Contract number: EIE/06/128/SI2.445841 Project duration: November 06 - April 2009 National Workshops Bottom up example – Energy labelling for white appliances.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accounting Method for Chinas Quarterly GDP by Expenditure Approach QIU, Qiong Dept. of National Accounts, NBS.
Advertisements

1 April 2006 Collaborative Labeling and Appliance Standards Program (CLASP) The Rationale for Energy Efficiency Standards and Labels.
Cosa è ?. Mandatory labelling EU Energy Labelling Voluntary labelling EU Ecolabel EU Energy Star programme.
Competition Effects of the Renewable Energy Policy Reform in Flanders: Is the Flemish market for Green Electricity Certificates working properly? Annemie.
Driving Market Penetration of Energy Efficient Appliances Henrik Sundström Vice President Environmental Affairs AB Electrolux.
Valuing an Acquisition
Environmental law is what we do. TM 1191 Second Avenue Suite 2200 Seattle, WA ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION.
NEEAP 2 UCD-NESC Workshop 25 April 2012 Dr. Stjohn O’Connor Department of Communications, Energy & Natural Resources.
Sofia Workshop 8 June 2007 Modelling the impact of policy and measures with MURE: The Czech Republic Case study.
Page 1 of 7 Growth presents challenge – and opportunity  Energy needs will increase 3-times in the next 15 years  Vast opportunities for cost-effective,
Energy Efficiency Initiative of the RFF Center for Climate and Electricity Policy RFF NY Breakfast Series November 9, 2010.
REMODECE Project: WP6: Strategies for Market Transformation and Recommendations to Policy Makers Aggelidis Konstantinos Centre for Renewable Energy Sources.
REMODECE Project: WP6: Strategies for Market Transformation and Recommendations to Policy Makers Markogiannakis Georgios Centre for Renewable Energy Sources.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
Quantifying Impacts of Transport- Related CO 2 Abatement Policies Roundtable on Transport - Related Climate Change Problems OECD Environment Directorate.
Developing the market for low carbon cars Sustainable Energy in Irish Transport 23 rd November 2005 Greg Archer Director Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership.
→ UK policy & targets Kyoto: reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by 12.5% below 1990 levels by UK targets: –Reduce carbon dioxide emissions by.
Article 5 of the Energy Services Directive Edward Green.
Advanced indicators Bruno Lapillonne, Vice President, Enerdata Reunión Técnica de Trabajo del Proyecto BIEE 24 – 26 de febrero, 2014, San José, Costa Rica.
The Energy Labelling of Household Appliances: the EU policy framework Conference-roundtable: Towards the Introduction of the EU Energy Label for Household.
Sustainable Procurement & Life Cycle Analysis Heather Pearce 9 th February 2010.
| 1 Guido de Wilt DG TREN D4 EUROPEAN POLICY REGARDING MICRO-CHP EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
The Danish Wood Pellet Survey By Peter Dal, DEA Third meeting in the Oslo Group on energy statistics Vienna, 4-6 February 2008.
Power Supply Workshop Craig W. Hershberg ENERGY STAR Office Equipment & Consumer Electronics US EPA January 14, 2002 San Francisco, California
E NERGY S TAR ® E NERGY S TAR Refrigerators and Freezers Richard H. Karney, US DOE July 18, 2001.
Analyses on the National Energy Efficiency Action Plans Assessments of the 1st NEAAPs and Challenges for the 2nd Round Dr. Ralf Schüle Wuppertal Institute.
Contract number: EIE/06/128/SI Project duration: November 06 - April 2009 National Workshops Didier bosseboeuf (ADEME) 22 janvier 2008.
Standards and Benchmarking for Energy Efficient Products Rod Janssen HELIO International and eceee September 23, 2009 Geneva.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Good practices to stimulate consumer demand for energy efficient appliances from selected EU Member States.
A worked example for Denmark using the proposed EU Directive rules Senior Adviser Peter Bach Danish Energy Authority EU and eceee expert seminar on measurement.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport REEEP Workshop Vienna, 6 April 2006 The European Regulatory Framework: Current and Future Policies Randall.
European Commission –Cabinet of Commissioner Andris Piebalgs EU Energy Efficiency Initiatives Stina Soewarta, European Commission Prague, June 2, 2005.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division UNECE Workshop on Consumer Price Indices Istanbul, Turkey,10-13 October 2011 Session.
Ukraine In-Depth Energy Efficiency Review VI International Specialized Trade Fair “ENERGY EFFICIENCY RENEWABLE ENERGY – 2013”, Kiev, 8 November 2013 Steivan.
Energy Efficiency in Sustainable Habitats: Roshni & Beyond Seminar on Universalisation of Roshni – A Green Innovation for Sustainable Habitats Rashtrapati.
Directorate general for Energy and Transport 1 Doing more with less as part of the Lisbon Strategy The Green Paper on Energy Efficiency.
Market Research & Product Management.
IFIEC Europe International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers 1 Promotion of Renewable Energies in the EU Member States Consequences on the Price.
German Electricity Association (VDEW) ·Za1 · Alexander Zafiriou German Electricity Association (VDEW), Berlin Proposal for an alternative approach.
January 20, 2006Rod Janssen EC Green Paper on Energy Efficiency Rod Janssen Energy Consultant.
Guidelines on Coordination of collective bargaining European Trade Union Institute 1 Guidelines on Coordination of Collective Bargaining Presentation European.
EWG44 11.b. PREE & CEEDS - 1/9 The 44 th Meeting of APEC Energy Working Group (EWG) Washington, D.C., U.S.A., 7-8 November b. Peer Review on Energy.
1 Mag. Johannes Reichl Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz Opportunities for Gas Utilities through the EU Energy Efficiency Policy.
Energy Efficiency Act from 2004 Provides legal base and legal obligations for certain parties for energy efficiency improvements - Buildings with gross.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport ECCP II Stakeholders` Meeting 24 October 2005 Energy Efficiency in the EU Randall Bowie DG Energy and Transport.
What Retailers Need to Know About New Light Bulb Legislation November 2011.
Energy Efficiency: from Policy to Implementation Investing in Energy Efficiency Conference Sofia, 14 th November 2012 Prof. Diana Mangalagiu Smith School.
Sales Forecasting Sunday 17th, 2016.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT EXCERPT RECOMMENDATIONS ON MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF DIRECTIVE 2006/32/EC ON ENERGY END-USE EFFICIENCY.
1 Chapter 12 Business Cycles and Unemployment Key Concepts Key Concepts Summary ©2000 South-Western College Publishing.
ECELP Policy Workshop 25 February 2013 Rodney Bay, St. Lucia POLICY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS AND LABELLING Detlef Loy Consultant.
Role of Financial Markets and Institutions
Energy Efficiency and Savings Calculation, Top-down and Bottom- up Methods, CEN Task XXI experts meeting October 2010.
REGIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY STAKEHOLDERS WORKSHOP COMESA/SADC – Examples of Best Practice Policies for EE promotion Presentation by Luc Kevo Tossou Energy.
1 Pepco and Delmarva Power Demand Side Management Programs Stakeholders Meeting February 20, 2009.
EMEES bottom-up case application 5: Energie-efficiënt cold appliences and washing machines An example of the use of a standardised calculation method.
TO BE or Not to Be GDP That is the Question.
LESSON 5 – SUMMARY – COMPANY’S RETURN ANALYSIS
CONSERVATION OPTIONS Global energy intensity — the amount of energy needed to generate each unit of GDP—has fallen steadily over the last several decades.
TC JWG 4 WI 00400 Introductory element — Energy Efficiency & Savings Calculation, Top-down and Bottom-up Methods — Complementary element Task 21 Experts.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Business Cycles and Unemployment
DEVELOPMENTS FUNDS – A BORROWER’S PERSPECTIVE
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
EU Tyres labelling scheme
Business Math Chapter 17: Inventory.
Driving sustainability IN SUPPLY CHAINs Through Innovation and Financial Incentive December 2018.
Energy Efficiency in the EU Randall Bowie DG Energy and Transport
18th September, 2018, BIEE Conference, Oxford Niall Kerr
Presentation transcript:

Contract number: EIE/06/128/SI Project duration: November 06 - April 2009 National Workshops Bottom up example – Energy labelling for white appliances Pascal LARSONNEUR Robert ANGIOLETTI 22nd January, 2007

Name/Organisation etc.222nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Harmonised bottom-up evaluation method for cold appliances and washing machines Type of EEI activities covered SectorResidential Energy end-useWhite goodsCold appliances Washing machines Efficient solutionA class appliances  A+ and A++ for cold appliances  < 0,17 kWh/kg for washing machines

Name/Organisation etc.322nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Types of EEI facilitating measures Regulation: Minimum Equipment Energy Performance Standards Information: Focused information campaigns Labelling Training and Education Metering and informative billing Financial instruments for energy savings: Cash rebates Tax rebates and other taxes reducing energy end-use consumption Third-party financing Loans Voluntary agreements: Industrial companies (appliance manufacturers) Commercial (appliance trade) or industrial organisations

Name/Organisation etc.422nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Formula for unitary gross annual energy savings Cold appliances The energy label provides data on the annual unit consumption Unit gross annual energy savings of cold appliances = ( [annual energy consumption] *BL - [annual energy consumption]* BAT )* F Where: BL= baseline  In case of normal replacement, the baseline should be, either the second best energy class appliances (currently A+ ), which is a very conservative option, or the average of the A+ to C appliances on offer  In case of early replacement: average stock appliance BAT (best available technology): the best energy class on the market (currently A++) F: correction factor reflecting the ratio of the consumption under the standard test conditions and the measured consumption in real life

Name/Organisation etc.522nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Energy label annual unit consumption Cold appliances

