Changing Forests…Enduring Values NACP Research Supporting Mandated Forest Service Carbon Monitoring Activities Sean Healey 1, Warren Cohen 1, Chris Woodall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An example of a large-scale interdisciplinary carbon problem Multidecadal climate variability Atmospheric evidence Ocean source? (upwelling, biological.
Advertisements

R6 Climate Change Update Marc Kramer Senior Climate Change Scientist, R6 Specialist Meeting November 2011.
Trend of international discussions on the UNFCCC
Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
The Downscaled Climate Projection Has Arrived – NOW WHAT?
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
Meeting Forest Carbon Planning Needs with Forest Service Data and Satellite Imagery Sean Healey, Gretchen Moisen RMRS Inventory, Monitoring, and Analysis.
THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE US FOREST CARBON INVENTORY: RECENT PAST AND NEAR FUTURE Christopher W. Woodall, Research Forester, U.S. Forest Service,
Carbon Information Needed to Support Forest Management Bob Davis, Director Of Planning, Watershed And Air, USDA Forest Service 0.
TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE FOREST CARBON INVENTORY OF THE UNITED STATES: RECENT PAST AND NEAR FUTURE Christopher W. Woodall, Research Forester, U.S. Forest.
US Forest Disturbance Trends observed with Landsat Time Series Samuel N. Goward 1 (PI), Jeffrey Masek 2, Warren Cohen 3, Gretchen Moisen 4, Chengquan Huang.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
NACP Breakout Session: North American Terrestrial Carbon Monitoring and Decision Support Capabilities (combined from CMS and CarboNA proposals) Organized.
Landsat and Carbon Assessments COP-15 Copenhagen, Denmark December 11, 2009 Dr. Marcia McNutt Director, U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior.
FOREST SERVICE GHG ISSUES AND INFORMATION NEEDS Elizabeth Reinhardt, FS Climate Change Office.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
Global Forest Carbon Monitoring: Opportunities to Apply the NACP Multi- tier Approach to UNFCCC Reporting and REDD Requirements Richard Birdsey, Yude Pan,
An Historically Consistent and Broadly Applicable MRV System Based on Lidar Sampling and Landsat Time-series Warren B. Cohen 1, Hans-Erik Andersen 1, Sean.
Recent developments in the UNFCCC process in relation to global observations 4 th GTOS Steering Committee Paris, 1-2 December 2009 Rocio Lichte Programme.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
Compton Tucker, GSFC Sassan Satchi, JPL Jeff Masek, GSFC Rama Nemani, ARC Diane Wickland, HQ Terrestrial Biomass Pilot Product: Estimating Biomass and.
Assessment of Ecosystem Services & Biodiversity
References 1. Zhang F.M., J.M. Chen, Y. Pan, R. A. Birdsey, S.H. Shen, W.M Ju, and L.M. He, Attributing carbon sinks in conterminous US forests to disturbance.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
Dr. David Cleaves Senior Climate Change Advisor U.S. Department of Agriculture – Forest Service 1 st European Evaluators Network Forum Leuven, Belgium.
Discussion of Draft CEQ Guidelines for Addressing Climate Change in NEPA Projects Tim Stroope, NEPA Coordinator, GMUG National Forest
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
Carbon Offset Projects and the FIA Neil Sampson March 3, 2009.
Possible collaboration with Pacific countries on REDD Plus
Forest Inventory and Analysis USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Remote sensing; The world beyond aerial photos.
Introducing the New Forest Carbon Accounting Framework The FIA Carbon Accounting Team: Christopher Woodall, Grant Domke, John Coulston, Dave Wear, James.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
The role of the Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study in the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Ken Davis The Pennsylvania State University The 13 th ChEAS.
