PDR slides for Tomo Sugano

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GN/MAE155B1 Orbital Mechanics Overview 2 MAE 155B G. Nacouzi.
Advertisements

More Satellite Orbits Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS Orbital Mechanics and Hohmann Transfer Orbit Summary Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
The Beginning of Modern Astronomy
Chapters 12 and 13 Review Questions
Horizontally Launched Projectiles black vector represents initial velocity of the horizontally launched projectile A ball rolling of the table is an excellent.
6. Space research and exploration of space increases our understanding of the Earth‘s own environment, the Solar System and the Universe. 4. Rapid advances.
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
Mission To Mars In Kerbal Space Program, Where distances are 1/9 real world values.
Formation Flying - T.Sugano Orbital Decay Perturbation in LEO is mainly due to atmospheric drag Orbital decay of space probes (e.g. Space Shuttle, ISS,
Circular motion and Gravitation Chapter 6 1Physics Chapter 6.
Rocket Trajectories By Jan-Erik Rønningen Norwegian Rocket Technology [ [ ]
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture 7 Gravitation 1.
FIREBIRD Ian Lyon Engineering and Physics Carroll College Simulation of the Precise Separation of a Two-Nanosatellite System using Differential Drag.
NADIR workshop - October 25-26, 2011page 1 / 15 Drag coefficients Sean Bruinsma CNES Marcin Pilinski CU Boulder.
Weighting Functions for Microwave and Infra-Red Satellite Nadir Sounding Remote Sensing I Lecture 7 Summer 2006.
Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH ESA Wireless Sensor Motes Study George Prassinos, SSC, University of Surrey.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Atul Kumar Presentation Week 3: February 1 st, 2007 Aerodynamics Team Re-Entry vehicle analysis - Lifting body 1.
Friction There are many forms of friction. This lesson introduces the force laws for static friction, kinetic friction, and rolling friction. Students.
Gravitation Applications Lecturer: Professor Stephen T. Thornton
Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
Gravitational Potential energy Mr. Burns
COMM Subgroup Tomo Sugano (Primarily served as COMM personnel) Tasks –Started out by helping Relative Orbit team with differential delta-V requirement.
1 Formation Flying Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby Sullivan Eric Weber Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao.
Layers of a DBMS Query optimization Execution engine Files and access methods Buffer management Disk space management Query Processor Query execution plan.
PHY131H1F - Class 11 Today, finishing Chapter 6: Friction, Drag Rolling without slipping Examples of Newton’s Second Law Microscopic bumps and holes crash.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
Friction There are many forms of friction. This lesson introduces the force laws for static friction, kinetic friction, and rolling friction. Students.
Optimal Low-Thrust Deorbiting of Passively Stabilized LEO Satellites Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, RAS Moscow Institute of.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
1 Formation Flying Project Proposal 2/5/07 Rachel Winters (Team Lead) Aziatun Burhan Tsutomu Hasegawa Shunsuke Hirayama Matt Mueller Masao Shimada Shelby.
EM propagation paths 1/17/12. Introduction Motivation: For all remote sensing instruments, an understanding of propagation is necessary to properly interpret.
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
Space unit Life in Space.
Scheduling policies for real- time embedded systems.
Physics 101 THursday 10/27/11 Class 19 Chapter 12.2 – 12.3 Gravitational attraction of spherical bodies Keplers laws.
Formation Flying - T.Sugano FCS and COMM FCS – Flight Control System COMM – Communications (camera is assumed to be part of COMM) Satellite needs to handle.
PARKINSON-SAT EA 469 Spacecraft Design Joe Campbell Thomas Dendinger Greg Lewis Paul Lwin.
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
1 Topics in Space Weather Topics in Space Weather Lecture 14 Space Weather Effects On Technological Systems Robert R. Meier School of Computational Sciences.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Energy in EM Waves: The Poynting Vector.
1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory JPL Flight Team Adam Nikolic Josh Ruggiero Bob Hoffman Dusty Terrill.
Circular Motion.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R ENB443: Launcher Systems Image Credit: ESA Caption: The generic Ariane-5 (Ariane Flight 162) lifting.
Ch. 4 Forces.
Statistics Presentation Ch En 475 Unit Operations.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Goppert, 1 James Goppert Week 8: March 8 th, 2007 Aerodynamics: Reentry Optimization Dynamics and Control: Communication.
CubeSat Re-Entry Experimental System Testbed C.R.E.S.T. STK 11 This software is an orbital simulator that allows the user to examine the flight path of.
CHAPTER Scalar & Vector Quantities Scalar Quantity = gives magnitude, quantity/how much of something you have. Examples: 30m/s, 50mph, 17N, $20,
Control engineering ( ) Time response of first order system PREPARED BY: Patel Ravindra.
Newton’s thought experiment: orbital velocity. Surface escape velocities Planet V escape, ft/sec Mercury13,600 Venus33,600 Earth36,700 Moon7,800 Mars16,700.
THE TSIOLKOVSKY ROCKET EQUATION
Lunar Trajectories.
Weight and Mass How much you are being pulled down vs. how much matter you have in your body.
CT-474: Satellite Communications
Technical Resource Allocations
Force & Acceleration Motion & Forces Newton’s Second Law Gravity
Friction There are many forms of friction. This lesson introduces the force laws for static friction, kinetic friction, and rolling friction. Students.
Architectural Design Space Exploration
Gravity 3.2 What is gravity?
4.2 Fields Gravitation Breithaupt pages 54 to 67 September 20th, 2010.
Universal Gravitation
AAE 450: Aero-thermodynamics
Part 1 Gravity: A Force of Attraction
Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
Command and Data Handling
Presentation transcript:

PDR slides for Tomo Sugano Tasks done so far: In-flight Delta V estimation of the mission Atmospheric Drag Analysis Orbital Decay Life Communication/CPU selection Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Presence of Atmospheric Drag in LEO orbit Atmospheric density is largest at perigee Largest drag is experienced at perigee Atmospheric drag shall be considered if orbit perigee height is <1000 km Atmospheric drag acceleration (D): 1/(ACD/m) is the ballistic coefficient, a measure of resistance to fluid A (projected area normal to flight path) m (mass of spacecraft) f (latitude correction coefficient) Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Effect of Atmospheric Drag to Orbit Profile Atmospheric drag tends to circularise the probe’s orbit Drag effect greatest at perigee Apogee height consequently reduced Overall altitude is lost unless orbit correction is done Determinant of satellite decay time Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Drag Coefficient of STS and other LEO probes STS Orbiter (aka the Space Shuttle) STS has a CD of 2.0 at typical mission altitudes in LEO Above 200 km of orbit altitude, use 2.2 < CD < 3.0 Cylindrical probes have larger CD than those of spherical probes Exact CD is hard to predict as LEO environment is not fully understood Currently best determined by actual flight test Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Consideration of Drag in Formation Flying FF mission is required to last at least 24 hours STS orbiter (primary) typically performs a trim burn once a day Trim burns correct orbit altitude and ascending node Drag differentials present between primary and satellite(s) Possible consideration of LEO drag in our mission Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano Orbital Decay Perturbation in LEO is mainly due to atmospheric drag Orbital decay of space probes (e.g. Space Shuttle, ISS, satellites) Altitude correction “trim burns” necessary to keep probes in orbit Orbit will decay in the absence of trim burns Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Orbit Lifetime Estimation Estimation of the orbit lifetime of our satellite after mission Consider atmospheric drag effect only Mission orbit is assumed virtually circular for simplicity Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Orbit Lifetime Equation Circular Orbit Lifetime Equation (Approximation) a0 = initial altitude S = projected area of the space probe m = space probe mass Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Exponential Atmospheric Model Scale height, H, obtained from tabulated data Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Assumptions set forth for our lifetime computation Assumptions: (Made for worst case or shortest decay) m = 50 kg (maximum); S = 0.385m2 (spherical correction of max volume) CD = 3.0 (upper bound value in LEO probes) a0 = 6400 + 300 km (typical altitude for STS or ISS) Δ = 150 – 300 = - 150 km (typical re-entry altitude, note the minus sign) f = 1 (ignore latitude effect; not significant (<10%)) ρ0 = 2.418x10-11 kg/m3 (Table, 300 km base altitude) Unavoidable uncertainty  Scale height, H - Not constant between orbit and re-entry altitude - Take H = 30 km, so β = 1 / (30 km) Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano Computation Result Based on the assumptions we made - T = tau_0 * 189.565 - T = (approx. 1.5 hr of initial orbit period)*(190) = 12 days LEO Nanosat at 300 km of altitude will take 12 days to decay. Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano Conclusion Our Nanosat does not decease for 12 days Retroburn delta-V input to decelerate the Nanosat for faster decay will be costly without a compelling space debris concern(?) Unless allowed to dispose of the Nanosat in space, retrieval is rather recommended(?) Retrieval may be attained fairly easily by using robot arm of STS perhaps equipped with capture net(?) Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Drag Differential Compensation Different ballistic coefficients between the orbiter and the Nonosat Consequent difference in drag forces exerted during mission Ballistic Coeff. of STS >> Ballistic Coeff. of Nanosat Nanosat must expend Delta-V to keep up with STS orbiter Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano Computations Atmospheric drag acceleration (Da): Drag (acceleration) difference between the two spacecraft: STS: S = 64.1 m2, CD = 2.0, m = 104,000 kg (orbiter average) sat: S = 0.385 m2 (nominal), CD = 3.0 (worst case), m = 50 kg Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Computations (cont’d) Orbiter speed (assuming circular orbit) Definition of Delta-V (or specific impulse) Mass expenditure of propellant (i.e. GN2 cold gas) Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano Results Using Isp = 65 sec; assume 50 kg for satellite weight Conclusions - At the typical 300 km LEO, Delta-V for 1 day mission is 1.36 m/s - Satellite will need at least 107 grams of GN2 to compensate drag - Besides this Delta-V requirement, we have orbit transfer Delta-V (currently estimated at 1.17 m/s) and ADCS Delta-V. Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Formation Flying - T.Sugano FCS and COMM FCS – Flight Control System COMM – Communications (camera is assumed to be part of COMM) Satellite needs to handle both FCS and COMM systems Use of COTS (Consumer Off-the-Shelf) computer(s) aimed COMM utilizes a low-cost COTS transceiver radio Formation Flying - T.Sugano

