Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project Elements Goals/Objectives/Performance Measures Next Steps Adjourn

Study Overview Develop transportation alternatives that eliminate or minimize the adverse impacts of increased traffic volumes on the Chickamauga Battlefield unit of Chickamauga-Chattanooga National Military Park (CCNMP) and the surrounding communities. Provide information and strategies to assist National Park Service (NPS), Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT), and the surrounding communities in responding to anticipated future growth. Purpose

Traffic Impact Study Portions of Walker and Catoosa Counties surrounding the Park Study Area Approach Review existing and future transportation needs and identify short term and long term solutions Primary focus - evaluate impact of recently completed US 27 relocation on traffic volumes and congestion Seek input from the public, local governments, and businesses: ―Issues, Improvements, Mitigation Address environmental justice considerations

Subarea Transportation Plan Chickamauga Battlefield unit of the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park Study Area Approach Address unique features of the Park and its role as an important local, and national cultural and historic resource Develop evaluation measures and thresholds that are appropriate to the Park Setting (resource protection and visitor experience)

Study Schedule Timing Activities March-July 2003 Study initiation, Work Plan Finalization, Public Involvement Plan, Data Collection, Public Outreach (Newsletter, Website, stakeholder database) July July Late July – early August 2003 Stakeholder Participation Panel (SPP) & Public/General Stakeholder Meetings (input on issues, needs, desired future conditions, goals, objectives) Project Coordinating Committee (PCC) Meeting Roadside survey distribution (information on travel patterns) August-Sept 2003Refinement of travel demand model and preparation of future travel volume projections Identification of Issues/Needs Mid Sept 2003SPP workshop/PCC meeting (evaluation measures and thresholds for Park)

Study Schedule (continued) Timing Activities Mid October 2003 Late October 2003 Newsletter 2/Website update Deliverable: Issues, needs, evaluation of transportation system, air quality Identify potential alternatives to address deficiencies and needs Review alternatives against established evaluation criteria and thresholds Early Dec 2003PCC, SPP and public meetings to review and comment Develop set of feasible alternatives, impacts and measures Late Jan 2004SPP meeting & PCC meeting to review and comment Mid Feb 2004Deliverable: Recommended alternatives Newsletter 3/Website update Mid Mar 2004 Late Mar 2004 Prepare draft report Public meeting - present recommendations Late Apr 2004Prepare final report Newsletter 4/Website update – present final recommendations

Study Products Program of transportation improvements in a format suitable for consideration in Chattanooga Hamilton MPO transportation planning process Traffic Impact Study Subarea Transportation Plan Set of viable transportation alternatives that reflect unique needs of the Park and preserve its role as an important local and national cultural and historic resource Recommendations will be considered by NPS in preparation of Park’s new General Management Plan

Traffic Patterns Data Collection Methodology License Tag Survey Traffic Patterns Weekday Traffic Patterns Before/After Patterns - US 27 Relocation Roadside Survey Future “As Is” Travel Demand Model Volumes Future Travel Demand Model Refinements

Key Project Elements Transportation & mobility Resource preservation Economic development Recreation Major Issue Areas

Transportation & Mobility Issues Conflicts between commuter and recreational traffic Conflicts between vehicular and non- vehicular travel Efficiency of non-recreational trips Quality of experience for tourists and recreational travelers Roadway function and level of service standards Appropriate Speed Number and severity of crashes Potential cost of improvements

Resource Preservation Issues Historical resources Natural resources Quality of life in study area Relationship to economic development Visitor transportation and recreational needs

Economic Development Issues Implications of projected growth − On transportation system − On historic and natural resources Relationship to preservation goals Balance between tourism and other forms of economic development Transportation actions and policies to enhance visitor experience Compatibility with policies of local communities

Recreation Issues Balance between different uses of Park − Commemoration − Education − Local recreation Bicycle/pedestrian considerations − Routes within Park − Connections to Park − Regional system issues Enhancing Park visitor experience with other opportunities in region

Goals, Objectives & Performance Measures Traffic Impact Study – 1A To ensure that the transportation system meets the mobility needs of the community and region. To provide a safe transportation system. To promote the development of alternative modes and connections between modes. To improve north-south connectivity east of the Chickamauga Park area. Traffic Volumes Level of Service Accident rates Goal Objectives Performance Measures

To increase the attraction of the US Highway 27 relocation for commuters (motorists not destined to the Park). To ensure that non Park traffic uses other alternatives. To ensure that the community transportation system can accommodate existing and future needs and provide easy access to the US Highway 27 Relocation. Traffic Volumes Level of Service Percent Split (% local and through traffic) Goal Objectives Performance Measures Goals, Objectives & Performance Measures, Cont. Traffic Impact Study – 1B

Goal To minimize adverse impacts of traffic and transportation usage on the Chickamauga Battlefield Unit of the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park and its resources. Objectives To reduce non-park vehicular traffic volume on park roadways. To provide adequate and safe transportation facilities for Park users on Park property. To provide an exceptional visitor experience. Performance Measures Traffic Volumes Percent Split (% local and through traffic) Accident Rate Level of Service Parking Utilization Visitor Feedback Subarea Transportation Plan – 2A Goals, Objectives & Performance Measures, Cont.

Goal To develop feasible transportation strategies that will respond to anticipated future growth in the area and in the Park. Objectives To identify transportation alternatives that reflect the unique needs of the Park in preserving its role as a historic resource. To identify what local communities can do with land use development to complement and protect the Park (minimize impacts of traffic on the Park). Performance Measures Traffic Volumes Number of Tourists Economic Value/Tourism Feasible and implementation recommendations Subarea Transportation Plan – 2B Goals, Objectives & Performance Measures, Cont.

Next Steps Late July/Early August: Roadside Survey Aug-Sept: Refinement of Travel Demand Model and Preparation of Future Travel Projections Mid-Sept: SPP Workshop – Evaluation Measures and Thresholds for Park Late Oct: Newsletter/Website Update/Deliverable – Issues and Needs; Transportation System Evaluation