1 Requirements for Long-distance Bus Terminals in Germany Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Innovation: User Support Terminals. Built around existing integration terminals Combine social services, shopping, banking, etc. Provide service access.
Advertisements

Research Needs in the Intercity Bus and Rail Transportation Industry Chapter 28 Research Methodologies.
Estonian Road Administration overview of tasks related to public transport management 6 May 2013.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Wholesale Market Investments in E. Europe- Lessons Learned Edward S. Seidler Senior Officer, (Marketing) FAO Rome 26 June 2006.
Integration of Public Transport in an Overall Transport System The Example of the Greater Zurich Area Christian Vogt, Zurich Transport Authority (ZVV)
Lecture 9: Hub-and-Spoke Operations
NedRailways Abellio’s Door to Door strategy Shared Transport Conference, February 25, 2015 John Dietz, ScotRail mobilisation team.
Importance of industrial tracks in the Republic of Croatia Asst. Prof. Nikolina Brnjac.
Increasing the Quality of Public Transport in Prague Prague Integrated Transport.
Connex Verkehr GmbH 27. Agustu Connex passenger rail activities Private Rail in Germany: The Example of Connex.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Paris and the Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Isabelle Bachmann- RATP- Paris.
Impact of capacity constraints on airport choice of air travellers Dr. Marc Ch. Gelhausen Paris,
ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORTATION FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES.
Internet Auctions Users can post items for sale and set a minimum price for it. Other internet users can now bid for the item being sold. These items.
Public hearing: Committee of Transport and Tourism Brussels 7 May 2013 Newcomer´s perspective The Fourth Railway Package – public hearing – Brussels.
Light House Projects Ghent – Car free zone
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
THE CITY OF MOSCOW AND NEW POSSIBILITIES FOR PRODUCTION LOCALIZATION ON MARCH, 19TH, 2015.
Reinventing Transit A European Perspective David Bayliss.
TRAVELLING.
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS. Different Economic Systems – Economic Questions  WHAT IS ECONOMICS? The study of how resources are managed in the production, exchange,
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
Financing Urban Public Infrastructure
Civitas Workshop –Effective solutions for green urban transport 24 April 2012 Athens Alan Lewis, TTR on behalf of: Lars Elgaard Thomsen, Public Transport.
This project is part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund), the Finnish Ministry of Environment and the partners. Mobility.
Agenda Development of long distance Coach market in case of Germany APC- 10 year‘s anniversary meeting, Riga, 05. Septemer 2013.
Rail and the West Midlands Economy EMTA Conference Birmingham, 11/11/11 Peter Sargant Head of Rail Development, Centro.
Sustainable travel for Limerick and Area By Professor Lewis Lesley.
Commuter Transportation Benefits Plan An Employee Communication Presentation.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SKOPJE: NEW APROACH FOR BETTER QUALITY OF SERVICE
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
Housing Service Review Service Report 24 November 2014.
Transit Oriented Development in the city region; a dream? Reindert Augustijn Team manager traffic and transport Stadsregio Arnhem Nijmegen.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN LATVIA: STRUCTURE AND FINANCING ANNIJA NOVIKOVA D EPUTY D IRECTOR OF R OAD T RANSPORT D EPARTMENT M INISTRY OF T RANSPORT.
BRT in India Delhi Case study. What is Delhi HCBS Delhi HCBS is not a BRT system. It is primarily a road infrastructure project. It was not conceived.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
Lecture 7: Airport Financial Management
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
Civil and Environmental Engineering 1 Norway’s toll rings: Full scale implementations of urban pricing Dr. Terje Tretvik - SINTEF, Norway IMPRINT-EUROPE.
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas FISCHER Almada, 26 th March 2009 Parking Policy Graz.
Per Gellert /Barcelona Quality for Passengers.
The True Costs of Road Transport: How to Make People Aware, and How to Make Government Set the True Prices András Lukács Clean Air Action Group, Hungary.
Key problems and priorities in urban transport sector in SEE Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest,
Designing a survey of Long Distance Transportation by Busses and Coaches: The Swedish approach Dimitrios Tsatsas Anette Myhr Swedish Institute for Transport.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0765r0 July 2012 Carl Kain, Noblis, Inc.Slide 1 Dynamic Mobility Integrated Dynamic Transit Operations Use Case for ISD Date:
Impacts Europe Impacts of planning instruments on suburbanisation and modal split in the Vienna Region Angelika WINKLERMunicipal Department 18.
The 4 th Railway Package: Impact for the keepers Clio Liégeois.
1 The Legal Conditions for Neglected Buildings in Germany Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger.
Building the Case for Privatization and Deregulation of Urban and Intercity Transportation Systems Clifford Winston The Brookings Institution.
3rd Forum for Sustainable Mobility and Metropolitan Development
EMTA General Meeting , Turin Tamas Dombi, ZTM Warsaw1 Actual Problems of the Public Transport in Warsaw Metropolitan Area.
› Railway Days 2015 Bukarest , Hamm Trevor Garrod // EUROPEAN PASSENGERS‘ FEDERATION // COMPETING FOR THE INTER-CITY MARKET.
Restructuriation and financing of public transport system in Gdynia Dariusz Tłoczyński, Ph. D., Marcin Wolek, Ph. D., Department of Transportation Market.
The reasons to use flexible car sharing are varied.
Public Transport Department Kirke Williamson Estonian Road Administration
E. Sambracos Associate Professor in Transport Economics Dept. of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus Air - Sea Transport: Competitiveness.
1 CITY OF SOFIA PARKING POLICY PARkon AUTUMN Metodi Avramov Sofia Urban Mobility Centre.
Electromobility in CIVITAS cities Cologne, Germany Michael Boßhammer, M.A. Dr.-Ing. Andreas Witte Institute for Urban and Transport Planning RWTH Aachen.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// TRANSPORT LIBERALISATION TENDENCY MARCH 2016.
RAIL TRANSPORT. 1.1 BACKGROUND OF RAIL TRANSPORT.
N° 1 Possible co-operation between rail and buses in the area of Telematics Applications for Passengers Presented by European Railway Agency (ERA) th.
Efficient urban transport and public transport systems Optimized door ‐ to ‐ door transport chains Dominik Brühwiler, Zürich Transport Authority, Switzerland.
FREE PUBLIC TRANSPORT Hasselt from the beginning to the end Summer School Tallinn 22 – 24 August 2013 Marc Verachtert, General Manager.
Menauitpuitptransport#MENAUITP Land Transportation Projects in the Kingdom of Bahrain Nada Deen Director, Land Transportation Projects Ministry of Transportation.
Maintenance Management Systems for Condominium Owners’ Associations under the German Condominium Act Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger, Miriam Hansel B.Sc.
Air Transport Infrastructure Russia & CIS
Serving Localities Chapter 24 Section 2.
Maintenance Management Systems for Condominium Owners’ Associations under the German Condominium Act Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger, Miriam Hansel B.Sc.
Presented by European Railway Agency (ERA)
Presentation transcript:

