MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIGHLIGHTS ON ICT POLICY FOR BASIC EDUCATION
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.
Head of Learning: Job description
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
BENGKEL PERSEDIAAN AUDIT PEMATUHAN & OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
SESSION 1 Introducing the Code of Practice for Programme Acceditation (COPPA)
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
Malaysian Qualifications Agency
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF MASTER’S DEGREES IN SPAIN 1.
Practical Placements & the QAA and ASET Guidelines By Ian Sunley & Lorna Uden Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology, Staffordshire University,
Sharifah Hapsah Shahabudin Vice Chancellor 11 th Malaysian Education Summit 2007 Malaysian Education: Winning in the Global Race 11 th Malaysian Education.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
ROADSHOW MQA 2008 : KOD AMALAN AKREDITASI PROGRAM (CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION, COPPA) 16 OKTOBER 2008 – 13 NOVEMBER 2008 SESI 3 : KERTAS.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
University Development Office. Questions What is the mission of a University development office? What are the prerequisites for a successful development.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
PLACE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ENHANCEMENT OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF MAKERERE UNIVERSITY BY SAM LUBOGA ACTING DIRECTOR QUALITY ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE 9/23/20151.
SESSION 2 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
EU/CoE PROJECT “STRENGTHENING HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS IN SERBIA”
JAZAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES
Shaping Society APMR Briefing Zulkefli Bin Mansor Pusat Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Program Akademik Bahagian Hal Ehwal Akademik.
E-Learning Strategic Plan E-Learning Vision: e-Learning expands opportunities for learners to do well at school and to be ICT capable for.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
6 Key Priorities A “scorecard” for each of the 5 above priorities with end of 2009 deliverables – with a space beside each for a check mark (i.e. complete)
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
ASST Workshop on Engineering Education Present Status, Trends and Challenges ASST Workshop on Engineering Education Present Status, Trends and Challenges.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
1 ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT AREA 4, 5 AND 6 Prepared by: WAN ARIF BIN WAN AHMAD EXAM & RECORD DEPARTMENT ِ
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
ROADSHOW MQA 2008 : KOD AMALAN AKREDITASI PROGRAM (CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION, COPPA) 16 OKTOBER 2008 – 13 NOVEMBER 2008 SESI 1 : KERTAS.
SESSION 4 EVALUATING FOR FULL ACCREDITATION USING COPPA EVALUATION INSTRUMENT 1.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
Assessment Validation. MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE ASQA (Australian Skills Quality Authority) New National Regulator ASQA as of 1 July, 2011.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
LGS – HR POLICY.  OVERALL POLICY STATEMENT  The most valued assets of the Service are the people who individually and collectively contribute to the.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Training for staff members responsible for writing self-evaluation reports of study programmes, May 2011 University of Tuzla Prof. Dr Emina Nakaš-Ićindić.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
Accreditation External Review
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
EUR-ACE Engineering Programme Accreditations
Internship Bill of Rights
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Indicators&Criteria in External Quality Assessment
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY ROADSHOW MQA 2008 : KOD AMALAN AKREDITASI PROGRAM (CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION, COPPA) 16 OKTOBER 2008 – 13 NOVEMBER 2008 SESI 2 : KERTAS 2 SECTION 2 : GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 9) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY

Vision, Mission, Educational Goals and Learning Outcomes Section 2 - Guidelines On The Standards and Criteria For Programme Accreditation Vision, Mission, Educational Goals and Learning Outcomes Curriculum Design and Delivery Assessment of Students Student Selection and Support Services Academic Staff Educational Resources Programme Monitoring and Review Leadership, Governance, and Administration Continual Quality Improvement

The Standards Benchmarked Standards Standards that must be met and its compliance demonstrated during programme accreditation exercise. Are usually expressed as a must Enhanced Standards Standards that should be met as the institution strives to improve itself and usually expressed as a should

AREA 4: STUDENT SELECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES 4.1 Student admission and selection (comply with policies of MOHE) Min. qualification, knowledge and capacity to pursue a programme 4.2 Articulation Regulations, Credit transfer and Credit Exemption 4.3 Transfer of students –student mobility 4.4 Student support services and co-curricular activities facilitate learning and personal development Many components apply at HEP level but Dept has access to them 4.5 Student representation and participation Inculcate self-confidence and wholesome development 4.6 Alumni Provide feedback on program, linkages with industry

