International Council on Archives Section on University and Research Institution Archives Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Preserving Electronic.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Long-Term Preservation. Technical Approaches to Long-Term Preservation the challenge is to interpret formats a similar development: sound carriers From.

Advertisements

Fedora Users’ Conference Rutgers University May 14, 2005 Researching Fedora's Ability to Serve as a Preservation System for Electronic University Records.

An Introduction June 17, 2013 Open Archival Information System (OAIS)

Institutional Repositories It’s not Just the Technology New England Archivists Boston College March 11, 2006 Eliot Wilczek University Records Manager Tufts.

Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.

KEEP Project Overview House Government Efficiency Committee March 14, 2012 Matt Veatch State Archivist & KEEP Project Manager

By Eileen Clegg Digital Preservation at Columbia in the Old Days (2009)

ISO & OAI-PMH By Neal Harmeyer, Amy Hatfield, and Brandon Beatty PURDUE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH REPOSITORY.

‘The Transparent Repository’ Kevin Bradley (NLA) & Chris Blackall (ANU)

ARCHIVES AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE Fran Blouin Director, Bentley Library University of Michigan Copenhagen City Archives February 2009.

Kevin L. Glick Electronic Records Archivist Manuscripts and Archives Yale University ECURE Arizona State University March 2, 2005 Fedora and the Preservation.

All Things to All People Combining Resources to Build an Integrated Digital Repository Preservation and Access for Electronic College and University Records.

PAWN: A Novel Ingestion Workflow Technology for Digital Preservation

An Overview of Selected ISO Standards Applicable to Digital Archives Science Archives in the 21st Century 25 April 2007 Donald Sawyer - NASA/GSFC/NSSDC.

KEEP System Stakeholder Advisory Team Meeting September 15, 2010.

Ingest and Dissemination with DAITSS Presented by Randy Fischer, Programmer, Florida Center for Library Automation, University of Florida DigCCurr2007.

PeDALS Persistent Digital Archives & Library System Richard Pearce-Moses Deputy Director for Technology & Information Resources Arizona State Library,

US GPO AIP Independence Test CS 496A – Senior Design Team members: Antonio Castillo, Johnny Ng, Aram Weintraub, Tin-Shuk Wong Faculty advisor: Dr. Russ.

Records Managers’ Forum 28 February Draft standard on the appraisal and disposal of State records Catherine Robinson Senior Project Officer, Government.

Finding a New Way Richard Pearce-Moses Deputy Director for Technology & Information Resources Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records Using.

World Data Center for Human Interactions in the Environment Conducting a Self-Assessment of a Long-Term Archive for Interdisciplinary Scientific Data as.

USING METADATA TO FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING AND CERTIFICATION ABOUT THE PRESERVATION PROPERTIES OF A PRESERVATION SYSTEM Jewel H. Ward, Hao Xu, Mike C.

Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) SC Department of Archives and History.

Digital Preservation 101, or, How to Keep Bits for Centuries Julie C. Swierczek Digital Asset Manager and Digital Archivist Harvard Art Museums.

OAIS Open Archival Information System. “Content creators, systems developers, custodians, and future users are all potential stakeholders in the preservation.

Relationships July 9, Producers and Consumers SERI - Relationships Session 1.

Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) ESIP Summer Meeting John Garrett – ADNET Systems at NASA/GSFC ESIP Summer Meeting.

Author(s): David A. Wallace and Margaret Hedstrom, 2009 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative.

Coming to TERM: Designing the Texas Repository Model Sue Soy Stan Gunn Marlan Green Dr. Patricia Galloway University of Texas at Austin Graduate.

Digital Preservation: Current Thinking Anne Gilliland-Swetland Department of Information Studies.

ACRL New England Chapter Information Technology Interest Group Preservation and Conservation Interest Group March 18, 2005 Here Today, Here Tomorrow Issues.

C. Huc/CNES, D. Boucon/CNES-SILOGIC, D.M. Sawyer/NASA/GSFC, J.G. Garrett/NASA-Raytheon Producer-Archive Interface Methodology Abstract Standard PAIMAS.

