Table 5.1.1: Stock and Flow of Renal Transplantation, 1996-2005 Year1996199719981999200020012002200320042005 New transplant patients 151126104127143161168160187155.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Blood pressure control in children following kidney transplantation in the UK Manish Sinha Evelina Childrens Hospital London UKRR and NHS Kidney Care Audit.
Advertisements

Chapter 7: Pediatric ESRD 2014 A NNUAL D ATA R EPORT V OLUME 2: E ND -S TAGE R ENAL D ISEASE.
End Stage Renal Disease in Children. End stage kidney disease occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to function at a level that is necessary for.
The PREVEND Study: Screening for micro-albuminuria
Age (years) Gender (Males), n (%) Dialysis duration (years) Hemoglobin (mg / dl) Pre dialysis SBP (mmHg) Pre dialysis DBP(mmHg) Post dialysis SBP (mmHg)
ESRD Registry Committee, Korean Society of Nephrology*
Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 1544) Randomisation Avoid ACE inhibitors/ beta-blockers (n = 390) Tight BP control (n =
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure Internal Medicine/Pediatrics.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
HEART TRANSPLANTATION Pediatric Recipients ISHLT 2012 J Heart Lung Transplant Oct; 31(10):
CHAPTER 3 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Editors: Mr Mohamed Ezani Md. Taib Dato’ Dr David Chew Soon Ping Dr Ashari Yunus Expert Panel: Mr Mohamed Ezani.
Recent management of Renal Transplantation in a Developing Country like Bangladesh, R Alam, Islam M S, R Alam, H Rahman, HU Rashid Department of Nephrology,
Lesley Stevens MD Tufts-New England Medical Center
UK Renal Registry 17th Annual Report Figure 3.1. Transplant prevalence rate per million population by age and gender on 31/12/2013.
Management of Hypertension according to JNC 7 BY SANDAR KYI, MD.
Kidney Transplantation– Medical, Surgical, and Immunologic Considerations Anil Kapoor, MD, FRCS(C) Associate Professor of Surgery McMaster University.
SSA Hearing on Compassionate Allowances Janet N Scheel MD November 9,2010.
Table 4.1.1: Stock and Flow of Liver Transplantation, Year * ** New transplant patients Deaths
© ANZDATA Registry Method and Location of Dialysis 1453 (30%) 632 (13%) 1317 (27%) 1335 (27%) Number of Patients Australia 31-Dec-96.
LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Pediatric Recipients ISHLT 2012 J Heart Lung Transplant Oct; 31(10):
CHAPTER 4 LIVER TRANSPLANTATION Editors: Dr Ganesalingam A/L Kanagasabai Expert panel: Dr Ganesalingam A/L Kanagasabai (Chairperson) Professor Dr Lee Way.
HEART TRANSPLANTATION Pediatric Recipients JHLT Oct; 32(10):
Table 5.1.1: Stock and Flow of Renal Transplantation, Year New transplant patients
Improving Hypertension Quality Measurement Using Electronic Health Records S Persell, AN Kho, JA Thompson, DW Baker Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern.
Study of cytokine gene polymorphism and graft outcome in live-donor kidney transplantation By Rashad Hassan MD Amgad El-Agroudy, Ahmad Hamdy, Amani Mostafa.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
CHAPTER 5: PAEDIATRIC RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY Lee Ming Lee Lim Yam Ngo Lynster Liaw Susan Pee Yap Yok Chin Wan Jazilah Wan Ismail Source: 21 st MDTR.
TRANSPLANTATION CHAPTER 8 ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2013.
Table 4.1.1: Stock and Flow of Liver Transplantation, Year * ** New transplant patients Deaths
CHAPTER 2 DIALYSIS IN MALAYSIA Goh Bak Leong Lim Yam Ngo Ong Loke Meng Ghazali Ahmad Lee Day Guat Source: 21 st MDTR Report 2013, NRR.
