C 1 November 13, 2009 Show-Ling Jang Professor of Economics, National Taiwan University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Natale Renato Fazio, Stefano Menghinello, Carmela Pascucci and Carla Sciullo Foreign trade and multinational enterprises statistics Division ISTAT ITALY.
Advertisements

Doing an Econometric Project Or Q4 on the Exam. Learning Objectives 1.Outline how you go about doing your own econometric project 2.How to answer Q4 on.
IDENTIFYING HOT BRAZILIAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: TECH MINING METHODS FOR RELATING SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE AND EMERGING RESEARCH AREAS EU-SPRI CONFERENCE,
1 ECA Technology Absorption and Technological Development: What Can We Learn from Patent Data? Lee Branstetter Carnegie Mellon University and NBER June.
Assessing Law and Order The Lesson from the Global Competitiveness Index and the Growth Competitiveness Index  Irene Mia  Senior Economist  Global Competitiveness.
Link creation and profile alignment in the aNobii social network Luca Maria Aiello et al. Social Computing Feb 2014 Hyewon Lim.
Global Event on Measuring the Information Society, May 2008, Palais des Nations, Geneva Session 4: Measurement of ICT Impact ICT and labour productivity,
Europe and Central Asia Region
 Jennifer Blanke Director, Senior Economist World Economic Forum  Montenegro | 20 May, 2008 Assessing Southeast Europe’s Competitiveness in an International.
Worldwide Nanotechnology Development: A Comparative Study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO Patents Artificial Intelligence Lab Department of Management Information.
An Introduction to International Trade
Introduction to International Trade
1 Problems of measurement and analysis in the national accounts under rapidly growing globalization. Soli Peleg Central Bureau of Statistics, Israel.
Figure 14.1 Economic Growth in the ADE/ASR model.
Factors affecting contractors’ risk attitudes in construction projects: Case study from China 박병권.
Master in Engineering Policy and Management of Technology, 8 th Edition - Science & Technology Innovation Policy 1 - By Keith Pavitt SPRU – Science Policy.
Universities and Firms: A Comparative Analysis of the Interactions Between Market Process, Organizational Strategies and Governance Seminar, September.
RESEARCH COLLABORATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERATURE OUTPUT: A SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS Presented by S.JEYAPRIYA, 2 nd MLIS, BDU, Trichy Guide Dr.
Show-Long Jang a and Simona Sung b a Department od Economics, National Taiwan University, No.21, Hsu-Chow Road, Taipei, 100 Taiwan b School of Business,
The Emerging High Tech Competitors from Asia, Contrasts between the national systems of innovation and its performance of China and India Professor Sunil.
DIGEST OF KEY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2008 Presentation Slides National Science Board.
1 International Knowledge Spillovers in the Wind Power Industry – Evidence from Europe Jonas A Grafstrom Luleå University of Technology Financial support.
Native and immigrant fertility patterns in Greece: a comparative study based on aggregated census statistics and IPUMS micro-data Cleon Tsimbos 1, Georgia.
 Jennifer Blanke Director, Senior Economist World Economic Forum  Montenegro | 20 May, 2008 Assessing Southeast Europe’s Competitiveness in an International.
1 Patent information for strategic technology management 作者: Holger Ernst 報告者:楊易霖 World Patent Information 25 (2003) 233–242.
1 1 Agglomeration of global office skyscrapers: Lessons learned Sofia Dermisi Roosevelt University USA 20 th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference.
Abstract Objective Selected Results To determine whether globalization influence of the internet results in similarity in web browsing behavior. To determine.
Company LOGO New Paradigm for International Insurance Comparison: With an Application to Comparison of Seven Insurance Markets Wei Zheng, Peking University.
Who emits most? An analysis of UK households’ CO2 emissions and their association with socio-economic factors Milena Büchs & Sylke V. Schnepf with Nick.
April 9, 2003Santiago, Chile The ISI Database: Reflecting the Best of International and Regional Research Keith R. MacGregor Sr. Vice President The Americas,
System Analysis of Virtual Team Collaboration Management System based on Cloud Technology Panita Wannapiroon, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Division of Information.
Patterns of Event Causality Suggest More Effective Corrective Actions Abstract: The Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) has used a consistent.
9. Fundamental Concepts of Macroeconomics 1.Objectives and Methods of Macroeconomics 2.Economic Growth 3.National Accounting.
BIA 2610 – Statistical Methods Chapter 1 – Data and Statistics.
WORKSHOP ON TEACHING AND RESEARCH OF TRADE AND POVERTY: Conceptual and Methodological approaches and Policy Implications Peacock, Hotel, Dar-es-Salaam,
1 STAT 500 – Statistics for Managers STAT 500 Statistics for Managers.
Globalization Theme: Impact of globalization and related responses (2) 9 Factors which influence the spread and evenness the spread and evenness of globalization.
Chapter 2 Doing Sociological Research Key Terms. scientific method Involves several steps in research process, including observation, hypothesis testing,
SCIENCE THE STUDY OF LIVING THINGS!. GROWTH VS DEVELOPMENT Growth is the process by which an organism becomes larger. Development is the process of change.
Methodology for deriving the STRI Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås Alexandros Ragoussis OECD Trade and Agriculture OEC D/TAD Services expert meeting 2 July 2009.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LECTURE 1: The World of International Economics.
1 Dilemmas in energy consumption, international trade and employment: Analysing the impact of embodied energy in traded goods on employment China University.
Week 2 The lecture for this week is designed to provide students with a general overview of 1) quantitative/qualitative research strategies and 2) 21st.
Holly Wang Workshop at CAU December 15, 2010 Conducting Empirical Research and Publishing in International Journals.
Knowledge sharing and creation in a teachers’ professional virtual community Presenter: Che-Yu Lin Advisor: Min-Puu Chen Date: August 5, Lin, F.,
BUILDING NANOBANK Data Structure and Selection Criteria Jason Fong and Emre Uyar University of California, Los Angeles 1.
Slide 12.1 Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, 5 th Edition, © Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill 2009.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 An Introduction to International Trade.
Sociology. Sociology is a science because it uses the same techniques as other sciences Explaining social phenomena is what sociological theory is all.
V MARKET RESEARCH REPORT ON GLOBAL AND CHINESE MICROWAVE OVEN INDUSTRY, Published: Apr Pages: 150 Category: Polymer.
V MARKET RESEARCH REPORT ON GLOBAL AND CHINESE ELECTRONIC SCALE FOR PERSONAL CARE INDUSTRY, Published: Apr Pages: 150 Category: Polymer.
Stat 101Dr SaMeH1 Statistics (Stat 101) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Almajma’ah University.
V 2015 MEDICAL ADHESIVES AND SEALANTS INDUSTRY REPORT - GLOBAL AND CHINESE MARKET SCENARIO Published: Jan Pages: 150 Category: Polymer.
The swedish research barometer 2016
JRC – Territorial Development Unit Petros Gkotsis 08 March 2017
Bibliometric Analysis of Herbal Medicine Publications, 1991 to 2004
A Comparative Study of the Publication on Alzheimer’s Disease
Dealing with data qualitative data The main report
Vertical Specialization in Multinational Firms
Ming-Yao Chen#, Wen-Ta Chiu and Yuh-Shan Ho*
3School of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Is this the Asian Century?
Tabulations and Statistics
Statistical Data Analysis
Econometric Tests of Copyright Openness
Defining Development.
South Asia Challenges and benefits of research collaboration in a diverse region March 2019 Maria de Kleijn-Lloyd.
South Asia Challenges and benefits of research collaboration in a diverse region March 2019 Maria de Kleijn-Lloyd.
Presentation transcript:

