Maryland Department of the Environment Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Salisbury University Drs. Elichia Venso and Mark.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presents.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Beach Health: Safe to Swim? Heather Morehead Maryland Department of the Environment June 19, 2009.
1 WWTP Effluent-borne Pathogen Regrowth Potential and Sediment Attachment Study Rob Donofrio, Director of Microbiology, NSF International Trent Martin,
Module 6 Effluent Monitoring and Receiving Water Monitoring.
Bacteriological Examination of water, milk and air
Identification of E. coli Sources in the Conesus Lake Watershed Using PCR Jason Somarelli Advisor: Dr. Joseph Makarewicz SUNY Brockport Department of Environmental.
RESULTS With increasing amounts of Novobiocin there was an obvious decrease in survival of colony forming units of bacteria (Fig. 8). Triclosan was more.
Microbiological Examination of Water January 17, 2007 Dr. Paul F. Vendrell.
E. coli Workgroup 1/10/07 Meeting Single Sample Maximum to Assess Compliance.
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Enterobacteriaceae A. General characteristics
Microbiology of Kitchen Sponges Jim Abshire, Maggie Crenshaw May 10, 2006 BSCI 223H.
Bacterial Source Tracking Methodologies
General Microbiology Laboratory By: Mahmoud W El-Hindi1.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Lab 8&9 Goals and Objectives : Exercise 37: Morphological Study of Unknown Bacterium Exercise 38: Cultural Characteristics Discuss observations of the.
Biochemical Tests.
Presence of Microbial Indicators in Reid Park Wetlands Jepson Sutton Scott Stine SWES 574.
Microbiology: Testing for Bacteria Linda Wolf Glencoe High School SWRP Teacher for 12 years.
Citizen Water Quality Monitoring: Bacterial testing using defined substrates David W. Buckalew Dept. of Natural Sciences Kathleen M. Register Clean Virginia.
1 / march/ 2013 Mario R. Barrera George M. Rivera Paola Tabaro Mentor: Prof. Mayra Rolón University of the Sacred Heart.
Culture Media (Types, Preparation & Sterilization)
CULTURE MEDIA LECTURE 5: Microbiology and Virology; 3 Credit hours
Lab 7: Enumeration of coliforms, fecal coliforms and E. coli in foods.
Water Quality Update for Wahwashkesh Lake Water quality update for WWK from the Ministry of the Environment Lake Partner Program that includes phosphorus.
University of Tabuk Faculty of Applied Medical Science Department of Medical Laboratory Technology Mr.AYMAN.S.YOUSIF M.SC IN Microbiology &IMMUNOLOGY Academic.
Investigation of Escherichia coli in freshwater sources using membrane filtration and Rep- PCR DNA fingerprinting.
Bacterial Abundance Objective Measure bacterial numbers and mass per unit volume. Note, we are not concerned with identification here. Why do we want to.
New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Bio-Stability of New York City’s Distribution Water Authors:
Wastewater Treatment Plants & Bacteria Strategies for Compliance Best Practices for Effluent Sampling TANNY BUSBY & LAURA BONJONIA ENVIRODYNE LABORATORIES,
BRITISH SOCIETY FOR MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY SCIENTIFIC WORKSHOP Enterics – a bog standard approach? J.D. Perry Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne An Appraisal.
Applied Environmental Microbiology 43 Copyright © McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC. Permission required for reproduction or display.
30-Day Running Geometric Means for the Upper Newport Bay Stations for The following graphs provide the 30-day running geometric means for the.
Rapid detection of pathogenic bacteria in surface water by bacteria universal primer The increase of urban population often results in higher percentage.
DEVELOPMENT OF RAPID QPCR APPROACHES FOR MEASUREMENT OF E
Gram-negative rods Enterobacteriaceae.
E. coli Facts – Beach Monitoring Julie Kinzelman, City of Racine Beach Management Workshop April 14 – 15, 2005, Egg Harbor, WI.
A long-term comparison of assessment methodologies for detecting fecal coliform bacteria in natural waters D.W. Buckalew, M.M. Hafez, K.E. Jones, G.A.
1 Measurement of Multiple Microbial Indicators at two Miami-Dade County Beaches Tomoyuki Shibata, M.S. Dept of Civil, Arch., and Environmental Engineering.
University of Tabuk Faculty of Applied Medical Science
How well do indicator bacteria estimate Salmonella in freshwater streams? Timothy M. Smith, Zsofia Jakab, Sarah F. Lucento, David W. Buckalew Department.
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
Amanda Garzio-Hadzick 1, Daniel Shelton 2, Yakov A. Pachepsky 2, Robert L. Hill 1, Andrey Guber 2, Randy Rowland 2, Zane Hadzick 1, 1 University of Maryland,
Metabolic Diversity Two fundamental nutritional needs:
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings.
Introduction Rivers and estuaries have always been the focus of human settlement and recreation. The waters are used for recreation, transport, boating.
CILER Tom Johengen, Ashley Burtner, Sander Robinson Wayne State University Donna Kashian, Vijay Kannappan, Hunter Oates, Carly Collins Fall 2010 Multiple.
Gram-negative rods: Enterobacteriaceae Part I
ASM General Meeting, May GM-A-1307-ASM: Q-51 ABSTRACT The objectives of this study are to compare multiple microbial indicators (enterococci, fecal.
OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, UPSTATE FRESHWATER INSTITUTE.
Richard A. Haugland USEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory Presented at ORD Product Expo for Region 9, February.
Intro to Microbiology.
Urinary Tract Infection Department of Microbiology
To limit human contact with contaminated waters, fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) are used to evaluate risk of illness from recreational bathing at beaches.
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
Coliforms
Isolation of Bacteriophages
Sources of Bacteria and their Variability in Urban Watersheds Robert Pitt Cudworth Professor Urban Water Systems Department of Civil, Construction, and.
IDENTIFICATION OF ENTEROBACTERIACEAE
Beth Schweitzer MT(ASCP), SM Nebraska Public Health Laboratory
IMT’s Food QA/QC Assays Andy Moreno Vice President, Microbiology Sales Engineering Cell: FAX:
Microorganisms (The Coliform Group Bacteria)
Stool Cultures for Water Samples
Practical 5 Water Microbiology I
Introduction to detection methods
Microbial Isolation and Identification Procedures
Microbiology of Water Dr.GulveR.M.
General Microbiology Laboratory
Culture of Stool Specimens
Citrate Utilization Islamic University_Gaza
Presentation transcript:

Maryland Department of the Environment Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Salisbury University Drs. Elichia Venso and Mark Frana Bacterial Source Tracking Laboratory

 To determine levels of fecal indicator organisms ( E. coli & Enterococcus) in beach sediment and water samples at 1 Delaware and 3 Maryland sampling sites  To investigate survival and/or regrowth of fecal indicator organisms found in sediment and water samples  To determine if an association was present between bacterial density in beach sand and in beach water  To select for and identify potential bacterial pathogens in these same water and sediment samples

 4 sampling locations:  Maryland  Assateague Island (bay side)  Granary Creek (Wye River tributary)  Sandy Point  Delaware  Delaware Shore  12 month project: Jan–Dec 2008  Sample collections:  Monthly (Jan-Apr; Oct – Dec)  Bimonthly (May – Sep)  Samples collected at each study site:  Water at knee depth  Sediment at water sampling location (“wet”)  Sediment in foreshore between high tide line and water’s edge (“dry”)

 Collection data sheets included information on:  Water  Temperature  Conductivity  Dissolved Oxygen  pH  Salinity  Sediment  Temperature  Note: Analysis was conducted on one set of samples for nitrogen, phosphorus, pH, etc.  Other  Air Temperature and Direction  Weather  Tide  Unusual observations

 Water:  Analysis of triplicate water samples to enumerate the fecal indicators using Colilert ® -18 Most Probable Number analysis for the detection of E. coli and Enterolert™ for the detection of Enterococci  Membrane filtration onto selective media for the isolation of potential pathogens

 Sediment:  Determination of moisture content  Agitation of 10 grams in 50 ml of extraction buffer for 30 minutes using a wrist-action shaker, then allowed to settle for 30 min  Membrane filtration of supernatant for enumeration of E. coli and Enterococci and identification of potential pathogens.  Regrowth:  Incubation of select sediment and water samples at 4°C, 21°C, and 37 ° C, followed by enumeration of E. coli and Enterococcus

MacConkey Sorbitol E. coli O157:H7 CIN Yersinia CAMPY CSM Campylobacter XLT4: BG: Salmonella SS Agar Salmonella/Shigella

 Carbon Source Utitilization using Biolog ©  Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Midi Labs ©  DNA amplification  Sequence matching

 Density in water versus in wet and dry sediments:  E. coli : 72% at AI 49% at SP  Enterococci 58% at AI 29% at GC  Density in water versus in wet and dry sediments and % moisture:  E. coli: 82% at AI 99% at GC 100% at SP  Enterococci: 92% at DS61% at GC 50% at SP  Density in water versus in dry sediment and % moisture:  Enterococci: 92% DS35% at GC 25% at SP

 Percentage of experiments with regrowth in water:  E. coli : 47% at AI27% at DS 73% at GC 67% at SP  Enterococci: 33% at GC 27% at SP  Percentage of experiments with regrowth in wet sediment:  E. coli : 67% at GC 20% at SP  Enterococci: 33% at GC 20% at SP  Percentage of experiments with regrowth in dry sediment:  E. coli : 33% at GC 20% at SP  Enterococci:27% at GC 20% at AI and SP

 One “potential” pathogen with a definitive ID:  Sandy Point Wet Sediment  Vibrio furnissii  Six additional potential pathogens, but with low confidence ID:  Granary Creek Water  E. coli O157:H7 (2)  Shigella dysenteriae (2)  Sandy Point Wet Sediment  E. coli O157:H7  Shigella flexneri  Other Genera identified:  Aeromonas  Citrobacter  Enterobacter  Klebsiella  Proteus  Pseudomonas  Serratia  Shewanella

 Detectable indicator bacterial densities were found in 47% of 408 assays.  The highest fecal indicator counts were found in sediment samples from Granary Creek.  The lowest fecal indicator counts were found at the Delaware Shore site.  Regrowth/survivability data was measurable at all four sites, although survival was relatively short-term for samples held at 21 °C and 37 °C as compared to samples held at 4 °C.  Only one potential pathogen was definitively identified.

 MDE  Kathy Brohawn  William Beatty  John “Rusty” McKay  Heather Morehead  Kathy Bassett  Sarah Harvey  Ann McManus  DNREC  John Pingree  Debbie Rouse  Glenn King  Salisbury University  Lesley Frana  Annie Adkins  Chris Labe  Isha Choudhary  Mary Vendetti,  Leo Cabrera  Cloe Manarinjara  Megan Robison