4.1 STUDENT ADMISSION AND SELECTION Criteria and processes of student selection must be clearly stated and disseminated to public especially to students Prerequisite knowledge and skills for the programme must be clearly stated Selection interview must be structured, objective and fair Student selection must be free from discrimination and bias Student intake– also take into account visiting, exchange or transfer students, professional prog must be stated and related to capacity of Dept

4.1 STUDENT ADMISSION AND SELECTION Appeal on student admission and selection Clear policy and appropriate mechanisms Admission policy must be monitored and reviewed periodically Admission policies and processes should be reviewed in consultation with relevant stakeholders, nationally and internationally

clear, well-defined and widely disseminated 4.2 ARTICULATION REGULATIONS, CREDIT TRANSFER AND CREDIT EXEMPTION, 4.3 TRANSFER OF STUDENTS Policies, regulations and processes on articulation practices, credit transfers, credit exemptions and student transfers must be clear, well-defined and widely disseminated Incoming transfer students must have comparable achievement in their previous institution

4. 2 ARTICULATION REGULATIONS, CREDIT TRANSFER AND CREDIT EXEMPTION 4 4.2 ARTICULATION REGULATIONS, CREDIT TRANSFER AND CREDIT EXEMPTION 4.3 TRANSFER OF STUDENTS The Dept should: have policies and mechanisms to facilitate student mobility, between programmes or institutions, within or outside the country (articulation agreements, credit transfer and credit exemption, including cross-border collaboration)

4.4 STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES AND CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES Appropriate and adequate support services – physical, social, financial, recreational, counseling and health must be made accessible to students Support services must be: evaluated regularly to ensure adequacy, effectiveness and safety Academic and career counseling must be provided by adequate and qualified staff Effective induction program must be made available with special attention given to out of state and international students, and students with special needs

4.4 STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES AND CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES Student support services should be given prominent organisational status and dominant role eg proper international students office, full time counselors There should be structured training and development plan to train and enhance skills and professionalism of counselors

4.5 STUDENT REPRESENTATION AND PARTICIPATION Dept must : adhere to HEP’s policy on student participation and representation eg student bodies – participate/feedback on programme development have a policy and programme for active student participation eg co-curricular activities and community or NGO engagement Publication activities should: - be guided by clear, formal and well-publicised policy (responsibilities, restrictions) - have adequate facilities

4.6 ALUMNI Department should: - foster active linkages with its alumni - encourage alumni to play a role in providing linkages with the industry and the professions and development of the programme

AREA 5: ACADEMIC STAFF Academic Staff Important Contribution to Quality of the Programme Effective policy on recruitment, service, development and appraisal Qualified and sufficient staff Conducive environment that encourages recruitment and retention – training, equitable work distribution, recognition and reward system 5.1 Recruitment and Management 5.2 Service and Development

5.1 Recruitment and Management There must be clear and documented policy on recruitment, service, development and appraisal The staff student ratio must be appropriate and comply with discipline standards Dept must: - have adequate full time & core academic staff - clarify roles of academic staff in teaching, research, consultancy, community services and administrative functions

5.1 Recruitment and Management Recognition and reward must be based on equitable work distribution and meritorious academic roles Academic appointment and promotion – eg Prof & Assoc. Prof must be guided by and in line with national policies and international best practices

5.1 Recruitment and Management There should be: - a balance between senior/junior, academic/non academic, local/international staff - national and international linkages – faculty exchange to enhance teaching and learning of the programme

5.2 Service and Development Institutional dan Dept policy must complement each other – service, development and appraisal Dept must provide - mentoring and formative guidance for new staff - necessary training, tools and technology for self- learning, access to information

5.2 Service and Development There should be - opportunities – including funding – for academic staff participation in professional, academic and other relevant activities, national and international - provision for advanced staff enhancement via research leave, sabbatical, participation in, and organization of, conferences