c 1 November 13, 2009 Show-Ling Jang Professor of Economics, National Taiwan University

Outline Introduction 2 The trend of patent production in China 3 Data source and procedure 4 Characteristics of the coinventorship structure 5 The determinants of joint invention of countries 6 Conclusion 7 2 Abstract 1

3  This study examines inventor data by country of residence, and by analyzing main collaborating countries with China in global technology production during , we demonstrate the evolving trend of an emerging market in the collaborative patenting network.  In addition to exploring the pattern of cross- border joint inventions, by linking patent data and other macro-economic factors, we model the propensity of China and other countries in engaging co-inventing activities. We find that China currently plays a supporting role in the international coinventorship.

Introduction 4 First Stage Second Stage We first provide a typology on the collaborative inventing network at country level, taking China as our focal country. Co- invention happens when joint invention between at least one inventor from China and at least one inventor from other country. Based on the indicators derived from the first exploratory stage of our analysis, we further investigate what determine the likelihood of joint invention between China and foreign co- inventors. The objective of this study is two-fold. We use patent data granted at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (hereafter USPTO) to examine the pattern of coinventorship in China over the period

The trend of patent production in China USPTO patent grants The number of patent applications per billion yuan of real R&D expenditure nearly doubled -The number of patent grants has more than tripled In terms of sheer quantity, the patent production in China has recently gaining momentum in absolute count and the patenting propensity has similarly increased. USPTO patent applicationsDomestic patent activities China’s patent application to USPTO -Increases ten times within the two recent decades, and is most conspicuous from 1997 China’s patents granted by USPTO -In year 2002 amount to 289, ranked 21 worldwide -The number increase to 1225, ranked 12 worldwide in year Comparing to the BRIC countries the total counts of BRIC’s utility patent grants by USPTO BRAZIL: 2094 RUSSIA: 2409 INDIA: 4080 CHINA: 5162

