Mod_18_10 Intra Day Trading Conference Call Commercial Offer Data for Interconnector Units in Ending Overlap Optimisation Period (EOOP) for WD1 MSP Software.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to do intraday capacity pricing in a continuous trade environment? 10 October 2011 NRA-TSO-PX meeting (Informal minutes, made during workshop, of the.
Advertisements

INTRA-DAY TRADING: Conference Call COD for Interconnector Units in WD1 Ending Overlap Optimisation Period (EOOP) 29 November 2011.
Mod_34_11 : Transition to SEM Intra-Day Trading 6 December 2011.
Mod 26_12 Notification Time for updating Interconnector Technical Data.
1 Loss Adjustment When Exporting Mod 24_11 Reflection of Physical Fixity of Interconnector Flows in Operational Data Transactions hen Exporting Modifications.
MOD_17_12 Report on Offered Capacity in Implicit Auctions.
Overview of Make Whole Payments Modifications Committee Meeting February 2015.
Discussion of Inter-RTO Seams Issues Presented by: Midwest ISO and NYISO Independent Market Monitor David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics October 7,
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Project Analysis and Forecast Risk ADVANCE-Managerial Finance Class Notes for Chapter 11 D.B. Hamm—updated Jan
Modification MOD_24_12 Amendments to the MIUN Calculator to address instances of Excessive Area.
MPID 223 (Failure to Follow Synchronising Instruction) JGCRP 12 th November 2014 (Anne Trotter)
1 TAC Review of PRR 650 August 3, Board Charge to TAC Board remanded PRR 650 to TAC for: “an analysis of how to ensure that consumers pay only.
1 Geographic Integration, Transmission Constraints, and Electricity Restructuring Comments by Erin Mansur Yale University, SOM and FES.
Real LifeSimulation Risk HighLow Why Use Simulation? Natural next step in the Portfolio Management Maturity Model.
LSU 10/09/2007Project Schedule1 The Project Schedule Project Management Unit #4.
Modifications Committee Mod_18_10: Intra-Day Trading 25 November 2010.
Ana-Maria Oprescu, Thilo Kielmann (Vrije University) Presented By Gal Cohen Cloud Computing Seminar CS Technion, Spring 2012.
Review of Bulk Energy Storage in SEM Gaelectric Energy Storage T&SC Modification Working Group 6 th September 2012 Mullany Engineering Consultancy Energy,
INTRA-DAY TRADING DESIGN Future Options for Limited Communication Failure (LCF) 27 September 2011.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
Short Term Testing Mod 65_08 Modification Committee 25 th November 2010.
Capacity trade and transfer mechanism and the next AMSEC auction Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 9 May 2007.
Australian Energy Market Commission Congestion Management Review and related projects ACCC Regulatory Conference Thursday, 26 th July 2007.
INTRA-DAY TRADING Development of Modification(s) 1st February 2011.
Evaluation of Proposals for New Rules for Energy Storage Gaelectric Energy Storage T&SC Modification Working Group 23 rd October 2012.
Market Trials - Friday call Credit and Treasury Weekly Update September 3, 2010.
Day Ahead Market Working Group March 31, Agenda Review minutes - March 24 Coral Proposal - Working Group Discussion Loads/LDCs and DAM.
SEM – One Year On Liam Ryan, Market Operations Manager.
INTRA-DAY TRADING Modification Development 5 April 2011.
INTRA-DAY TRADING DESIGN Changes required to the MIUN Calculation for SEM Intra-Day Trading 27 March 2012.
1 Mod_18_10 : Intra Day Trading in the SEM Working Group 4 August 19 th 2010 SEMO High-Level Impact Assessment.
Mod_18_10_v2 : SEM Intra-Day Trading 6 December 2011.
Addressing Constrained-Off Payments for Intertie Transactions Darren Matsugu, Supervisor - Markets, IESO Presentation to Technical Panel: June 2, 2015.
Cross border redispatching Central West Electricity Regional Energy Market Mini Forum Alain Marien 20 th of June 2006.
Agenda point 2a) Plans for handling of losses on HVDC cables in NWE day-ahead price coupling IG Meeting Copenhagen 19. September 2012.
1 IMM Pricing Concerns with PFR and FFR Proposed pricing structure provides incentive for FFR to offer at less than cost. Dual clearing price pricing structure.
Interconnector Under Test Update to TSC Modifications Committee 5 th December 2012.
C O U P L E D NWE Day Ahead Price Coupling Handling of losses in the algorithm IG meeting, December 5 th, 2012, DERA premises, Copenhagen.
Mod_02_13 Registration of Charges Legal Spending Update.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
N ODAL P ROGRAM U PDATE TO C OPS Jim Galvin.
Intraday Trading March RAs raised a Modification (18_10) in March 2010, proposing the implementation of “intra-day trading” in the SEM. The Modifications.
Review Group -140 Thoughts on additional information requirements.
Impact Assessment Mod_17_12 : Report on Offered Capacity in Implicit Auctions 24 October 2012.
Trades and Transfers Workshop, 6 th November 2007.
DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers Steve Reedy Market Design Manager TAC 2 September 2010.
WMS – Nodal Credit Integration Start Up May 19,
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
Interconnector Physical Notification submissions following XBID (Cross Border Intra Day) market implementation; the cross border gate closure definition.
SLIDE 1 FCAS CAUSER PAYS: STAGE 1 DISPUTE MEETING BACKGROUND 15 MARCH 2016 PRESENTED BY LOUISE THOMSON.
Alternative Approach to Enduring Exit Flat Capacity & Revenue Recovery Gas TCMF 14 th December 2006.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Calculating CRR Auction Portfolio Exposure:
Entry Capacity Overrun price calculation
Understanding Area Balancing
* Amendment to Appendix P to ensure correct treatment of Interconnector Unit Offer Data 29th May 2012 * 1##
GCE PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS SERVICES AS 3
Intervention pricing working group
Correction of Minor Material Drafting Errors
Market Design in New England
Update to Unit Under Test Process
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
Correction to No Load Cost - “and” vs “or”
Mod 09_19 - Removal of locational constraints from Imbalance Pricing
Interconnector trading in SEM 7th June 2007
%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%9F%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%9C/%E0 %A4%B0%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE-
Mod_10_19 Removal of Negative QBOAs Related to Dispatchable Priority Dispatch Units from the Imbalance Price 27th June 2019.
%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%9F%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%9C/%E0 %A4%B0%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE-
Presentation transcript:

