17-03-2001The barrel reference system1 THE BARREL REFERENCE SYSTEM C.Guyot (Saclay) Goal: Provide a geometrical survey of the whole barrel muon spectrometer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alignment systems for GlueX GlueX Collaboration Meeting Bloomington, Indiana May 20-22, 2004 Courtesy of Dimos Sampsonidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Advertisements

1 Alignment using high Pt tracks 1.Small w.r.t. large barrel chambers 2.BEE w.r.t. EC chambers 3.Endcap – Barrel 4.BIS8 w.r.t. BIS7 5.Inner tracker – Muon.
S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November ATLAS Group, University of Oxford, UK S. M. Gibson, P. A. Coe, A. Mitra, D. F. Howell, R. B. Nickerson Geodetic Grids.
Projective platforms gluing for ATLAS chambers J.-Ch. Barrière, V. Gautard, P. Ponsot, Y. Reinert, Ph. Schune for the Saclay muon hardware group CEA Saclay.
Marcel Vreeswijk (NIKHEF) The NIKHEF Muon Mission Drift tube wiring Chamber assembly X-ray scan of BOL-0 at CERN Status and Plans The Making of ATLAS Muon.
HERMES tracking for OLYMPUS. Part #1. Detector survey. A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
D. Peterson, Muon Spectrometers at ATLAS and CMS, presentation to LEPP 19-Nov  spectrometers at ATLAS and CMS Our charge: Survivability Resolution.
Yurii Levashov Undula t or fiducialization test Oct. 14, 2004 Undulator Fiducialization Test Results Fiducialization Tolerances.
Christine KOURKOUMELIS University of Athens ATLAS Muon Chamber construction in Greece and alignment studies for H  ZZ  4μ decay Como, 8/10/03.
Yurii Levashov LCLS Undulator Fiducialization October 20, 2005 *Work supported in part by DOE Contract DE-AC02-76SF LCLS.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, Endcap Alignment Dick Loveless DOE/NSF Review 9 May 2001.
Platform positioning during MDT construction Tool for the platform positioning Ph. Schune J.-Ch. Barrière P RAXIAL A LIGNMENT S YSTEM (barrel) positioning.
MUON_EDR-06 (Alignment) Enrique Calvo Alamillo February 28-March 1, 2002 Link Mechanics: Status.
The RASNIK Alignment System. Particle Physics CERN, Geneva, Swiss.
05/10/ MASTERMUX / USAMUX LAYOUT C.Guyot (Saclay)
22 July 2008 John Hart Toroid Field Parameterisation 1 Toroid Field Parameterisation An informal report to the RAL ATLAS meeting John Hart 22 July 2008.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
14 August Magnetic Field in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Masahiro Morii for the ATLAS Group Harvard University Laboratory for Particle Physics and.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
ATLAS EXPERIMENT INTEGRATION TASK: SPACE MANAGEMENT Tatiana Klioutchnikova 05/06/
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
Workshop on B/Tau Physics, Helsinki V. Karim ä ki, HIP 1 Software Alignment of the CMS Tracker V. Karimäki / HIP V. Karimäki / HIP Workshop.
Analysis of Metrology Data from First Two Small Disks Stephen Pate 5/11/111.
Drilling a Double Cosine-Theta Coil Hunter Blanton, Spencer L. Kirn, Christopher Crawford University of Kentucky Abstract: A double cosine theta coil is.
Projective Praxial =Proximity+Axial In-plane bil bml bol Muon Chamber Alignment (Saclay) goal: absolute 30um on sagitta sofar: relative movements (better.
Freiburg 7/07/20001 laser beam lens CCD (long arm) screen + grid CCD (short arm) glass plates at  45° STAMP : Saclay Telescope for the Alignment of Many.
BARREL ALIGNMENT PLATFORM POSITIONING Goal: Positioning of the platforms at their nominal position on the MDT chambers (No position measurement in a database).
Alignment Bars Requirements Strategy Layout Length Prediction Shape Prediction Readout Scheme Model to predict bar shape in the experiment Calibration.
1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Toronto, Canada High-Precision, Large-Volume Particle Tracking U. Bratzler* Outline (Example: Muon Tracking in ATLAS)