CPU selection for the Nanosat Arcom VIPER 400 MHz CPU recommended VIPER is suitable because of its - Light weight, 96 grams - Operable temperature range, -40 C to + 85 C - Windows Embedded feature, easy to program - Computation speed, 400 MHz - Memory capacity, up to 64MB of SDRAM - Embedded audio I/O, necessary for COMM with voice radio Redundancy can be implemented. Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Arcom VIPER 400 MHz embedded controller Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Radio selection for the Nanosat Kenwood Free Talk XL 2W transceiver recommended Kenwood Free Talk XL is suitable because of its - COTS nature, low cost - 2W of transmission power, more than enough for non-obstructed space communication, but higher wattage than FRS 500 mW radio - Ability to use both GMRS and FRS frequencies - FRS frequencies recommended because by international treaty FRS (Family walkie talkie) is restricted to 500 mW - 500 mW is too weak to penetrate into space - MilSpec cetified Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Kenwood Free Talk XL 2W FRS/GMRS Transceiver 15 UHF channels (7 FRS and 8 GMRS) 2W output for both categories DC 7.2 V (600mAh) Circuit board weighs only 60 grams Speaker/Microphone/Encapsulation Removed Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Scheme of FCS/COMM Integration Formation Flying - T.Sugano

Detailed Scheme of integration Formation Flying - T.Sugano