CarboEurope, IMECC and GHG- Europe Mike Jones School of Natural Sciences Trinity College Dublin.
15-18 October 2002 Greenville, North Carolina Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS Jeff Tschirley Programme director.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
The US National Greenhouse Gas Inventory of Forests: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Christopher W. Woodall with Domke, Smith, Coulston, Healey,
Measuring degradation for REDD+ forest reference emission levels / forest reference levels (FREL/FRL) Julian Fox Forestry Officer (UN-REDD) Food and Agriculture.
National Forest Monitoring Systems: M & MRV in the context of REDD+ Activities MJ Sanz, FAO REDD MRV Workshop for developing a roadmap to establish an.
“STEWARDSHIP IN FORESTRY” Forestry Projects for Terrestrial Sequestration -- Regulatory and Public Acceptance Issues -- Jim Cathcart, Ph.D. Oregon Department.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
SDCG-4, Caltech, CA, USA 4 th -6 th September 2013 Author/Presenter Indonesia MRV & Reporting Status & Related Space.
Guidance for Implementation of National Forests Monitoring Systems COLOMBIA EDERSSON CABRERA M. Coordinator Forest and Carbon Monitoring System SDCG-7.
Aim 2 & 4 Integration. Objectives of Aims 2 & 4 Aim 2 Develop multi-scaled modeling program to assess forest management systems Aim 4 Life cycle, policy.
Systematic Terrestrial Observations: a Case for Carbon René Gommes with C. He, J. Hielkema, P. Reichert and J. Tschirley FAO/SDRN.
Integrating Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation Dick Cameron Senior Conservation Planner The Nature Conservancy, California Program 1.
R-PLAN and REDD activities Review Lao PDR Flag of your country.
Role of Technical Agencies Responsible for Hazard Assessment, Monitoring, Observations, Data and Analysis Dr. David Green National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
The Australian Government’s Overseas Aid Program © Commonwealth of Australia 2003 Global Initiative on Forests and Climate (GIFC) Penny Davis 3 September.
Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: Welcome from NASA HQ November 12, 2014.
Timber Products Output Carbon Accounting Christopher Woodall Group Leader.
Climate Change Response Framework projects Presentation to the Forest Community Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity in the Context of Climate Change Workshop.
Success and Failure of Implementing Data-driven Upscaling Using Flux Networks and Remote Sensing Jingfeng Xiao Complex Systems Research Center, University.
Towards a comprehensive Monitoring Framework for REDD+ Peter Holmgren FAO 5 December 2010.
NASA Carbon Monitoring System (NASA-CMS) NASA Carbon Monitoring System Science Team Overview George Hurtt NASA-CMS Science Team Leader Department of Geographical.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
NASA CMS Algorithm Assessment/Intercomparison Working Group Summary Presentation November 6 th, 2013 Coordinator: Scott Powell Members: David Baker, Molly.
Introduction to the NAP process & the NAP Expo NAP-Expo 8– 9 August 2014, Bonn, Germany LEG Thinley Namgyel.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
Using inventory data as a proxy de delimit forest degradation Joint GFOI/GOFC-GOLD Expert Workshop 2: Approaches to monitoring forest degradation for REDD+
Our New GEF supported project: Enhancing the System for Land Based Emissions Estimation in Kenya to Meet the Transparency Requirements of the Paris Agreement.
DIABOLO has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No Project duration:
Bradley Reed USGS Climate and Land Use Change
Science-Policy Interface
QUANTIFYING TROPICAL WETLAND BIOMASS AND CARBON STOCKS
The implementation of Carbon Budget Model at EU level
Presentation transcript:

