HOW MEDICAL SCHOOLS OPERATIONALIZE LCME ACCREDITATION January 9, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clinical Programs and Competence Evaluation and Outcomes Keith Watson, D.O. Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education Centers for Osteopathic Research.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
The 21st Century Context for
Introduction to Competency-Based Residency Education
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
School of Nursing Reaccreditation November 9-11, 2009 Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) ensures the quality and integrity of baccalaureate,
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Comparison: Traditional vs. Outcome Project Evaluative Processes Craig McClure, MD Educational Outcomes Service Group University of Arizona December 2004.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Medical School Preparation for LCME Accreditation The University Toledo College of Medicine August 24, 2011 Barbara Barzansky, PhD, MHPE LCME Secretary,
Triple C Competency-based Curriculum: Implications for Family Medicine Residency Programs.
PROFESSIONALISM EDUCATION: POSSIBLE COMPETENCIES Barbara Barzansky, PhD, MHPE LCME Co-Secretary APHC Conference May 3, 2013.
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
Foundation Modules (FOM 011, 013, 014) FOM Team.
Fundamentals of Assessment Todd L. Green, Ph.D. Associate Professor Pharmacology, Physiology & Toxicology PIES Seminar
Evaluation: A Challenging Component of Teaching Darshana Shah, PhD. PIES
Adapted from: PARCC Model Content Frameworks English Language Arts/Literacy October 2011.
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
American Chemical Society The Role of Undergraduate Research in the Certified Chemistry Major Thomas Wenzel Department of Chemistry Bates College Lewiston,
Judith Brenner, MD Associate Dean for Curricular Integration Samara Ginzburg, MD Associate Dean for Medical Education Keith Metzger, PhD Assistant Professor,
The Role of Culture in the Training of Health Care Professionals: A Multidisciplinary Panel Danny M. Takanishi, Jr., MD, FACS Professor and Chair Department.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
BRIDGET C. O’BRIEN, PhD UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO Educating Physicians: A focus on integration, inquiry, innovation and improvement.
Writing Narratives Based on ACGME Competencies. Narratives What Are They?  Written Evaluation of Student Performance Formative  Mid-Course Evaluation.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Developing an Assessment System B. Joyce, PhD 2006.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
What is a Planned Curriculum?
AN INNOVATIVE & INTEGRATED TESTING FORMAT COMBINING ANATOMY, PRIMARY CARE SKILLS, AND OMM IN A SIMULATED PATIENT ENCOUNTER Gail Dudley, DO, Francine Anderson,
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
STUDY SKILLS COURSE MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
National Center for Physician Training in Addiction Medicine Core Competency Webinar Series   Core Competency: Practice-Based Learning and Improvement.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Gail March, Ph.D. Office of Medical Education January, 2014 © 2014, Trustees, Boston University Do not copy or distribute.
Introduction to Concepts and Principles of Learning ( Medical Education) (CMD 211) Dr. Muhammad Ghauth Qureshi Dr. Muhammad Nour-El-din Saleh Dr. Khadija.
What is the difference between milestones and evaluations? Why do so many struggle with this?
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
ACGME SIX CORE COMPETENCIES Minimum Program Requirements Language Approved by the ACGME, September 28, 1999 “The residency program must require its residents.
Not Just “MK-1” How learning the skills of EBM relates to the pediatric milestones Martha S Wright, MD, MEd Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Weston High School Improvement Plan 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Defining Grades in the Surgery Clerkship Jeremy M. Lipman, MD MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Competence by Design (CBD) Foundations of Assessment.
1 Transforming Our Practices Transformed Our Teaching: Meeting ACGME Competencies with New Models of Care Katherine Miller, M.D. John Nagle, MPA U. Of.
1 Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21st Century Teaching and Learning December 8, 2009 HOMEROOM 3 Fair Assessment & Materials and Resources.
Surviving the LCME Visit: Lessons Learned AJ Copeland, MD, FACS Clerkship Director Associate Professor Department of Surgery Uniformed Services University.
CBME and CanMEDS 2015 Susan Glover Takahashi, MA, PhD Laura Leigh Murgaski, MScCH Lisa St. Amant Jesse Montgomery Kim O’Hearn.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for the Assessment of Early Medical Students H. Carrie Chen MD MSEd1, Margaret McNamara MD1, Arianne Teherani.
Highly Capable Education
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Instructional Methods Lessons Learned & Next Steps
Committee # 4: Educational Program For The MD
Presentation transcript:

