What is Knowledge?.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Knowledge?. you must believe the knowledge statement your belief in the knowledge statement has to be true your true belief has to be justified.
Advertisements

Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 5 Ways of knowing – Reason.
Logical Fallacies AKA “How NOT to Win an Argument”
LOGICAL FALLACIES Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments Moore AP Language and Composition.
A summary of common fallacies
Flawed Arguments COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES.  Flaws in an argument  Often subtle  Learning to recognize these will:  Strengthen your own arguments 
 In this task you will see 16 different arguments.  You have to identify which of the 8 common fallacies is being used by the argument.
What is Knowledge?. “organised common sense” Imagine a mental map of reality: your ideas of true and false, right and wrong, reasonable and unreasonable,
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
TOK - Emotion And reason.
Logical Fallacies Created by J. Nelson. Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) Arguments of this kind focus not on the evidence for a view but on the character.
How to avoid errors in logic
Logical Fallacies.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Errors in Reasoning.
‘The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything but his reason.’
Recognizing Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is a mistake in logical thinking; it is a MENTAL TRAP.
‘The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything but his reason.’
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
McGraw-Hill©Stephen E. Lucas 2001 All rights reserved. CHAPTER SIXTEEN Methods of Persuasion.
Informal Reasoning 1/9. Agenda  Introduce Informal Reasoning  Reflect on Informal Reasoning  END GOAL: Is informal reasoning reliable?
 Reason A Way of Knowing.  Logic is the beginning of wisdom, Valeris, not the end. - Spock.
What is a logical fallacy?. Logical fallacies Do you know what a “fallacy” is? Look at the word – it has “falla” in it, which could mean “fault,” “flaw,”
Logical Fallacies1 This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because pity does not serve as evidence for a claim Just to get a scholarship does not justify.
Informal Reasoning. Fallacies The ten deadly fallacies Ad IgnorantiamClaiming something is true because it cannot be proved to be false Hasty generalizationGeneralizing.
An Introduction to Logic And Fallacious Reasoning
Fallacies To error in reason is human; to analyze divine!
Topic: Logical Fallacies in Propaganda and Advertising Essential Question: Identify what you would consider to be the most widely used “bad argument” in.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Informal Reasoning.  A fallacy is a failure in reasoning that leads to an argument being invalid.  They are like cracks in the foundation.
ToK - Reason 1. Reason (noun) a basis or cause, as for some belief, action, fact, event, etc 2. Reason (verb) - to think or argue in a logical manner;
Rhetorical Fallacies. Slippery slope: We can’t do ________. That would lead to _______ which would lead to ________. youtube.com/ watch?v=9gJI.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
All of these children are wrong.
Reason Pt. 2. Inductive Reasoning Induction moves from the particular to the general. As a result, it involves generalizing: moving from observable facts.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies FLAWED ARGUMENTS SUBTLE ERRORS IN JUDGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION.
EVALUATING ARGUMENTS AND BUILDING ARGUMENTS ENGL 121 Howard Community College.
Reason: Wrap Up 1/16. Agenda Review main points Bad Reasoning Is reasoning certain? END GOAL: For you, is reason a reliable WOK?
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Talking points 1. Would Neil still have committed suicide if Mr. Keating had never come into his life? Who is most to blame for Neil’s death? Mr. Keating?
‘The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything but his reason.’
Logical Fallacies. Slippery Slope The argument that some event must inevitably follow from another without any rational claim. If we allow A to happen.
Informal Logic Fallacies
Ways of knowing: Reason
©Adam vanLangenberg - MSSS
Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
If A happens, then B happens then A must cause B
Common Logical Fallacies
10.RI08 I can analyze and evaluate specific claims in a text to determine if the reasoning is valid and the evidence fully supports the claim.
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
Logical Fallacies.
Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum)
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Informal Logical Fallacies
Writing the Argumentative Essay
Ways of knowing: Reason
Common Logical Fallacies
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
1. Could I receive an A for this class
Presentation transcript:

What is Knowledge?

“justified, true belief” you must believe the knowledge statement your belief in the knowledge statement has to be true your true belief has to be justified.

“justified, true belief” Requires: Evidence – reasonable & positive evidence that supports & justifies belief. Coherence – does this fit with our current understanding?

Logical fallacies

The more churches there are in a city, the more prostitutes there are.