The trend of patent production in China (cont’d) Figure 1 Trend of patent production in China 6

Data source and procedure 7 Data source In this study, we used the USTPO database to examine the pattern of inventive collaborations between China and other countries. Utility patents, patents for invention, are chosen. Because utility patents have been considered as indicative of technological output. Because there are only limited numbers of patent production in the earlier decades, we choose to cover period from 1997, when we begin to witness a patent boom, to Database Patent type Period We included in our sample all patents involving Chinese inventors as long as one or more of the inventors were located in China. Since 1997, Hong Kong has been considered as the special administrated region of China. We distinguished patents with Hong Kong origin from the analysis due to its marked differences in economic development. Since 1997, Hong Kong has been considered as the special administrated region of China. We distinguished patents with Hong Kong origin from the analysis due to its marked differences in economic development.

Data source and procedure (cont’d) We included in our sample all patents involving Chinese inventors as long as one or more of the inventors were located in China. Total of 5374 China’s utility patents granted by USPTO during Procedure 2. Technological field analysis We focus on the main collaborating countries that conduct co- inventing activities with China We further examine the ownership of these co-inventions. 1. Country pair approach 3. The ownership of these co- inventions We also code the technological field of such co-invention based on Hall’s taxonomy (Hall, 2001).

Characteristics of the coinventorship structure Our patent dataset enables us to examine the various aspects of the co-inventing activities, such as: propensity team size and its composition geographical distribution of partners technological directions the evolving role of China Co-inventingactivitiesCo-inventingactivities 9

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 To what extent have co-invented patents accounted for China’s total patent production share? Who partners with China to jointly invent? Under what type of technological fields does joint invention occur? How the authorship and ownership of China’s co-invented patents reveal the collaboration nature? Characteristics of the coinventorship structure (cont’d) 10

Characteristics of the coinventorship structure (cont’d) 11 Figure 2 China's co-invented patent count and its patent share by year

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 To what extent have co-invented patents accounted for China’s total patent production share? Who partners with China to jointly invent? Under what type of technological fields does joint invention occur? How the authorship and ownership of China’s co-invented patents reveal the collaboration nature? Characteristics of the coinventorship structure (cont’d) 12

Table 1 China's co-invented patents by country pair (part) 13 Number of co-invented patent by co-inventor's country Number of co-invented patent by co-inventor's country pair Top three assignee's country Co-invented country Patent count PairPatent share Share of assigneed patent 123 USA (US) 862 (52.24%) US/CN44.42%40.36%US(607)CN(12)TW(11) US/CN/HK1.21%1.09%US(15)HK(2)VG(1) US/CN/TW0.61% US(5)TW(3)CN/US/TW(2) US/CN/GB0.55% US(8)GB(1) US/CN/SG0.55%0.48%US(5)SG(3) US/CN/FR0.48% US(8) US/CN/JP0.42% US(4)JP(1)CN(1) US/CN/CA0.36%0.30%US(4)BM(1) US/CN/DE0.36%0.30%US(2)DE(2)US/DE(1) US/CN/DE/JP0.30% DE(5) US/CN/GB/BE0.30% US(5) US/CN/KR0.30% US(4)KR(1) Other pairs2.36%2.30% Taiwan (TW) 524 (31.76%) TW/CN30.97%30.91%TW(380)CN/TW(110)CN/VG(11) TW/CN/US0.61% US(5)TW(3)CN/US/TW(2) Other pairs0.18%

Characteristics of the coinventorship structure (cont’d) 14 Figure 3 Coinventing propensity by foreign collaborators Singapore has the highest proportional share of co-invented patents with China to its total patent counts, averaging at 1.67%, followed by Taiwan with an average of 0.82%

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 To what extent have co-invented patents accounted for China’s total patent production share? Who partners with China to jointly invent? Under what type of technological fields does joint invention occur? How the authorship and ownership of China’s co-invented patents reveal the collaboration nature? Characteristics of the coinventorship structure (cont’d) 15

Characteristics of the coinventorship structure (cont’d) 16 Figure 4 Co-invented patent count by technological categories Based on NBER technological classification scheme proposed by Hall (2001): class 1 : Chemical class 2 : Computers & Communications class 3 : Drugs & Medical class 4 : Electrical & Electronic class 5 : Mechanical class 6 : Others Based on NBER technological classification scheme proposed by Hall (2001): class 1 : Chemical class 2 : Computers & Communications class 3 : Drugs & Medical class 4 : Electrical & Electronic class 5 : Mechanical class 6 : Others