CHAPTER 13 RENAL TRANSPLANTATION Editor: Dr. Goh Bak Leong Expert Panel: Dato’ Dr. Zaki Morad b Mohd Zaher (Chair) Dr. Goh Bak Leong (Co-Chair) Dr. Fan.
UK Renal Registry 9 th Annual Report 2006 Fig 11.1 UK transplantation prevalence rate per million population by age and gender on 31/12/2005.
Table 5.1.1: Stock and Flow of Renal Transplantation, Year New transplant patients
CHAPTER 5 RENAL TRANSPLANTATION Editor: Dr. Goh Bak Leong Expert Panel: Dato’ Dr. Zaki Morad b Mohd Zaher (Chair) Dr. Goh Bak Leong (Co-Chair) Dr. Fan.
Chapter 12 End Stage Kidney Disease among Indigenous Peoples of Australia and New Zealand 2014 ANZDATA Registry 37th Annual Report Data to 31-Dec-2013.
Table 6.1.1: Stock and Flow, Year New transplant Deaths* Lost.
HEART TRANSPLANTATION Pediatric Recipients 2014 JHLT Oct; 33(10):
Prevalence and management of cardiovascular risks in renal transplant recipients Dr VS Aithal Consultant Nephrologist Swansea.
2015 ANNUAL DATA REPORT V OLUME 2: E ND -S TAGE R ENAL D ISEASE Chapter 7: Transplantation.
© ANZDATA Registry Prevalence and Incidence End Stage Renal Failure - Australia ( ) Per Million Functioning Transplant (259) New Pts (82) Deaths.
Table 3.1.1: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Deaths
2015 ANNUAL DATA REPORT V OLUME 2: E ND -S TAGE R ENAL D ISEASE Chapter 5: Hospitalization.
CHAPTER 13 Renal Transplantation Goh Bak Leong Fan Kin Sing Rohan Malek Bin Dato’ Dr. Johan Rosnawati Yahya S. Prasad Menon Tan Si Yen Wong Hin Seng Source:
Table 1.1.1: Stock and Flow of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Deaths
UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report Figure Median height z-scores for transplant patients
Table 4.1.1: Stock and Flow of Liver Transplantation, Year * ** New transplant patients Deaths.
Table 3.1.1: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Deaths
UK Renal Registry 15th Annual Report Figure 7.1. Median height z-scores for transplant patients
CHAPTER 2 DIALYSIS IN MALAYSIA Goh Bak Leong Lim Yam Ngo Ong Loke Meng Ghazali Ahmad Lee Day Guat Source: 20 th MDTR Report 2012, NRR.
Table 1.1.1: Stock and Flow of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Deaths
The SYMPHONY Trial Reference Reddan DN, et al. Renal function, concomitant medication use and outcomes following acute coronary syndromes. Nephrol Dial.
USRDS USRDS 2002 adr Incident counts by initial modality figure 7.1 patients age 19 years & younger.
Table 2.1.1: Number of Corneal Transplantation and Transplant Rate per million population (pmp), Year
2016 Annual Data Report, Vol 2, ESRD, Ch 5
Management of Hypertension according to JNC 7
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
Table 3.1.1a: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation,
2017 Annual Data Report Healthy People 2020.
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Number of Grafts Performed by Country
Current and future management of diabetic renal failure
2018 Annual Data Report Volume 3: Healthy People 2020
Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. doi: /nrgastro
ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2013
Table 1.1.1: Stock and Flow of Blood and Marrow Transplantation,
Table 6.1.1: Stock and Flow, *based on year of death Year
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
Areef Ishani, Allan J. Collins, Charles A. Herzog, Robert N. Foley 
Worldwide incidence of ESRD figure 12.1, per million population
Table 6.1.1: Stock and Flow, Year
Presentation transcript:

Table 5.1.1: Stock and Flow of Renal Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Died Graft failure Lost to follow up Functioning graft at 31st December Figure 5.1.1: Stock and Flow of Renal Transplantation,

Table 5.1.2: New transplant rate per million population (pmp), Year New transplant patients New transplant rate, pmp Figure 5.1.2: New transplant rate, New Transplant rate, pmp Year Rate, pmp

Table 5.1.3: Transplant prevalence rate per million population (pmp), Year Functioning graft at 31st December Transplant prevalence rate, pmp Figure 5.1.3: Transplant prevalence rate, Transplant Prevalence rate, pmp Year Rate, pmp

Table 5.1.4: Place of transplantation, Year No.% % % % % % HKL UMMC Selayang Hospital Other local China India Other overseas Unknown TOTAL Year TOTAL No.% % % % % HKL UMMC Selayang Hospital Other local China India Other overseas Unknown TOTAL

Table 5.2.1: Renal Transplant Recipients’ Characteristics, Year New Transplant Patients Age at transplant (years), Mean Age at transplant (years), SD % Male % Diabetic (co-morbid / primary renal disease) % HBsAg positive % Anti-HCV positive

Table 5.2.2: Primary causes of end stage renal failure, Year No.% % % % % New transplant patients Glomerulonephritis Diabetes Mellitus Hypertension Obstructive uropathy ADPKD Drugs/toxic nephropathy Hereditary nephritis Unknown Others Year No.% % % % % New transplant patients Glomerulonephritis Diabetes Mellitus Hypertension Obstructive uropathy ADPKD Drugs/toxic nephropathy Hereditary nephritis Unknown Others

Table 5.3.1: Type of Renal Transplantation, Year No.% % % % % Commercial Cadaver Commercial Live Donor Live Donor (genetically related) Live Donor (emotionally related) Cadaver Total Year No.% % % % % Commercial Cadaver Commercial Live Donor Live Donor (genetically related) Live Donor (emotionally related) Cadaver Total *Commercial Cadaver (China, India, other oversea) *Commercial live donor (living unrelated) *Cadaver (local)

Table 5.3.2: Biochemical data, Biochemical parametersSummary Creatinine, umol/LN Mean SD Median 120 Minimum 3835 Maximum Hb, g/dLN Mean 12.9 SD 1.9 Median 12.9 Minimum Maximum Albumin, g/LN Mean 39.3 SD 10.5 Median 39.3 Minimum 2234 Maximum 5046 Calcium, mmol/LN Mean SD 0.2 Median 2.3 Minimum Maximum 3.3 Biochemical parametersSummary Phosphate, mmol/LN Mean1.1 SD0.2 Median1.1 Minimum0.3 Maximum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), U/L N Mean SD46.5 Median73 Minimum1018 Maximum Alanine Transferase (ALT), U/L N Mean SD Median 2524 Minimum 44 Maximum563613

Table 5.3.2: Biochemical data, Biochemical parametersSummary Total cholesterol, mmol/LN Mean SD 1.11 Median 5.4 Minimum Maximum LDL cholesterol, mmol/LN Mean 3.13 SD Median 3.1 Minimum 10.9 Maximum HDL cholesterol, mmol/LN Mean 1.6 SD Median 1.6 Minimum 0.2 Maximum Biochemical parametersSummary Systolic Blood Pressure, mmHg N Mean SD Median130 Minimum80 Maximum Diastolic Blood Pressure, mmHg N Mean SD Median80 Minimum4050 Maximum121127

Table 5.3.3: Medication data, Medication dataSingle drug treatmentCombined drug treatment N%N%N%N% All patients (i) Immunosuppressive drug(s) treatment Prednisolone Azathioprine Cyclosporin A Tacrolimus (FK506) Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Rapamycin Others (ii) Non-Immunosuppressive drug(s) treatment Beta blocker Calcium channel blocker ACE inhibitor AIIRB Anti-lipid Other anti-hypertensive

Table 5.4.1: Post transplant complications, Post transplant complications Complication developed before transplant (regardless of complication after transplantation) Complication developed only after transplantation N%N%N%N% All patients Diabetes (either as Primary Renal Disease or co- morbid) Cancer Cardiovascular disease + cerebrovascular disorder Hypertension * Hypertension: BP systolic > 140 and BP diastolic >90 OR have either Beta blocker / Calcium channel blocker / ACE inhibitor / AIIRB / Other anti-hypertensive

Table 5.4.2: Transplant Patients Death Rate and Graft Loss, Year No. at risk Transplant death Transplant death rate % Graft loss Graft loss rate % Acute rejection Acute rejection rate % All losses All losses rate % *Graft loss=graft failure *All losses=death / graft loss (acute rejection happens concurrently with graft failure/ death)

