Mobility Limited Flip-Based Sensor Networks Deployment Reporter: Po-Chung Shih Computer Science and Information Engineering Department Fu-Jen Catholic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1/22 Worst and Best-Case Coverage in Sensor Networks Seapahn Meguerdichian, Farinaz Koushanfar, Miodrag Potkonjak, and Mani Srivastava IEEE TRANSACTIONS.
Advertisements

Design Guidelines for Maximizing Lifetime and Avoiding Energy Holes in Sensor Networks with Uniform Distribution and Uniform Reporting Stephan Olariu Department.
Bidding Protocols for Deploying Mobile Sensors Reporter: Po-Chung Shih Computer Science and Information Engineering Department Fu-Jen Catholic University.
A Distributed Algorithm for the Dead End Problem of Location Based Routing in Sensor Networks Le Zou, Mi Lu, Zixiang Xiong, Department of Electrical Engineering,
Movement-Assisted Sensor Deployment Author : Guiling Wang, Guohong Cao, Tom La Porta Presenter : Young-Hwan Kim.
KAIST Adaptive Triangular Deployment Algorithm for Unattended Mobile Sensor Networks Suho Yang (September 4, 2008) Ming Ma, Yuanyuan Yang IEEE Transactions.
Target Tracking Algorithm based on Minimal Contour in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Taehyun Hwang, Tian He, and David Du Department of Computer.
Optimal Sleep-Wakeup Algorithms for Barriers of Wireless Sensors S. Kumar, T. Lai, M. Posner and P. Sinha, BROADNETS ’ 2007.
Dissemination protocols for large sensor networks Fan Ye, Haiyun Luo, Songwu Lu and Lixia Zhang Department of Computer Science UCLA Chien Kang Wu.
1 Worst and Best-Case Coverage in Sensor Networks Seapahn Meguerdichian, Farinaz Koushanfar, Miodrag Potkonjak, Mani Srivastava IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE.
SMART: A Scan-based Movement- Assisted Sensor Deployment Method in Wireless Sensor Networks Jie Wu and Shuhui Yang Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Dynamic Medial Axis Based Motion Planning in Sensor Networks Lan Lin and Hyunyoung Lee Department of Computer Science University of Denver
Online Data Gathering for Maximizing Network Lifetime in Sensor Networks IEEE transactions on Mobile Computing Weifa Liang, YuZhen Liu.
1 Efficient Placement and Dispatch of Sensors in a Wireless Sensor Network Prof. Yu-Chee Tseng Department of Computer Science National Chiao-Tung University.
On the Task Assignment Problem : Two New Efficient Heuristic Algorithms.
Yanyan Yang, Yunhuai Liu, and Lionel M. Ni Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology IEEE MASS 2009.
CS 712 | Fall 2007 Using Mobile Relays to Prolong the Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Wang, Vikram Srinivasan, Kee-Chaing Chua. National University.
Steady and Fair Rate Allocation for Rechargeable Sensors in Perpetual Sensor Networks Zizhan Zheng Authors: Kai-Wei Fan, Zizhan Zheng and Prasun Sinha.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS 2007 (TPDS 2007)
SOS: A Safe, Ordered, and Speedy Emergency Navigation Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks Andong Zhan ∗ †, Fan Wu ∗, Guihai Chen ∗ ∗ Shanghai Key Laboratory.
Exposure In Wireless Ad-Hoc Sensor Networks Seapahn Meguerdichian Computer Science Department University of California, Los Angeles Farinaz Koushanfar.
Efficient Gathering of Correlated Data in Sensor Networks
Dynamic Coverage Enhancement for Object Tracking in Hybrid Sensor Networks Computer Science and Information Engineering Department Fu-Jen Catholic University.
A Framework for Energy- Saving Data Gathering Using Two-Phase Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks Wook Chio, Prateek Shah, and Sajal K. Das Center for.
A novel gossip-based sensing coverage algorithm for dense wireless sensor networks Vinh Tran-Quang a, Takumi Miyoshi a,b a Graduate School of Engineering,
WMNL Sensors Deployment Enhancement by a Mobile Robot in Wireless Sensor Networks Ridha Soua, Leila Saidane, Pascale Minet 2010 IEEE Ninth International.
SoftCOM 2005: 13 th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks September 15-17, 2005, Marina Frapa - Split, Croatia.
Rate-based Data Propagation in Sensor Networks Gurdip Singh and Sandeep Pujar Computing and Information Sciences Sanjoy Das Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and David H.C. Du Dept. of.
Boundary Recognition in Sensor Networks by Topology Methods Yue Wang, Jie Gao Dept. of Computer Science Stony Brook University Stony Brook, NY Joseph S.B.
Efficient Deployment Algorithms for Prolonging Network Lifetime and Ensuring Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Yong-hwan Kim Korea.
Maximum Network Lifetime in Wireless Sensor Networks with Adjustable Sensing Ranges Cardei, M.; Jie Wu; Mingming Lu; Pervaiz, M.O.; Wireless And Mobile.
