Advancing Marketing Knowledge Kent B. Monroe AMA Winter Educators’ Conference February 12, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
Advertisements

Topics
Anthony Greene1 Simple Hypothesis Testing Detecting Statistical Differences In The Simplest Case:  and  are both known I The Logic of Hypothesis Testing:
Sampling and Probability Chapter 5. Samples and Their Populations >Decision making The risks and rewards of sampling.
Statistical Issues in Research Planning and Evaluation
CHAPTER 23: Two Categorical Variables: The Chi-Square Test
Chapter 9 – Hypothesis Tests concerning One Population Mean.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING Four Steps Statistical Significance Outcomes Sampling Distributions.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9 Homework: 1-9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics ~
Statistics Micro Mini Threats to Your Experiment!
Understanding Research Results. Effect Size Effect Size – strength of relationship & magnitude of effect Effect size r = √ (t2/(t2+df))
PSY 1950 Confidence and Power December, Requisite Quote “The picturing of data allows us to be sensitive not only to the multiple hypotheses that.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 20 – April 3, 2008.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics
Reliability and Validity. Criteria of Measurement Quality How do we judge the relative success (or failure) in measuring various concepts? How do we judge.
Validity Lecture Overview Overview of the concept Different types of validity Threats to validity and strategies for handling them Examples of validity.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 7 Sampling, Significance Levels, and Hypothesis Testing Three scientific traditions critical.
Innovate, Educate, and Transform Linda Fischer, Ed.D., Doctoral Support Center January 2014 Navigating the Dissertation.
Chapter 4 Hypothesis Testing, Power, and Control: A Review of the Basics.
4-1 Statistical Inference The field of statistical inference consists of those methods used to make decisions or draw conclusions about a population.
Determining Sample Size
Reporting & Ethical Standards EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Sampling: Theory and Methods
Statistical Analysis A Quick Overview. The Scientific Method Establishing a hypothesis (idea) Collecting evidence (often in the form of numerical data)
Chapter Nine Copyright © 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Sampling: Theory, Designs and Issues in Marketing Research.
The Argument for Using Statistics Weighing the Evidence Statistical Inference: An Overview Applying Statistical Inference: An Example Going Beyond Testing.
1 Hypothesis testing can be used to determine whether Hypothesis testing can be used to determine whether a statement about the value of a population parameter.
Main issues Effect-size ratio Development of protocols and improvement of designs Research workforce and stakeholders Reproducibility practices and reward.
Sekaran and Bougie; Research Methods for Business : A Skill Building Approach, 5th Ed; Wiley Scientific Investigation Ch. 2.
Highlights from Educational Research: Its Nature and Rules of Operation Charles and Mertler (2002)
Chapter 21: More About Tests “The wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.” -David Hume 1748.
10.2 Tests of Significance Use confidence intervals when the goal is to estimate the population parameter If the goal is to.
URBDP 591 I Lecture 3: Research Process Objectives What are the major steps in the research process? What is an operational definition of variables? What.
Inferential Statistics Body of statistical computations relevant to making inferences from findings based on sample observations to some larger population.
Lecture 16 Section 8.1 Objectives: Testing Statistical Hypotheses − Stating hypotheses statements − Type I and II errors − Conducting a hypothesis test.
S-012 Testing statistical hypotheses The CI approach The NHST approach.
The Integrity of Data Management Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Howard University November 2, 2010 Peggy Carr, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner National.
Dissertation Defense Machine Assisted Grading of Rare Collectibles through the COINS framework By: Rick Bassett July 24, 2003.
Academic Research Academic Research Dr Kishor Bhanushali M
Quantitative Research 2
METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH NINTH EDITION PAUL C. COZBY Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
 Descriptive Methods ◦ Observation ◦ Survey Research  Experimental Methods ◦ Independent Groups Designs ◦ Repeated Measures Designs ◦ Complex Designs.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Sampling, Significance Levels, and Hypothesis Testing Three scientific traditions.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Criteria for selection of a data collection instrument. 1.Practicality of the instrument: -Concerns its cost and appropriateness for the study population.
Understanding Basic Statistics Fourth Edition By Brase and Brase Prepared by: Lynn Smith Gloucester County College Chapter Nine Hypothesis Testing.
Howard University October 10,2012 The Integrity of Data Management Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Peggy Carr, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner National.
URBDP 591 A Lecture 16: Research Validity and Replication Objectives Guidelines for Writing Final Paper Statistical Conclusion Validity Montecarlo Simulation/Randomization.
What Is Science?. 1. Science is limited to studying only the natural world. 2. The natural world are those phenomena that can be investigated, discovered,
THE NATURE OF CAUSATION Free Will Vs. Determinism Causation in the natural sciences -- plants and nutrition Causality in the social sciences assumes determinism.
C HAPTER 2  Hypothesis Testing -Test for one means - Test for two means -Test for one and two proportions.
BIOLOGY: Chapter 1 The Science of Biology. 1.1 The Science of Biology “ Science” is basically two things: – A body of knowledge… an accumulation of things.
Presented by Mo Geraghty and Danny Tran June 10, 2016.
AP Statistics Part IV – Inference: Conclusions with Confidence Chapter 10: Introduction to Inference 10.1Estimating with Confidence To make an inference.
HYPOTHESES TESTING. Concept of Hypotheses A hypotheses is a proposition which the researcher wants to verify. It may be mentioned that while a hypotheses.
Research Design. How do we know what we know? The way we make reasoning Deductive logic Begins with one or more premises, reasoning then proceeds logically.
Chapter Nine Hypothesis Testing.
Reliability and Validity
Chapter 8: Inferences Based on a Single Sample: Tests of Hypotheses
Leacock, Warrican and Rose (2009)
Hypothesis Testing.
Understanding Results
Hypothesis Testing: Hypotheses
Research Methods: Concepts and Connections First Edition
Hypotheses Hypothesis Testing
Section 12.2: Tests about a Population Proportion
Chapter Nine Part 1 (Sections 9.1 & 9.2) Hypothesis Testing
Statistical Inference
AP STATISTICS LESSON 10 – 4 (DAY 2)
Presentation transcript:

Advancing Marketing Knowledge Kent B. Monroe AMA Winter Educators’ Conference February 12, 2005

Advancing Marketing Knowledge2 Thanks and Acknowledgements  American Marketing Association  McGraw-Hill/Irwin  Selection Committee  Madhu Viswanathan  Current and former colleagues at Illinois, Richmond, Virginia Tech, Massachusetts  Current and former students  My family

Advancing Marketing Knowledge3 Three Recommendations 1.Encourage multiple approaches for developing knowledge 2.Reduce use of traditional rules of thumb 3.Endorse ways of accumulating knowledge  Researchers, educators, reviewers and editors all play a significant role

Advancing Marketing Knowledge4 Questions of Empirical Research  Is there an effect? (Conclusion validity)  If so, can we detect it?  Have correct statistical analyses been used?  Are there rival, plausible hypotheses? (Internal validity)  Can we generalize back to theory? (Construct validity)  Can we generalize to and across … ? (External validity)

Advancing Marketing Knowledge5 Some Ways to Enhance Discovery  Allow for accidents and unexpected observations to occur  Determine reasons for variability or error  Ease the focus on precision  Get out in the field (observe, listen)  Tinker around: let the “data” speak to you

Advancing Marketing Knowledge6 Researchers’ Dilemma  Maximizing construct validity may reduce conclusion validity (finding an effect)  Maximizing internal validity may reduce construct validity of setting, sample, treatments  Generalizing effects to different constructs requires multiple, diverse research efforts

Advancing Marketing Knowledge7 Multiple Approaches 1.Theory + Method  Substantive 2.Substantive + Method  Theory 3.Substantive + Theory  Method –(McGrath and Brinberg, (Journal of Consumer Research, June 1983)  It is myopic to believe there is only one way to develop knowledge.

Advancing Marketing Knowledge8 Rules of Thumb  The fallacy of “statistical significance”  Are empirical effects only significant if the statistical test of the null hypothesis achieves a probability level of.05?  Is this an appropriate or even the only criterion for accepting new knowledge?

Advancing Marketing Knowledge9 Criteria for Selecting α  Select small α if: Greater research control Greater research control Unsure of direction of effect Unsure of direction of effect Large confidence interval needed Large confidence interval needed Large effect expected Large effect expected  Select larger α if: Small sample size (Hunter, Journal of Consumer Research, June 2001) Small sample size (Hunter, Journal of Consumer Research, June 2001) Early stages of research Early stages of research

Advancing Marketing Knowledge10 Other Considerations for Selecting α  Consequences of type I error vs. type II error  Prior evidence against the null hypothesis  The convention of p <.05 is popular but of dubious merit.

Advancing Marketing Knowledge11 Accumulating Knowledge  The problem of n = 1 –(Wells, Journal of Consumer Research, December 2001)  Searching for new knowledge vs. building a “store” of knowledge  The need for  Replication (Can results be reproduced?)  Robustness (Do results hold across concepts, methods, substantive areas?)  Boundary conditions (When are results not supported?)  Re-search

Advancing Marketing Knowledge12 Accumulating Knowledge  Knowledge accrual requires convergence of findings derived from divergent methods.  Construct validity requires diversity of methods.  Robustness or generalizability requires diversity of populations, occasions, settings, and methods.  Neither one study nor a few studies are sufficient to determine knowledge.

Advancing Marketing Knowledge13 Accumulating Knowledge  Replication is –complementary to diversity, generalizability, robustness. –necessary to reduce the small sample bias of our research  A replicated result represents information about the reliability of a finding.  The belief that replication research does not make a significant contribution is a misconception.

Advancing Marketing Knowledge14 Accumulating Knowledge  We should encourage a diversity of methods applied to any research domain, by someone.  It is not expected that any one researcher be an omnimethod expert.  However, we must demand it of the Marketing discipline as a collective.

Advancing Marketing Knowledge15 A Fantastic and Rewarding Journey  Discovering and developing new knowledge  Writing and communicating this knowledge  Teaching and mentoring –Doctoral students (36 dissertations) –Masters students (MBA and MS) –Undergraduate students –New faculty –Editing and reviewing manuscripts

Advancing Marketing Knowledge16 Thank You!  I truly appreciate this honor.  Best wishes for a enjoyable conference and a productive and happy  Enjoy the journey – it is a very rewarding experience to be an educator.