Figure 5.4.2(i): Transplant Recipient Death Rate, Death rate percent Year Annual death rate

Figure 5.4.2(ii): Transplant Recipient Graft Loss Rate, Graft loss rate percent Year Annual graft loss rate

Table 5.4.3: Causes of Death in Transplant Recipients, Year No% % % % % % % % % % Cardiovascular Died at home Infection Graft failure Cancer Liver disease Accidental death Others Unknown TOTAL

Table 5.4.4: Causes of Graft Failure, Year No.% % % % % % % % % % Rejection Calcineurin toxicity Other drug toxicity Ureteric obstruction Infection Vascular causes Recurrent/de novo renal disease Others Unknown TOTAL

Table 5.4.5: Patient survival, Interval (years)No.% SurvivalSE * No.=Number at risk SE=standard error Figure 5.4.5: Patient survival,

Table 5.4.6: Graft survival, Interval (years)No.% survivalSE * No.=Number at risk SE=standard error Figure 5.4.6: Graft survival,

Table 5.4.7: Patient survival by type of transplant, Type of TransplantCommercial CadaverCommercial Live DonorLive DonorCadaver Interval (years)No.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSE * No.=Number at risk SE=standard error

Figure 5.4.7: Patient survival by type of transplant, Cumulative survival Duration in years Commercial cadaver Commercial live donor Live donor Cadaver

Table 5.4.8: Graft survival by type of transplant, Type of TransplantCommercial CadaverCommercial Live DonorLive DonorCadaver Interval (years)No.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSE * No.=Number at risk SE=standard error

Figure 5.4.8: Graft survival by type of transplant, Cumulative survival Duration in years Commercial cadaver Commercial live donor Live donor Cadaver

Table 5.4.9: Patient survival by year of transplant (Living related transplant, ) Year of Transplant Interval (years)No.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSE * No.=Number at risk SE=standard error

Figure 5.4.9: Patient survival by year of transplant (Living related transplant, ) Cumulative survival Duration in years Year Year

Table : Graft survival by year of transplant (Living related transplant, ) Year of Transplant Interval (years)No.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSE * No.=Number at risk SE=standard error Figure : Graft survival by year of transplant (Living related transplant, ) Cumulative survival Duration in years Year Year

Table : Patient survival by year of transplant (Commercial cadaver transplant, ) Year of Transplant Interval (years)No.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSE * No.=Number at risk SE=standard error Figure : Patient survival by year of transplant (Commercial cadaver transplant, ) Cumulative survival Duration in years Year Year

Table : Graft survival by year of transplant (Commercial cadaver transplant, ) Year of Transplant Interval (years)No.% SurvivalSENo.% SurvivalSE * No.=Number at risk SE=standard error Figure : Graft survival by year of transplant (Commercial cadaver transplant, ) Cumulative survival Duration in years Year Year

Table 5.5.1: Risk factors for IHD in renal transplant recipients at year 2004 and Diabetes 28 (1.9)19 (1.2) Hypertension** 504 (34.3)513 (33.5) CKD 121 (8.2)142 (9.3) Diabetes + Hypertension**145 (9.9)157 (10.3) Diabetes + CKD21 (1.4)20 (1.3) CKD + Hypertension**530 (36.1)538 (35.2) Diabetes + CKD + Hypertension**120 (8.2)141 (9.2) ** Hypertension: BP systolic > 140 and BP diastolic >90 OR have either Beta blocker / Calcium channel blocker/ ACE inhibitor/ AIIRB / Other anti-hypertensive drugs GFR(mL/min/1.73m 2 ) = 1.2*(140-age(year))* weight(kg) / creatinine(µmol/L) if male GFR(mL/min/1.73m 2 ) = 0.85*(1.2*(140-age(year))* weight(kg) / creatinine(µmol/L) ) if female. CKD stage III – GFR, CKD stage IV – GFR, CKD stage V – GFR, < 15

Figure 5.5.1a: Venn Diagram for Pre and Post Transplant Complications (in %) at year Hypertension Diabetes