1 Requirements for Long-distance Bus Terminals in Germany Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim

2 Long-distance Bus Terminals Agenda Introduction – current relevance of this topic Deficits – where and why? Survey of requirements for long-distance bus terminals Results of the survey Conclusion Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim

3 Introduction (1) - Legal realities -  For many decades: no relevance of long-distance busses in Germany Long distance passenger transport by rail was legally protected from competition Applications for long-distance bus line concessions had no chance of success  Significantly liberalized market for long-distance busses by the Amendment of the German Federal Passenger Transportation Act to 1st January 2013 Entrepreneurs still need an official concession (only for security reasons) For granting concessions it is irrelevant, whether other bus or railway companies already operate the transport service applied for (parallel operations are allowed) On long-distance lines competition between different bus companies is now possible No regulation of fares by public authorities Long-distance Bus Terminals Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim

4 Introduction (2) - Market development since the liberalisation -  Really fast market grown since the liberalisation A new market in Germany was created on 1st January 2013 Within a short time applications for many new connections from different companies were submitted The acceptance of domestic long-distance bus services by passengers is extremely high Currently companies compete heavily on low special prices  Rapid growth of new services but no new infrastructure In many cities new infrastructure for the passengers is required (bus terminals) The German Federal Legislator provides no regulations for this type of infrastructure The German Federal Passenger Transportation Act only knows the term “bus stop”, which requires signage by the bus company (minimal standard) Long-distance Bus Terminals Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim

5 Introduction (3) Market share: long-distance bus companies in Germany Long-distance Bus Terminals Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim Source: Own diagram based of IGES-Institut, The German Long-distance Bus Market, December 2013