People who have a tattoo are more likely to develop lung cancer People who have a tattoo are more likely to develop lung cancer. This is true.

Connor says that he knows someone who is 90 and who has smoked 40 cigarettes a day for 75 years and he’s OK, so smoking can’t be harmful.

Eleanor bought a good luck charm and he seems to be doing better at school.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc Assuming one thing causes another just because one follows another. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

A summary of common fallacies

Ad ignorantiam Claiming that something is true because it cannot be proved to be false. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

Hasty generalisation Generalising from insufficient evidence. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

Ad hominem Attacking /supporting the person rather than the argument. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

Circular reasoning Assuming the truth of what you are supposed to be proving. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

Special pleading Using double standards to excuse an individual or group. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

Equivocation Using language ambiguously. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

False analogy Assuming that because two things are alike in one way that they are alike in other respects. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

False dilemma Assuming that only a limited number of alternatives exist. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

Loaded question A question that is biased because it contains a built-in assumption. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

In each of the following cases, decide which best applies to the argument. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question.

1. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. Since strict gun control laws were introduced in Dodge City, the crime rate has risen. This shows that gun control does nothing to reduce crime. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

post hoc ergo propter hoc Since strict gun control laws were introduced in Dodge City, the crime rate has risen. This shows that gun control does nothing to reduce crime.

2. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. Abbie said she trusted me, and she must be telling the truth because she wouldn’t lie to someone that she trusted. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

circular reasoning Abbie said she trusted me, and she must be telling the truth because she wouldn’t lie to someone that she trusted. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

3. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. The ends justifies the means. After all, if you want to make omelettes, you have to break eggs. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

false analogy The ends justifies the means. After all, if you want to make omelettes, you have to break eggs.

4. That can’t be right, non of my friends would believe it. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. That can’t be right, non of my friends would believe it. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

ad hominem That can’t be right, non of my friends would believe it.

5. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. Since many great scientists have believed in God, there must be some truth in religion. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

ad hominem Since many great scientists have believed in God, there must be some truth in religion.

7. Do you want to be part of the solution, or part of the problem? Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. Do you want to be part of the solution, or part of the problem? “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

false dilemma Do you want to be part of the solution, or part of the problem?

8. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. “I agree that you shouldn’t copy mp3s illegally, but I’ve only copied a few and I do buy tracks sometimes.” “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

special pleading “I agree that you shouldn’t copy mp3s illegally, but I’ve only copied a few and I do buy tracks sometimes.”

9. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. The average UK family has 2.5 children. The Smiths are average people, they must have 2.5 kids. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

equivocation The average UK family has 2.5 children. The Smiths are average people, they must have 2.5 kids.

10. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. Since no-one has been able to prove that God didn’t create the universe, we must conclude that God did make everything. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

ad ignorantium Since no-one has been able to prove that God didn’t create the universe, we must conclude that God did make everything.

11. Are all your family stupid, or is it just you? Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. Are all your family stupid, or is it just you? “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

loaded question Are all your family stupid, or is it just you?

12. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. No scandal has ever touched Mr Porter. He must be a clean living and honest man. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

ad ignorantium No scandal has ever touched Mr Porter. He must be a clean living and honest man.

13. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. Just as you are more likely to take care of a car that you own rather than a car that you rent, a slave owner would look after a slave better than an employer would look after their worker. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

false analogy Just as you are more likely to take care of a car that you own rather than a car that you rent, a slave owner would look after a slave better than an employer would look after their worker.

14. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. To ignore the possibility that Norway landed the first person on the moon just because nobody has heard of a Norwegian space program is arrogant. If we are unaware of something does not mean that it never happened. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

ad ignorantium To ignore the possibility that Norway landed the first person on the moon just because nobody has heard of a Norwegian space program is arrogant. If we are unaware of something does not mean that it never happened.

15. Hasty generalisation, post hoc ergo propter hoc, circular reasoning, ad hominem, special pleading, ad ignorantium, false dilemma, false analogy, equivocation, loaded question. In the fight against terrorism, you are either with the USA or against. “Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma”, Richard van de Lagemaat, Cambridge University Press

false dilemma In the fight against terrorism, you are either with the USA or against.

Your knowledge issues?

McDonald’s and language

Moon Landing?

Intelligent Design

Obama’s Health Policy