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
26/10/20051 BARREL ALIGNMENT: LIST OF PARAMETERS REQUIRED FOR THE POSITIONING AND THE CALIBRATION OF THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS Praxial system: - Platforms -
1 Possible setup for the H8 test beam F.Cerutti pIntroduction: from H8 Phase I to the system test pPossible setup in : Magnets on the H8 beam.
1 MuonGeoModel status report focus on issues relevant to , 20 Access to Condition DB with M. Verducci, R. Harrington MDT deformations with I. Logashenco.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
CLIC Module WG 20/07/2009 H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU Pre-alignment system and impact on module design.
2/4/2001Ludovico Pontecorvo INFN Roma1 Plans for the H8 system test: 2001/2002 Goals for the 2001/2002 Test beam Beam layout Chamber Supports 2001 Schedule.
Analyzing Praxial Platform Positions on MDT Barrel Chambers Using X-Ray Tomograph Measurements Chris Hayward Advisor: Silvia Schuh August 14, 2003 UM CERN.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.
Tracking Systems in VR.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
Visualization of the Optical Alignment System of the Muon Endcap Spectrometer in the H8-testbeam set-up Maaike Limper Making pretty pictures!
Calibration and production of PRAXIAL (*) sensors for the ATLAS muon spectrometer Optical Metrology - SPIE Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial Inspection.
17/03/01 PDR ATLAS Alignment, Olivier Cloué1 ATLAS ALIGNMENT (BARREL) : Installation at CERN (1) zEstimated dates : (Web planning) y11/2004 -> Start of.
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Installation scenario, status on the installation tools.
Project Office Activities R. Vuillermet 08/09/2015R. Vuillermet PH-ADO-PO1.
THE H8 TEST STAND Conceptual Design Mechanical supports Status of preparation Project schedule 1 (Brandeis, CERN, MPI, Seattle - presented by Sandro Palestini)
1 ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alignment LHC Days in Split, 5-9 Oct J.Krstic, M.Milosavljevic Institute of Physics, Belgrade D.Fassouliotis,C.Kourkoumelis,
Javier Castillo3rd LHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 15/06/ Status of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Alignment Strategies & Results from Cosmic run Javier.
Emulsion Test Beam first results Annarita Buonaura, Valeri Tioukov On behalf of Napoli emulsion group This activity was supported by AIDA2020.
PIXEL ladder alignment Hidemitsu ASANO. Photo analysis & survey beam data (with zero magnetic field) ① SVX standalone tracking Global Tracking Strategy.
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
Pierre-François Giraud, Muon Alignment Meeting1 Status of the barrel alignment system Pierre-François Giraud CERN.
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
LABELING OF BARREL ALIGNMENT CABLES
PANDA Muon Group Meeting, Protvino 7 June 2011 G
José Manuel Iñesta José Martínez Sotoca Mateo Buendía
PANDA Collaboration Meeting , BINP Sergey Pivovarov.
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Integration issues Denis Diyakov, Alexander Seletskiy,
LumiCal mechanical design, integration with LDC and laser alignment
Commissioning of the MUON Spectrometers in ATLAS and CMS
LCLS Undulator Fiducialization
RICH 2004 Characterization and compensation of magnetic distortions for the pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH Gianluca Aglieri Rinella,
Implementation of Chamber Misalignments and Deformations in the
Measurement and Characterization of a 5T Solenoid Field
The ATLAS Barrel Alignment Readout System
RICH 2004 Characterisation and compensation of magnetic distortions for the pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH Gianluca Aglieri Rinella,
Presentation transcript:

The barrel reference system1 THE BARREL REFERENCE SYSTEM C.Guyot (Saclay) Goal: Provide a geometrical survey of the whole barrel muon spectrometer giving the absolute chamber positions with a precision < 0.5 mm on translation and < 0.5 mrad on rotations Why: Correction of the projective system sagitta prediction Pattern recognition requirements (relative chamber positions are needed with a precision < 1mm ) Magnetic field reconstruction (aims at a reconstruction of the toroid coil positions w.r.t. chambers with a precision of about 1mm)

The barrel reference system2 dd Rotation axis Chamber rotated by an angle  Distance d between the plane of the projective sensors plane and the wire plane Projective sensors  Wire plane Correction to the projective system sagitta prediction The projective system predicts zero sagitta correction for this muon whereas a false sagitta of the of order  d is measured with the wire plane. With d = 50mm, the angle  has to be known with a precision < 0.5 mrad to keep this error on the sagitta below 25  m. BIL BML BOL

The barrel reference system3 Principle of the reference system (only one sector shown) (camera - LED sources)

The barrel reference system4 Reference system implementation: plate-chamber connection Closed wheel of plate-plate connections Foot plate BIL BIR BML Standard sector plate

The barrel reference system5 Plates on the toroid rib Supported via a 3 balls system Calibration: Ball triplets location on the plate measured with a 3D CMM (+- 10  m) Camera (Cf BCAMs calibration procedure in the end cap system) LED holes location w.r.t. balls known to <  m by construction CMOS camera Platform on MDT tubes

The barrel reference system6 Reference system implementation: BL-BS chambers connection BIL-BIS connection BML-BMS connection BOL-BOS connection Projective system

The barrel reference system7 Implementation on MDT chambers

The barrel reference system8 SIMULATION/RECONSTRUCTION (1): Principle of the simulation/reconstruction program: Mechanical elements (MDT chambers, sensor platform, reference plates) are simulated by a 3D nodes in space, connected by either rigid mechanical bars (fixed distance), by proximity sensors (distance measurement), by RASNIKs (sagitta measurement over 3 nodes) or camera/LED system (angular and distance measurements): A MDT chamber is described by 4 nodes at the corners + one central node, connected by rigid bars and RASNIKs (inplane). The 4 corner nodes also carry the praxial sensors, connected to other praxial nodes via axial RASNIKs and proximity measurements. The projective nodes and the reference system nodes are rigidly connected to the 4 MDT corner nodes. The reference frame is defined by 3 reference plate nodes (one is fixed, the second has 2 dof, the third only one dof). In the simulation, all nodes are moved in space with ranges [+- 5mm] in all 3 directions. The reconstruction algorithm is based on a global fit which accounts for all the nodes connections.

The barrel reference system9 Nodes layout in the simulation/reconstruction program (one sector) RASNIK Camera (BCAM) Plates on toroid ribs BIL BML BOL In-plane RASNIKs BOL BML BIL z y x y z x cm

The barrel reference system10 SIMULATION/RECONSTRUCTION (2): AXIAL RASNIK resolutions: 5  m in x/y, in magnification 100  rad on mask/pixel lines rotation CAMERA resolutions: 100  rad on absolute pointing direction 20  rad on relative spot angles (=> on distance measurement) PROXIMITY sensor resolutions: 20  m in x/y/z Precision on chamber NODE positioning: Praxial and projective nodes: 20  m in z/y, 150  m in x (tube direction) Reference system nodes : 200  m in x/y/z Precision on distance measurement between 2 plates on the same toroid coil: 100  m

The barrel reference system11 Reconstruction accuracy of the nodes corresponding to the toroid rib plates  x = 306  m  y = 216  m  z = 393  m   x = 117  rad   y = 99  rad   z = 76  rad cm rad TranslationsRotations

The barrel reference system12 Reconstruction accuracy of the nodes corresponding to the MDT corners  x = 321  m  y = 252  m  z = 482  m cm Translations Projective track sagitta reconstruction accuracy Generated  z = 4.5 mm  z = 20  m Reconstructed cm The measured position of a straight track hit in a chamber is calculated by interpolation w.r.t. the assumed positions of the 4 corner nodes. The generated sagitta results from the initial random nodes movements (supposed to be unknown).

The barrel reference system13 Conclusion: The proposed system provides the required accuracy on the absolute chamber positioning within a sector. The simulation/reconstruction study of the whole barrel system is yet to be performed. Status and planning: 05/2001: Final drawings of the MDT platforms (similar to the platform for the magnetic field sensors) and of the positioning tools (if required) 10/2001: Delivery to the MDT construction sites of the first platforms and of their positioning tools. 12/2001: first barrel MDT chambers build with reference platforms 2003: Assembly and calibration of the cameras 2003: Assembly and measurement of the reference plates. 2003: Construction of the LED supports 2003/2004: Assembly and calibration of the cameras for the BL-BS connections 2004: Installation on the toroid ribs before the chamber installation : Installation in the ATLAS cavern of the BL-BS extension plates with their cameras