Discussion Items for Inter-Provider Service Performance Metrics Ralph Santitoro CTO Office Inter-Provider QoS Workshop at MIT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
Advertisements

1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum MEF 19 Abstract Test Suite for UNI Type 1 February 2008.
Introducing the Specifications of the MEF
Introducing the Specifications of the MEF
Japan Telecom Information & Communication Labs
Ralph Santitoro Director of CE Market Development Meeting the Challenges for Cloud Service Delivery over Carrier Ethernet.
Ethernet Access Services Definition and Implementation
Heavy Reading Packet-Optical Transport Evolution – May 19, NYC Ralph Santitoro Carrier Ethernet Market Development
Ralph Santitoro Carrier Ethernet Market Development 22 March 2011 Connection-Oriented Ethernet for Cloud-based Unified Communications.
Simulation Study on the Effect of the trTCM Parameters Hakyong KIM R&D Center, Corecess Inc. Tel : PCS : Mail :
HIERARCHY REFERENCING TIME SYNCHRONIZATION PROTOCOL Prepared by : Sunny Kr. Lohani, Roll – 16 Sem – 7, Dept. of Comp. Sc. & Engg.
doc.: IEEE /157r0 Submission March 2003 Allen Hollister, PlantronicsSlide & VoIP Allen Hollister Plantronics.
William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition Chapter 13 Congestion in Data Networks.
CMP206 – Introduction to Data Communication & Networks Lecture 1 - Networking Fundamentals.
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 – QoS.
Introducing the Specifications of the MEF
Traffic Manager Vahid Tabatabaee Fall 2007.
Constructs for Carrier Ethernet Networks and Services Ralph Santitoro Director of Carrier Ethernet Market Development, Fujitsu Founding Member and Director,
Competitive Analysis of Buffer Policies with SLA Commitments Boaz Patt-Shamir, Tel Aviv University Gabriel Scalosub, University of Toronto Yuval Shavitt,
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model Lesson 4.10: Deploying End-to-End QoS.
Multiple constraints QoS Routing Given: - a (real time) connection request with specified QoS requirements (e.g., Bdw, Delay, Jitter, packet loss, path.
Metrics for Performance Evaluation Nelson Fonseca State University of Campinas.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 8. CS Summer 2003 Populating LFIB with LDP Assigned/Learned Labels Changes in the LFIB may be triggered routing or.
Computer Networks: Performance Measures1 Computer Network Performance Measures.
Color Aware Switch algorithm implementation The Computer Communication Lab (236340) Spring 2008.
Design of QoS Router Terrance Lee. Broadband Internet Architecture Intelligent Access Electronic Switch (Intserv or Diffserv) Switching /Routing QoS Security.
… what buyers need to understand … what providers need to communicate Ralph Santitoro Co-chair, MEF Technical Marketing Committee
Introduction to Ethernet Services
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum February 2008.
Chapter 3 part II Data and Signals
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
Understanding QoS Fundamentals. The basic overview for QoS is “Who goes 1 st? ” from an exit perspective on a switch or router. ‘Evil Villains’ in the.
A Security Analysis of the Network Time Protocol (NTP) Presentation by Tianen Liu.
Bell Labs Advanced Technologies EMEAAT Proprietary Information © 2004 Lucent Technologies1 Overview contributions for D27 Lucent Netherlands Richa Malhotra.
Protection notice / Copyright notice Technical Sales, COM FN A SB / May 2006 SURPASS hiD 6600 Enhanced QoS Solution.
