Spotlight on Marine Fuel Issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.
Advertisements

Air Emissions Regulations Update Tripartite meeting 15/16 September 2006; Seoul
Tackling the Environmental Impact of Transport Presentation by David Jamieson MP to the Institute for Public Policy Research Wednesday 15th October 2003.
14 th Annual Marine Money Greek Forum, October 2012 Sustainable investments in technology.
2010 Energy Buyers Conference Miami, October 26 th MARPOL and ISO 8217:2010 “Changes in our industry”
A Quick Lesson On Crude Oil
Global Petroleum Market Outlook Changes on the Horizon Prepared for 2009 Energy Buyers' Conference Miami Beach –October 26.
Developing Coal Tar/ Petroleum Pitches
Freight by Water Conference Teesside 7 September 2012 Sulphur Directive Impacts.
Alternative energy for shipping in Nordic waters
Håkon B. Thoresen 24 September 2009 Fuel changeover considerations HFO-MGO INTERTANKO Bunker Sub-committee, Nafplia, Greece.
Hellenic Forum Athens 6 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
USE OF MDO BY SHIPS PART OF A HOLISTIC APPROACH BUNKER SUMMIT – GREECE 2007
OGC 1. BUNKER FUELS Regulation and practice David Springett SGS MARINE SERVICES October 2012 © SGS Group Management Ltd. Geneva Switzerland 2012 Not to.
SECA 1st of January 2015.
© 2013 BELL PERFORMANCE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Fuels Overview: Heavy Fuel Oil NEW DIMENSION LOGISTICS - JANUARY 2015.
Environmental Bunker legislation and the Potential Impact on the Vancouver Market May 2014 May
UPDATE ON THE REVISION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI LATIN AMERICAN PANEL March 12-13, 2008 Miami Beach, Florida.
SEDS Review Liquid Fuels Sector May 7, 2009 Don Hanson Deena Patel Argonne National Laboratory.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
BUNKER FUEL REGULATIONS Latest updates/status & an INTERTANKO VIEW
1 MARPOL – Annex VI Control of Air Pollution from Ships from Ships and its Current Revision process Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
MARPOL ANNEX VI AMENDMENTS PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES Tripartite Meeting Beijing CCS Headquarters November 8/9, 2008.
NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
IMO requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects Gdansk April 2008 ‘
Big West of California, LLC Bakersfield Refinery REFINING 101
Study on future fuels for cargo vessels in the Baltic Sea
“ Revision of Marpol Annex VI and its implications for the Gulf region ” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO 15 December 2008, Dubai.
Environmental Landscape A burden or opportunity? Tony Field South East Europe Marine Business Manager.
CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION CUSTOMER SERVICE MEETING OCTOBER 28, 2009 MARINE AIR EMISSION CONTROL AND FUEL SWITCHING JOE ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Title: Coal Cowboy Duration: 00:12:51 Link: engr
Maritime Law Association Spring Meeting April 28-30, 2015
Name:Goh Choong Leoong Student No: P Date: 30/08/06.
Canadian Experience in Implementing the North American Emission Control Area (ECA) Mexico City, Mexico May 19, 2015.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Marine Services Sustainable Shipping Conference Sustainable Energy in Marine Transportation Zabi Bazari and Gill Reynolds Lloyd ’ s Register EMEA IMarEST.
Refinery Processes Muhammad Fahad Ansari.
Marine Fuels Where are we? Where are we going? How will we get there?
Australia’s Experience in Alternative Transport Fuels An Overview.
Håkon B. Thoresen, DNV Petroleum Services, Norway 31 Jan 2011 Fuel Quality - Update INTERTANKO Bunker Sub-committee, London.
The Role of Innovation in US Gulf Coast Competitiveness The Future of the Gulf Coast Petrochemical Industry Global Energy Management Institute University.
Economic Analysis Introduction Motivation Process Flow Diagram Design Basis/Block Flow Diagram Environmental Analysis We have taken advantage of the arbitrage.
The INTERTANKO option to meet stricter Annex VI requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects.
The Oil Industry.
The INTERTANKO option for the revision of Annex VI - IMO regulation for the Prevention of Air Pollution from ships by Manager.
Working together for a safer world Bringing Reality to Marine Environmental Issues.
IFLOS SUMMER ACADEMY 2008 Panel Discussion “SHIP AIR EMISSIONS” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO.
AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Reducing Atmospheric Pollution Globally: Kristian R. Fuglesang The distillate solution.
Hellenic Forum 27 March 2008 Athens Peter M. Swift.
AIR EMISSIONS LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires 5th November 2014
Alternative marine fuels
The INTERTANKO options to meet marine environmental challenges by Manager Research and Projects Global Forum Strategic Planning.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Why LNG? Fuelling Operations Feb 2016 Tom Strang SVP Maritime Affairs Carnival Corp & plc.
Greek Shipping Summit 2007 Athens 8 November 2007 Peter M. Swift.
What have we learned in the meantime?
How Much Oil?. In the United States, plastics are not made from crude oil They are manufactured from petroleum products, which include liquid petroleum.
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
Air Emissions from Ships: The Changing Landscape Bryan Wood-Thomas EEB Clean Air Seminar World Shipping Council 20 November 2008.
Presenter: Captain Charlie Tweedel Sabine Pilots Association
MARITIME AIR EMISSIONS Lloyd’s List events 11 December 2007 Distillates THE Solution THE holistic solution for the revision of MARPOL Annex VI Peter.
CEF Action n° 2016-EU-SA-0009 "CYnergy"
Low Emissions Products from Aalborg Industries
Biodiesel Seminar On Submitted To: Submitted By:
The oil industry Wan Chi Chao (Jessie) 12F.
New Analysis from ESAI Energy Market Implications of
Icelandic Transport Authority
Challenges or opportunities for African refining: MARPOL regulations
IMO work to address GHG emissions from ships
IMO GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT 2020, IMPACTS TO MAJOR FLAGS AND MEASURES TO HELP SHIPOWNERS AND OPERATORS 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Spotlight on Marine Fuel Issues An overview Sophia Themelarou Lloyd’s Register, Fuel Oil Bunker Analysis and Advisory Service (FOBAS) ELINA PROJECT – 5th FORUM, APRIL 25TH 2014