Changing Forests…Enduring Values NACP Research Supporting Mandated Forest Service Carbon Monitoring Activities Sean Healey 1, Warren Cohen 1, Chris Woodall 1, Rich Birdsey 1, Dave Cleaves 1, Grant Domke 1, Alex Hernandez 2, Jing Chen 3, Min Zhang 3, Zhiqiang Yang 4, Karen Dante 1, Todd Schroeder 1, Steve Stehman 5, Gretchen Moisen 1, Hans Andersen 1 1.US Forest Service 2.Utah State University 3.University of Toronto 4.Oregon State University 5.SUNY ESF

Changing Forests…Enduring Values UNFCCC reporting for US forest sector Technical support for national forests and grasslands to meet policy/business requirements simultaneously, consistently, and with appropriate scientific rigor: – Climate Change Performance Scorecard Element 9 – 2012 Planning Rule and Directives – NEPA Considerations Forest Service Carbon Responsibilities

Changing Forests…Enduring Values 1.Emphasize ecosystem integrity and resilience. 2.Recognize carbon sequestration as one of many services. 3.Support practical and effective approaches in carbon exchange and markets. 4.Consider system dynamics and scale in decision making. 5.Use the best information and methods to make decisions about carbon stewardship. 6.Strive for program integration and balance. Forest Carbon Management Principles

Changing Forests…Enduring Values Much progress has been made in the inventory and C accounting over the last decade – Nearly all C pool estimates are now obtained from annual inventory measurements The current C accounting framework was not built around the annual NFI Must leverage the large investment in the annual NFI in the new accounting framework – Build in flexibility to incorporate remotely sensed data and associated products in the disturbance and LUC modules – Adaptable to user-defined scenarios to engage stakeholders and partner agencies Forest Accounting for UNFCCC reporting is being re-engineered

NASA Carbon Monitoring System Project to enhance coherence of biomass estimates over time by integrating Landsat history data and lidar-based structure data (PI:Cohen) Landsat-based history information is a useful predictor of biomass, and can be used to predict biomass over time In order to have enough history to predict biomass going back to the early 1990s, we need to use history data that includes the MSS ( ) archive Pflugmacher et al., 2012 NASA CMS Project to enhance coherence of biomass estimates over time with remote sensing (PI:Cohen)

Developing methods to integrate lidar data into carbon monitoring both for biomass estimation applications in this country and to pilot methods that may be useful in countries where field data are less plentiful. Example of lidar data collected at South Carolina site NASA CMS Project to enhance coherence of biomass estimates over time with remote sensing (PI:Cohen)

Scorecard Element 9 – Carbon Assessment and Stewardship – Baseline assessment of carbon stocks – Influence of disturbance and management activities – Integrating carbon stewardship Application – Climate Change Performance Scorecard Changing Forests…Enduring Values

Forest Carbon Management Framework (ForCaMF) developed through NASA Applied Science (PI: Healey) ID Panhandle NF less fire, more harvest Role of disturbance and management in forest carbon storage is assessed by integrating a forest dynamics model with maps of forest condition (structure, species composition) and subsequent disturbance Uses a new method for calibrating Monte Carlo simulations called “PDF Weaving” (Healey et al., 2014 RSE) to explicitly account for map error

Results can be viewed over time and with uncertainty Flathead National Forest more fire, less harvest Healey et al., 2014 Remote Sensing of Environment Idaho Panhandle National Forest more fire, less harvest Forest Carbon Management Framework (ForCaMF) developed through NASA Applied Science (PI: Healey) Deliverables: Historical assessments ( ) of the relative carbon impact of management and disturbance on each planning unit (national forest) Nationally consistent methods Aligned with inventory information already used by the national forests Transparent error calculations

Changing Forests…Enduring Values InTEC is a process model that is carefully calibrated with inventory-based productivity information and high-quality disturbance data Assessment of climatic and disturbance factors for the Nez Perce- Clearwater National Forest Integrated Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (InTEC) (PI: Chen; Collaborator: Birdsey)

Changing Forests…Enduring Values Integrated Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (InTEC) (PI: Chen; Collaborator: Birdsey) Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forest InTEC balances the breadth of a process model with the fidelity to local inventory data that is needed for credibility among managers

The Forest Service has a proactive stance on carbon assessment Past NACP research has led to monitoring systems that are currently helping the National Forest System with mandated assessments Current NACP research will likely support our future national UNFCCC reporting approach Summary Changing Forests…Enduring Values