HOW MEDICAL SCHOOLS OPERATIONALIZE LCME ACCREDITATION January 9, 2014

Frequency of Noncompliance Citation Full Survey Visits (n = 53) October 2010 to June 2013 During this timeframe, 8 schools (15%) were found to be noncompliant with ED-5-A This makes ED-5-A one of the 15 most frequently cited standards in the past 3 years

ED-5-A. A medical education program must include instructional opportunities for active learning and independent study to foster the skills necessary for lifelong learning. It is expected that the methods of instruction and assessment used in courses and clerkships (or, in Canada, clerkship rotations) will provide medical students with opportunities to develop lifelong learning skills. These skills include self-assessment on learning needs; the independent identification, analysis, and synthesis of relevant information; and the appraisal of the credibility of information sources. Medical students should receive explicit experiences in using these skills, and they should be assessed and receive feedback on their performance.

ED-5-A active learning and independent study evidence of learning activities during the first two years (phases) of the curriculum that include all of the following: identify, analyze, and synthesize information relevant to their learning needs assess the credibility of information sources share the information with their peers and supervisors and receive feedback receive feedback on their information-seeking skills

ED-5-A active learning and independent study independent study: need blocks of time for study evidence that the free time is blocked and that the school adheres to it review the amount of time available for students to engage in self-directed learning and independent study in the first two years (phases) of the curriculum how big is a small group? students max

Data Collection Instrument (DCI) Questions 1.Provide sample weekly schedules in the Appendix that illustrate the amount of time in the first and second years (phases) of the curriculum that students spend in scheduled activities. 2.Provide a list of the types of instructional formats that the medical school characterizes as active learning. 3.Describe the time available for students to prepare for active learning.

Data Collection Instrument (DCI) Questions 4.In the context of the annotation to this standard and the definition of active learning (above), provide examples that illustrate the opportunities that exist in the curriculum for students to do each of the following: Assess their learning needs, individually and in groups Identify, analyze, and synthesize information relevant to their learning needs Assess the credibility of information sources Share the information with their peers and supervisors

Data Collection Instrument (DCI) Questions 5.Describe where and how in the curriculum there is assessment of students’ progress in developing the skills needed for lifelong learning, including the ability to learn through self-directed, independent study. In the Appendix, provide examples of any instruments used for such assessment 6.Is demonstration of these skills considered as a criterion for grading in any course or clerkship rotation?

SELF-STUDY QUESTION Evaluate the adequacy of required opportunities and time available for students to engage in active learning and independent study. Assess the effectiveness of the program’s efforts to prepare students to engage in self-assessment of their learning needs and to develop other skills to support habits of lifelong learning. Note whether student acquisition of the skills related to lifelong learning are being assessed.

SURVEY REPORT GUIDE Describe the opportunities that are in place for students to engage in active learning and independent study, including opportunities for students to assess their own learning needs; identify, analyze, and synthesize information relevant to these learning needs; and assess the credibility of information sources. Are students assessed on and do students receive feedback on the development of these skills? In the report narrative, provide several examples of active learning that meets the requirements of the standard (ED-5-A).

ACADEMIC YEAR STANDARD ED-5-A WILL BECOME ELEMENT SELF-DIRECTED AND LIFE-LONG LEARNING. The faculty of an institution that sponsors a medical education program ensures that the program’s curriculum includes self- directed learning experiences and time for independent study to allow students to develop the skills of lifelong learning. Self-directed learning involves students’ self- assessment of learning needs; independent identification, analysis, and synthesis of relevant information; and appraisal of the credibility of information sources.

LCME Standard: ED-5A or 6.3 Life Long and Active Learning Deconstruct the standard Discuss alignment with EPAs and General Competencies Present brief curriculum design examples from three institutions FIU, CWR, and VTC Colleges of Medicine that address the LLL competency Open discussions: Amy Wilson-Delfosse – CWR Rick Vari – VTC George Dambach – FIU HWCOM.