Overview 1. Fuel quality 2. Future development Marine fuel grades Practice of blending Sludge generation 1. Fuel quality Regulatory framework Shipping industry response 2. Future development

PART 1 Fuel Quality

Introduction Bunker fuel is NOT a uniform product or product stream in itself Various streams of heavy residues and lighter cutter stocks are used to make the final blend Product in bunker tanks on board the ship is the result of optimization between production costs and compliance with specifications Composition of fuel delivered to ships has changed over the last few decades Rising costs and fluctuations in feedstock quality as well as optimized refining techniques make fuels more complex in nature

Marine Fuel Oils Residual fuel oils Blended from: Atmospheric residues Vacuum residues Visbroken residue Process residues+ distillate Distillates Blends usually for DMB/ DMC grades only - FAME? Grades (ISO 8217:2010): RMA10, RMB30, RMD80 RME180 RMG180, RMG380, RMG500 RMG700, RMK380, RMK500, RMK700 Grades (ISO 8217:2010): DMX, DMA, DMZ and DMB

Changing Landscape of Blending Increasing demand for LSFO products High crude prices Increasing demand for light distillate products e.g. gasoline and diesel More resources dedicated to sophisticated refinery processes that enable high yield fractions Residue and lighter cutter stocks changing

Main target blend specification Producing an acceptable fuel: Viscosity (initially) - Reflected in product names and classification (relates to ship’s ability to effectively pre-heat fuel prior to consumption) Superseded by density as refining techniques became more sophisticated Remaining parameters include limits specified in ISO 8217 Blending is now mostly about producing an acceptable fuel whilst meeting sulphur requirements. Impact of environmental regulations Increasing demand for LSFO products Superseded by density as refining techniques became more sophisticated.

From Fuel Compatibility to Stability Unit sheets Asphaltene stacks Start of agglomerate formation Asphaltene deposits

Two-Component Model (Shell, 1952) Fuel oil system consists of two pseudo components: Asphaltenes : largest, most polar molecules with a tendency to form a separate phase Assigned value: FR max (insolubility number) Maltenes : the rest of the solution which acts as a solvent for the asphaltenes Assigned value: Po (solubility number)  Fuel is stable as long as Po > FR max (or Po/FR max >1)

Fuel Quality Key Issues

Is sludge generation a problem? 26% of the total investigation cases of FOBAS (2013) were sludge/ filter clogging based

PART 2 Future development

Emissions regulations drivers SOX NOX CO2 Particulate Matter

Marine Exhaust Emission Controls IMO MARPOL Annex VI Adopted by MARPOL Conference in 1997 – in effect from May 2005 Substantially revised 2008 – in effect from July 2010 Currently 75 signatory States Revisions and interpretations resulting from IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee meetings – latest April 2014 National / Local Controls EU Sulphur Directive – 0.10% m/m S cap for vessels ‘at berth’ within EU ports Regulated California Waters -DMA or DMB 0.1% m/m S for 24 nm off the coast of California Other national / local regulations or ‘voluntary’ schemes

Sulphur Emissions Regulatory Framework

Current Emission Control Areas (ECA-SOx)

Reducing Emissions ~ The Refineries Perspective Will deliver distillate demand with current production methods Up to 2015 <0.10% S – Coking refinery techniques for more distillates: not a cheap option 2015 and after Predicted to be more costly than HSFO but less than MGO 2020/25 S<0.50% m/m Currently shipping is a wide residual fuel market - low value by product- but significant investment required to deliver <0.50 & <0.10% S fuel – 2015/20 Will abatement technologies or Alt – fuels ease demand on refineries? Will emissions technology evolve resulting in more stranded refinery investment risk?

Alternative Fuels? Petroleum (today) 2. Alternatives (Next 10 years) Residual Marine fuel oils (RFO) Distillate Marine fuel oils (MGO) 2. Alternatives (Next 10 years) LNG, RFO/MDO + EGCS LPG / CNG / Hydrogen Methanol /DME Bio-Diesel FAME HFO Emulsions MSAR 3.Alternatives (5-30 years) Bio-Fuels /Gas – 2nd / 3rd Generation Synthetics Coal Glycerol Wood Chip Nuclear 4.Natural energy sources (hybrids+) wind solar Wave Any Others ?