Name/Organisation etc.622nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Formula for unitary gross annual energy savings Washing machines The energy label displays the standard cycle consumption It is therefore necessary to estimate the average number of cycles per year Unit gross annual energy savings of washing machines = ( [CC*AC]*BL - [CC*AC]*BAT )* F Where: CC: Cycle Consumption as stated on the energy label AC: Annual number of Cycles for the average household BL = baseline, depending on the level of effort  In case of normal replacement: second best energy class appliances (currently A );  In case of early replacement: average stock appliance; BAT (best available technology): the best energy class on the market (currently A+) F: correction factor reflecting the ratio of the consumption under the standard test conditions and the measured consumption in real life

Name/Organisation etc.722nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Washing machines Energy label annual unit consumption

Name/Organisation etc.822nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Baseline Two approaches must be used:  Consumers willing to purchase a more efficient appliance than they would have done without the EEI promotion measure.  The measure may encourage early replacement. In the first case, a market modelling approach should define the baseline, since the savings refer to the appliance that would have been purchased if the measure was not implemented. Level 1: EU 27 not efficient appliances average unit consumption Level 2: country not efficient appliances average unit consumption In the latter case, a stock modelling approach should define the baseline: the savings are estimated with reference to an appliance that would have normally been kept in the stock, still functioning, if the measure not was applied (level 3).

Name/Organisation etc.922nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Market modelling Market share (%), average EEI, average UC (kWh/y)

Name/Organisation etc.1022nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Stock UC of year N for saturated markets UCn = UCn-1 – S/V * (UCn-1 – UCsn) Where UCn is the UC of the consumers' stock at the end of year N UCn-1 is the UC of the consumers' stock at the end of year N-1 UCsn is the UC of the sales of year N, as calculated above S is the sales volume over one year (constant over the base period) V is the consumers' stock volume (constant over the base period) Stock modelling (1)

Name/Organisation etc.1122nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Stock UC of year N for non-saturated markets Sold appliances are obviously not only intended for replacement but also for first purchase, thereby increasing the equipment rate. The stock volume must therefore be calculated by estimating the ratio of sold appliances purchased for replacement and the ratio of first purchase. The average stock UC at the end of year N becomes: UCn = UCn-1 – Sn/Vn-1. (UCn-1 – UCsn) Where Sn is now the sales volume of year N and Vn-1 the stock volume at the end of year N-1. Stock modelling (2)

Name/Organisation etc.1222nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Considering rebound effect There could be a rebound effect in the purchase of bigger cold appliances, knowing they are energy efficient. However, no information is available (this could be the subject of a model survey in a set of countries). The same is the case whether consumers are washing more often because they know that they purchased an energy-efficient washing machine. One direct rebound effect could also be linked to the fact that it is easier for larger washing machines (6, 7 or more kg of capacity) to achieve the threshold of 0.17 kWh/kg. So an EEI measure to promote energy-efficient washing machines could accelerate the shift towards bigger machines.

Name/Organisation etc.1322nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Requirements for double counting White goods are already included in the EU energy labelling scheme, and there is a minimum energy performance standard for cold appliances. Furthermore, the EcoDesign Directive is expected to lead to a new minimum energy performance standards for cold and wet appliances, and a revision of the EU energy label. Therefore, double-couting with these measures is likely to be an issue. It will be smaller, if the method presented here is only applied to facilitating measures that promote A++ cold appliances and very energy-efficient washing machines. In any case, two general recommendations can be made:  Try to evaluate the effect of the whole package of facilitating measures that promote energy-efficient cold appliances and washing machines;  Try to cross-check the results with a top-down evaluation using regression analysis of the diffusion indicators for the overall market share of the A++ cold appliances and the very energy-efficient washing machines, and/or for the average UC of all appliances sold in a Member State market.

Name/Organisation etc.1422nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Requirements for free-rider effect Partial free-rider effect occurs for white appliances as a consequence of the self- sustained evolution of the market: higher demand for efficient appliances contributes to a larger and more competitive offer of best technologies. Free-rider effect is therefore due to those consumers who would have purchased the most efficient appliances, even if the measure were not implemented. A survey of participants will be needed to evaluate the share of free riders. As the free-rider effect and the multiplier effect work into the opposite direction, they partly cancel out each other. Furthermore, even with extensive surveys and evaluation efforts, the uncertainty for these effects can remain high. For EEI measures or measure packages that have limited gross annual energy savings (e.g., below 20 million kWh/year), it may therefore be considered to neglect both correction factors.

Name/Organisation etc.1522nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Requirements for savings lifetime Energy savings lifetime Efficient cold appliances : 15 years Efficient wet appliances : 12 years Source : CWA CEN Workshop 27 Saving lifetimes of energy efficient improvement measures in bottom up calculations

Name/Organisation etc.1622nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Total gross annual energy savings = average annual energy savings per sold unit of equipment * number of sold equipment

Name/Organisation etc.1722nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Total ESD annual energy savings = total gross annual energy savings of all white appliances * double-counting factor * (1-free-rider coefficient + multiplier coefficient)

Name/Organisation etc.1822nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Data collection (1)

Name/Organisation etc.1922nd, January 2008Wuppertal Institute & ADEME Name/Organisation etc. Data collection (2)