BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Society for Risk Analysis Workshop 3: Application of Web-based Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) Leslie Galloway, University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge.
Advertisements

Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Risk Assessment.
1 Risk assessment: overview and principles –Risk principles –Steps in risk assessment –Risk calculation –Toxicology.
National Inventory of Potential Sources of Soil Contamination in Cyprus Part 2 Risk-Based Approach to Assessment of Cypriot Contaminated Sites Eleonora.
MASARYK UNIVERSITY Brno – Czech Republic RECETOX
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Exposure Assessment Thanks to Marc Rigas, PhD for an earlier version of this lecture Much of the materials is drawn from Paustenbach, DJ. (2000) The practice.
Responding to Soil Contamination in the Moanataiari Subdivision And when the NES does and does not apply May 2012.
Risk Assessment: A Conceptual Introduction
29 th International conference SEGH, 8-12 July Toulouse, FRANCE 2013 Health risk estimate for groundwater and soil contamination in the.
SOUTHWEST DIVISION Evaluation of Ambient Metals in the San Francisco, California Area Presentation for the NDIA Conference G. Patrick Brooks, R.G. NAVFAC,
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
Asbestos-Contaminated Soil Regulations in Colorado
1 Uncertainty in Ecological Risk Assessments Larry Tannenbaum, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM)
Environmental Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis of Contaminated Sites: Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment F. Quercia, ANPA Workshop ICS/UNIDO - Fundacion Mamonal Environmental.
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
Screening Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment Poplar Point, Washington, DC.
Philip Bedient, Ph.D. Rice University
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
1 School Siting Environmental Health and Safety Considerations J. Brad Peebles Ph.D.,C.E.P
(IAQ). What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures.
Community Health Risk Assessment An Assessment of Risk Related to the Oil and Gas Industry in Garfield County Teresa A. Coons, PhD Senior Scientist Saccomanno.
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
Michael J. Sullivan, Ph.D., CIH, REA
Approaches for Evaluating the Relevance of Multiroute Exposures in Establishing Guideline Values for Drinking Water Contaminants Kannan Krishnan, Université.
INTRODUCTION TO TOXICOLOGY SIDNEY GREEN, PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACOLOGY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE HOWARD UNIVERISTY.
Examples of Health Risk Assessment Applications for Contaminated Sites in the Upper Silesia, Poland Eleonora Wcislo Institute for Ecology of Industrial.
Production of Nitric Acid Environmental Impact Assessment Erik TolonenNick Poulin Environmental Engineering Environmental Planning and Decision Making.
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Tier 1 Environmental Performance Tools Economic Criteria.
TCA in groundwater Anne Karvonen Juha Villman Mikko Pohjola.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
Determining Risks to Background Arsenic Using a Margin – of – Exposure Approach Presentation at Society of Risk Analysis, New England Chapter Barbara D.
The Vieques Problem By Monique Latalladi. Table of Contents Background / History Definition of Problem ATSDR findings Documentation Analysis Conclusion.
Current Asbestos Related Issues Aparna Koppikar, M.D., Ph. D May 21, 2003 National Center for Environmental Assessment.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management, 4e.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
EHS 507 Potential dose: the amount of chemical that is ingested or inhaled, or the amount of chemical contained in material applied to skin. Applied dose:
George M. Woodall, PhD NCEA Toxicologist Leland Urban Air Toxics Research Center October 18, 2005 EPA Reference Values: Regulatory Context.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
Tomsk Polytechnic University ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT FROM CHEMICAL EXPOSURE OSIPOVA NINA The Lecturer of Natural Resourses Department, Ph.D in Сhemistry.
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety Stephanie Simstad The Ohio State University Extension Clermont County AFCEE, 2002.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Environmental Risk Assessment and Risk Management Kevin L. Long ENVIRON International Corporation Academy Park High School May 12, 2010.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder.
Key Concepts on Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
1 Risk Assessment for Air Toxics: The 4 Basic Steps NESCAUM Health Effects Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
TOXICOLOGY AND RISK ASSESSMENT
Environmental sampling and monitoring
Introduction to Risk Assessment
Presentation transcript:

BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012

WHAT IS RISK?  Definition: probability of harm or loss  Risk = Hazard x Exposure  Risk can be voluntary or involuntary  Interpretation of risk differs for each of us  Predictive risk assessment (U.S. EPA) vs. health study (ATSDR, Health Department)

PURPOSE OF BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT  Characterize current and potential future risks to human health and the environment  Determine the need for remedial action  Aid stakeholders in understanding potential site-related risks  Satisfy Federal regulations requiring the assessment of risk at Superfund sites

BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS  Hazard Identification  Exposure Assessment  Toxicity Assessment  Risk Characterization  Uncertainty Analysis

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION  Gather and analyze relevant site data  Identify Chemicals of Potential Concern (CoPCs) CoPCs are chemicals that may contribute significantly to site-related risks CoPCs are chemicals that may contribute significantly to site-related risks Determined by comparison to generic risk-based screening levels or regulatory criteria Determined by comparison to generic risk-based screening levels or regulatory criteria Identification process also considers essentiality, frequency of detection, and background conditions Identification process also considers essentiality, frequency of detection, and background conditions

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT  Analyze contaminant releases  Identify potentially-exposed populations (current and future)  Identify potential exposure pathways  Estimate exposure point concentrations for CoPCs  Estimate contaminant intake (dose) for each CoPC

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (cont.) Common Land-Use Scenarios  Residential  Occupational Commercial / Industrial Commercial / Industrial Construction Construction  Recreational  Other Agricultural Agricultural Trespassing Trespassing Maintenance (Landscaping) Maintenance (Landscaping)

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (cont.) Common Exposure Pathways  Surface soil  Subsurface soil  Ground water  Air  Surface water  Sediment

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (cont.) Common Exposure Routes  Ingestion Soil Soil Ground water Ground water Surface water Surface water Sediment Sediment  Dermal contact Soil Soil Ground water (bathing) Ground water (bathing) Surface water Surface water Sediment Sediment  Inhalation Soil (outdoor vapors, airborne particulate, vapor intrusion) Soil (outdoor vapors, airborne particulate, vapor intrusion) Ground water (showering, vapor intrusion) Ground water (showering, vapor intrusion) Air Air

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (cont.) Generic Dose Equation - Ingestion Dose = (C x CR x EF x ED) / (BW x AT) where:C = contaminant concentration, media-dependent CR = contact rate, media-dependent EF (days/yr) = exposure frequency ED (yrs) = exposure duration BW (kg) = body weight AT (days) = averaging time Generic Dose Equation - Inhalation Exposure Concentration = (CA x ET x EF x ED x CF) / AT where:CA (ug/m 3 ) = contaminant concentration in air ET (hrs/day) = exposure time EF (days/yr) = exposure frequency ED (yrs) = exposure duration CF (1 day/24 hrs) = conversion factor AT (days) = averaging time

TOXICITY ASSESSMENT  Collect qualitative and quantitative toxicity information for CoPCs  Determine appropriate toxicity values for CoPCs to estimate risks Reference Dose (RfD) Reference Dose (RfD) Inhalation Reference Concentration (RfC) Inhalation Reference Concentration (RfC) Carcinogenic Slope Factor (CSF) Carcinogenic Slope Factor (CSF) Inhalation Unit Risk (IUR) Inhalation Unit Risk (IUR)

RISK CHARACTERIZATION  Combine Exposure Assessment with Toxicity Assessment to describe potential for adverse health effects

RISK CHARACTERIZATION (cont.) Cancer Risks Risk = CSF x Dose where:CSF (mg/kg/day) -1 = Carcinogenic Slope Factor Risk = IUR x EC where:IUR (ug/m 3 ) -1 = Inhalation Unit Risk, chemical-specific EC (ug/m 3 ) = exposure concentration Non-Cancer Risks HQ = Dose / RfD where:HQ (unitless) = Hazard Quotient RfD (mg/kg/day) = Reference Dose HQ = EC / (RfC x 1000 ug/mg) where:HQ (unitless) = Hazard Quotient EC (ug/m 3 ) = exposure concentration RfC (mg/m 3 ) = Reference Concentration, chemical-specific