1 Strategic Plan for Digital Archives Programme DAP PROJECT SCOPE OVERVIEW STATUS.

WGISS /09/2015 DATA PRESERVATION – CNES APPROACH B. Chausserie-Laprée.

Metadata for digital preservation: a review of recent developments Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath ECDL2001, 5th European Conference.

Selene Dalecky March 20, 2007 FDsys: GPO’s Digital Content System.

OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.

How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 Technical Issues.

Funded by: © AHDS Preservation in Institutional Repositories Preliminary conclusions of the SHERPA DP project Gareth Knight Digital Preservation Officer.

Defining Submission Agreements and Policies DigCCurr Professional Institute May 16-21, 2010 & January 5-6, 2011 Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA Carolyn.

The Project Three-year grant from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), April 2010-March 2013 Develop electronic records.

Fedora and the Preservation of University Electronic Records Project NHPRC Electronic Records Research Grant Kevin L. Glick Manuscripts and Archives, Yale.

M-1 INGEST OVERVIEW Don Sawyer National Space Science Data Center NASA/GSFC October 13, 1999.

The OAIS Reference Model Michael Day, Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University of Bath Reference Models meeting,

Preservation metadata and the Cedars project Michael Day UKOLN: UK Office for Library and Information Networking University of Bath

June 21, 2011EDMC Workshop in Silver Spring, MDDan Kowal Submission Agreements: The role they play in supporting the relationship between the Data Producer/Provider.

ARIADNE is funded by the European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme Archiving and Repositories Holly Wright.

Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects November 15, 2004 Preservation Metadata.

SEDAC Long-Term Archive Development Robert R. Downs Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center Center for International Earth Science Information Network.

Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,

The OAIS model SEEDS meeting May 5 th, 2015, Lausanne Bojana Tasic.

Cedars work on metadata Michael Day UKOLN, University of Bath Cedars Workshop Manchester, February 2002.

@ulccwww.ulcc.ac.uk IRMS Cymru October 2015 From EDRMS to digital archive: a wish-list for ways to preserve digital records.

Eliot Wilczek University Records Manager Digital Collections and Archives Tufts University Institutional Repositories: Models & Approaches A NELINET Seminar.

Data Management and Digital Preservation Carly Dearborn, MSIS Digital Preservation & Electronic Records Archivist

Setting up long term digital preservation DLM Forum Member Meeting Luxembourg 14-15th October 2015.

Eliot Wilczek University Records Manager Digital Collections and Archives Tufts University Repositories: How are They Evolving? A NERCOMP Workshop September.

Data Management and Archival Storage Bojana Tasić FORS SEEDS Workshop I Belgrade, October.

Ingest and Dissemination with DAITSS

Trusted Repository Systems Overview

Building A Repository for Digital Objects

Statewide Digitization and the FCLA Digital Archive

Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II

Fedora and the Preservation of University Records ECURE

Research data preservation in Canada

Open Archival Information System

Robin Dale RLG OAIS Functionality Robin Dale RLG

Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II

How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II

ArchivesSpace – Archivematica – DSpace Workflow Integration

Presentation transcript:

International Council on Archives Section on University and Research Institution Archives Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University Eliot Wilczek University Records Manager Digital Collections and Archives Tufts University

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Eliot Wilczek Tufts University Hardware Content Application Hardware Content Application Hardware Content Application Hardware Content Application Sophisticated Delivery Tools Rich Content Decentralized Isolated Vertical Systems The Situation Perseus Digital Library Digital Collections & Archives

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Eliot Wilczek Tufts University Hardware Content Application Hardware Content Application Hardware Content Application Hardware Content Application Centralized Multiple Creators Diverse Content Sustainable Sophisticated Delivery Tools Flexible Development Institutional Repository Perseus Digital Library Digital Collections & Archives The Goal

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Eliot Wilczek Tufts University Hardware Content Application Hardware Content Application Hardware Content Application Hardware Content Application F lexible E xtensible D igital O bject R epository A rchitecture FEDORA Perseus Digital Library Digital Collections & Archives The Solution

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Eliot Wilczek Tufts University DSpace FEDORA Fedora Comparison