Figure 5.5.1b: Venn Diagram for Pre and Post Transplant Complications (in %) at year DiabetesHypertension

Table 5.5.2a: Systolic BP, 2004 – No. (%) Systolic BP < (13.4)232 (14.2) Systolic BP < (22.0)318 (19.5) Systolic BP (29.6)474 (29.0) Systolic BP (27.0)452 (27.7) Systolic BP (6.6)133 (8.1) Systolic BP >=18023 (1.5)24 (1.5)

Figure 5.5.2a: Systolic BP, 2004 and 2005 Percent Year Systolic BP <120 Systolic BP <130 Systolic BP Systolic BP Systolic BP Systolic BP >=

Table 5.5.2b: Diastolic BP, 2004 and No. (%) Diastolic BP<80454 (29.3)465 (28.5) Diastolic BP<85661 (42.6)712 (43.6) Diastolic BP (3.1)73 (4.5) Diastolic BP (20.6)308 (18.9) Diastolic BP (3.6)65 (4.0) Diastolic BP >=11012 (0.8)10 (0.6)

Figure 5.5.2b: Diastolic BP, 2004 and 2005 Percent Year Diastolic BP <80 Diastolic BP <85 Diastolic BP Diastolic BP Diastolic BP Diastolic BP >=

Table 5.5.3: CKD stages, No. (%) CKD stage 1121 (7.9)118 (7.3) CKD stage 2570 (37.0)578 (35.6) CKD stage 3726 (47.1)798 (49.1) CKD stage 4110 (7.1)112 (6.9) CKD stage 513 (0.8)19 (1.2)

Figure 5.5.3: CKD stages by year Percent Year CKD Stage 1 CKD Stage 2 CKD Stage 3 CKD Stage 4 CKD Stage

Table 5.5.4: BMI, 2004 – No. (%) BMI <20242 (15.6)253 (15.5) BMI (39.4)656 (40.2) BMI (32.2)512 (31.4) BMI > (12.8)212 (13.0) Figure 5.5.4: BMI by year Percent Year BMI <20 BMI BMI BMI >

Table 5.5.5a: LDL, 2004 – No. (%) LDL < (18.2)418 (25.6) LDL (60.9)860 (52.7) LDL >= (20.9)355 (21.7) Figure 5.5.5a: LDL by year Percent Year LDL <2.6 LDL LDL >=

Table 5.5.5b: Total Cholesterol, No. (%) Total Cholesterol < (7.3)159 (9.7) Total Cholesterol (26.6)455 (27.9) Total Cholesterol (48.5)772 (47.3) Total Cholesterol (12.7)173 (10.6) Total Cholesterol > (4.9)74 (4.5) Figure 5.5.5b: Total Cholesterol by year Percent Year Total Cholesterol <4.1 Total Cholesterol Total Cholesterol Total Cholesterol Total Cholesterol >

Table 5.5.5c: HDL, No. (%) HDL <187 (5.6)118 (7.2) HDL (16.5)308 (18.9) HDL > (77.9)1207 (73.9) Figure 5.5.5c: HDL by year Percent Year HDL <1 HDL, HDL >

Table 5.5.6a: Treatment for hypertension, 2004 – 2005 YearNo.% on anti-hypertensives% on 1 anti-hypertensive drug% on 2 anti-hypertensives% on 3 anti-hypertensives Table 5.5.6b: Distribution of Systolic BP without anti-hypertensives, 2004 – 2005 YearNo.MeanSDMedianLQUQ % Patients >= 160 mmHg Table 5.5.6c: Distribution of Diastolic BP without anti-hypertensives, 2004 – 2005 YearNo.MeanSDMedianLQUQ % Patients >= 90 mmHg

Table 5.5.6d: Distribution of Systolic BP on anti-hypertensives, 2004 – 2005 YearNo.MeanSDMedianLQUQ % Patients >= 160 mmHg Table 5.5.6e: Distribution of Diastolic BP on anti-hypertensives, 2004 – 2005 YearNo.MeanSDMedianLQUQ % Patients >= 90 mmHg