RISK CHARACTERIZATION (cont.)  Unacceptable Risk Excess cancer risk greater than 1E-04 Excess cancer risk greater than 1E-04 probability of developing cancer from defined exposure is greater than 1 in 10,000probability of developing cancer from defined exposure is greater than 1 in 10,000 For non-cancer impacts, sum of HQs for similar target organs is greater than 1 For non-cancer impacts, sum of HQs for similar target organs is greater than 1 “safe” dose is exceeded“safe” dose is exceeded

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS  Describe assumptions and significant unknowns associated with risk assessment process  Quantitative measure of variability and sensitivity of each input parameter can be performed via Monte Carlo Analysis

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL RISK ASSESSMENT PARADIGM Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Risk Management National Research Council, 1983 Dose-Response Assessment Hazard Identification Risk Characterization Exposure Assessment Statutory and Legal Considerations Public Health Considerations Regulatory Decisions Social Factors Economic Factors Control Options

Asbestos  Two mineral groups Serpentine Serpentine Single asbestosform variety (chrysotile)Single asbestosform variety (chrysotile) Amphibole Amphibole Several asbestosform varieties (crocidolite, amosite, anthophyllite, tremolite, actinolite)Several asbestosform varieties (crocidolite, amosite, anthophyllite, tremolite, actinolite)

Asbestos Investigations  No method has been found that reliably predicts asbestos concentrations in air given concentrations at the source.  Levels of asbestos in air from source disturbance are measured, not predicted.  Activity-Based Sampling (ABS)

Asbestos ABS Sampling  Potential limitations Representativeness of samples over an area of concern Representativeness of samples over an area of concern Generalizing snapshot findings to future exposures Generalizing snapshot findings to future exposures Engaging in dissimilar activities Engaging in dissimilar activities Differing environmental conditions Differing environmental conditions

Asbestos ABS Sampling (cont.)  Remedy to limitations Bias sampling towards most contaminated asbestos sources Bias sampling towards most contaminated asbestos sources Perform aggressive soil disturbance (raking), to generate maximum air concentrations Perform aggressive soil disturbance (raking), to generate maximum air concentrations Sample when environmental conditions are favorable to maximum airborne release Sample when environmental conditions are favorable to maximum airborne release Apply conservative exposure assumptions and tox criteria in Baseline Risk Assessment Apply conservative exposure assumptions and tox criteria in Baseline Risk Assessment

Asbestos Risks  Inhalation Carcinogenic Carcinogenic Lung cancerLung cancer MesotheliomaMesothelioma Laryngopharyngeal cancerLaryngopharyngeal cancer GI tumors (possibly)GI tumors (possibly) Non-Cancer Non-Cancer AsbestosisAsbestosis Pleural diseasePleural disease

Asbestos Risk Equation Generic Risk Equation - Inhalation ELCR = EPC x TWF x IUR where:ELCR = Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk, the risk of developing cancer due to site-related exposure EPC = Exposure Point Concentration, the concentration of asbestos fibers in air (f/cc) IUR = Inhalation Unit Risk (f/cc)-1 TWF = Time Weighting Factor, to account for less-than-continuous exposure during a one-year exposure, where: TWF = [Exposure time (hours exposed/day ) / 24] x [Exposure frequency (days/year ) / 365]

Example TWFs TWFs for Example Exposure Scenarios Exposure ScenarioHrs/DayDays/YearTWF Continuous Baseline residential Gardening Recreational Child playing in soil TWF = [Exposure time (hours exposed/day ) / 24] x [Exposure frequency (days/year ) / 365]

Asbestos IURs  Cancer risk estimates depend not only on EF and ED, but also on age at first exposure  Refer to handout (Table 2 and Table 3 from EPA Asbestos Framework) for IURs

Estimation of Potential Cumulative Risk from Asbestos ELCRc = Σ EPCi TWFi IURLTLi where:ELCRc = the cumulative excess cancer risk to an individual from exposure to multiple environments or multiple scenarios

Example Risk Calculation for Asbestos  Refer to handout (Example 3 from EPA Asbestos Framework)