1 Mobile-Assisted Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks Nissanka B.Priyantha, Hari Balakrishnan, Eric D. Demaine, Seth Teller IEEE INFOCOM 2005 March.
An Energy Efficient Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks Seema Bandyopadhyay and Edward J. Coyle Presented by Yu Wang.
REECH ME: Regional Energy Efficient Cluster Heads based on Maximum Energy Routing Protocol Prepared by: Arslan Haider. 1.
An Energy-Efficient Voting-Based Clustering Algorithm for Sensor Networks Min Qin and Roger Zimmermann Computer Science Department, Integrated Media Systems.
Trade-offs Between Mobility and Density for Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Wang, Vikram Srinivasan and Kee-Chaing Chua National University of.
1 Probabilistic Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Nadeem Ahmed, Salil S. Kanhere and Sanjay Jha Computer Science and Engineering, University of New.
Bounded relay hop mobile data gathering in wireless sensor networks
Barrier Coverage With Wireless Sensors
1 WEEK 11 Graphs III Network Flow Problems A Simple Maximum-Flow Algorithm Izmir University of Economics.
Ai Chen, Ten H. Lai, Dong Xuan Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus Measuring and Guaranteeing Quality of.
By Naeem Amjad 1.  Challenges  Introduction  Motivation  First Order Radio Model  Proposed Scheme  Simulations And Results  Conclusion 2.
Efficient Computing k-Coverage Paths in Multihop Wireless Sensor Networks XuFei Mao, ShaoJie Tang, and Xiang-Yang Li Dept. of Computer Science, Illinois.
Maximizing Lifetime per Unit Cost in Wireless Sensor Networks
1 An Arc-Path Model for OSPF Weight Setting Problem Dr.Jeffery Kennington Anusha Madhavan.
Scalable Data Aggregation for Dynamic Events in Sensor Networks Kai-Wei Fan, Sha Liu, Prasun Sinha Computer Science and Engineering, Ohio State University.
Po-Yu Chen, Zan-Feng Kao, Wen-Tsuen Chen, Chi-Han Lin Department of Computer Science National Tsing Hua University IEEE ICPP 2011 A Distributed Flow-Based.
Barrier Coverage in Camera Sensor Networks ACM MobiHoc 2011 Yi Wang Guohong Cao Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University.
Hole Detection and Boundary Recognition in Wireless Sensor Networks Kun-Ying Hsieh ( 謝坤穎 ) Dept. of Computer Science and Information Engineering National.
1 EE5900 Advanced Embedded System For Smart Infrastructure Static Scheduling.
Mobile Sensor Deployment for a Dynamic Cluster-based Target Tracking Sensor Network Niaoning Shan and Jindong Tan Department of Electrical and Computter.
Global Clock Synchronization in Sensor Networks Qun Li, Member, IEEE, and Daniela Rus, Member, IEEE IEEE Transactions on Computers 2006 Chien-Ku Lai.
Adaptive Triangular Deployment Algorithm for Unattended Mobile Sensor Networks Ming Ma and Yuanyuan Yang Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering.
“LPCH and UDLPCH: Location-aware Routing Techniques in WSNs”. Y. Khan, N. Javaid, M. J. Khan, Y. Ahmad, M. H. Zubair, S. A. Shah.
Exploiting Sink Mobility for Maximizing Sensor Networks Lifetime Z. Maria Wang, Emanuel Melachrinoudis Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering.
Younghwan Yoo† and Dharma P. Agrawal‡ † School of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, KOREA ‡ OBR Center for Distributed.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
Efficient Point Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Jie Wang and Ning Zhong Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts Journal of Combinatorial.
Efficient Placement and Dispatch of Sensors in a Wireless Sensor Network You-Chiun Wang, Chun-Chi Hu, and Yu-Chee Tseng IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.
KAIS T Sensor Deployment Based on Virtual Forces Reference: Yi Zou and Krishnendu Chakarabarty, “Sensor Deployment and Target Localization Based on Virtual.
Repairing Sensor Network Using Mobile Robots Y. Mei, C. Xian, S. Das, Y. C. Hu and Y. H. Lu Purdue University, West Lafayette ICDCS 2006 Speaker : Shih-Yun.
I owa S tate U niversity Laboratory for Advanced Networks (LAN) Coverage and Connectivity Control of Wireless Sensor Networks under Mobility Qiang QiuAhmed.
T H E O H I O S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Computer Science and Engineering 1 1 Sriram Chellappan, Xiaole Bai, Bin Ma ‡ and Dong Xuan Presented by Sriram.
Prof. Yu-Chee Tseng Department of Computer Science
Barrier Coverage with Optimized Quality for Wireless Sensor Networks
Mobile-Assisted Localization in Sensor Network
EE5900 Advanced Embedded System For Smart Infrastructure
at University of Texas at Dallas
Edinburgh Napier University
Presentation transcript:

Mobility Limited Flip-Based Sensor Networks Deployment Reporter: Po-Chung Shih Computer Science and Information Engineering Department Fu-Jen Catholic University 2015/9/14

2 2 Outline  Introduction  Related work Edmonds-Karp algorithm Assumption  SOLUTION Overview Mobility Model Constructing the Virtual Graph  Performance  Conclusion

3 3 Introduction  It is not practical to manually position sensors in desired locations.  In this paper, we study deployment of sensor networks using mobile sensors.  Our problem is to determine a movement plan for the sensors in order to maximize the sensor network coverage and minimize the number of flips.

4 4 Introduction  A certain number of flip-based sensors are initially deployed in the sensor network that is clustered into multiple regions. (a) movement plan (b) result

5 5 (a) A snapshot of the sensor network and the optimal movement plan. (b) The resulting deployment. Introduction

6 6 Outline  Introduction  Related work Edmonds-Karp algorithm Assumption  SOLUTION Overview Mobility Model Constructing the Virtual Graph  Performance  Conclusion

7 7  Edmonds-Karp algorithm Use BFS to find the augmenting path. The augmenting path is a shortest path from s to t in the residual network. Running Time of Edmonds-Karp algorithm : O(VE 2 ). Given a network of seven nodes, source A, sink G, and capacities as shown below: Related work 7 7

8 8  Assumption All the sensors are mobile. Each sensor knows its position. The sensor network is a square field. It is divided into two-dimensional regions, where each region is a square of size R. { } R, where and are sensing and transmission ranges of the sensors. i.e., R =m*d Sensors can flip only once to a new location. Related work 8 8

9 9 Outline  Introduction  Related work Edmonds-Karp algorithm Assumption  SOLUTION Overview Mobility Model Constructing the Virtual Graph  Performance  Conclusion

10 SOLUTION  Overview Phase 1 : Each sensor in the network will first determine its position and the region it resides in. Phase 2 : Sensors then forward their location information to the base-station (region-head). Phase 3 : The base-station using the region information to determine the movement plan. Phase 4 : The base-station will then forward the movement plan to corresponding sensors in the network.

11 SOLUTION  Mobility Model First : The distance to which a sensor can flip is fixed and is equal to F. Second : Sensors can flip to distances between 0 and F.  Parameters definition F : The maximum distance a sensor can flip. d : F is an integral multiple of the basic unit d. ( sensors can flip once to distances d, 2d, 3d,... nd from its current location, where nd = F ). C : C=n denotes the sensor has n choices for the flip distance ( between d and maximum distance F ).

12 Parameters definition (Cont.) Hole : Region without any sensor. Source : Region with at least two sensors. Forwarder : Region with only one sensor.  EX1 : F=d, C=1, reachable regions of region 1 are regions 2 and 5.  EX2 : F=2d, C=1, reachable regions of region 1 are regions 3 and 9.  EX3 : F=2d, C=n, reachable regions of region 1 are regions 2,3,5, and 9. SOLUTION 12

13 SOLUTION  Constructing the Virtual Graph for the Case R = d, F = d, C = 1

14 SOLUTION  Constructing the Virtual Graph for the Case R = d, F = d, C = 1 Case2 R = d, F = 2d, C = 1 Case3 R = d, F = 2d, C = n

15 SOLUTION 15  Constructing the Virtual Graph for the Case R = 2d, F = d, C =

16 SOLUTION  Theorem 1. Let be the minimum-cost maximum-flow plan in GV. Its corresponding flip plan will maximize coverage and minimize the number of flips.

17 Outline  Introduction  Related work Edmonds-Karp algorithm Assumption  SOLUTION Overview Mobility Model Constructing the Virtual Graph  Performance  Conclusion

18 Performance Qi : The number of regions with at least one sensor at initial deployment. Qo : The number of regions with at least one sensor after the movement plan determined by our solution is executed. CI = Qo – Qi (Coverage Improvement) FD=J/Qo – Qi (Denoting J as the optimal number of flips as determined by our solution). Network sizes : 300*300 units and 150*150 units. The region sizes are R = 10 and R = 20 units. The basic unit of flip distance d = 10 units. C=1 and C=n. The number of sensors deployed is equal to the number of regions. PN = P/Q (Denoting P as the total number of packets (or messages) sent and Q as the number of regions). : Different distributions in initial deployment.

19 Performance

20 Performance

21 Performance

22 Performance

23 Performance

24 Performance

25 Outline  Introduction  Related work Edmonds-Karp algorithm Assumption  SOLUTION Overview Mobility Model Constructing the Virtual Graph  Performance  Conclusion

26 Conclusion  We proposed a minimum-cost maximum- flow based solution to optimize coverage and the number of flips.

27 Thanks for your attention