Metro Ethernet Forum Layer 2 Services
Integrated Services (RFC 1633) r Architecture for providing QoS guarantees to individual application sessions r Call setup: a session requiring QoS guarantees.
Page 19/13/2015 Chapter 8 Some conditions that must be met for host to host communication over an internetwork: a default gateway must be properly configured.
QOS مظفر بگ محمدی دانشگاه ایلام. 2 Why a New Service Model? Best effort clearly insufficient –Some applications need more assurances from the network.
CSC 336 Data Communications and Networking Lecture 8d: Congestion Control : RSVP Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
TICTOC Problem Statement TICTOC BOF IETF68 Stewart Bryant Yaakov (J) Stein )
MEF Ethernet Traffic Parameters draft-dimitri-mef-ethernet-traffic-parameters-00.txt IETF65 - Dallas - Mar’06.
Building Differentiated Services Using the Assured Forwarding PHB Group Juha Heinänen Telia Finland Inc.
Quality of Service (QoS) of interconnected Packet- based Networks Workshop on “Monitoring Quality of Service and Quality of Experience of Multimedia Services.
Quality of Service (QoS) Monitoring and Functions of Internet ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Africa (Kampala, Uganda, June 2014) Yvonne UMUTONI.
Metro Ethernet UNI Standards Update Gary Southwell VP of Product Marketing Internet Photonics MEF Marketing Collateral co-chair
Chapter 8: Internet Operation. Network Classes Class A: Few networks, each with many hosts All addresses begin with binary 0 Class B: Medium networks,
Ryad Ben-El-Kezadri, Giovanni Pau Network Research Lab, UCLA TimeRemap: Stable & Accurate Time in Vehicular Networks REVE Workshop
Carrier Ethernet Last Update Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 1.
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 - Queuing and Basics of QoS.
PART1: IP SLA Voice Performance Measurement and related technologies 1.
EE 122: Lecture 15 (Quality of Service) Ion Stoica October 25, 2001.
Cisco 2 - Routers Perrine. J Page 112/19/2015 Chapter 8 TCP/IP Error Message Some of the conditions that must be met in order for host to host communication.
CS4231 Parallel and Distributed Algorithms AY 2006/2007 Semester 2 Lecture 5 Instructor: Haifeng YU.
SLA/SLS Fundamental concepts SLAs/SLSs are the essential mechanisms for agreeing, configuring, delivering, guaranteeing and evaluating the obtained QoS.
Precise measurement of physical link delay 802.1as, IEEE 802 plenary Lu Huang
An End-to-End Service Architecture r Provide assured service, premium service, and best effort service (RFC 2638) Assured service: provide reliable service.
1 1 Carrier Ethernet Services Overview 26 September2007 Moderator: Ralph Santitoro - Turin Networks Panelists: Tony Tam - Anda Networks Dr. Sarath Kumar.
Anthony Magee, 6 th September 2013 Carrier Ethernet Service Life-Cycle Management.
Tel Hai Academic College Department of Computer Science Prof. Reuven Aviv Markov Models for data flow In Computer Networks Resource: Fayez Gebali, Analysis.
1 © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 2 v3.1 Module 8 TCP/IP Suite Error and Control Messages.
Voice Performance Measurement and related technologies
Introducing the Specifications of the MEF
Egress Bandwidth Profile Considerations for Multipoint
MEF 10.4 Notes MEF 10.4 Notes.
… what buyers need to understand … what providers need to communicate
EE 122: Quality of Service and Resource Allocation
PTP SOLUTIONS: Using PTP as a backup to GPS
Presentation transcript:

Discussion Items for Inter-Provider Service Performance Metrics Ralph Santitoro CTO Office Inter-Provider QoS Workshop at MIT October 20-21, 2004

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 1 Key Service Performance Metrics Rate of Service (RoS) / Bandwidth Profile –Octet count per UNI/NNI, CoS aggregate or Flow per time Performance of Service (PoS) –One Way Packet Delay (also looking at Round Trip) –Packet Delay Variation –Packet Loss Ratio Availability of Service (AoS) –% of time PoS PMs are met over time interval Need Common Terminology, Definitions and Parameters

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 2 Bandwidth Profile Parameters Let’s agree on some common definitions for rate enforcement parameters 4 main parameters for each type of bandwidth profile – CIR/CBS determines packet delivery per PoS objectives EIR/EBS determines amount of excess packet delivery CM (Color Mode) determines the whether packet color markings per CoS should be honored or ignored –EIR ≠ PIR, EBS ≠ PBS –PIR = CIR+EIR Common Definitions and Terms for Rate Enforcement

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 3 Color Indications Green –Packets conformant to CIR/CBS and SLA applicable per PoS parameters (delay, delay variation and loss) Yellow –Packets not conformant with CIR/CBS but conformant with EIR/EBS and SLA not applicable –Packets admitted to network but may be dropped under congestion Red –Packets not conformant to CIR/CBS or EIR/EBS –Packets typically dropped but may be admitted to network Red packets get dropped ahead of yellow packets

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 4 Rate Enforcement / Color from a Token Bucket Perspective Common parameters / definitions result in consistent service performance Metro Ethernet Forum trTCM algorithm for Ethernet services –MEF 5 tech. spec. – Applicable to Ethernet and IP services > CBS > EBS C E New token added CIR/8 times/second New token added EIR/8 times/second Packets arrive at NNI Packets accepted at NNI ≤ CBS ≤ EBS Color-Blind NNI Color-Aware NNI

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 5 NNI Bandwidth Profiles MEF has defined these for UNI. Some possible NNI variants below BW Profile to use depends upon type of service supported at NNI NNI S1S1 S2S2 S3S3 BWP Per NNI Useful for single CoS for all services NNI CoS 1 CoS 2 CoS 3 BPW Per CoS 1 Aggregate BWP Per CoS 2 Aggregate BWP Per CoS 3 Aggregate Useful for services with similar performance requirements, e.g., Gold/Silver/Bronze IP VPN NNI S1S1 CoS 6 BWP Per Subscriber CoS 6 CoS 4 CoS 2 BWP Per Subscriber CoS 4 BWP Per Subscriber CoS 2 S2S2 Useful for services requiring stringent, common performance among subscribers, e.g., VoIP service Is this really needed at NNI?

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 6 Performance of Service (PoS) Packet Delay (One Way) –P percentile of the delay of all successfully delivered Green packets per CoS over time interval T –E.g., PD = 100ms 99.9% over 5 min. intervals Packet Delay Variation (a.k.a. jitter) –P percentile of the difference of delays of green packet pairs within time interval T with inter-packet time interval of Δt –Selection of Δt related to application –E.g., PDV = 5ms 99.9% over a 5 min. intervals, Δt = 5ms Packet Loss Ratio –Ratio of number of discarded green packets during time interval T to number of ingress green packets during the time interval T –E.g., PLR = 0.1% over a 5 min. intervals

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 7 POS PM Zoning Zoning used with PoS PMs to factor in delay introduced due to distance ZoneDistance 100 km Metro 1,000 km Regional 5,000 km National 10,000 km Continental >50,000 km Global PoS PMs in SLA based on Zone Access / Aggregation 10 km

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 8 Performance of Service (PoS) Time Sync / Stamping Critical for one way delay/delay variation measurements IEEE 1588 highlights ( –Provides a deterministic injection and extraction of timestamp information at source and destination MACs to distribute frequency & optional phase aligned clock reference –Sync messages sent at source (master) to end points (slaves) MAC injects precision timestamp –or- Follow-up message sent containing precise master sending time –All slaves compute offset and correct their clocks –Can be sent as UDP/IP packets or as native Ethernet packets Stratum traceable reference over a packet network

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 9 Availability of Service (AoS) Calculated via the following over time interval T –Packet Delay, Delay Variation and Loss Ratio performance objectives being met –UNI or NNI (L1) availability E.g., AoS = 99.9% calculated over 15 minute intervals Would be useful to have BCP guidelines for interval T / CoS –T differs depending upon CoS performance objectives

Inter-Provider QoS Workshop – Service PMs – October 22, Santitoro 10 PM Service Attribute Summary Service Attribute PM descriptionParameters PoS Packet Delay (ms) P percentile, T measurement interval Packet Delay Variation (ms) P percentile, T measurement interval Packet Loss Ratio (%) P percentile, T measurement interval Δt inter-packet time interval RoS Bandwidth Profile per NNI Bandwidth Profile per CoS Aggregate Bandwidth Profile per Subscriber CoS AoSPD, PDV, PLR SLOs being met (%)T measurement interval