Deconstructing the Standard The new LCME Standard 6 is characterized as “Competencies, Curricular Objectives and Curricular Design” 6.3 Two Components “Active and Life Long Learning” Life Long Learning (LLL): A General Competency, also one of the new, proposed Entrustable Professional Activities (#7). Active Learning - Teaching/learning formats: facilitating skill development, opportunities for formative feedback and assessments of the skills and competency (Essential for LLL?) Time: formal allocation of time blocks in the curriculum design for skill development

Life Long Learning A general approach may be found from the Association of American Colleges and Universities website: “Foundations and Skills for Life Long Learning Value Rubric”: Definition “purposeful learning activity undertaken on an ongoing basis with the aim of improving knowledge, skill and competence” Elements within the competency: Curiosity, Initiative, Independence, Transfer and Reflection Evaluation ‘anchors’ in the Rubric: Benchmark, Milestones and Capstone

Alignment LCME Standard ED-5A and/or 6.3 alignment with proposed EPAs and General Competencies (ACGME)

Entrustable Professional Activity #7 ‘ Form clinical questions and retrieve evidence to advance patient care’ From AAMC “Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency” draft Aschenbrener and Englander Suggestion: develop curriculum components in the context of EPA #7 as the model for the LLL curriculum.

EPA #7 The framework for EPA #7 “critical functions” provides a useful ‘deconstruction’ for reflections on a curriculum regarding the LCME standard 6.3 (LLL Competency): Awareness and appraisal of sources and content of medical information Develop a well formed, focused, pertinent clinical question based on clinical scenarios Identify and use information technology Assess applicability and generalizability of evidence Demonstrate curiosity, objectivity and scientific reasoning in acquisition and application of knowledge Apply findings to patient care Communicate findings to health care team and patients Reflect on outcomes From AAMC “Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency” draft Aschenbrener and Englander

An Alternative – Elements of Life Long Learning Competency are imbedded in several of the General Competencies Patient Care Knowledge for Practice Practice Based Learning and Improvement Interpersonal and Communication Skills Personal and Professional Development Suggest reviewing the recent publication - Englander et al, “Toward a Common Taxonomy of Competency Domains for the Health Professions and Competencies for Physicians” : Academic Medicine 88, No 8 August 2013,

Development and Assessment of the competency of LLL is a fundamental component of clerkships and 4 th year rotations Daily Routine Forming clinical questions Independent study/research Communication Analysis Application Implementation and adaption of EPA #7 suggest that formal assessment and validation of the competency of LLL may be a new challenge.

Preparation and LLL Skill Development in the Preclerkship Curriculum Three examples: Case Western Reserve Virginia Tech Carilion Florida International

CWR: Amy Wilson-Delfosse Case Inquiry “IQ” 2 Cases/week: (2 years > 150 sessions) Development of learning objectives for both cases on Day 1 Discussion of learning objectives for the first case on Day 2 Discussion of the second case on Day 3 Small group: faculty facilitated Feedback by students and facilitators Essay Format, formative and summative assessments

CWRU Pedagogy: Case Inquiry (aka “IQ”) Teams Student-centered small groups with a faculty facilitator Case-based Self-directed learning Teamwork Utilization of resources

CWRU Feedback: Daily Debriefing Checkout Peer Feedback Self Assessment Team Process Developmental Approach to Small Group Debriefing Checkout

CWRU Assessment: Essay Exams Importance of aligning goals/objectives and methods with assessment Drive deep concept understanding Promote integration of concepts Reveals necessary curricular improvements to faculty

VTC: Richard Vari PBL - CBL 3X/week, 7 hours each week (2,2,3) over first 2 years of curriculum Small group/faculty facilitated Progressive Case development Question formation, self directed study, communication, analysis Session based feedback Formative – mid block by students and facilitators Summative at end of blocks

FIU Osler Fridays – Carla Lupi Year 3 Curriculum Designed specifically to address LLL competency development (supplement to clerkships) Full day, case based learning Small group/faculty facilitated Progressive, complex cases Scheduled time in sessions for self directed study, (question formation, research and analysis) communication Feedback, each session Oral exams – summative assessments

FIU Osler Fridays were initially planned and implemented for clerkship year (weekly sessions on Fridays, full day) Migrated the format “upstream” into second and first year curriculum for skill development – Use case based (simple), small group, facilitated format throughout years 1 and 2 as regular and routine components of courses.

Summary LLL – develop a curriculum for the competency (EPA #7 suggested as model) Case based, active /self directed learning in small facilitated groups are a common (and preferred) educational format for the development and assessment of LLL competency Develop and cultivate learning objectives intimately aligned with the elements of the general competency (LLL) using EPA #7 or ACGME- GC’s. Develop formative feedback and summative assessment processes for LLL compentency.