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 To what extent have co-invented patents accounted for China’s total patent production share? Who partners with China to jointly invent? Under what type of technological fields does joint invention occur? How the authorship and ownership of China’s co-invented patents reveal the collaboration nature? Characteristics of the coinventorship structure (cont’d) 17

Characteristics of the coinventorship structure (cont’d) Avg Avg inventor count per CIP Avg CN inventor count per CIP Share of CN inventor per CIP (%, ) Share of CN as first inventor to total CIP (%) Patent assigned to CN Total CIPs ,650 Share of CN ownership to total CIP (%) Avg assignee count Table 2 Statistical summary on co-invention: authorship and ownership

To what extent have co-invented patents accounted for China’s total patent production share? Who partners with China to jointly invent? Under what type of technological fields does joint invention occur? 1 out 3 patented granted by USPTO which China has participated are the products of international technological collaboration The US is the most predominant collaborative partner with China, accounts for 52% of all the co-invented patents Category 4 (Electrical and Electronic) accounts for most of the joint inventing activities, followed by category 2 (Computers and Communications) Characteristics of the coinventorship structure (cont’d) How the authorship and ownership of China’s co-invented patents reveal the collaboration nature? It appears that a major portion of the co-invented activities are non-Chinese driven patenting events.

The determinants of joint invention of countries CI cit = Constant + Dominance cit +First cit + Ownership cit + Technology cit + Geography i + Culture i + RGDP cit + GGDP ct + e cit c: China i : the country index t : the year index. The explainatory variable CI cit is the propensity of China and country i jointly engaging in patenting during year t, considering their respective patent stock. It is computed by taking the number of co-invented patent (CIP) between China and country i in period t divided by the net of the total patent production of China and of country i less the numerator CIP; the result is expressed in percentage term. 20

Table 3 Variable definition and descriptive VariablesDefinitionSourceMean S.D. Min. Max. CI No of co-invented patent (CIP) between China and country i in period t divided by net of the total patent production of China and of country i less the no of the co-invented patents, expressed in percentage term. USPTO First Proportional share, in percentage term, of Chinese inventor being the first inventor of the CIP to the total count of CIPs between China and country i. USPTO Dominance Proportional share, in percentage term, of China inventor counts to the total inventor counts in the co-invention teams between China and country i. USPTO Ownership Proportional share, in percentage term, of patent ownership assigned to China entities to the total count of CIPs between China and country i. USPTO Technology Proportional share, in percentage term, of patents pertaining to technological IT related classes (class 2 and 4 ) to all CIPs between China and country i. NBER Geography Dummy variable, country of APEC members is coded as 1, otherwise 0. APEC Culture Dummy variable, country of ethnic Chinese is coded as 1, otherwise 0. APEC RGDP Relative GDP per capita of to that of country i, in percentage term. APEC GGDP Annual GDP growth rate of. APEC

Table 4 Correlation matrix of variables Variables CI1 2 First Dominance Ownership Technology Geography Culture RGDP GGDP

Table 5 OLS estimated results on the determinants of China’s co-inventorship Variables Model 1Model 2Model 3 Coeff. S.E.Coeff. S.E.Coeff. S.E. First Dominance0.0069** * Ownership0.0042* * Technology0.0040*** Geography Culture0.4930*** RGDP0.0711*** *** *** GGDP0.0510* ** Constant ** ** *** Adj R No. of Observations87 23

Regression Findings 2 Being Asia neighboring countries or APEC countries does not enhance the propensity to co-invent with China. 3 Being having ethic Chinese affiliation is the determining factor in influencing the likelihood of having joint inventing activities with China. 4 In terms of the technological realm of collaboration, our results show the technological fields for coinventorship align with the country’s relative strength. 1 The propensity for having coinventorship between China and foreign partners increases with China’s GDP level.

Conclusion 25 Text in here China has not played a prime role in these co-inventing activities. Instead, China currently plays a supporting role in the international coinventorship. The relative high co-invented patent share to her total patent production is another indication of the dependency on or the leverage of foreign collaborators in boosting China’s international patent production. We also observe evidence of improving autonomy as the proportion of assignment endowed to Chinese entities increases, with a positive time trend. There is an apparent surge in China’s co-invented patents in the past decade.

Conclusion (cont’d) Limitation and Future Study For future studies, researchers could look into patent citation data and address the issue of international co-inventions with a more refined quality and impact analysis. Kostoff et al.(2007) point out that collaborating with external countries produces a substantial increase in number of Chinese articles published, and the major impact is particularly at the high end. In this study, we assess various quantitative aspects of co-invented patents, yet we have not dealt with the qualitative aspect.

Questions 27 Please me at

28