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Eliot Wilczek Tufts University DSpace FEDORA Ingest Tool Delivery Application Ingest Tool Search Tool Fedora Comparison

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Eliot Wilczek Tufts University Fedora’s ability to serve as preservation system for university electronic records with archival value Yale University and Tufts University National Historical Publications and Records Commission Research Project

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Eliot Wilczek Tufts University 1.Functional Requirements for Recordkeeping Systems 2.Functional Requirements for Preservation Systems 3.Ingest Electronic Records Process 4.Maintain Electronic Records Process 5.Report Findings 6.Future Work and Implement Findings Research Project

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Eliot Wilczek Tufts University 1.Functional Requirements for Recordkeeping Systems 2.Functional Requirements for Preservation Systems 3.Ingest Electronic Records Process 4.Maintain Electronic Records Process 5.Report Findings 6.Future Work and Implement Findings Research Project

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Authentic Records Are what they purport to be A judgment on records; not an element of records Trustworthy System Allows presumption of authenticity Recordkeeping System Requirements Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Exerts Needs Meets Needs Records Controls  Requirements (internal/external)  Responsibilities (internal/external)  Policies  Practices Recordkeeping System  Institution  People  Procedures  Infrastructure  Applications Figure 1 Relationship of Records Controls and Recordkeeping Systems Institution Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, Compliance 2.Creation & Capture 3.Maintenance 4.Classification 5. Retention & Disposition 6.Protection from Loss or Corruption 7.Preservation 8.Use Rights 9.Discover & Delivery 10. Design & Performance Recordkeeping System Requirements Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, Ingest 2.Archival Storage 3.Data Management 4.Administration 5. Preservation Planning 6.Access Preservation System Requirements Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Trustworthy Ingest Process Maintained Level of Authenticity Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) January 2002 Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) ISO 14721:2003 Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide OAIS Archive Ingest Access Administer Preserve Store Data Manage Producer Consumer SIP Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide OAIS Archive Ingest Access Administer Preserve Store Data Manage Producer Consumer SIP Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide OAIS Archive Ingest Access Administer Preserve Store Data Manage Producer Consumer AIP Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide OAIS Archive Ingest Access Administer Preserve Store Data Manage Producer Consumer DIP Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide OAIS Archive Ingest Access Administer Preserve Store Data Manage Producer Consumer DIP Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Producer-Archive Interface Methodology Abstract Standard May 2004 Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) Preliminary Phase Formal Phase Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide Validation Transfer Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Submission Agreement Producer-Archive Interface Methodology Abstract Standard May 2004 Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) Preliminary Phase Formal Phase Validation Transfer Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Submission Agreement Agreement between Archive & Producer Instructions for Ingest Process Standards for Validation Documentation of Ingest Process Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement B: Transfer and Validation Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement B: Transfer and Validation A: Negotiate Submission Agreement A7: Use Rights A8: Privacy and Confidentiality Appraisal A1: Establish Relationship A2: Define Project A3: Records Survey A4: Record Type Appraisal A5: Format Appraisal A6: Identifier Rules A9: Feasibility Assessment A10: Finalize Submission Agreement Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide

A: Negotiate Submission Agreement B: Transfer and Validation B1: SIP Creation and Transfer B2: Validation B3: Transform and Attach Metadata B4: AIP Formation B5: Final Appraisal B6: Formal Accession Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

A1: Establish Relationship A2: Define Project A3: Records Survey A4: Record Type Appraisal A5: Format Appraisal A6: Identifier Rules A7: Use Rights A8: Privacy and Confidentiality Appraisal A9: Feasibility Assessment A10: Finalize Submission Agreement Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement

First Appraisal Should we accession? A1: Establish Relationship A2: Define Project A3: Records Survey A4: Record Type Appraisal A5: Format Appraisal A6: Identifier Rules A7: Use Rights A8: Privacy and Confidentiality Appraisal A9: Feasibility Assessment A10: Finalize Submission Agreement Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement

Define Records Creator Record Type Format Dates Identification Rules Extent A1: Establish Relationship A2: Define Project A3: Records Survey A4: Record Type Appraisal A5: Format Appraisal A6: Identifier Rules A7: Use Rights A8: Privacy and Confidentiality Appraisal A9: Feasibility Assessment A10: Finalize Submission Agreement Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement

Standing Resources Preservation Formats Record Types Identifier Rules Creators Security Procedures System Capacities A1: Establish Relationship A2: Define Project A3: Records Survey A4: Record Type Appraisal A5: Format Appraisal A6: Identifier Rules A7: Use Rights A8: Privacy and Confidentiality Appraisal A9: Feasibility Assessment A10: Finalize Submission Agreement Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement

Resources Creators Record Types Preservation Formats Identifier Rules Security Procedures System Capacities Records Creator Record Type Format Identification Rules Dates Extent A1: Establish Relationship A2: Define Project A3: Records Survey A4: Record Type Appraisal A5: Format Appraisal A6: Identifier Rules A7: Use Rights A8: Privacy and Confidentiality Appraisal A9: Feasibility Assessment A10: Finalize Submission Agreement Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement

Resources Creators Record Types Preservation Formats Identifier Rules Security Procedures System Capacities Records Creator Record Type Format Identification Rules Dates Extent A1: Establish Relationship A2: Define Project A3: Records Survey A4: Record Type Appraisal A5: Format Appraisal A6: Identifier Rules A7: Use Rights A8: Privacy and Confidentiality Appraisal A9: Feasibility Assessment A10: Finalize Submission Agreement Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement

Second Appraisal Can we accession? A1: Establish Relationship A2: Define Project A3: Records Survey A4: Record Type Appraisal A5: Format Appraisal A6: Identifier Rules A7: Use Rights A8: Privacy and Confidentiality Appraisal A9: Feasibility Assessment A10: Finalize Submission Agreement Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement

Finalize Submission Agreement Endorse human-readable version Code machine-readable version A1: Establish Relationship A2: Define Project A3: Records Survey A4: Record Type Appraisal A5: Format Appraisal A6: Identifier Rules A7: Use Rights A8: Privacy and Confidentiality Appraisal A9: Feasibility Assessment A10: Finalize Submission Agreement Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide A: Negotiate Submission Agreement

B1: SIP Creation and Transfer B2: Validation B3: Transform and Attach Metadata B4: AIP Formation B5: Final Appraisal B6: Formal Accession Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide B: Transfer and Validation Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Submission Agreement Guides SIP Preparation Supplies Validation Rules Dictates Transformation Defines Target Repository B1: SIP Creation and Transfer B2: Validation B3: Transform and Attach Metadata B4: AIP Formation B5: Final Appraisal B6: Formal Accession Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide B: Transfer and Validation Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Records Preparation SIP Format Rules Record Format Rules Metadata Standards Transfer Procedures B1: SIP Creation and Transfer B2: Validation B3: Transform and Attach Metadata B4: AIP Formation B5: Final Appraisal B6: Formal Accession Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide B: Transfer and Validation Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Processing Technical Validation Format Transformation Attach Available Metadata Turn Records into AIPs B1: SIP Creation and Transfer B2: Validation B3: Transform and Attach Metadata B4: AIP Formation B5: Final Appraisal B6: Formal Accession Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide B: Transfer and Validation Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Final Appraisal Intellectual Review Transformation Review Metadata Review Last Chance to Reject B1: SIP Creation and Transfer B2: Validation B3: Transform and Attach Metadata B4: AIP Formation B5: Final Appraisal B6: Formal Accession Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide B: Transfer and Validation Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

To Repository Submit to Repository Issue Acknowledgement Post-processing B1: SIP Creation and Transfer B2: Validation B3: Transform and Attach Metadata B4: AIP Formation B5: Final Appraisal B6: Formal Accession Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide B: Transfer and Validation Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Implications Carefully document decisions Base decisions on documented policies, procedures, information Regularize decision-making steps Automate accessioning, preservation, descriptive work Scaleable Shift focus Processing records to Articulating resources Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Ingest Guide Eliot Wilczek Tufts University

Fedora and the Preservation of University Records Digital Collections and Archives, Tufts University Digital Collections and Archives, Tufts University Fedora Preserving Electronic Records at Tufts University ICA/SUV Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Thank You Eliot Wilczek Tufts University