Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits Joel Leon, Bureau of Technical Services April 9, 2014 1 Presented by – ACE academy New Jersey Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eduardo J Salazar-Vega, MPH CPH Jan Koehn, MS CIH.
Advertisements

1 MODIFICATIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE (EJ) PROCEDURES SOP have been developed for facilities in Camden Waterfront South and the Ironbound Section of.
1 Improving Customer Service Through Electronic Data Management & Paperless Data Delivery ~~~~~ The USEPA Region 2 Experience Linda M. Mauel Chief, Hazardous.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality July 2013 Environmental Management Commission.
Kentucky Division for Air Quality Taimur Shaikh Ph.D.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Overview of the Clean Air Act and the Proposed Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and New Source Performance Standards Public Outreach.
Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
New Source Review for Air Toxics November 2, 2005 Peter J. Moore Yorke Engineering x24.
Modeling with CAMEO Les Benedict St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Frank Steitz Air Quality Permitting Program 10/12/2012
Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards rule-makings: human health-based criteria and implementation tools Cheryl Niemi Washington Department of Ecology.
‘OHS - A Survival Kit’ State Library of Victoria Buildings & Facilities Division (OHS) Occupational Health & Safety ‘A Survival Kit’ February 2002 Presenter:
Actions to Reduce Mercury Air Emissions and Related Exposure Risks in the United States Ben Gibson Office of Air Quality and Planning and Standards U.S.
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection – Drinking Water Program Underground Injection Control (UIC) eDEP Forms.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality Air Toxics Rule Changes Stakeholder Meeting March 20,
NJDEP RADIUS PORTAL Bachir Bouzid April 10, 2013 ACE Academy 1.
Health Risk Assessments & Land Use March 25, 2010.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Proposed Regulatory Framework Kentucky Air Toxic Program (KATP) Presentation to: Kentucky Chemical Industry Council November 10, 2005 Environmental & Public.
1 Environmental Business Council September 22, 2009 Janine Commerford Assistant Commissioner BWSC in FY10.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
September Lori Hanson, Lead worker Dispersion Modeling (515)
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines June 17, 2009 Mark Dakers, Environmental Analyst Massachusetts.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
For 2014 Golden Empire AWMA Conference September 16, 2014 Leland Villalvazo, Supervising AQS San Joaquin Valley APCD.
WP4. Assessment of environmental impacts and resulting externalities from multi-media (air/water/soil) impact pathways A. Rabl, T. Bachmann, R. Torfs -
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Board Meeting June 27, 2013 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board Update on Recommendations to the California Public Utilities.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Toxicology Update - Implementation of Revised Impacts Review Procedures Mike Coldiron, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
George M. Woodall, PhD NCEA Toxicologist Leland Urban Air Toxics Research Center October 18, 2005 EPA Reference Values: Regulatory Context.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
Air Pollution Research Group Analysis of 1999 TRI Data to Identify High Environmental Risk Areas of Ohio by Amit Joshi.
Rob Collins Water Group EEA Hazardous Substances in Europe’s fresh and marine waters – An overview Report for publication – 1 st half of 2011 Rob Collins.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
1 NEW RISK SCREENING TOOLS Joel Leon September 16, 2011.
Tom Weeks, Archi Dela Cruz February 17, Overview Why and how is guidance changing? How will this affect me? District Implementation/Outreach.
Environmental Risk Assessment and Risk Management Kevin L. Long ENVIRON International Corporation Academy Park High School May 12, 2010.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
NJDEP Air Toxics Program Olga Boyko NJDEP Division of Air Quality Health Effects of Air Pollution Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
Key Concepts on Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
1 Diesel Risk Assessment & 1 st Level Screening Worksheets Joel Leon Bureau of Technical Services October 16, 2012.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards TR17 Updated Scope, Recommendations, and Timeline Water Resources Advisory Committee March 24, 2016 John Quigley,
From Surveillance to Intervention to Policy Change: Air Pollution Models & Public Health Mark Werner, Ph.D. Wisconsin Division of Public Health
RACT 2 – Source Testing and Monitoring Requirements Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA Tom Wolf, GovernorPatrick McDonnell,
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits
Complying with Periodic Emissions Monitoring Requirements
Technical Manuals 1002 & 1003 Updates
North Carolina Division of Air Quality Mike Abraczinskas
Arsenic Acceptable Ambient Level Revision
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
A Short Update on Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS)
Registrations.
Click to start.
NEW JERSEY 1-HR SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION
Presentation transcript:

Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits Joel Leon, Bureau of Technical Services April 9, Presented by – ACE academy New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

2 Who Has To Do Risk Assessment? Anyone applying to the NJDEP Division of Air Quality for a new pre-construction permit, or a modification (including Operating Permits), who lists any of the chemicals that are on the risk screening worksheets.

