Sediment dynamics in flow-regulated streams and the impact on aquatic ecosystems Nira L. Salant Dartmouth College 2005 Advisors: Carl Renshaw and Frank.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
Advertisements

Protect and Restore Little Salmon River Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries/Watershed Program By Chad Fealko.
River Regulation / Dam Construction – Effects on Rivers and Streams.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
Aquatic Habitat Guidelines - Stream Restoration Guidelines
Aquatic Entomology ZOOL 484/584 Policies Course outline - website.
Gravel Mining Ryan Kindt Kristina Lowthian CIVE 717 April 9, 2012 Gualala River, California fly-over, Courtesy: Jamie Hall.
Geomorphic Impacts of Dam Removal Rollin H. Hotchkiss Director, Albrook Hydraulics Laboratory Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Stream Ecology (NR 280) Chapter 1 – Introduction to Fluvial Systems Basic Concepts.
Sediment Movement after Dam Removal
Modeling the Effects of Urbanization on Stream Salamander Abundances Using a Before-After Control-Impact Design Steven J. Price 1,2, Robert A. Browne 1.
Do installed steam logjams increase macroinvertebrate richness and abundance? Seyeon Kim and Ong Xiong with faculty mentor Dr. Todd Wellnitz Biology Department.
The relationship between riparian areas and biological diversity A comparison of streams in eastern Colorado and southwestern Virginia By Ann Widmer
S. Fork Nooksack River, WA. Reasons for Land Clearing Agriculture Lumber Mining Urban Development.
km Landsat TM and ETM from the Minthorn Springs node on the Umatilla River, Oregon. Assessing scales of thermal influence in alluvial floodplains.
Remote Mapping of River Channel Morphology March 9, 2003 Carl J. Legleiter Geography Department University of California Santa Barbara.
Geomorphic Effects of Dams on Rivers Gordon Grant.
Scouring—↑flashiness of the hydrograph → scour and gravel shift.
Geomorphic Effects of Dams on Rivers Gordon Grant.
Introduction Out of the nearly 75,000 dams in the lower 48, the Pacific Northwest contains about 2,048 and many are adding to river degradation, as affected.
Overview of Exercise Module 1 – Geologic Setting Module 2 – Flow Regimes Module 3 – Downstream Effects.
Biological Objectives Tied to Physical Processes Dr. William Trush Scott McBain Arcata, CA.
Ganga Basin Hydrologic Regime – Environmental Flow Perspective World Bank and INRM Consultants New Delhi February, 2015.
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
Hydrosapiens GIV eSAT of Vermont: Water Group 2013 Ben DeJong, Nina Brundage, Caitlin Beaudet, Julie Rickner, Mariah Ollive, Hannah VanGuilder, Heather.
Watershed Assessment and River Restoration Strategies
Abstract Background Conclusion Stream Bed Morphology and Discharge Rates of Deckers Creek Data was collected at 5 different points along a 100 meter transect.
Utilization of Benthic Invertebrates as Salinity Indicators in South Florida Rivers, Lessons from the Peace and Alafia Rivers Utilization of Benthic Invertebrates.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Changes to Stream Mitigation Procedures and Guidelines Mike Moxey USACE, Mobile District IRT Chair May.
Connectivity of River Flow Marisa Hendron Limnology 475/575 Presented November 25, 2009 Prof. Mark Sytsma.
King County Normative Flow Project Parametrix, King County, Herrera, & Foster Wheeler Normative Flow Studies King County Department of Natural Resources.
Physical Stream Habitat. What is “Habitat”? Broad Definition (EPA): “The spatial structure of the environment which allows species to live, reproduce,
Ryan Johnson Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon
Conceptual Ecological Model of San Acacia Reach of Middle Rio Grande River – 2/13/07 1 st Draft Ibis Ecosystem Associates, Inc. Diversion & Regulation.
Unimpaired connectivity between active channel and floodplain Eliminated connectivity between active channel and floodplain Impaired connectivity between.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
Emily Shimada, Environmental Science, University of Idaho Research Team B: Watershed Management in the Andean Paramo Faculty Advisors: Dr. Alex Fremier,
Streamflow, Stream Shape and Connectivity in Watersheds.
Functional Diversity and Substrate Composition Shape Primary Productivity and Decomposition Patterns in an Aquatic Ecosystem Methods Background The impact.
Printed by My results indicate that:  Periphyton and macroinvertebrate abundance had a positive relationship to light intensity.
The use of 7 Be to quantify downstream trends in sediment transport below a flood-control dam Paper number: H53B-1237 Results 7 Be-derived transport rates.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Teaching where science and policy intersect by developing a river restoration plan on a local stream Gabrielle David Department of Earth and Environmental.
THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE. The Hydrologic Cycle The Hydrologic Cycle - Fresh Water Storage Reservoir % of Total Fresh Water Glaciers (Frozen)76% Groundwater22%
Factors affecting sedimentation rates of a tidally influenced salt marsh in Plum Island Sound, MA McDonald Lee Advisor: Dr. Carl Friedrichs Graduate Assistant:
Channel and Habitat Monitoring in the Countyline Reach of the Lower White River Presented by Sarah McCarthy and Terry Butler River and Floodplain Management.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Stream Ecosystem Assessment Group 1 Camp Caesar August 2003.
Channel Rehabilitation Projects TAMWG - June ‘04 Trinity River at Hocker Flat 1/16/2003.
The effects of tile drain input on a gaining stream: Using a thermal end member mixing model and a statistical analysis approach Zachary Kisfalusi Master's.
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
Aquatic Resources Work Group Meeting December 18, 2008.
Sediment Management in Prado Basin and Lower Santa Ana River Greg Woodside, P.G., C.Hg Executive Director of Planning & Natural Resources September 20,
Estimating the Volume of Fine-Grained Sediments Behind Four Low-Head Dams, Kalamazoo River, Michigan. In cooperation with the Michigan Department of Environmental.
Christie Beeman and Jeff Haltiner Philip Williams & Associates Hydrograph Modification: An Introduction and.
PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
Stream Classification. What factors affect stream morphology? Width Depth Slope Velocity Discharge Flow resistance Sediment size Sediment load Leopold.
Functional Floodplains on the Central Valley’s Regulated Lowland Rivers: A Vital Link to the Delta Betty Andrews, PE Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd.
U.S. EPA: NCEA/Global Change Research Program Glenn E. Moglen University of Maryland November 12, 2002 Changing Climate and Land Use in the Mid-Atlantic:
Do not reproduce any photos that are in this presentation.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Hydrologic Change & Riparian Forests Winter Ecology – Spring 2008 Mountain Research Station – University of Colorado, Boulder Jason Ward.
An Assessment of Hydrologic Variability on
River Regulation / Dam Construction – Effects on Rivers and Streams.
Morphodynamic and Sediment Tracers in One-Dimension
photo : Michael Collier
Stream Geomorphic Assessment of Allen Brook
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Presentation transcript:

Sediment dynamics in flow-regulated streams and the impact on aquatic ecosystems Nira L. Salant Dartmouth College 2005 Advisors: Carl Renshaw and Frank Magilligan

Impact of dams on ecosystems - Limited recruitment of riparian species - Reduced access to floodplain habitat - Reduced diversity and abundance of benthic fauna - Decreased productivity of algae and biofilm

O2O2 N

Purpose Link the ecological impacts of dams to the geomorphic response resulting from hydrologic changes Primary questions What are the geomorphic responses of the streambed? How can we effectively quantify these responses?

Overview of methods Four metrics 1. Short-lived fallout radionuclides ( 7 Be, 210 Pb) 2. Embeddedness measurements 3. Long-term hydrologic and morphologic data 4. Benthic invertebrates Three rivers Regulated: Ompompanoosuc, Black Unregulated: White Year-long monitoring

Three inter-connected parts **Use of fallout radionuclides to quantify sediment transport below dams** Timescales of stream bed stabilization due to altered flow and sediment regimes below dams The effect of substrate stability and sediment deposition on benthic ecology downstream of a flood-control/run-of-the-river dam

watersediment Deposition and aggradationArmoring and incision Ecological changes DAM

S* vs. T* From Grant et al. 2003

Deposition and aggradation Armoring and incision Changes in sediment residence time and transport velocity DAM

Short-lived fallout radionuclides 7 Be (t 1/2 = 53.4 days) Relative 7 Be/ 210 Pb activity High 7Be/210Pb = “New” Low 7 Be/ 210 Pb = “Old Erosion “New” “Old”

Study sites

Union Village Dam

Level of flood-control gates compared to hydrograph

Highly regulated High flow

Level of flood-control gates compared to hydrograph Partially regulated High flow

Level of flood-control gates compared to hydrograph Unregulated Low flow

Bed sediment sampling Monthly sampling February to July 2004

Samples dried, sieved and counted for 7 Be activity

Highly regulated High flow

Highly regulated flow: Early spring

Partially regulated High flow

Study sites

Partially regulated flow: Mid-spring

Entire time period

Measured transport velocities Time period 7 Be velocity (m/d) Early spring: 31 March – 14 May40 – 60 Mid-spring: 31 March – 28 May40 – 60 Late spring: 28 May – 18 June below dam downstream 30 – – 80

Comparisons to previous studies Sediment transport rates MaterialVelocity (m/d)Source Bed load0.3 – 4.5 m/dBeechie (2001) Bed load30 – 80 m/dThis study Suspended load600 – 1500 m/dBonniwell (1999)

Effect of grain size interactions on transport

Dates 7 Be velocity One-fraction velocity Two-fraction velocity Sand | Gravel Sand fraction (F s ) 31 March – 14 May40 – – March – 28 May40 – – May – 18 June below dam downstream 30 – – – – – Comparisons to previous studies Sediment transport models

Timescales of stream bed stabilization due to altered flow and sediment regimes below dams Ompompanoosuc River - Sediment over-supply Black River - Sediment limitation

Timescales of bed elevation stabilization Bed elevation variance

Black River Immediate stabilization

Ompompanoosuc River Gradual stabilization

Benthic ecology Lack of disturbanceSediment deposition

FamilyDateRegulatedUnregulatedP HydropsychidaeJuly HydropsychidaeSeptember < EphemerellidaeJuly < EphemerellidaeSeptember < Results

Conclusions Radionuclides offer a simple and effective method for directly measuring transport rates Dams and their specific operation control the geomorphic response of the streambed Geomorphic changes to the streambed drive changes to benthic ecology

Acknowledgements Funding National Science Foundation Arthur D. Howard Award (GSA QG&G) Vermont Geological Society Dartmouth College Earth Sciences Hydrologic records/ dam information Greg Hanlon and Thomas Snow (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) Ken Toppin (USGS) Biological assistance Jeffrey Veikko Ojala (USDA Forest Service) Scott Wixsom and Dan Mckinley (USFS Green Mountain National Forest) Craig Layne and Darren Ward (Dartmouth Department of Biology) Kaoru Itakura Rebecca Krystosek Julie Jo Walters Field assistance Kelly Sennatt and Alexandra Fleming (Dartmouth Department of Earth Sciences). Thank you Frank and Carl! Also thanks to Jim Kaste, Keith Nislow, and Brian Dade for their advice and assistance