Mod_18_10 Intra Day Trading Conference Call Commercial Offer Data for Interconnector Units in Ending Overlap Optimisation Period (EOOP) for WD1 MSP Software Run 29 th November 2010

TW EA1 09:30EA2 11:30WD1 08:00 EA1 CODEA1 MIUNs fixed EA2 MIUNs + EA1 MIUNs fixed EA2 MIUNs fixed WD1 MIUNs + + LOW IMPORT PRICE HIGH IMPORT PRICE import EOOP SOOPTWEOOPTWEOOP OPTION 1 zero COD OPTION 2 EA2 COD OPTION 3 persist ? ? Scenario 1: Low to High Import Price NB No system change throughout the day to load/wind/gen availability/gen COD

TW EA1 09:30EA2 11:30WD1 08:00 EA1 CODEA1 MIUNs fixed EA2 MIUNs + EA1 MIUNs fixed EA2 MIUNs fixed WD1 MIUNs + + HIGH IMPORT PRICE LOW IMPORT PRICE import NB No system change throughout the day to load/wind/gen availability/gen COD EOOP SOOPTWEOOPTWEOOP OPTION 1 zero COD OPTION 2 EA2 COD OPTION 3 persist ? ? Scenario 2: High to Low Import Price

The optimisation for EOOP WD1 will influence the Interconnector flow for the last few hours of the relevant Trading Day (i.e. the end of the WD1 Trading Window). The outcome of the optimisation becomes the actual Interconnector flow. Any COD values used in the WD1 EOOP can only be a best estimate / guess, as bidding for these Trading Periods has not yet occurred. TSOs are concerned to minimise swings in Interconnector flow for bidding patterns that are not known. Such swings are likely to result in increases in constraint costs. Initial Considerations

If settlement optimisation outcomes (i.e. using actual bid values) are different from the dispatched values, this results in additional constraints. Once the WD1 schedule is produced, the Interconnector flow for the EOOP Trading Periods may be adjusted (if EA2 produces a lower flow than WD1, MIUNs will be adjusted in the previous Trading Day). Impacts on Constraints

For EA1/EA2, using the COD from the first 6 hours for the EOOP is a reasonable compromise. However, for WD1:  Using zero COD – is likely to produce an incorrect Interconnector schedule.  Using EA1/EA2 COD values from the start of the day – is very likely to be incorrect, as will not reflect price changes between EA2 and WD1 and may result in “artificial” swings in flow.  Persistence – reduces the likelihood of large “artificial” changes in the Interconnector flow at the end of the WD1 Trading Window. Options