3 Risk Assessment Steps* §Hazard identification §Dose-response assessment §Exposure assessment §Risk characterization *As recommended by the National Research Council, 1983

4 NJDEP DAQ Risk Assessment Procedures: Tiered Approaches to the Process

5 Comprehensive Risk Assessment §Focus on inhalation pathway §Protocol approval needed §Should be submitted with modeling document §Technical Manual 1003: Guidance on Risk Assessment for Air Contaminant Emissions

6 Technical Manual 1003: Guidance on Risk Assessment for Air Contaminant Emissions §Revised 12/2009 §Adobe pdf version available at

7 Refined Risk Assessment: Special Cases Mercury Emitters If emissions are over 20 lb/year, applicant must evaluate the health risk from ingestion of fish from a local freshwater body. Fish ingestion model available from BTS.

8 Refined Risk Assessment: Special Cases Hazardous Waste Combustors USEPA requires multi-pathway risk assessment, based on “Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities” available at

NJDEP Division of Air Quality Risk Screening A short-cut for determining potential risk for the thousands of Air Pollution Control Permits processed every year. 9

Risk Screening Worksheet - 2 Different Evaluations (in one Excel spreadsheet) LONG-TERM RISK §Emissions in tons/year §Annual average ambient air concentration §Incremental cancer risk AND noncancer hazard quotient SHORT-TERM RISK §Emissions in pounds/hour §1-, 8-, or 24-hour average ambient air concentration §Short-term hazard quotient 10

11

Determining Air Concentrations Without Doing Dispersion Modeling To determine air concentrations, you need: §Stack height (feet) §Distance to property line (feet) Type into proper cells in worksheet, and “air impact values” will pop up in subsequent cells (no need for look-up tables) §Emission rates (chemical-specific) in tons/year & pounds/hour 12

Determining Cancer Risk For each chemical: Air concentration x unit risk factor = incremental cancer risk 13

Determining Noncancer Risk (Long-Term and Short-Term) For each chemical: Air concentration / reference concentration = hazard quotient 14

Risk Screening Guidelines for Air Toxics Cancer Risk §Total cancer risk less than or equal to 1 x (one in a million) is considered negligible. §Total cancer risk greater than 1 x is referred for further evaluation. Noncancer Risk §Total hazard index less than or equal to 1 is considered negligible. §Total hazard index greater than 1 is referred for further evaluation. 15

16 2 nd -Level Risk Screening §Done by NJDEP/BTS §Applicant must submit detailed plot plan and other information (see “Risk Screening Policy and Second-Level Risk Screening” at

Electronic copies of the risk screening spreadsheet (in Excel) and other related materials (in Adobe pdf format) are available on-line on the NJDEP Air Quality Permitting Program website: 17

18

19

20

21

22 Note “Air impact value” cells (I21 & I22)

23 Type in stack height (I19) & distance to property line (I20)

24 Type in emission rates in columns E and K

Check resulting cancer risk & hazard indices

NEGLIGIBLE UNACCEPTABLE Less than One One Greater than One NJDEP Division of Air Quality NONCANCER RISK GUIDELINES FOR ALL SOURCES 25

27 NEGLIGIBLE UNACCEPTABLE One in ten million One in one million One in one hundred thousand One in ten thousand One in one thousand NJDEP Division of Air Quality CANCER RISK GUIDELINES* *For new and modified sources

NEGLIGIBLE UNACCEPTABLE One in one million One in one hundred thousand One in ten thousand One in one thousand NJDEP Division of Air Quality FACILITY-WIDE CANCER RISK GUIDELINES 27

29 NJ DEP Division of Air Quality Bureau of Technical Services Air Quality Evaluation Section Joel Leon