Policy Considerations for Interregional Commuter Bus Service TRAC Meeting May 11, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Advertisements

1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing
Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus Study: Final Report and Next Steps 0.
What Makes Streetcars Work? Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Seattle Center City Streetcar Workshop July 20, 2007.
Passenger Ferry Grant Program September 11, 2013 Vanessa Williams Transportation Program Specialist.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGH POINT Sounding Board/Steering Committee Meeting Service Recommendations January 13, 2015.
Division of Transit & Rail Advisory Committee (TRAC) Kick-Off Meeting January 11, 2013.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Upstart to Start Up: Colorado’s High Speed & Intercity Transit Vision & State Rail Plan September 2014.
Recent Changes in Intercity Service Delivery in Minnesota 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Gerry Weiss, State.
Cañon City Weather Averages Boulder Weather Averages Denver Weather Averages Colorado Springs Weather Averages Fort Collins Weather Averages Total Avg.
Five-Year Mass Transit Fund Financial Forecast April 6,
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
Calgary Regional Partnership Workshop BC Transit Governance and Funding Experience Bill Lambert, Manager, Transportation Solutions, April 16, 2013.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
Transportation & Aging Senior and Disabled Riders Transportation Summit December 6, 2013.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
Overview to CDOT Policies and Guidance Transit and Rail Advisory Committee Meeting April 13, 2012.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
December 12-13, 2007 Item 4.4 Tab 31 California State Rail Plan to
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
RAIL PLANNING IN COLORADO SCORT – September 17, 2012 Portland, Maine.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
INTERREGIONAL EXPRESS BUS SERVICE Presentation to NATA – May 22, 2014.
Transportation and the CDM: Key Issues & Potential Case Studies March 14, 2003 Winnipeg.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Regional HOT Lanes Study Preliminary Findings An Informational Hearing of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Toll Roads and Managed Lanes.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
FlexBRT Project Briefing. Background Feasibility Study began in – $750,000 TEA-21 Grant to study an ITS Circulator in North Orange County/South.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
1 Countywide Transit Network Study objectives: Establish a connected rapid transit system to meet demands through the year 2050 Define transit corridor.
Access Pasco 10-Year Transit Development Plan ( ) October 2013.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Financial Plan Planning Council 2040 RTP June 4, 2015.
NORTH FRONT RANGE MPO COUNCIL DECEMBER 12, 2013 Mark Imhoff, Director Division of Transit & Rail Colorado Department of Transportation Interregional Express.
Regional Transit Framework Study Regional Council September 24, 2008.
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Matching FTA Dollars CASTA Spring 2017.
Review of 2018–2023 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
Title VI Program Overview
Mobility Choice Blueprint
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee January 19, 2018
Intercity Bus Study 5311/Update
California’s Rural Intercity Bus System: 2018 Update
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
April 23, 2018.
D Line Project Overview
Citrus Heights Comprehensive Transit Plan
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Presentation transcript:

Policy Considerations for Interregional Commuter Bus Service TRAC Meeting May 11, 2012

General Concepts Increase mobility and connectivity between regions Increase interregional access to employment Provide energy-conserving options to long- distance SOV commuting Fill in the gaps between transit systems

Service/Mobility Concepts Service between transit systems – Provides connectivity to local services – Not intended to replace service within existing RTA/Agency service areas (e.g., Boulder-Denver, Glenwood-Aspen, Fruita-Grand Junction) Start small with options for expansion – Initially provide am/pm peak-period service – Expand based on demand and finances Manage by performance – Develop criteria to determine eligibility for operating assistance – Use performance measures to adjust service over time

FASTER Funding Concepts CDOT owns buses (FASTER capital funds) CDOT contracts for service – IGAs with public providers – Direct contracts with private providers FASTER state transit funds used for O&M

Funding Scenarios Allocate $2M (approximately 22%) of FASTER funds for interregional bus operations – At what level does CDOT fund service routes? 20% to 50%? More? Less? – Requires revision to TC Resolution and FASTER Guidance Match – Local/Regional – 20% to 40% In-kind, fare box, other – Federal – 20% to 40% – Possible match requirements are adjusted Start-up vs. on-going

Potential Routes Colorado Springs – Denver – Fort Collins – Possible extensions to Pueblo and/or Greeley Grand Junction – Glenwood Springs – Possible extension to Dotsero Conceptual criteria for other routes: – High congestion corridors – High ridership corridors – Future rail corridors – Network connectivity (connections to activity centers, metro areas, other routes, gaps in service, etc)

Develop Partnerships Potential Partners: – MPOs and TPRs – Local Jurisdictions – Local Transit Providers – RTAs – Others Develop IGAs – Operations – Maintenance – Others

Other Service Issues Number of Buses Hours of Operation Frequency of Service Number of Trips Number and Location of Stops Fare structure Bus Maintenance and Storage Marketing