6 Deficits - Long-distance bus terminals -  Many cities in Germany do not have a suitable infrastructure for long-distance bus terminals (infrastructure only for urban traffic) Available bus stops are overburdened Bus companies are forced to choose second best bus stops Location of a bus terminal has to be integrated in the urban planning process  Consequence: new infrastructure is required Bus companies wish bus terminals in an attractive location with a minimum of comfort for their passengers  Outstanding questions: Who is responsible for the financing and construction? What are the requirements concerning location and facilities? Long-distance Bus Terminals Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim

7 Survey Basis of the survey of requirements for long-distance bus terminals 50 municipalities were contacted, 27 responded The most important cities in Germany were questioned Included are smaller cities as well, because in Germany the long-distance bus transport is important also for smaller cities, where the rail connection is not well developed Questions referred to… the current relevance of this topic for municipalities 2.… the importance to keep the planning process in their own hands 3.… the decision if bus terminals should be constructed centrally or decentralised 4.… who should be the developer and who should be the operator 5.… the financing possibilities (e.g. user fee, rental income, public funds,…) 6.… the requirements concerning the relevant facilities for long-distance bus Terminals 7.… the implementation of accessibility (also disabled access) Long-distance Bus Terminals Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim

8 Results of the survey (1) 93 % of the cities are discussing about long-distance bus terminals 100 % want to keep the planning process in their own hands 81 % prefer central locations for bus terminals Existing infrastructure is the most important requirement factor for long-distance bus terminals, but currently mostly suitable for urban traffic The opinion concerning developer and operator is balanced 33 %: Developer and operator should be the municipality 30 %: Developer and operator should be a private company 30 %: Developer should be the municipality, operator a private company 27 %: Any other combination is possible Long-distance Bus Terminals Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim

9 Results of the survey (2) Financing is broken down by: …. User fees: 93 % …. Rental income: 70 % …. Subsidies: 59 % Long-distance Bus Terminals Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim Source: Own diagram based of the survey

10 Results of the survey (3) Long-distance Bus Terminals Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim CriteriaSimply bus stop Long-distance bus terminal Type 1Type 2Type 3Type 4Type 5 Size of the city and traffic-related significance of the bus stop < Inhabitants – Inhabitants – Inhabitants > Inhabitants Large starting/final bus stations, traffic junction (linked traffic infrastructure) LocationCentral (Near the main station) Central (Near the main station) Central (Near the main station, maybe a second one decentralised near the airport) Central (Near the main station, maybe a second one decentralised near the airport) Number of stopping places ≤ 22 – 55 – 15≥ 15Depending on the size type 3 or type 4 Departures per day ≤ 5050 – – 140≥ 140Depending on the size type 3 or type 4 Passengers per departures per day ≤ – – 2.800≥ 2.800Depending on the size type 3 or type 4 Typical facilitiesWeather shelter, seats, timetable Additionally: Toilets, heated waiting area, ticket vendig machines Additionally: Shops, kiosk, convenience-stores, restaurants, travel agency, utility infrastructure for busses, bathrooms with showers, baggage room, dynamic passenger information Additionally: Larger loading zones for international transportation, tourist information, police, first aid, shopping facilities, personal customer service, money exchange, overnight accommodation Depending on the size type 3 or type 4 Quality of transport connections Local public transport connection Additionally: taxi Additionally: car-sharing, car rental Additionally: Connection to the airport Depending on the size type 3 or type 4 Parking facilitiesKiss & Ride, parking spaces depending on the availability Additionally: Managed parking spaces Additionally: Managed parking spaces with long- stay parking Additionally: Park & Ride Depending on the size type 3 or type 4 ExamplesSimply bus stopUlmMannheimHamburg, München, BerlinDepending on the size type 3 or type 4

11 Conclusions 1.The long-distance bus transport market recorded a rapid growth since the Amendment of the German Federal Passenger Transportation Act to 1st January New infrastructure in the form of central long-distance bus terminals for the passengers is required Most suitable are central locations near the main railway station, because of the existing infrastructure 3.There are different requirements for long-distance bus terminals depending on - the size of the city, - the traffic-related significance and - the existing infrastructure Long-distance Bus Terminals Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Michaela Nachtsheim

12 Thank you for your attention! Prof. Dr. Andreas Saxinger Nurtingen-Geislingen University Parkstraße 4 D Geislingen Tel.: 0049 / 7331 / / Michaela Nachtsheim (Research assistant) Nurtingen-Geislingen University Parkstraße 4 D Geislingen Tel.: 0049 / 7331 / /