework Hosted a number of consultation events in 2010 with placement providers Developed.
Practical Experiences - Evaluation of Program 1 Geneva January 29, 2016.
Developing a national governance framework for health promotion in Scottish hospitals Lorna Smith Senior Health Improvement Programme Officer NHS Health.
1 Presentation of the second External evaluation of the University of Luxembourg ( ) Luxembourg, February 17 nd 2011.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
ICT4D: Evaluation Dr David Hollow DSV, University of Stockholm.
Monitoring and Evaluation for UNDP/GEF projects MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF UNDP/GEF PROJECTS Inception Workshop, Baikal Lake Watershed Project,
CILIP Performance Framework – Business metrics & KPI
Monitoring & Evaluation Processes A A walkthrough of the whole process
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.
Development and Energy in Africa
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Follow-up and Evaluation Mechanism
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Country group work on integrating climate into CSP cycle
DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK: National Accounts and Supporting Statistics
Doing Assessments Jointly
Monitoring and Evaluation of Peace building
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Part B: Evaluating Implementation Progress and Impact of Professional Development Efforts on Evidence-Based Practices   NCSI Cross-State Learning Collaboratives.
DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK: National Accounts and Supporting Statistics
Presentation transcript:

PEACE III - Theme 1.1 Aid for Peace – Phases I & II 21 September 2011 Celeste McCallion

Overview  Aid for Peace process  Learning from Phase I  Requirements for Phase II

Why monitor and evaluate  Improve the quality, efficiency and effectiveness of the implementation of the Programme  Report back to funders and key stakeholders  Aid to management  Learning lessons

What is the Aid for Peace Approach?  Objective: To facilitate the planning and evaluation of peace and aid interventions taking place in situations of latent or manifest violent conflict or in the aftermath of a violent conflict or war.

Aid for Peace Approach – Four stages Peace building relevanceassessment Conflict risk assessment Peace and conflict effects assessment Peace building needs analysis

Reporting  Quantitative  Outputs/results – Database & Quarterly Reports  Qualitative  Outcomes/impacts – Quarterly Reports & Aid for Peace reports  Programme level reporting  Monitoring & Evaluation Working Group  Monitoring Committee  Annual Implementation Report

Learning from Phase I  ASM Review recommendations  Peace-building Needs Analysis  Update with relevant research  Prioritised  Peace-building Relevance Assessment  Theories of Change

Learning from Phase I  ASM Review recommendations  Conflict Risk Assessment  Assessment of likelihood  Responsible Officer  Reporting Frequency  Peace-building Effects Assessment  SMART indicators  Evaluation mechanism and performance monitoring framework

Requirements of Phase II  Similar to Phase I – taking account of recommendations from ASM  Possible table format for presentation of indicators (links to Needs and Relevance) ActivityNeedTheory of Change Outputs/ Results Outcomes /Impacts Measure ment Tools

Requirements of Phase II  First report was due by end August  Received 9  Comments issued on first drafts  Awaiting further drafts  Agreed by end September

Requirements of Phase II  Database – quantitative information  Quarterly reports – to SEUPB  Remaining Aid for Peace Reports  Interim Report – December 2012  Final Report – March 2014

Contact details: Celeste McCallion