AREA 6: EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES Adequate resources important to support teaching and learning – include finance, expertise, physical infrastructure, ICT and research facilities 6.1 Physical facilities - guided by field of study 6.2 Research and Development – largely directed to universities offering degree level programmes and above 6.3 Educational expertise – specialised staff trained and have considerable experience in teaching-learning methodologies 6.4 Educational exchanges – students, staff, educational materials 6.5 Financial allocations

6.1 Physical Facilities Physical facilities must be - sufficient, appropriate to ensure effective delivery - comply with relevant laws, health and safety regulations Library or resource center must be adequate, up-to-date, qualified staff, support facilities Equipment and facilities must be adequate for practical-based programme

6.1 Physical Facilities Learning environment should be regularly improved through renovations, new facilities, latest equipment Facilities should be user friendly to those with special needs

(For universities running degree programmes and above) 6.2 Research and Development (R & D) (For universities running degree programmes and above) Dept must have a policy and program on research and development Facilities must be adequate to sustain R & D There should be - link between R & D and commercialization - periodic review on research resources and facilities to enhance research capabilities

6.3 Educational Expertise 6.4 Educational Exchanges Dept must have a policy on use of educational expertise in development of new and effective teaching & learning methods The Dept should have: - a policy and future planning on educational exchanges (collaboration with other institutions, nationally and internationally)

6.5 Financial Allocation Dept must have budgetary and procurement procedures to ensure sufficient and efficient utilisation of resources include planning, monitoring and control of resources Dept should be given sufficient financial autonomy in allocating resources

AREA 7: PROGRAMME MONITORING AND REVIEW Prog monitored, reviewed, evaluated - quality enhancement -include reviewing institutional structures and processes, curriculum components (current?, industry relevant?) -monitoring student progress, employability and performance Feedback – students, faculty, employers, alumni, professional bodies, analysis of student performance 7.1 Mechanisms for programme monitoring and review 7.2 Involvement of stakeholders

Student performance and progression must be analysed 7.1 MECHANISMS FOR PROGRAMME MONITORING AND REVIEW 7.2 INVOLVEMENT OF STAKEHOLDERS Student performance and progression must be analysed in relation to the objectives and LO of programme There must be - programme review committee - periodic program evaluation using proper mechanisms and resources Partners involved in collaborative arrangements must share responsibilities in programme monitoring and review Program evaluation must involve relevant stakeholders

Programme review exercise should 7.1 MECHANISMS FOR PROGRAMME MONITORING AND REVIEW 7.2 INVOLVEMENT OF STAKEHOLDERS Stakeholders should have access to the review report and their views considered Programme review exercise should incorporated stakeholder feedback esp from alumni and employers involve relevant professional bodies, in the case of professional programmes

AREA 9: CONTINUAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT The only constant is change - advances in science and technology, new knowledge - changes structures, functions, activities, curriculum, T-L methodologies, assessment methods etc Need to continually and systematically review and monitor these changes and developments to ensure that: - learning outcomes of programme are met - curriculum is current and industry relevant - programme delivery is effective - assessment methods appropriate - educational resources adequate and up-to-date

AREA 9: CONTINUAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT Dept must: - support and complement the HEP’s policies, procedures and mechanisms for review – structures, functions, processes, strategies - develop a system to review its programme periodically - initiate review, implement its recommendations and record results ie follow-up and follow through process

AREA 9: CONTINUAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT Dept should embrace the spirit of continual quality improvement – based on prospective studies and analyses. Current policies and practices should be revised based on past experience, present conditions and future possibilities Person or unit responsible for internal quality audit should be given a prominent role in the policy processes of the Dept

CONCLUSION Standards in the nine areas of evaluation: Assist Dept to ensure that the internal QA systems (policies, processes, mechanisms) are in place: aims, objectives and LO of programme achieved produce graduates with the required LO that is compatible with the national and international human resource requirements

SECTION 3: SUBMISSION FOR PROVISIONAL AND FULL ACCREDITATION - Assist HEP Prepare Documents For Submission For Provisional And Full Accreditation - Provide Guide On Information Required. Covers All Nine Areas Of Evaluation - Describe The Various Documents Required For Submission To MQA

Thank You